Mujeres esclavas
bajo la autoridad femenina: entre dóciles y rebeldes.
(Buenos Aires,
Siglo XVIII)*
María Selina Gutiérrez Aguilera[1]
Departamento de Historia de América
Universidad de Sevilla
Reception: 24/05/2015
Evaluation: 16/06/2015
Approval: 20/10/2015
Research and Innovation Article.
Resumen
La
investigación del presente trabajo se sitúa en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII.
El objetivo que persigue es la indagación y examen de las mujeres que
soportaron la condición de esclava en esta época bajo la autoridad de otras
féminas y su relación con el contexto social y jurídico de la época en que
vivieron.
En primer lugar se analizará este sector poblacional
desde un punto de vista cuantitativo, atendiendo a diversas características
demográficas. Posteriormente, se procederá a examinar este conjunto social a
luz de otra documentación, fundamentalmente de corte judicial, en la que
aparecen interactuando.
Estas mujeres conformaban un grupo muy heterogéneo de
gran interés para la investigación científica, que además de soportar el yugo
de la esclavitud, se vieron doblemente excluidas por su género. El referido cruce
de fuentes ha permitido la aproximación histórica a este sector social,
profundizando en su configuración al mismo tiempo que se propicia un
conocimiento más íntimo de estos sujetos. Se ponen de relevancia ciertos
aspectos referentes a su cotidianeidad, reafirmando la situación de
vulnerabilidad en la que se hallaban, pero también como procuraron sortear los
vaivenes a los que su condición les limitaba.
Palabras clave: Mujer, Esclava, Jefa de
hogar, Buenos Aires, Colonia.
Between obedient and rebellious: slave women under female authority. (Buenos
Aires, 18th century)
Abstract
The research carried out for this paper is based in
the city of Buenos Aires during the 18th century. The main objective is to
inquire into and examine the situation endured by the slave women of the time
under the authority of other women, and their connection with the social and
legal context of the moment in which they lived.
First of
all, this portion of the population will be analyzed from a quantitative
standpoint, paying attention to diverse demographic characteristics.
Afterwards, this social group will be examined in the light of other documents,
essentially of a legal nature, in which they appear.
These women
formed a very heterogeneous group with great relevance to scientific research.
Not only did they bear the burden of slavery; they were additionally excluded
because of their gender. The aforementioned cross-reference of sources, has
permitted an approach to the history of this social group, going deeper into
its formation as well as promoting a closer knowledge of its subjects. Certain
aspects regarding their daily life are highlighted, confirming the situation of
vulnerability in which these slave women lived, but also showing them to be
strong enough to deal with all the problems they had to face because of their
condition.
Key words:
Woman, Slave, Head of the household, Buenos Aires, Colony.
Femmes esclaves sous l’autorité féminine: entre soumises et rebelles. (Buenos-Aires XVIIIe
siècle)
Résumé
Cet article porte sur le Buenos-Aires du XVIIIe siècle et
cherche à étudier des femmes ayant subi l’esclavage sous l’autorité d’autres
femmes, ainsi que les rapports qu’elles ont établi avec leur contexte social et
juridique.
D’abord nous analyserons ce groupe
d’un point de vue quantitatif, en considérant diverses caractéristiques
démographiques. Ensuite, nous examinerons ces femmes à la lumière d’une autre
documentation, fondamentalement de type légal.
Il s’agit d’un groupe très
hétérogène, d’un grand intérêt pour la recherche scientifique, car non
seulement ces femmes éprouvaient le joug de l’esclavage, mais encore elles
étaient doublement exclues à cause de son genre. Le rapprochement de divers
types de sources nous a permis de comprendre la configuration de ce groupe
ainsi qu’une connaissance intime des sujets qui le composaient. Nous remarquons
certains aspects de leur vie quotidienne, en réaffirmant la situation de
vulnérabilité où elles se trouvaient, puis leurs tentatives de relever les
défis posés par leur condition.
Mots clés: Femme,
Esclave, Patronne de la maison, Buenos-Aires, période coloniale
1. Introduction
Buenos Aires in the 18th century is presented as a
suggestive scenario in which to delve into and carry out research from multiple
historical perspectives. Throughout this century, the porteño territory experienced profuse
changes that had an impact on the different social, economic, demographic and
political structures, revealing a highly interesting context for the
researcher,
Within the panorama mentioned, the analysis of the
female population is presented as a
matter to go deeper into and reflect upon, for in the Hispano-American
social context, women played a fundamental, although traditionally unknown, role
as the protagonists of their time.
This text[2] is set out in the framework of a more
extensive research project, which deals with the study of the female figure as
a whole. For the present work the objective is reduced to the analysis of the
slave women who were under the authority of other females, giving the context
researched a female perspective and observing the coexistence and/or co-habitation
in the intimacy of the household.
According to Dora Barrancos’
thesis, female historiography started gaining momentum in 1970, revisiting the
sources and modifying concepts[3] that
the more traditional historiography had left aside in favor of the geopolitical
and economic aspects, the analysis of great events and, in effect, of a history
made by men and for men. Thus, new bibliographical contributions arose in the
80s, which positioned themselves in the historiographical vanguard. In this new
scenario, for the Hispano-American context, it is worth mentioning, in
particular, the socio-historical contributions of Doctor Pilar
Gonzalbo, who became an essential reference[4].
In this
sense and from a general perspective, the works carried out on the Rio de la
Plata territory by researchers of the caliber of Susan Socolow[5] or Silvia Mallo[6]
are also of great relevance, for their publications, together with those of José
Luis Moreno[7],
which, among others, are part of the most outstanding historical work.
It is
necessary to make reference with respect to the studies regarding slavery,
given the large amount of production. First, essential works, such as “Posibilidades y perspectivas para el estudio de
la esclavitud en los Fondos
del Archivo General de Indias” [8] (Possibilities and perspectives
for the study of slavery in the Collections of the General Archive of the
Indies) by Enriqueta Vila Vilar, have to be mentioned. This constitutes a valuable
guide to consult the sources dedicated to the study of said topic. On the other
hand, “La esclavitud
en la América Española,” (Slavery in Spanish
America) by José Andrés-Gallego[9],
makes a compendium about the slaves in the Hispanic monarchy by delving into
all the aspects related to it. Finally, from a more concrete perspective, it is
important to highlight the interesting work of historian Dora Dávila Mendoza[10]
on the territory of Venezuela, given her theoretical-methodological
contribution and the interesting documental corpus that she uses.
With regard to female slavery, the scientific
profusion on the topic, not limited to the phenomenon or the trade, has been
really valuable for historical studies. In these last few years, the number of
scholars that have contributed to expand modern historiography with their novel
revelations on female slaves, such as those carried out by María Eugenia Chaves[11].
Historian
Dora Barrancos carried out some work where she
explores, in depth, the female figure in Argentinian history, more precisely in
the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata, and she dedicates a part of said work
to reflect upon women slaves[12].
In the same way, it is vital to highlight the research carried out by Dora Celton[13],
Jaqueline Vassallo[14],
Florencia Guzmán[15],
and Marta Golberg[16];
for the case of Buenos Aires I will refer to some works of my authorship[17].
Finally,
the contributions made from Law History and legislative knowledge have to be
mentioned. The works of historians, such as Jaqueline Vasallo,
Viviana Kluguer or Mª Alejandra Fernández[18],
whose contributions made through judicial sources deal with the topics of
delinquency, violence, and conflict, have been worthwhile for Social History
researchers and fundamental for this work.
Taking as reference this excellent historiographical
background and starting from the Social history approach, through the use of
this methodology it is intended to cover the whole of the historical reality,
delving into the population studies, the history of the family and every-day
life, focusing at all times in the female figure and in particular, the slaves.
For this reason, this research is intended to be faced from the conjugation of
the quantitative and qualitative approaches, which give the topic dealt with a
complete meaning and that realistic evidence is presented so as to give grounds
to this research.
The
group of women who belonged to the slave strata constituted a very important
number to take into consideration for the social and historical analysis of 18th
century Buenos Aires. So, it is relevant, to contextualize the situation
through a demographic view of the proposed topic. From a quantitative point of
view, there has been an exhaustive study of a relevant source, given the
information about the female figure, such as the Padrón de Ciudad and Campaña de Buenos
Aires (City Registration System and Buenos Aires Campaign) collected in 1744[19].
Each of the women who appear in the registration system were recorded in order
to make an estimation of the number of slaves who lived in the area. There is
also information about them, such as age, ethnic group or number of children.
This is some of the explicit and implicit data that the source offers us.
The records were created through databases that
allowed for the interrelation of the different fields that appeared in the
document. The resulting information is examined through statistic and
demographic tools, in order to later interpret the results from the view of
Social History.
On the
other hand, the qualitative perspective is vital. It is carried out through the
constant cross-referencing of numerous sources found in the documental
repositories, especially in the General Archive of the Argentine Nation, in
Buenos Aires. In this sense, the methodology applied is that of case study,
using a branch of Social History which is Micro-history.
It is
worth mentioning that the individuals that were subjugated to slavery were
considered the property of their masters, attending the social and legislative
norm. However, it is not adequate to presuppose that such indifference
completely annulled them as individuals. In reference to this, it is important
to highlight that the sources document numerous events in which slaves are
shown as the main characters in them, interacting in society, not only with
their peers, but also transgressing the prominent strata.
The
amplitude and disparity of sources contribute to a greater rigor in the final
results of this research; the documents that, from their excellence, mention
this unknown reality are the judicial files. This type of document is of great
interest to begin historical studies regarding the feminine gender, being that which
refers to matters related to women slaves, which is of interest for the present
work. In the sources used many events can be observed where there are
conflictive situations in which women are the victims, for example in what
refers to the abuses and ill-treatment they were exposed to in some cases even
beyond what was tolerable at the time. The violence that is detectable from the
reading of the documents shows different ways of inflicting violence, sexual,
power abuse, etc., putting together the violence inflicted not only upon women,
but especially on women considered to be inferior.
It is of utmost interest to observe these figures, not
only as the receptors, but also as guilty agents of the events. This novel view
comes to project a more defined image about these women, who lived beyond the limits
of what was accepted. This contribution, far from limiting to label them as
beings who lack human capacity, who are docile and submissive, portrays them as
active creators of their circumstances, at least up to where the limit was unbreakable.
Even when it is true that the legal framework discriminated against them, it
was also useful for those who knew how to take advantage of their scarce opportunities
in order to for them to rise to a better position.
2. Brief
approximations of the female slave population and their environment
Buenos Aires began the 18th century as a traditionally
marginalized territory of the Spanish Crown, with all that this implied. However,
in the mid-18th century there were multiple changes that had
repercussions in the social, economic, and demographic system, abandoning the
century as a flourishing and prosperous capital, from the creation of the
Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata in 1776. The society turned out to be
dynamic, of great social mobility and ethnic variety.
It is a reality that the transformations that take
place in any area nurture the different factors to favor the slow but sure
permutation of the fundaments of its system and the circulation between the
different ruling sectors. Although, in the case of Buenos Aires, and by
extension the Hispano-American territory, the metamorphosis that the century
brought about created a revolution in some of the structures, so, at the time
that the great columns that supported the weight of the fundamental principles
on which these communities were based, there was a fight for them to be kept
unaltered.
The social structure of the New World, heterogeneous
and monolithic[20],
followed the system transplanted from the metropolis to the territories of the
empire, and that was based on the hierarchical and patriarchal model. The
cultural categories related to an economic-social order are based on racial,
social and gender inequality and the inequity in the organization of family patterns
and kinship[21].
José Luis Moreno makes an allusion to the family as
“the constitutive cell of every social entity, as the essential source of the socialization
of individuals and as a propelling engine of the individual initiatives of men
and women[22].”
This model was based on the authority of the father of the family, who had the
power to decide over the future of the members of the household, for he had the
responsibility to care for the spotless honor of his family, as in conjunction
with the socio-economic position and kinship; these constituted the most
appreciated values of the social system.
Within this social context, the role that women played
was essential for the social balance to be maintained. They were the basis on
which the hierarchical pyramid rested, for any behavior out of the norm was
seen as a threat by the Church and the ideological and cultural structures[23].
Furthermore, the state shared those fears, as its stability depended to a great
extent on it. On the other hand, the discrimination that had taken place in the
territory gave women certain flexibilities and relative freedoms which are
worth analyzing.
The woman was seen as the depository and the one in
charge of transmitting the family legacy, vital to the eyes of society in order
to maintain a position of prestige and honor. The lack of honor was not
considered in the same way for men and women. In a society where “appearing”
was privileged over “being”, Ann Twinam indicates
that the loss of family reputation could occur if their faults were evidenced
in public. However, should they be hidden in order to be acknowledged in
private, the individual and the family could maintain their public prestige[24].
From the same traditional order that the Spanish
implanted in America, the legal condition of women was derived. Women received
the same legal incapacity that, due to their gender, the women of the Peninsula
through the Royal Fuero,
the Partidas,
the Toro Laws, the Nueva recopilación and the legislation dictated by the
Spanish kings until Carlos IV, had been assigned. Thus, implementing Castilian
law, the rules and customs tending to control and order female behavior, in
public as well as in private law[25],
were put into force.
Susan Socolow affirms that it is not surprising that it was thought
that women in the Spanish Colonial society were inferior beings simply because
of their condition as women, which already put them in an inferior position.
Although women had certain legal rights, limited of course, the obstacles were
so many that for the porteñas there were only three options: getting married, remaining a spinster, or
becoming a nun[26].
The de jure reality, however, did not lead to the absolute annulment of women, as in
the documentation available it is shown that despite the scarce level of
action, the sector of those women is presented as avant-garde, attempting
within their possibilities, to fight against a situation that was not favorable
for them. Thus, “one of the ways that women had to question the family project
that had been imposed on them was by confronting their rights and obligations,
faculties and prerogatives, before the justice. [27]”
Clearly,
the delimitation that was imposed over their privileges varied depending on the
type of woman[28]:
indigenous, creole, slave, etc. In a world where honor was the quality that defined
this distinction, common women had very little to lose. If they kept their
reputation in the home or through an adequate company in public places, the
least favored were, on the one hand, forced to go out to work and, on the other
hand, to “exchange their honor” for a marriage that was convenient for their
families, and this did not make sense either. It is not that they were not
concerned about it, but it is true that the only belonging of value that by
birth they could have and use in the best possible way was their chastity;
nevertheless, social control did not have the same weight for them nor did it
suppose them to be virtuous. The women of the masses mainly formed of slaves and
mulattos, pardos and free zambos,
were labeled as “sexually promiscuous, lazy, and thieves.[29]”
In this society of acknowledged and enhanced inequality,
if a woman was socially and legally limited[30],
the situation of the women slaves is understood to be the most pitiful of all.
The slave woman was socially stigmatized for her “hungry and lustful
sexuality,” as much attractive to as condemned by the white man. At the same
time, the female slave was considered to be a sexual object, putting her on the
same level as a prize for other men, for example, when she was offered in
marriage to a slave in exchange for loyalty and the services rendered[31].
These women were ostracized from history until the
first research works on slavery took place and, after these, the first studies
regarding black, slave families, which allowed for an approximation to the prominence
of the woman slave as a historical subject with an identity of her own[32].
Due to its geographical situation and, later on, to
the development that it experienced during the 18th century, Buenos
Aires became a port that received a large flow of the
slave trade. Fradkin and Garavaglia state that among the goods that arrived in the
port, one of the most relevant ones were the slaves. According to the French
book entry between 1702 and 1714, there was a contribution of 3500 black people
and in the English book entry, between 1722 and 1738, some 10500, of which 25%
would remain in Buenos Aires. Although there is not much information about the
next period, historians affirm that from 1777 onwards “the slaves formed a
substantial part of the trade, especially those who resulted from new licenses
(some of them adjudicated to neighbors of Buenos Aires) and of the trade with
neutral countries during the European wars.” Finally, they consider that the
interruptions derived from the Atlantic war in 1796 “gave life to a trade that
originated in the Rio de la Plata, frequently, in locally built ships, which
reached, during the time that the conflict lasted, relatively important
proportions.[33]”
The
price that the slaves reached in the market depended on numerous factors, such
as their behavior, skills, age, and physical state. Although age and sex
determined the real price, age and health were essential. In this line, for
women there were differences in their prices. In the 18th century,
some valuations or slave sales, allowed for the realization that there was a
slight difference in the value of the slaves with regard to their gender; male
slaves being slightly more expensive than female slaves. On the other hand, the
sale of women who had children, as a package, was a common business while the
slave practice lasted[34].
With
respect to the black population, mostly located in slave trade areas, in the
most recent works on the Rio de la Plata, there difficulty in reconstructing
the families. It was a population that was not regarded by society, so registering
their events, or doing it correctly, was not a priority. Here lies is the
difficulty in carrying out research when it comes to finding sources.
History demographics allow us to approach, on a
relatively accurate basis, the family structures, and they relate to economic
or political circumstances[35].
In the territory we are studying, the prevailing demographic pattern was the
high general and child mortality rate[36].
From population studies, it is possible to analyze the female figure through
censuses and population records. Thanks to these censuses, the analysis of domestic
organization, the processes of house mobility and the importance of family ties
can be analyzed. “This is a basic source and a starting point in the study of
the family. The knowledge of the composition, structure, size, activity and
work force has this type of research work as its almost exclusive reference. [37]“
For all the above, these types of sources are ideal
for the study of women, as long as the obligation of registering was within the
reach of the whole of the population, which actually depended on the aim of the
registration of data (fiscal, for recruitment, gun control or knowledge and
state of the population)[38].
When the objective was recruitment, for example,
relying on this source is pointless.
Despite
being an excellent source for the study of households, which was the natural
environment for women, on the other hand, women were sometimes not registered
as men were; it depended to a large degree on the will of the person
registering the information. In the case of women slaves, the indifference is
even more noticeable, as will be seen later, in some records they are just
given a number, but no other information is given.
The source used in order to carry out the present
study has been the census of 1744[39],
in order to find out the real number of women we were going to deal with. This
census was a useful tool to see society from an
socio-economic point of view, and it demanded the enrolment of all the
neighbors who had to give information about their name, family name, age,
origin, profession, number of family members, marital status, or ethnic group[40],
among others. The choice of the source is relevant because, on the one hand, it
is considered the most complete of the registers carried out in the first half
of the 18th century[41]
and, on the other hand, it is the only one that places special interest in
giving more substantial and precise information in the registering of data
related to women. It is right in the mid-18th century when this
collection of data was carried out. At this point, big changes were taking
place, and the area was experiencing a great economic and demographic boom,
which is of interest to observe.
It is of special interest, given that the information
is registered by the head of the household, male or female, as a fundamental
part of this work is the analysis of women who were the heads of households who
had female slaves under their command.
However, the lack of said sources is also
understandable, for it is a snapshot of a moment that has to be completed with
other sources. It was left to the mercy of the person in charge of recording
the information and how thorough they were, such as in the case of our source, which
unfortunately, was incomplete.
The number of inhabitants counted in the records is 10,056
inhabitants for the urban area and the suburbs; but in that account the priests,
members of the military, elected officials and their families are not included;
and the Jesuits are only mentioned to indicate that they were property owners. Lyman
Johnson and Susan Socolow have corrected said number and estimated a more realistic
figure of 11,600 inhabitants[42].
First, there is
a thorough account of all the households or houses that appear in the census
resulting in a total of 994 houses, which are sub-divided when necessary based
on the number of rooms, inhabited by different families, depending on the main
family. Thus, approximately, 37% of the units were managed by female heads of
household, not a small percentage for the parameters of the time[43].
With a special interest in the people registered, and
following the quantitative precisions of Johnson and Socolow, around 22% of the
population in 18th century Buenos Aires were under the authority of
women. If 37% of the households were managed by women, when putting this
information in quantitative terms, the percentage of female heads of households
over the total of the population is scarcely above 3%. However, if the comparison
is made over our population, they constitute almost 15% of women who held that
position.
The total population on which this study is based is
constituted of 56% females and 44% males. According to the ethnic group and
following the source, it is possible to observe the approximate female
distribution in the following table.
Table Nº 1: Women according to their ethnic group
Ethnic group |
Percentage |
White |
25% |
Dark, Brown and mullata |
10% |
Mestiza |
2% |
Native |
2% |
Black |
6% |
Asian |
0,5% |
No information |
54,5% |
Source: Census of Buenos Aires,
1744. Elaborated by the author.
In these households, a population of casta women is
registered. However, as it can be observed, there is a majority category
denominated “no information, and that unfortunately is a constant when
cross-referencing different types of information. The reason could be that the
people being registered did not want to be ascribed to a particular ethnic group
so there was no record of it and this could facilitate their aspirations to
ascend the social ladder or in other cases it was the result of the negligence
of the census taker.
Among the multiple aspects to highlight regarding the
non-white women population, it is interesting to mention their condition as
heads of households, a situation that has not been researched in depth and is of
great interest[44].
Taking into consideration their ethnic group, without forgetting that it was a determinant
for the position of a woman who was head of a household and that white women
were considered superior, it is observed how the socio-economic position and
the ethnic condition determined the type of housing and economy of the
household. The economic resources and the social estimation that white women
had, was not the same for all women. In the following graph, it is possible to
see that the larger percentages are shared between white women and “not
specified,” followed by brown and mulatta,
mestiza, black, and native. It is
logical to think about the castas, with less resources, on many occasions did not have
another choice but to “add themselves”[45]
to other houses, becoming heads of household in their restricted and
subordinated contexts.
Graph Nº 1:
Classification of heads of households according to ethnic group.
Source: Census of Buenos Aires, 1744.
Elaborated by the author.
Taking into account the slave population registered,
it supposes that they make up 18%. Out of the five hundred slaves registered,
48% of them are women and 52% are men. The female slave population we have
worked with is 9% of the total.
Leaving the “not specified” percentage aside,
evidently, most of the women slaves were under the authority of a white head of
household. However, there are some relevant cases in which the slaves were able
to reach that position. In the records, there is a house in which two mulattas, Nicolasa, 30
years old, and Josefa, 40 years old, “who said they were the property of Don Matías,” shared the position of head of household in a
small house. Aurelia Cavanillas, from Córdoba[46],
was also added.
On the other hand, in the records, there is also
evidence of women heads of households who, although they were not slaves at
that moment, they had been so. For example, “a shack made of hay that belongs
to a black woman called María, now free, once a slave of Melchor
Domínguez, and single. [47]”
Leaving aside the anecdotal cases, there were women
who more frequently were head of household, being the leaders of their groups
under the roof of their owners or outside of their houses. There is a register
of 6%. For example, in the case of Tomasa, the mulatta slave of Pedro Espinosa, who lived in the house of the mulatta Gabriela Aguirre and had another
one called María Rosa, who is free, and there is a boy she has under her care.
In that way, she was the Head of Family under the authority of a mulatta Head of Household[48].
The case of a mulatta called Ana is
also worth mentioning; she lived with her four children and was head of family,
under the shelter of Doña Rosa Gutiérrez, head of household[49].
In order to
be able to analyze female slavery according to their ethnic group, the
following graph can be observed, where it is clarified that most of them were
black, followed by mulatta, and a
remaining 3% of non-white ethnic groups.
Graph Nº 2: Female
slavery according to their ethnic group
Source: Census of Buenos Aires, 1744.
Elaborated by the author.
In order to understand correctly the reach of this
data, it has to be contrasted with the relevant data of each sector. Of the
total of the black population registered, 92% are slaves, the rest of the total
of the black population appear as “not specified” or “free.” From the black
people, 60% are women, like María, who was single and now free, but had been Melchor Dominguez’ slave[50].
From the total of the mulatto population, 53% were
women and the remaining percentage were men, and 20% were slaves. As regards
the other ethnic groups, we can highlight the case of a brown slave, married to
a mason, son of Antonia Jacome, brown, free, and a
widow[51].
Finally, the largest percentage is the feared “not
specified.” With regard to the specific study of slave women, there is a great
number of cases where, when naming an individual, there is no other specification
than his or her condition as a slave, for example “the black slave of Doña
Dominga Romero. [52]”
It also has to be added that black slaves could not
only be the property of whites, but also of members of other ethnic groups, as
is the case of the “slave María Teresa, property of Ana de Laurriaga,
brown and a widow. [53]”
As regards age groups, it is important to highlight
that the youngest slave registered was 4 years old, a girl called Elena, and
the eldest was 70, a black woman called María, both slaves, both women, and the
most curious even, they both lived in the same household[54].
With respect to María, there is a concept of solidarity to point out that
prevailed throughout that time, despite the dark deeds that this society
sometimes demonstrated. It is especially visible in the case of slaves who were
very old or sick and they were mainly aggregated by the heads of household[55].
With respect to the other age groups, the percentages
are minimal, the only one that is worth reporting is the one where age is not
specified, though they are adults, and represent 43% of the total.
In what refers to other considerations, such as their
place of origin, as it was expected, in 100% of the cases, the information is
missing. As regards family composition, in most records they appear as members
of large families or variants of them, it is logical, given that their presence
in the household determined this typology[56].
Finally, with respect to work occupations, in most
cases, just saying slave did not require any further specification. On other
occasions, there appear figures such as “their personal work” or “their work,”
which does not clarify the activity. Fortunately, in some households the tasks
they carried out were specified, for example: seamstress, kneader, washer, and
worker in the farms.
It has been intended to carry out a brief
approximation to some of the statistical and demographic data that describe the
female and slave population of the time. It is essential to do further research
to constitute more complex groups and patterns with the aim of expanding the
current knowledge.
3. Slave
women and their relation with the social and judicial context.
In order
to carry out studies on a larger scale, it is vital to resort to other sources
that bring about a more qualitative perspective and describe the data, humanize
the figures, and observe the characters of the past within their historical
context. From this approach, which completes the above and taking microhistory
as a starting point, it is required to analyze sources of varied natures, mainly
judicial files.
Within
the spectrum of realities that the documents show, it is intended to focus on
those that, in some way, make reference to the master-slave relationship, no
matter the type of link they had, adding, at the same time, other files that
show the realities lived by women slaves in the time and space researched.
Most
of the sources studies describe situations in which women had to face ill
treatment and abuse. There are disparate situations registered, the most
attractive for analysis being the cases brought to the authorities by them and those
in which the lawsuits brought before the metropolitan justice prospered by
giving them sufficient consideration, sometimes even denying the reason to
their mistresses. Despite legal disparity and strong marginalization, given
their few rights, the slaves sought legal capacity and together with other
women of caste took advantage of their rights within the limits of obligation
and restriction, overcoming the obstacle of their own realities. This use of
the law is seen as a strategy to seek protection, make their rights visible or
improve their situation and that of their families in an attempt at social
ascension.
As it has been mentioned, slaves were fundamental
pieces on which the class-based configuration of Hispano-America rested and it
had its grounds in the model implemented by the Spanish, who were the key
guardians of the intertwining of prestige and socio-economic appearance
continuing to be profitable for the social apex. On the other hand, if women
were secondary characters, being a woman and a slave put together two
requisites to be considered of the lowest social condition, as to their
discrimination due to their gender was added their ethnic condition and the
position they had in the society. In the mid-18th century, the
ethnic group and the social status of a person went hand-in-hand.
The judicial sources offer relevant information for
historians. It is well understood that the researcher is supposed to leave
behind prejudice and abstain from getting involved in the cause, making an
analysis from an objective point of view and presupposing certain deformations
of the realities expressed by the different subjects[57].
Given their situation, slaves could be victims of different
forms of violence, frequently they appear as passive subjects and it is common
to find disputes over the slaves in the documents, as is the case of “Don Dionisio Almirón against Don Pablo Lázaro Beruti for the latter to give him back a mulatta slave that was his property,[58]”
in this case the slave “has difficulty asserting her rights.”
A very common documental typology is the masters’ denunciation
of the flight of slave women, such is the case of the claim imposed by Cipriana Bárbara[59]
where she expresses that “a black slave
called Juana went from the colony to Real de San Carlos, and she demanded that
the slave was returned to her,” the verdict of the justice was “overruled”. This case took place in 1778, at the end of
the century and at this point the justice was more protective of the slaves.
A profuse typology can be carried out based on the
gravity of what has been narrated, for example, the cases of flight. In this sense,
there were also slaves that rather than disappearing and leaving their
environment, decided to appear before the justice and claim their freedom, for
example “Ana María, black slave of Don Lucas Infante[60].” She asked for the freedom conceded
by her master before dying “for her good services and care” to be respected and
that for diverse reasons she could not yet enjoy.
Slaves in general, female slaves in particular, given
the type of domestic chores they carried out, very close to the family, were seen,
on occasions, as almost members of the same unit. Slaves did not live only in
violent environment, they were at times protected by their masters, we should
not forget that their defense many times hid other reasons from which the owner
would obtain a benefit. Following this idea, it is pertinent to mention the case
of the criminal lawsuit of Don Pedro Ferreira versus Vicente Escudero for attempting to kill a slave. This is probably
the case that registers the highest level of sexual violence. In 1787, when
Pedro Ferreira[61]
presented a civil and criminal lawsuit against Vicente Escudero
as “with little fear of God or respect for the justice he had carried out
criminal excesses,[62]”
for Escudero followed the mulatta slave of the claimant, María Bentura “with the intention
of killing her, which he would have done if it had not been for Don Antonio’s
interference and used other attributes to hide her and give her an excuse for
leaving. [63]”
It is added that this is not the only persecution that María
Bentura is the object of “for afterwards and for that
reason, it had come to his attention that Escudero
had asked her to marry him, however, as she was already married he had
persecuted her with threats that he would kill her. [64]”
But women slaves were not all submissive and passive
subjects before the deeds of injustice narrated, some were also active. Two
positions could be described: their rebellious predisposition to generate
tactics to overcome their problems or improve their situation and their participation
in minor criminal activities, even transgressing social behaviors, in which often
there was a background of countless atrocities.
The files that deal with cases related to honor are
also relevant. Social consideration was minimal, as among equals there were few
behavioral norms that were the same as in other strata, adjusting the limits.
For example, a black slave called Ana María filed a complaint against a black
slave who asked her to wed and did not fulfill his promise[65].
One of the cases
of greatest interest is the one that unraveled due to the will of the well-known
Negra María. This woman managed to buy her freedom and her own house, with the
help of her master with whom she had a very good relationship. When María died,
she left all her patrimony to her children and 25 pesos of their matrimonial
assets to her husband “in case there was any money left” after paying for her
funerals and fulfilling her last wishes. The problem was not that she had left
a will, as many black people and slaves had the custom of doing so as is proved
by many historians, but because of the situation that took place afterwards, as
a legal fight was unleashed which involved the most important lawyers of Buenos
Aires at the end of the 18th century[66].
With respect to the women slaves who could no longer
endure slavery and did not hesitate to appear before the justice, there is the
case of María Ignacia
Nogales[67],
the brown slave of Don José García Martínez, who appears in court to inform
that after the demise of her mistress, Doña María Nogales, with whom she had an
excellent relationship, and who had freed her son Juan Pedro, “for the many
services received due to her illnesses and old age[68].”
She complains that the executor of her mistresses will has her son in his house
deprived of the most basic needs, for example clothes, and he suffers from
ill-treatment, which does not allow him to complete his training as a
shoemaker. She requests that “in virtue that my son is a free man and that I am
his mother, that he is put under my care, so he learns more about the shoemaker
trade, and by working he can dress decently, and that he helps me in the way
that he did with our deceased mistress, for I kept her with my personal work,
as she was an old and ill person, and I wish to start paying for my freedom[69].”
In view of this, it was determined that her son’s freedom was true and the
person who was keeping him had to give him back.
In the family environment, disputes were a constant,
especially the ones related to married couples. However, it has to be taken
into consideration that violence in the marriage was not exclusive to low
social strata and slaves, for there are records of this in all social groups.
The case of Rosa Herrera and her husband is particularly interesting. They
filed a complaint with contradictory statements, for which she was finally put
in prison as she had a licentious life according to her husband’s petition and
“for not wanting to have a life with him.[70]”
Silvia Mallo thinks that the
increase in the afro descendant population in the 18th century was responsible
for the rise in social tension and insecurity in the streets. She affirms that
“cruelty and ill-treatment were part of slavery” [71]
and that apart from the violence of the system and the ruling sectors in the
face of crimes committed by slaves, not only were the cases ignored at the
time, but they also transform the diversity of crimes into a form of resistance
to the system and the master, on their way to seeking freedom[72].
Social prejudice and slave practices did not help to calm the environment.
Violence could reach the most extreme extents, as can be certified in the case
of Dominga, a black woman who stabbed her mistress to death[73].
While exposing these realities it is possible to make up a social profile of
the least known historical agents.
Conclusions
The study of
slave women is an investigation of the utmost importance in order to recuperate
the female figures who were most ignored by traditional historiography. The
need to cross-reference sources of a diverse nature is clear, so as to approach
these types of studies, given that many of these documents show gaps for works
of a socio-historical type, as the register of the slaves, without distinction
of gender, was related to economic reasons.
The
demographic data contains surprising information on how slave women were heads
of the households or of their families on their own and how only with the
resources they had at hand in addition to their own effort, they could carry
their families forward despite the obstacles they faced. Connections should be
made with the documental examples collected, in which actions of great interest
are observed.
On
occasions, they did not have anything more than their own work. It is for this
that their dimension of hard-working women and their detailed study is of the utmost
interest to create a full profile of the women of the time.
But in
order to approach the topic of women, we should first leave aside all kind of
preconceptions. It is true that the ethnic group, social position and freedom
were essential values when establishing the social mosaic that determined which
were the working sectors, but they are not the only ones.
Throughout
this work, we have tried to show through objective data how the figures of
these women had a more representative role than the one that they had so far
been given and, to this end, it has been analyzed from different perspectives.
The
vulnerability of their situation and the weak position of many women, whose own
honor was not even valued, as a consequence of their status, contrasts with the
image of others who did not hesitate to make their rights felt in the legal
plane, appearing before the justice to act in the legal issues they were
permitted to take part in, defending themselves and their families, and
procuring social improvement, as well as the defense of their honor, although
that honor was not sufficient to mix with high-society families.
In the
documents collected there are testimonials of cases that signify a micro scale
approach, but given that these are documented, it is not farfetched to think to
what extent these practices were constant. The historian has to set himself the
challenge of discerning to what extent and how there was a leap to a macro
scale, that is to say, in what way they inserted themselves in a wider social
context.
To
conclude, it is valid to point out that in some of the cases studied,
especially in those at the end of the 18th century, it is possible to see a certain
sensitivity towards the “inferior women” in the legal resolutions, as well as
towards women in general, possibly being the start to the path that led to the
abolition of slavery and the struggle for female and racial rights.
Documentary
Sources
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Cabildo de Buenos Aires. Correspondencia con
el Virrey, 1790-94.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Criminales.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Escribanías.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Solicitudes civiles.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Sucesiones.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Tribunales.
Archivo General de la Nación
Argentina de Buenos Aires (AGN). Buenos Aires-Argentina. Sala IX, Tribunales Administrativos.
Documentos
para la Historia Argentina, t. X: Padrones de la ciudad y campaña de Buenos
Aires (1726- 1810),
Padrón de la ciudad y campaña de Buenos Aires de 1744. Buenos Aires: Peuser, 1955.
Bibliography.
Barrancos, Dora. Mujeres en la sociedad argentina, una
Historia de cinco siglos. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2007.
Barrancos, Dora. Mujeres: entre la casa y la plaza. Buenos
Aires: Sudamericana, 2012.
Castillo, Norma Angélica.
“Mujeres negras y afromestizas en Nueva España”
(parte V, capítulo XXI). En Historia de
las Mujeres en España y América Latina. El Mundo Moderno vol. II. Madrid:
Cátedra, 2005.
Celton, Dora Estela. “Fecundidad
de las esclavas en la Córdoba colonial”, Revista
Junta Provincial de Historia de Córdoba, núm. 15 (1993): 29-48.
Chacón Jiménez, Francisco y
Rodríguez, Pablo. “Padrones” (capítulo XXV). En A través del tiempo. Diccionario de fuentes para la historia de la
familia. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 2000.
Chaves, María Eugenia. “La
mujer esclava y sus estrategias de libertad en el Mundo Hispano colonial de
finales del siglo XVIII”. Anales,
núm. 1 (1998): 91-118.
Dávila Mendoza, Dora. La sociedad esclava en la Provincia de
Venezuela, 1790-1800: solicitudes de libertad-selección documental. Venezuela.
Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2009.
Fernández, María Alejandra.
"Las razones de la violencia y la fundamentación del castigo: una
aproximación a las formas de acusación y de defensa en la justicia criminal
colonial" (Buenos Aires, 1776-1810)" (capítulo IV). En Formas de Historia Cultural. Buenos
Aires: Prometeo-UNGS, 2008.
Fradkin, Raúl y Garavaglia,
Juan Carlos. La Argentina colonial. El
Río de la Plata entre los siglos XVI y XIX. Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno,
2009.
Frías, Susana R. y García Belsunce, César A. y Olivero, Sandra. “La evolución de la
familia en Buenos Aires en los siglos XVII y XVIII”. En Seminar on Changes and continuity in
American demographic behaviours: the five centuries’ experiencia. Córdoba: International Union
for the Scientific Study of Population, 1998.
Gallego, José
Andrés. La esclavitud en la América española. Madrid: Encuentro;
Fundación Ignacio Larramendi, 2005.
Golberg, Marta. “La población negra
y mulata de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, 1810-1840”. Desarrollo Económico, vol. 16, núm. 61 (abril-Junio 1976): 75-99.
Gonzalbo Aizpuru, Pilar. Familia y orden colonial. México: El
Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Históricos, 1998.
Gonzalbo Aizpuru, Pilar. “Familias y
vida familia. Aproximaciones a la historia de la familia en México” (capítulo
I). En Dimensiones del diálogo americano
contemporáneo sobre la familia en la época colonial (Murcia: Editum, 2009) 29-56.
Gonzalbo Aizpuru, Pilar. Educación, familia y vida cotidiana en
México Virreinal. México, D.F.: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios
Históricos, 2012.
Gutiérrez Aguilera, Mª Selina. “Las mujeres jefas de hogar en el Buenos Aires
Colonial”. Temas Americanistas, núm.
25, (2010): 26-54.
Gutiérrez Aguilera, Mª Selina. “Mujeres
trabajadoras: la subsistencia en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII”. El futuro del pasado, núm. 3 (2012):
67-90.
Gutiérrez Aguilera, Mª Selina. “Mujeres
agregadas en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII: caridad y solidaridad”. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos, (octubre
2012): 1-13. [En ligne], Débats,
mis en ligne le 02 octobre
2012, consulté le 10 mai 2015. URL:
http://nuevomundo.revues.org/64111; DOI: 10.4000/nuevomundo.64111.
Guzmán, Florencia.
“Representaciones familiares de las mujeres negras en el Tucumán Colonial. Un
análisis en torno al mundo doméstico subalterno” (capítulo XVI). En Poblaciones históricas. Fuentes, métodos y
líneas de investigación, Serie de Investigaciones 9, Río de Janeiro: ALAP,
2009.
Johnson, Lyman.
“Estimaciones de la población de Buenos Aires en 1744, 1778 y 1810”. Desarrollo Económico vol. 19, núm. 73
(1979): 107-109.
Johnson, Lyman
y Socolow, Susan.
“Población y espacio en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII”. Desarrollo Económico vol. 20, núm. 79 (1980): 330-331.
Kluguer, Viviana. “El expediente judicial como fuente para la investigación
histórico-jurídica: Su utilidad para el estudio de la historia
de la familia colonial iberoamericana”, Passagens núm. 1 (2009): 1-15.
Kluguer, Viviana. Escenas de la vida conyugal. Los conflictos
matrimoniales en la sociedad virreinal rioplatense. Buenos Aires: Editorial
Quorum, 2003.
Kluguer, Viviana. “El proyecto
familiar en litigio. Espacios femeninos y contiendas conyugales en el
virreinato del Río de la Plata, 1776-1810” (capítulo VI). En Historia, género y familia en Iberoamérica
(siglos XVI al XX). Caracas: Fundación Konrad Adenauer, Universidad
Católica Andrés Bello e Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, 2004.
Laslett, Peter. “La historia de la
Familia”. En Historia de la familia,
Antologías Universitarias, Nuevos Enfoques, en ciencias sociales. México:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 1999.
Mallo, Silvia C. “Mujeres esclavas en América a fines del siglo XVIII:
una aproximación historiográfica”. En El
negro en la Argentina: presencia y negación. Buenos Aires: América Latina,
2001.
Mallo, Silvia C. La sociedad rioplatense ante la justicia:
1750-1850. La Plata: Archivo Histórico de la Provincia de Buenos Aires “Dr.
Ricardo Levene”, 2004.
Mallo, Silvia C. “El Virreinato
del Río de la Plata a fines de la Colonia: Conflictos, Convivencia e
Integración” (capítulo II). En La
sociedad colonial en los confines del Imperio. Diversidad e identidad (siglos
XVI-XIX). Córdoba, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Históricos “Prof. Carlos
S. A. Segreti” y La Plata: CHAyA,
2010.
Mallo, Silvia C. “El color del delito en Buenos Aires
1750-1830”. Memoria & Sociedad 7,
núm. 15 (20013): 111-123.
Moreno, José Luis. Historia de la familia en el Río de la Plata.
Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2004.
Olivero Guidobono,
Sandra. “Hogares femeninos en el Buenos Aires colonial” (capítulo II). En Familias y relaciones diferenciales: Género
y edad. Murcia: Edit.um, 2009.
Olivero Guidobono,
Sandra. “Ni propietario ni conchabado; agregado. Fuerza laboral y solidaridad
en la familia rural rioplatense: el Pago de la Costa a mediados del siglo
XVIII” (capítulo VIII). En Estampas
familiares en Iberoamérica. Un acercamiento desde la Antropología y la Historia.
México D.F.: CIESAS, 2010.
Potthast, Bárbara. Madres, Obreras, amantes… protagonismo femenino en
la historia de América Latina. Madrid: Iberoamericana,
2010.
Vila Vilar, Enriqueta.
“Posibilidades y perspectivas para el estudio de la esclavitud en los Fondos
del Archivo General de Indias”. Archivo
Hispalense: Revista histórica, literaria y artística tomo 68, núm. 207-208
(1985): 255-272.
Ridder deZemborain, Maud de. “El
testamento de la negra María”. Todo es
Historia, núm. 512, (marzo 2010): 6-15.
Socolow, Susan.
Los mercaderes del Buenos Aires
Virreinal: familia y comercio. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de la Flor, 1991.
Twinam Ann. Vidas públicas, secretos privados. Género, honor, sexualidad e
ilegitimidad en la Hispanoamérica colonial. Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura
económica, 2009.
Vassallo, Jaqueline. Mujeres delincuentes. Una mirada de género
en la Córdoba del siglo XVIII. Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba,
2005.
Vassallo, Jaqueline. “Castas,
honestas, viles y malas”. Anuario, núm.
10 (2007): 493-505. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Argentina/cijs-unc/20110618041948/anuario-CIJS-X.pdf
Vassallo, Jaqueline. “Esclavas
peligrosas en la Córdoba tardo-colonial”. Dos Puntas, Año IV, núm. 6 (2012): 199-217.
* This article
is the product of the study made in the framework of the Doctorate Thesis. In
it, carried out in the Department of American History of the Universidad de
Sevilla (Spain), women in Buenos Aires of the 18th century are
analysed.
[1] Bachelor’s degree in History and a Masters in
American Studies from the Universidad de Sevilla. Studying a Doctorate in
American History and is Honorary Assistant in the American History Department
of the Universidad de Sevilla. Professor in Courses for Foreign Universities of
the Faculties of Philology, Geography and History of the Universidad de Sevilla
and Researcher in Training and Scientific Secretary of the Permanent Seminar on
Families and Social Networks: Ethnicity and Mobility in the Atlantic World,
since its foundation. mgutierrez12@us.es
[2] It constitutes the presentation of part of a set of
doctoral research projects, this being the section of most recent study.
[3]
Dora Barrancos, Mujeres: entre la casa y
la plaza (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2012), 7-8.
[4] See: Pilar Gonzalbo Aizpuru, Familia y orden colonial (Mexico D.F.: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios
Históricos, 1998) or Pilar Gonzalbo
Aizpuru, Educación, familia y vida
cotidiana en México Virreinal (Mexico, D.F.: El
Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Históricos, 2012).
[5] The work of Susan
Socolow, Los
mercaderes del Buenos Aires Virreinal: familia y comercio (Buenos Aires:
Ediciones de la Flor, 1991), vital to understanding the porteño socio-economic
context.
[6] Among her most
recent work, we can find: Silvia C. Mallo, “El Virreinato del Río de la Plata a fines de la
Colonia: Conflictos, Convivencia e Integración”, in La sociedad colonial en los confines del Imperio. Diversidad e
identidad (siglos XVI-XIX) (Córdoba, Argentina: Centro de Estudios
Históricos “Prof. Carlos S. A. Segreti” and La Plata:
CHAyA, 2010), 35-58 o Silvia C. Mallo,
La sociedad rioplatense ante la justicia:
1750-1850 (La Plata: Historical Archive of the Province of Buenos Aires “Dr. Ricardo Levene”, 2004).
[7] As
an example, is cited: José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia en el Río de la Plata
(Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2004).
[8]
Enriqueta Vila Vilar, “Posibilidades y perspectivas para el estudio de la
esclavitud en los Fondos del Archivo General de Indias”, Archivo Hispalense: Revista histórica, literaria y
artística book 68: No 207-208 (1985): 255-272.
[9]
José Andrés Gallego, La esclavitud en la
América española (Madrid: Encuentro; Fundación Ignacio Larramendi, 2005).
[10]
Dora Dávila Mendoza, La sociedad esclava
en la Provincia de Venezuela, 1790-1800: solicitudes de libertad-selección
documental, (Venezuela: Universidad Católica Andrés Bello, 2009).
[11] Consult María Eugenia Chaves, “La mujer esclava y sus
estrategias de libertad en el Mundo Hispano colonial de finales del siglo
XVIII”, Anales, No. 1 (1998): 91-118,
among others.
[12]
Dora Barrancos, Mujeres en la sociedad
argentina, una Historia de cinco siglos (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 2007).
[13]
Dora Estela Celton, “Fecundidad de las esclavas en la
Córdoba colonial”, Revista Junta
Provincial de Historia de Córdoba, No. 15 (1993): 29-48.
[14]
Jaqueline Vassallo, “Esclavas peligrosas en la
Córdoba tardo-colonial”, Dos Puntas, Año
IV, No. 6 (2012): 199-217.
[15]
Florencia Guzmán, “Representaciones familiares de las mujeres negras en el
Tucumán Colonial. Un análisis en torno al mundo doméstico subalterno”, en Poblaciones históricas. Fuentes, métodos y
líneas de investigación, Research series, 9 (Rio
de Janeiro: ALAP, 2009), 403-426.
[16]
Marta Golberg, “La población negra y mulata de la
ciudad de Buenos Aires, 1810-1840”, Desarrollo
Económico vol. 16, No. 61 (April-June 1976):
75-99.
[17] Mª
Selina Gutiérrez Aguilera, “Mujeres trabajadoras: la
subsistencia en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII”, El futuro del pasado, No. 3 (2012): 67-90.
[18] See: Viviana Kluguer, Escenas de la vida conyugal. Los conflictos
matrimoniales en la sociedad virreinal rioplatense (Buenos Aires: Editorial
Quorum, 2003); Jaqueline Vassallo, Mujeres delincuentes. Una mirada de género
en la Córdoba del siglo XVIII (Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba,
2005), and María Alejandra Fernández, "Las razones de la violencia y la
fundamentación del castigo: una aproximación a las formas de acusación y de
defensa en la justicia criminal colonial" (Buenos Aires, 1776-1810)",
in Formas de Historia Cultural
(Buenos Aires: Prometeo-UNGS, 2008).
[19] Documentos para la Historia Argentina, t. X:
Padrones de la ciudad y campaña de Buenos Aires (1726-1810), Padrón de la ciudad y campaña de Buenos
Aires, 1744 (Buenos Aires: Peuser, 1955).
[20] Susan Socolow, Los mercaderes del Buenos Aires Virreinal…,
11.
[21]
José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia…,
17-18.
[22]
José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia…,
13.
[23]
José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia…,
39-45.
[24]
Ann Twinam, Vidas
públicas, secretos privados. Género, honor, sexualidad e ilegitimidad en la
Hispanoamérica colonial (Buenos Aires, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2009),
105-106.
[25]
Jaqueline Vassallo, “Castas, honestas, viles y
malas”, in Anuario No 10 (2007):
493-494.
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Argentina/cijs-unc/20110618041948/anuario-CIJS-X.pdf
[26] Susan Socolow, Los mercaderes del Buenos Aires Virreinal…,
49.
[27]
Viviana Kluguer, “El proyecto familiar en litigio.
Espacios femeninos y contiendas conyugales en el virreinato del Río de la
Plata, 1776-1810”, in Historia, género y
familia en Iberoamérica (siglos XVI al XX) (Caracas: Fundación Konrad
Adenauer, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello e Instituto de Investigaciones
Históricas, 2004) 209-239.
[28]
Jaqueline Vassallo,
Castas, honestas… 493-494.
[29]
Jaqueline Vassallo,
Castas, honestas… 505.
[30] For the study of the legal condition of women in the
Americas, see Jaqueline Vasallo Mujeres delincuentes,… 29-62.
[31]
José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia,…
45.
[32] Sivia C. Mallo, “Mujeres esclavas en
América a fines del siglo XVIII: una aproximación historiográfica”, en El negro en la Argentina: presencia y
negación (Buenos Aires: América Latina, 2001).
[33]
Raúl Fradkin and Juan Carlos Garavaglia,
La Argentina colonial. El Río de la Plata
entre los siglos XVI y XIX (Argentina: Siglo Veintiuno, 2009), 91.
[34]
Norma Angélica Castillo, “Mujeres negras y afromestizas
en Nueva España”, in Historia de las
Mujeres en España y América Latina. El Mundo Moderno vol. II (Madrid:
Cátedra, 2005) 585-589.
[35]
Pilar Gonzalbo Aizpuru, “Familias y vida familia.
Aproximaciones a la historia de la familia en México”, in Dimensiones del diálogo americano contemporáneo sobre la familia en la
época colonial (Murcia: Edit.um, 2009), 29-56.
[36]
José Luis Moreno, Historia de la familia…,
17-18.
[37]
Francisco Chacón Jiménez & Pablo Rodríguez, “Padrones”, in A través del tiempo. Diccionario de fuentes
para la historia de la familia (Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, 2000),
147-148.
[38]
Francisco Chacón Jiménez & Pablo Rodríguez, “Padrones”…, 146.
[39] Carried out in the city. Campaign authorized by Governer Domingo Ortiz de Rosas so as to find out the state
of the population and that of the sector that was entitled to carry weapons.
[40] Susana R. Frías, César A. García Belsunce y Sandra Olivero, “La evolución de la familia en Buenos Aires en los siglos
XVII y XVIII”, in Seminar on Changes and
continuity in American demographic behaviours: the
five centuries’ experience (Córdoba: International Union for the Scientific
Study of Population, 1998), 1-15.
[41]
Sandra Olivero Guidobono, “Hogares femeninos en el
Buenos Aires colonial”, in Familias y
relaciones diferenciales: Género y edad (Murcia: Edit.um, 2009), 37.
[42] Lyman Johnson and Susan Socolow, “Población y espacio en el Buenos Aires del siglo
XVIII”, Desarrollo Económico vol. 20,
No 79 (1980): 330-331; Lyman Johnson, “Estimaciones
de la población de Buenos Aires en 1744, 1778 y 1810”, Desarrollo Económico vol. 19, No 73 (1979): 107-109.
[43] See, among others,
Bárbara Potthast, Madres,
Obreras, amantes… protagonismo femenino en la historia de América Latina.
(Madrid: Iberoamericana, 2010), 174-189.
[44] See: Gutiérrez Aguilera, Mª Selina,
“Las mujeres jefas de hogar en el Buenos Aires Colonial”, Temas Americanistas No 25, (2010): 26-54. The data has been improved and expanded in the present work.
http://institucional.us.es/tamericanistas/uploads/revista/25/SELINA-GUTIERREZ.pdf
[45] For more information: Sandra
Olivero Guidobono, “Ni propietario ni conchabado;
agregado. Fuerza laboral y solidaridad en la familia rural rioplatense: el Pago
de la Costa a mediados del siglo XVIII”, in Estampas
familiares en Iberoamérica. Un acercamiento desde la Antropología and la
Historia (México D.F.: CIESAS, 2010), 199-226.
[46] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
410.
[47] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
496.
[48] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
449.
[49] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
417.
[50] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
496.
[51] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
345.
[52] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
345.
[53] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
369.
[54] Documentos para la Historia Argentina…,
408.
[55] See Mª Selina Gutiérrez Aguilera,
“Mujeres agregadas en el Buenos Aires del siglo XVIII: caridad y solidaridad”, Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos, (October 2012): 1-13. [On line],
Débats, mis en ligne le 02 octobre 2012, retrieved
on 10 May 2015. URL: http://nuevomundo.revues.org/64111; DOI: 10.4000/nuevomundo.64111.
[56] For the study and family classification the typology
of Peter Laslett was adapted to the Argentine
situation. Peter Laslett, “La historia
de la Familia” in Historia de la familia,
Antologías Universitarias, Nuevos Enfoques, en ciencias sociales (Mexico: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 1999), 34-70.
[57]
Viviana Kluguer, “El expediente judicial como fuente
para la investigación histórico-jurídica: Su
utilidad para el estudio de la historia de la familia colonial iberoamericana”,
Passagens No 1 (2009):
1-15.
[58] “Don Pablo Lázaro Beruti filed a lawsuit against Don Dionisio
Almirón for the latter to return his mulatta slave,” General Archive of the Argentine Nation
(Buenos Aires) (AGN, by its acronym in Spanish), Room IX, 23-06-02, Administrative Court, Record 14. File 433,
1804.
[59] “Request by Cipriana
Bárbara”, AGN, Room IX, 12-09-04, Civil
Requests, Book 1, Letters A-B, 1778.
[60] “Ana María, black slave who
belonged to Don Lucas Infante, on her freedom,” AGN,
Room IX, 35-03-05, Court, Record 21,
File 20, 1784.
[61] “Criminal lawsuit filed by Don Pedro Ferreira against
Vicente Escudero, for trying to kill a slave”, AGN,
Room IX, 39-08-04, Court, 280. File 27.
[62] Ibídem.
[63] Ibídem.
[64] Ibídem.
[65] “Criminal Case against Simeón,
black slave of Manuel de Basavilbaso, due to the word
of marriage that he gave Ana María, black slave,”
AGN, Sala IX, 32-01-05, Criminal, Record 8, File 1, 1774.
[66] Notary Boyso. Protocol 5, AGN & AGN, Inheritance 8418. Case widely
studied by Maud de Ridder de Zemborain, “El testamento de la negra María”, Todo es Historia, No 512, (March 2010): 6-15.
[67] “File promoted by María Ignacia Nogales (black woman) regarding her son named Juan
Pedro, whom Don José Antonio Segovia has at his service”, AGN, Sala IX, 23-06-07, Tribunales Administrativos, Record 19, Expediente
618.
[68]
Ibídem.
[69]
Ibídem.
[70] “Request Rosa Herrera”, AGN, Room
IX, Cabildo de Buenos Aires.
Correspondencia con el Virrey, 1790-94.
[71]
Silvia C. Mallo, “El color del delito en Buenos Aires
1750-1830”, Memoria & Sociedad 7,
No. 15 (20013): 114.
[72]Ibídem.
[73] “Against Dominga, black
woman, for stabbing her mistress”, AGN, Room IX, 32-01-01, Criminal, Record 3, File 7, 1761-1763.