Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé

Efeito do treinamento de autorregulação para a aprendizagem da matemática

Resumo

Este documento destaca a necessidade de incorporar uma estratégia pedagógica em um ambiente B-learning que serve como uma espécie de andaime para o desenvolvimento da capacidade de autorregulação, em função de melhorar o desempenho escolar em Matemática. Interesse para abordar esta questão foi destinado a observar o efeito da formação de estudantes com sistema de autorregulação incorporado em um ambiente B-learning no desempenho do aluno. Para este fim, foi explorada a interação entre o ambiente de aprendizagem (variável independente), desempenho escolar e capacidade de autorregulação. 56 alunos participaram, homens e mulheres de primeiro semestre cursando um workshop para melhorar a matemática básica. O processamento de dados foi realizado a partir de uma análise ANCOVA. Os resultados mostraram de forma consistente que o treinamento em autorregulação impacta positivamente a aprendizagem dos alunos e melhora consequentemente o desempenho acadêmico.

Palavras-chave

aprendizagem, desempenho escolar, autonomia educacional, apoio educacional, tecnologias da informação

PDF (Español)

Biografia do Autor

Luis Bayardo Sanabria Rodríguez

Profesor Titular Doctor en Educación Universidad Pedagógica Nacional (Bogotá-Colombia)

Nilson Genaro Valencia Vallejo

Profesor Asociado Universidad Pedagógica Nacional (Bogotá-Colombia) Magister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación

Jaime Ibáñez Ibáñez

Profesor Asociado Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, (Bogotá-Colombia) Magister en Tecnologías de la Información aplicadas a la Educación


Referências

  1. Azevedo, R. (2008). “The role of self-Regulation Learning about Science with Hypermedia”. En Robinson, D. & Schraw, G. (Eds.), Recent Innovations in Educational Technology that Facilitate Students Learning (pp. 127-156). USA: Information Age Publishing.
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005). “Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning”. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 193-197. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_1
  3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J., Winters, F., Moos, D., & Greene, J. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412. Recuperado de: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
  4. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizacion Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
  7. Bernacki, M., Aguilar, A., & Byrnes, P. (2010). Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: An Opportunity-Propensity Analysis. En Dettori, G. & Persico, D. (Eds.), Fostering Self-Regulated Learning through ICT (pp. 1-26). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference Published. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-901-5.ch001
  8. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  9. Bjork, R., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). “Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions”. EN: Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
  10. Campbell, D. & Stanley, J. (1995). Diseños experimentales y Cuasiexperimentales en la Investigación Social. Buenos Aires, A: Amorrortu Editores.
  11. Chen, M. (1995). “A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments”. Instructional Science, 23, 183-220. doi: 10.1007/BF00890451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890451
  12. Choi, I., Land, S. & Turgeon, A. (2005). “Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion”. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 483-511. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4
  13. Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2005). “Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning”. Instructional Science, 33, 513-540. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3
  14. Ellis, C. & Folley, S. (2011). “Using Student Assessment Choice and eAssessment to Achieve Self-Regulated Learning”. En: Dettori, G. & Persico, D. (Eds.), Fostering Self-Regulated Learning through ICT (pp. 89-104). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-901-5.ch006
  15. Flavell, J. (1976). “Metacognitive aspects of problem solving”. En: Resnick, I. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  16. Gravill, J., & Compeau, D. (2008). “Self-regulated learning strategies and software training”. Information & Management, 45, 288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.03.001
  17. Hacker, D. (1998). “Definitions and Empirical Foundations”. En:
  18. Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J. & Graesser, A. (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  19. Hadwin, A., Wozney, L. & Pontin, O. (2005). “Scaffolding the appropriation of selfregulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in student-teacher discourse about a graduate research portfolio”. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 413-450. Recuperado de http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1274-7
  20. Hofer, B., Yu, S. & Pintrich, P. (1998). “Teaching College Students to be Self-Regulated Learners”. En: Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp. 57-85). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  21. Hu, H., & Driscoll, M. (2013). “Self-Regulation in e-Learning environments: A remedy for community college”. Educational Technology and Society, 16(4), 171–184. Recuperado de http://www.ifets.info/journals/16_4/14.pdf
  22. Kramarski, B. (2011). “Assessing self-regulation development through sharing feedback in online mathematical problema solving discussion”. En: Dettori, G. & Persico, D. (Eds.), Fostering self-Regulated Learning through ICT (pp. 232-247). Hersey, PA: Information Science Reference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-901-5.ch014
  23. Lajoie, S., & Azevedo, R. (2006). “Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments”. En: Alexander, P. & Winne P. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. (2da ed.) (pp. 803-821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  24. Locke, E., & Lantham, G. (1985). The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 205-222. Recuperado de: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.7.3.205
  25. http://fitnessforlife.org/AcuCustom/Sitename/Documents/DocumentItem/8790.pdf
  26. López, O., Hederich, C., & Camargo, A. (2012). “Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: Andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo”. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13–25. doi:10.14349/rlp.v44i2.1028
  27. Maldonado, L., Fonseca, O., Ibáñez, J., Macías, D., Ortega, N., Rubio, M. & Sanabria, L. (1999). Metacognición y Razonamiento Espacial en Juegos de Computador. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
  28. Melvarech Z. & Kramarski, B. (1997). “IMPROVE: a multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms”. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365-394. doi: 10.3102/00028312034002365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034002365
  29. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). “Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings”. The psychology of learning and motivation, 26, 125-141. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Louis_Narens/publication/239059304_Metamemory_A_theoretical_framework_and_new_findings/links/0c96053c5e047895af000000.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
  30. Pintrich, P. (2000). “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning”. En: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
  31. Pintrich, P., Smisth, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Technical Report No. 91-B-004). Recuperado de http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
  32. Scholl, P., Bastian F., Benz, B., Bohnstedt, D., Rensing, C., Schmitz,
  33. B., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). “Implementation and Evaluation of a Tool for Setting Goals in Self-Regulated Learning with Web Resources”. En: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V. & Specht M. (Eds.), Learning in the synergy of multiple disciplines (pp. 521–534). Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_48
  34. Schunk, D. (1996). “Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skills learning”. American Education Research Journal, 33, 359-382. doi: 10.3102/00028312033002359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002359
  35. Schunk, D., & Zimmerman, B. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press.
  36. Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2008). “Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulated learning in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders”. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 207–230. doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z
  37. Whipp, J., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). “Self-regulation in a Web-based course: A case study”. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02504714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504714
  38. Winne, P. (1996). “A Metacognitive View of Individual Differences in Self-Regulated Learning”. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327-353. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9
  39. Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1997). “Studying as self-regulated learning”. En: Hacker, D. & Graesser, A. (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 279-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  40. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). “The role of tutoring in problem solving”. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
  41. Zimmerman, B. (2000). “Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective”. En: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  42. Zimmerman, B. (1998). “Academic studying and the development of personal skill: a self-regulatory perspective”. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
  43. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). “Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement”. En: Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, (pp. 273-292). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  44. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. NY: Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4
  45. Zimmerman, B., & Tsikalas, K. (2005). “¿Can Computer-Based Learning Environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning?” Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267-271. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_8

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.