Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 31 No. 60 (2022)
April-June 2022 (Continuous Publication)

Papers

Impact of Planting Density on the Effectiveness of Laboratory-Scale Artificial Wetlands Planted with Limonium Perezzi for Tannery Wastewater Treatment

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v31.n60.2022.13850

Published 2022-06-28

Lina-Marcela Saenz-Reyes
Universidad Libre

Rafael-Nikolay Agudelo-Valencia
Universidad Libre

Stivenzo-Rafael Ortiz-de-la-Hoz
Universidad Libre

Siby-Inés Garcés-Polo
Universidad Libre

Abstract

The impact of the planting density of Limonium perezzi on the effectiveness of laboratory-scale artificial wetlands for the soaking stage wastewater treatment in tanneries was analyzed. The planting densities were 10.27 plants/m2 (HAP4) and 15.4 plants/m2 (HAP6). The hydraulic retention time in each wetland was 4.5 days, and the experiments were conducted for 32 days, when the plants began to wither and water samples were taken for the respective analysis. The wetlands were operated for 8 weeks to observe their deterioration with respect to time. The stabilization period of the wetlands varied between 7 and 10 days until the concentration of the effluent was little variable. The statistical analysis of the results indicates that the planting density influences the effectiveness of the wetland in terms of percentage of concentration decrease, the wetlands planted with 15.4 plants/m2 were more efficient, which was determined with the Student’s T test (p<0.05). The percentages of decrease in the chemical demand for oxygen, chlorides, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) for the highest planting density were 81%, 54%, and 55%, respectively. As in previous studies, it was observed that the planted species has the ability to absorb salt and release it through leaves and stems, as observed from the seventh day of operation.

Keywords

Tanneries, Soaking, Chlorides, , Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Dissolved Solids, Halophyte Plants, Artificial Wetland, Limonium Perezzi

PDF

Author Biography

Lina-Marcela Saenz-Reyes

Roles: Investigation, Methodology, Witing-review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Rafael-Nikolay Agudelo-Valencia

Roles:  Investigation, Methodology, Witing-review & editing, Supervision.

Stivenzo-Rafael Ortiz-de-la-Hoz

Roles: Formal analysis.

Siby-Inés Garcés-Polo

Roles: Formal analysis, Supervision.

References

  1. M. K. Marichamy, A. Kumaraguru, N. Jonna, “Particle size distribution modeling and kinetic study for coagulation treatment of tannery industry wastewater at response surface optimized condition,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 297, e126657, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126657
  2. S. Garcia-Segura, J. D. Ocon, M. N. Chong, “Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents — A review,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 113, pp. 48–67, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014
  3. S. Tamersit, K. E. Bouhidel, “Treatment of tannery unhairing wastewater using carbon dioxide and zinc cations for greenhouse gas capture, pollution removal and water recycling,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 34, e101120, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101120
  4. A. D. Villalobos-Lara, F. Álvarez, Z. Gamiño-Arroyo, R. Navarro, J. M. Peralta-Hernández, R. Fuentes, T. Pérez, “Electrocoagulation treatment of industrial tannery wastewater employing a modified rotating cylinder electrode reactor,” Chemosphere, vol. 264, e128491, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128491
  5. V. Sodhi, A. Bansal, M. K. Jha, “Investigation of activated sludge characteristics and their influence on simultaneous sludge minimization and nitrogen removal from an advanced biological treatment for tannery wastewater,” Environmental Technology & Innovation., vol. 24, e102013, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102013
  6. A. B. Mpofu, O. O. Oyekola, P. J. Welz, “Anaerobic treatment of tannery wastewater in the context of a circular bioeconomy for developing countries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 296, e126490, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126490
  7. T. Tran, D. A. Le, N. Hong Hai, T. Phi Hung, N. Cong Danh, L. Van Tan, V. T. Dieu Hien, X.-T. Bui, “Study on optimal conditions of poly ferric chloride (PFC) dosage treating tannery wastewater,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 38, pp. 2981–2987, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.320
  8. K. Sivagami, K. P. Sakthivel, I. M. Nambi, “Advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of tannery wastewater,” Journal of environmental chemical engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3656–3663, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.06.004
  9. T. D. H. Vo, X.-T. Bui, B.-T. Dang, T.-T. Nguyen, V.-T. Nguyen, D. P. H. Tran, P.-T. Nguyen, M. Bollera, K.-Y. Andrew Lin, S. Varjani, P. L. Show, “Influence of organic loading rates on treatment performance of membrane bioreactor treating tannery wastewater,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 24, e101810, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101810
  10. Q. Wang, G. Zhou, Y. Qin, R. Wang, H. Li, F. Xu, Y. Du, C. Zhao, H. Zhang, Q. Kong, “Sulfate removal performance and co-occurrence patterns of microbial community in constructed wetlands treating saline wastewater,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 43, e102266, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102266
  11. F. Younas, N. Khan Niazi, I. Bibi, M. Afzal, K. Hussain, M. Shahid, Z. Aslam, S. Bashir, M. M. Hussain, J. Bundschuh, “Constructed wetlands as a sustainable technology for wastewater treatment with emphasis on chromium-rich tannery wastewater,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 422, e126926, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126926
  12. R. Bakhshoodeh, N. Alavi, C. Oldham, R. M. Santos, A. A. Babaei, J. Vymazal, P. Paydary, “Constructed wetlands for landfill leachate treatment: A review,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 146, e105725, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105725
  13. J. Du, Q. Li, R. Zhao, J. Yang, S. Zhou, C. Chen, M. Zhang, D. Zhao, S. An, “Effect of influent salinity on the selection of macrophyte species in floating constructed wetlands,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 282, e111947, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111947
  14. M. Dassanayake, J. C. Larkin, “Making plants break a sweat: The structure, function, and evolution of plant salt glands,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, e406, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2017.00406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00724
  15. E. Medina, A. M. Francisco, R. Wingfield, O. L. Casañas, “Halofitismo en plantas de la costa caribe de Venezuela: halófitas y halotolerantes,” Acta Botánica Venezuelica, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49-80, 2008.
  16. A. R. F. Hotterer, G. Hertenberger, J. Polanía, “Sobre la ecofisiología de plantas halofitas y desérticas,” Acta Biológica Colombiana, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 9–21, 1990.
  17. J. Chen, Variety comparison and modelling flowering of limon. 2005.
  18. American Public Health Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association, 1995.
  19. C. S. C. Calheiros, P. V. B. Quitério, G. Silva, L. F. C. Crispim, H. Brix, S. C. Moura, P. M. L. Castro, “Use of constructed wetland systems with Arundo and Sarcocornia for polishing high salinity tannery wastewater,” Journal of environmental management, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.003
  20. M. F. Castillo-Castañeda, R. N. Agudelo-Valencia, “Artificial wetland planted with Limonium Perezzi, for the treatment of wastewater from tanning: Humedal artificial plantado con Limonium Perezzi, para el tratamiento de aguas residuales provenientes del curtido,” Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, no. 97, pp. 103–108, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20200263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20200263
  21. Y. Liang, H. Zhu, G. Bañuelos, B. Yan, Q. Zhou, X. Yu, X. Cheng, “Constructed wetlands for saline wastewater treatment: A review,” Ecological Engineering, vol. 98, pp. 275–285, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.005
  22. J. M. Chyan, S. C. Huang, C. J. Lin, “Impacts of salinity on degradation of pollutions in hybrid constructed wetlands,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 124, pp. 176–187, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.