Ben Baker (2021). Reporte evaluativo de un manuscrito (hipotético) para un libro introductorio a la filosofía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v9.n32.2023.16074Palabras clave:
.Resumen
.
Descargas
Referencias
Adamson, P. (2015). Philosophy in the Islamic World: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
American Philosophical Association (2023a). Anti-Racist Teaching Resources. https://www.apaonline.org/page/antiracistteaching
American Philosophical Association (2023b). Diversity and Inclusiveness Syllabus Collection. https://www.apaonline.org/members/group_content_view.asp?group=110430&id=380970
Anderson, E. S. (1999). What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics, 109 (2), pp. 287-337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57 (40), pp. 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.321
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy, 33 (124), pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943
Arpaly, N. (2002). Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnes, E. (2009). Disability, Minority, and Difference. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26 (4), pp. 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00443.x
Basu, R. (2019). The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs. Philosophical Studies, 176 (9), pp. 2497-2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1137-0
de Beauvoir, S. (1952). The Second Sex. New York: Knopf.
Black, D. L. (1999). Mental Existence in Thomas Aquinas and Avicenna. Mediaeval Studies, 61 (1), pp. 45-79. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306458
Boden, M. A. (1970). Intentionality and Physical Systems. Philosophy of Science, 37 (2), pp. 200-214. https://doi.org/10.1086/288294
Botts, T. F., Bright, L. K., Cherry, M., Mallarangeng, G. and Spencer, Q. (2014). What Is the State of Blacks in Philosophy? Critical Philosophy of Race, 2 (2), pp. 224-242. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.2.2.0224
Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. (2006). Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods. Ethics, 116 (3), pp. 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1086/500524
Burton, D. (2016). The Cowherds, Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 33 (3), pp. 519-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-016-0072-8
Calhoun, C. (2009). The Undergraduate Pipeline Problem. Hypatia, 24 (2), 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01040.x
Chakrabarti, A. (1989). From the Fabric to the Weaver? R. W. Perrett (Ed.), Indian Philosophy of Religion (pp. 21-34). Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward A Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge: A Bradford book.
Coetzee, P. H. and Roux, A. P. J. (1998). Philosophy from Africa: A Text with Readings. London: Routledge.
Cudd, A. E. and Jones, L. E. (2005). Sexism. R. G. Frey and C. H. Wellman (Eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics (pp. 102-117). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch8
Deloria, V. (2003). God Is Red: A Native View of Religion. New York: Fulcrum Publishing.
Dembroff, R. A. (2016). What Is Sexual Orientation? Philosophers’ Imprint, 16 (3), pp. 1-27. https://philpapers.org/archive/DEMWIS.pdf
Detlefsen, K. (2007). Reason and Freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the Order and Disorder of Nature. Archiv Fur Geschichte Der Philosophie, 89 (2), pp. 157-191. https://doi.org/10.1515/AGPH.2007.008
Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression. Social Epistemology, 28 (2), pp. 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585
Dougherty, T., Baron, S. and Miller, K. (2015). Female Under-Representation among Philosophy Majors: A Map of the Hypotheses and a Survey of the Evidence. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 1 (1), pp. 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2015.1.4
Douglass, F. (1968). My Bondage and My Freedom. New York: Arno Press.
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1897). Strivings of the Negro People. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1897/08/strivings-of-the-negropeople/305446/
Edelglass, W. and Garfield, J. (2009). Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fanon, F. and Markmann, C. L. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
Foot, P. (1972). Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives. The Philosophical Review, 81 (3), pp. 305–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184328
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganeri, J. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garfield, J. L. (1995). The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gendler, T. S. (2011). On the Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 156 (1), pp. 33-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9801-7
Goldman, A. and O’Connor, C. (2019). Social Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-social/
Goodman, C. (2009). Consequences of Compassion: An Interpretation and Defense of Buddhist Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gyekye, K. (1978). The Akan Concept of a Person. International Philosophical Quarterly, 18 (3), pp. 277–287. https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq197818329
Harvey, P., y Siderits, M. (2004). An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 31 (3), pp. 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2004.00162_1.x
Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be? Noûs, 34 (1), pp. 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201
Hochman, A. (2013). Against the New Racial Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy, 110 (6), pp. 331-351. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2013110625
Hurley, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hursthouse, R. (2001). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Iqbal, M. (1934). The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koch, T. (2001). Disability and Difference: Balancing Social and Physical Constructions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27 (6), pp. 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.6.370
Korsgaard, C. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leslie, S. J. (2017). The Original Sin of Cognition: Fear, Prejudice, and Generalization. Journal of Philosophy, 114 (8), pp. 393-421. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2017114828
MapForTheGap.com (2023). Minorities and Philosophy. http://www.mapforthegap.com/
Matilal, B. K. y Evans, R. D. (Eds.) (1986). Buddhist Logic and Epistemology: Studies in the Buddhist Analysis of Inference and Language. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Matilal, B. K., y Chakrabarti, A. (Eds.) (1994). Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mitchell, M. (2018). The Dimensions of Diversity: Teaching Non-Western Works in Introductory Philosophy Courses. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 57 (2), pp. 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217318000021
Mkhize, N. (2008). Ubuntu and Harmony: An African Approach to Morality and Ethics. R. Nicolson (Ed.), Persons in Community: African Ethics in a Global Culture (pp. 35-44). Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwazulu-Natal Press.
Norton-Smith, T. M. (2010). The Dance of Person and Place: One Interpretation of American Indian Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24 (4), pp. 249-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
Okin, S. M. (2005). Forty Acres and a Mule’ for Women: Rawls and Feminism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4 (2), pp. 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05052540
Oruka, H. O. (1990). Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and Modern Debate on African Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
Park, P. K. J. (2013). Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830. New York: State University of New York Press.
Potter, K. H. (1984). Does Indian Epistemology Concern Justified True Belief? Journal of Indian Philosophy, 12 (4), pp. 307-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196086
Radhakrishnan, S. and Moore, C. A. (1957). A Source Book in Indian Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Saul, J. (2016). What Is It Like to Be a Woman in Philosophy?. https://beingawomaninphilosophy.wordpress.com/
Shapiro, L. (2007). The Correspondence between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shelby, T. (2002). Is Racism in the ‘Heart’? Journal of Social Philosophy, 33 (3), pp. 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/0047-2786.00150
Sherman, N. (1989). The Fabric of Character: Aristotle’s Theory of Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shun, K.L. and Wong, D. B. (2004). Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shutte, A. (2009). Ubuntu as the African Ethical Vision. M. F. Murove (Ed.), African Ethics: An Anthology for Comparative and Applied Ethics (pp. 85-99). Grahamstown: University of Kwazulu-Natal Press.
Siderits, M. and Katsura, S. (2013). Nagarjuna’s Middle Way: Mulamadhyamakakarika. Somerville: Simon and Schuster.
Spencer, Q. (2014). A Radical Solution to the Race Problem. Philosophy of Science, 81 (5), pp. 1025-1038. https://doi.org/10.1086/677694
Steele, C. M., y Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (5), pp. 797-811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
Tan, S. (2016). Why Equality and Which Inequalities?: A Modern Confucian Approach to Democracy. Philosophy East and West, 66 (2), pp. 488-514. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2016.0048
Thompson, M., Adleberg, T., Sims, T. and Nahmias, E. (2016). Why Do Women Leave Philosophy? Surveying Students at the Introductory Level. Philosopher’s Imprint, 16 (6), pp. 1-36. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0016.006
Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (1), pp. 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_6
Tiwald, J. (2011). Confucianism and Human Rights. T. Cushman (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Human Rights (pp. 244-254). New York: Routledge.
Tuske, J. (2017). Indian Epistemology and Metaphysics. New York: Bloomsbury.
Van Norden, B. W. (2007). Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Norden, B. W. (2017). Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto (eBook). https://doi.org/10.7312/van-18436
Watson, B. (2007). The Analects of Confucius. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wolf, S. (1987). Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility. F. D. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology (pp. 46-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wollstonecraft, M. and J. Johnson. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects. New York: J. Johnson.
Wylie, A. (2003). Why Standpoint Matters. R. Figueroa and S. G. Harding (Eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology (pp. 26-48). New York: Routledge
Publicado
-
Resumen84
-
PDF101
-
XML2
-
HTML3
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores deben presentar los artículos de acuerdo con las normas de publicación de la revista.
Los derechos del artículo están sujetos a la Licencia de Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA), por lo tanto se permite su uso y difusión, siempre y cuando se realice la citación de los autores y la revista, y no se use para fines comerciales. Los derechos de los artículos publicados le corresponden a la revista.
Los autores aceptan la licencia de uso utilizada por Cuestiones de Filosofía, al igual, que las políticas de autoarchivo y acceso abierto.
Enviar el formato de autorización de publicación (copyright) diligenciado y firmado por cada autor con el manuscrito. Los autores deben garantizar que el artículo es producto de un proceso de investigación original, otorgando el reconocimiento de las ideas, figuras y gráficos de autores que se encuentren dentro del manuscrito, a través de la citación y referencia correspondiente. No se publicaran artículos que presenten plagio.
El autor debe garantizar que el artículo es inédito y no se ha publicado en ningún medio. De igual forma, debe garantizar a través de declaración escrita que no se ha presentado simultáneamente a otras revistas para iniciar el proceso editorial. Debe expresar al comité con anterioridad algún conflicto de intereses o error en el documento.