Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 27 No. 47 (2018)

Papers

Simulation of a biogas cleaning process using different amines

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v27.n47.2018.7751

Published 2018-01-15

  • Guillermo Sepúlveda
    • ,
  • Luis Eduardo Jaimes
    • ,
  • Leonardo Pacheco
    • ,
  • Carlos Alirio Díaz

Guillermo Sepúlveda
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga (Bucaramanga-Santander, Colombia)

Luis Eduardo Jaimes
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga (Bucaramanga-Santander, Colombia)

Leonardo Pacheco
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga (Bucaramanga-Santander, Colombia)

Carlos Alirio Díaz
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga (Bucaramanga-Santander, Colombia)

Abstract

The use of biogas generated in landfills has gained importance in developing countries like Colombia. Taking into account that this biogas presents poor combustion properties that make interchangeability with other combustible gases difficult, the elimination of gases and vapors, such as CO2 and H2O, through a cleaning process, in which the biogas is converted to biomethane, improves the biogas properties as a fuel gas for general use. In this work, we simulated the generation of biogas at El Carrasco sanitary landfill in Bucaramanga, using the US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) landfill gas emissions model. Additionally, we simulated the biogas cleaning process to extract the remaining moisture using the ProMax software; for this, we used three different amines (MDEA, MEA, and DEA), followed by a glycol dehydration process. The results showed that the amine MEA produced the largest increase in the concentration of CH4 (90.37 %) for the biogas generated in the landfill. Furthermore, dehydration with glycol was an efficient process to obtain a gas with a high percentage of methane (91.47 %) and low water presence (1.27 %); this would allow the use of biomethane in conventional industrial combustion processes and power generation.

Keywords

amine, deacidification, biogas cleaning, simulation

PDF XML

References

  1. G. Mundaca, "How much can CO2 emissions be reduced if fossil fuel subsidies are removed?," Energy Economics, vol. 64, pp. 91-104, May. 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.014
  2. International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Highlights 2016. IEA Publications, 2016.
  3. Biogas Power (Off-grid) Programme. Available: http://mnre.gov.in/schemes/offgrid/biogas-2/.
  4. W. Ortiz, J. Terrapon-Pfaff, and C. Dienst, "Understanding the diffusion of domestic biogas technologies. Systematic conceptualization of existing evidence from developing and emerging countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 74, pp. 1287-1299, Jul. 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.090
  5. I. Pérez, et al., "Technical, economic and environmental assessment of household biogas digesters for rural communities," Renewable Energy, vol. 62, pp. 313-318, Feb. 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.017
  6. K. C. Surendra, D. Takara, A. G. Hashimoto, and S. K. Khanal, "Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 31, pp. 846-859, Mar. 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015
  7. Q. Aguilar-Virgen, P. Taboada-González, and S. Ojeda-Benítez, "Analysis of the feasibility of the recovery of landfill gas: a case study of Mexico," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 79, pp. 53-60, Sep. 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.025
  8. W. Tsai, "Bioenergy from landfill gas (LFG) in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 11(2), pp. 331-344, Feb. 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.001
  9. J. García, et al., "Compositional analysis of excavated landfill samples and the determination of residual biogas potential of the organic fraction," Waste Manage, vol. 55, pp. 336-344, Sep. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.003
  10. Q. Aguilar-Virgen, et al., "Power generation with biogas from municipal solid waste: Prediction of gas generation with in situ parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 30, pp. 412-419, Feb. 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.014
  11. R. Kadam, and N. L. Panwar, "Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 73, pp. 892-903, Jun. 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167
  12. C. Díaz González, A. Amell, and J. Suárez, "Comparison of combustion properties of simulated biogas and methane," CT&F Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro, vol. 3(5), pp. 225-236, 2009.
  13. C. E. Lee, C. B. Oh, I. S. Jung, and J. Park, "A study on the determination of burning velocities of LFG and LFG-mixed fuels," Fuel, vol. 81(13), pp. 1679-1686, Aug. 2002. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00049-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00049-2
  14. Z. L. Wei, C. W. Leung, C. S. Cheung, and Z. H. Huang, "Effects of equivalence ratio, H2 and CO2 addition on the heat release characteristics of premixed laminar biogas-hydrogen flame," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41(15), pp. 6567-6580, Apr. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.170
  15. L. Pizzuti, C. A. Martins, and P. T. Lacava, "Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 62, pp. 856-865, Sep. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.011
  16. C. Lee, and C. Hwang, "An experimental study on the flame stability of LFG and LFG-mixed fuels," Fuel, vol. 86(5-6), pp. 649-655, Mar. 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.033
  17. C. A. Díaz González, A. Amell Arrieta, and L. F. Cardona, "Estudio experimental de la estabilidad de llama de biogás en un sistema de premezcla," Energética, 39, 2008.
  18. L. Pizzuti, et al., "Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A state of the art," in 10th Int. Conf. on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2014.
  19. H. Nonaka, and F. M. Pereira, "Experimental and numerical study of CO2 content effects on the laminar burning velocity of biogas," Fuel, vol. 182, pp. 382-390, Oct. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.098
  20. N. Hamidi, "Carbon dioxide effects on the flammability characteristics of biogas," Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 493, pp. 129-133, Jan. 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.493.129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.493.129
  21. K. Biernat, W. Gis, and I. Samson-Bręk, "Review of technology for cleaning biogas to natural gas quality," Combustion Engines, vol. 148, pp. 33-39, 2012.
  22. M. J. Khalil, K. Sharma, and R. Gupta, "Strategic technologies for biogas purification," in National Conference on Synergetic Trends in Engineering and Technology (STET-2014), 2014.
  23. B. Morero, and E. A. Campanella, "Simulación del Proceso de Absorción Química con Soluciones de Aminas para la Purificación Biogás," Información Tecnológica, vol. 24(1), pp. 25-32, 2013. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642013000100004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642013000100004
  24. N. Abatzoglou, and S. Boivin, "A review of biogas purification processes," Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, vol. 3(1), pp. 42-71, Jan. 2009. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.117
  25. P. L. Fosbøl, et al., "Design and simulation of rate-based CO2 capture processes using carbonic anhydrase (CA) applied to biogas," in 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-13), 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1268
  26. R. Ochieng et al., "Simulation of the Benfield HiPure process of natural gas sweetening for LNG production and evaluation of alternatives," in Proceedings of Sour Oil and Gas Advanced Technology, 2012.
  27. V. N. Hernández, M. W. Hlavinka, and J. Bullin, "Design glycol units for maximum efficiency", in Proceedings of the Annual Convention-Gas Processors Association, 1992.
  28. K. W. Mattsson-Bose, and L. G. Lyddon, "Using a process simulator to improve sulphur recovery," Sulphur-London-, pp. 37-42, 1997.
  29. S. Rasi, Biogas Composition and Upgrading to Biomethane. Jyväskyla: University of Jyväskyla, 2009.
  30. A. Alexander, C. Burklin, and A. Singleton, "Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) Version 3.02," US Environmental Protection Agency, Eastern Research Group, 2005.
  31. H. Kamalan, M. Sabour, and N. Shariatmadari, "A review on available landfill gas models," Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 4(2), pp. 79-92, Feb. 2011. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2011.79.92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2011.79.92
  32. Alcaldía de Bucaramanga, Plan de Gestión Integral de Residuos Sólidos
  33. Pgirs. Bucaramanga: 2015.
  34. E. Erdmann, et al., "Endulzamiento de gas natural con aminas. Simulación del proceso y análisis de sensibilidad paramétrico," Avances en Ciencias e Ingeniería, vol. 3(4), 2012.
  35. F. R. Abdeen, et al., "A review of chemical absorption of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading," Chin. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 24(6), pp. 693-702, Jun. 2016. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.05.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2016.05.006

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.