Main Article Content
AutoresJesús David Terán-Villanueva
Salvador Ibarra-Martínez, Ph. D. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7106-6010
Julio Laria-Menchaca, Ph. D. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5641-8535
José Antonio Castán-Rocha, Ph. D. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4973-0827
Mayra Guadalupe Treviño-Berrones, M.Sc. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-6986
Alejandro Humberto García-Ruiz
José Eduardo Martínez-Infante
Course planning of an educative center or university is composed of multiple complex problems like the design of the schedule for the students, classrooms, and professors for each signature. One of the problems is the forecasting of the number of subjects to make available for the students; this problem seems easy at first glance because once we have the number of approved and failed students for each subject, we can easily calculate the following demand for each subject. However, there are occasions where the course planning for the following period starts before having the information related to the number of accredited students; which lead us to the problem of forecasting the accreditation ratio for the calculation of the subject demand from the students. In this paper, the performance of a causal model compares to the performance of a statistical model for the forecasting of the approve and fail ratio of the students. The final results show that the causal model outperforms the statistical model for the given instances. We consider that this advantage occurs because the causal model learns the behavior patterns of the training data independently, instead of generalizing the accreditation ratio. Additionally, the statistical method can present significant problems when trying to forecast accreditation ratios for situations that are not found in the training data, while the causal model will use the information learned to predict such situations.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles included in the Revista Facultad de Ingeniería are published under the Creative Commons (BY) license.
Authors must complete, sign, and submit the Review and Publication Authorization Form of the manuscript provided by the Journal; this form should contain all the originality and copyright information of the manuscript.
The authors who publish in this Journal accept the following conditions:
a. The authors retain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the work registered under the Creative Commons attribution license, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this Journal.
b. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work It was first published in this Journal.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the process.
review and publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of published work.
d. The Journal authorizes the total or partial reproduction of the content of the publication, as long as the source is cited, that is, the name of the Journal, name of the author (s), year, volume, publication number and pages of the article.
e. The ideas and statements issued by the authors are their responsibility and in no case bind the Journal.
 J. S. Armstrong, “Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners,” International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3.
 C. D. Bailey, and S. Gupta, “Judgement in learning-curve forecasting: a laboratory study,” J. Forecast., vol. 18 (1), pp. 39–57, Jan. 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199901)18:1<39::AID-FOR683>3.0.CO;2-N.
 J. E. Hanke, and D. W. Wichern, Pronosticos en los Negocios, Pearson Educación, 2010.
 W. Jun, L. Yuyan, T. Lingyu, and G. Peng, “Modeling a combined forecast algorithm based on sequence patterns and near characteristics: An application for tourism demand forecasting,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 108, pp. 136-147, Mar. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.01.028.
 L. G. Ruiz, R. Rueda, M. P. Cuéllar, and M. C. Pegalajar, “Energy consumption forecasting based on Elman neural networks with evolutive optimization,” Expert System with Applications, vol. 92, pp. 380-389, Feb. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.059.
 W. He, “Load forecasting via deep neural networks,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 122, pp. 308-314, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.374.
 F. Moretti, S. Pizzuti, S. Panzieri, and M. Annunziato, “Urban traffic flow forecasting through statistical and neural network bagging ensemble hybrid modeling,” Neurocomputing, vol. 167, pp. 3-7, Nov. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.100.
 X. Feng, Q. Li, Y. Zhu, J. Hou, L. Jin, and J. Wang, “Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM 2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 107, pp. 118-128, Apr. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.030.