Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 32 Núm. 63 (2023)
Enero-Marzo 2023 (Publicación Continua)

Articulos

IoT-LAT: Prototipo de gemelo digital para la simulación de escenarios educativos de los laboratorios de arte y tecnología del Instituto Departamental de Bellas Artes, Cali, Colombia

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v32.n63.2023.15254

Publicado 2023-02-22

Oswaldo-Andrés Ordóñez-Bolaños
Universidad del Cauca

Luz-Marina Sierra-Martinez
Universidad del Cauca

Diego-Hernán Peluffo-Ordoñez
Mohammed VI Polytechnic University

Resumen

Los Gemelos Digitales (DT) tienen el potencial de transformar procesos de manufactura, construcción, mantenimiento y control de diferentes procesos industriales debido a que permiten la integración entre el mundo físico y el mundo digital. Sin embargo, el diseño y desarrollo de conceptos digitales complejos requiere que sus metodologías y procesos se implementen correctamente. En este trabajo se presenta el desarrollo de un prototipo de gemelo digital de los laboratorios de arte y tecnología del Instituto Departamental de Bellas Artes, Cali, utilizando el proceso de desarrollo ágil Scrum, el cual facilitó la organización en el diseño y desarrollo del prototipo IoT-LAT. Para la construcción se estableció una arquitectura IOT de 3 capas que permitió mapear los componentes del gemelo digital y los elementos reales a simular para su construcción. El prototipo IoT-LAT permite a estudiantes y docentes interactuar e informarse digitalmente del estado físico del laboratorio, conocer cuáles elementos tecnológicos se encuentran disponibles en el espacio y cómo se usan.

Palabras clave

Gemelo digital, Internet de las cosas, Metodologías agiles, Simulación virtual, Scrum

PDF (English) XML (English)

Citas

  1. D. J. Wagg, P. Gardner, R. J. Barthorpe, W. K., “Digital Twins: State-of-The-Art and Future Directions for Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, e4046739, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046739
  2. M. Singh, E. Fuenmayor, E. P. Hinchy, Y. Qiao, N. Murray, D. Devine, “Digital Twin: Origin to future,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 4, no. 36, e4020036, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4020036
  3. M. Grieves, Origins of the Digital Twin Concept. 2016. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26367.61609
  4. A. El Saddik, “Digital twins: The convergence of multimedia technologies,” IEEE multimedia, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167
  5. Y. Fu, G. Zhu, M. Zh, F. Xuan, “Digital Twin for Integration of Design-Manufacturing-Maintenance: An Overview,” Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 80, e760, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00760-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-022-00760-x
  6. F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, F. Sui, “Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 3563–3576, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-017-0233-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1
  7. A. Sharma, E. Kosasih, J. Zhang, A. Brintrup, A. Calinescu, “Digital Twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 30, e100383, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383
  8. A. M. Madni, D. Erwin, A. Madni, “Exploiting Digital Twin Technology to Teach Engineering Fundamentals and Afford Real-World Learning Opportunities,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32800
  9. T. I. Erdei, R. Krakó, G. Husi, “Design of a Digital Twin Training Centre for an Industrial Robot Arm,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 12, e8862, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178862
  10. Y.-B. Lin, M.-Z. Shieh, M.-F. Shih, C.-C. Cheng, “EduTalk: An IoT Environment for Learning Computer Programming and Physics,” IEEE Internet Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 21946–21957, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3182280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3182280
  11. K. A. Peppler, “Media arts: Arts education for a digital age,” Teachers College Record, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 2118–2153, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200806
  12. M. Xiong, H. Wang, “Digital twin applications in aviation industry: A review,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2022, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 5677–5692, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-022-09717-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09717-9
  13. H. T. Nguyen, Ø. Haugen, “Building Experimental Laboratory for Digital Twin in Service Oriented Architecture,” in Proceedings - 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems, ICPS 2022, pp.01-06 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS51978.2022.9816926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS51978.2022.9816926
  14. Bellas Artes Institución Universitaria del Valle, “Bellas Artes Institución Universitaria del Valle,” 2022. https://bellasartes.edu.co/
  15. K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, “La guía scrum 2020(Scrum Guide 2020),” Scrum.org.
  16. L. Atzori, A. Iera, G. Morabito, “The Internet of Things: A survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
  17. R. van Kranenburg, “The Internet of Things: A critique of ambient technology and the all-seeing network of RFID,” Institute of Network Cultures, 2007. https://acortar.link/uoJpXn
  18. S. Naveen, S. G. Hegde, “Study of IoT: Understanding IoT Architecture, Applications, Issues and Challenges,” in Proceedings - International Conference on Innovations in Computing & Networking, ICICN16. 2016.
  19. P. Gokhale, O. Bhat, S. Bhat, “Introduction to IOT,” International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41-46, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2018.517
  20. J. Gubbi, R. Buyya, S. Marusic, and M. Palaniswami, “Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1645–1660, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010
  21. J. Zhang, M. Liang, “A new architecture for converged internet of things,” in International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, ITAP 2010, pp. 1-4, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITAPP.2010.5566263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITAPP.2010.5566263
  22. O. Said, M. Masud, “Towards Internet of Things: Survey and Future Vision,” International Journal of Computer Networks, vol. 5, no. 1, e001, 2013.
  23. D. Dinculeană, X. Cheng, “Vulnerabilities and Limitations of MQTT Protocol Used between IoT Devices,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, e848, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9050848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050848
  24. Anonym, Sci-Fi Styled Modular Pack, 2022. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/3d/environments/sci-fi/sci-fi-styled-modular-pack-82913
  25. D. Svanæs, A. Scharvet Lyngby, M. Bärnhold, T. Røsand, S. Subramanian, “UNITY-Things: An Internet-of-Things Software Framework Integrating Arduino-Enabled Remote Devices with the UNITY Game Engine,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12789, pp. 378–388, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77277-2_29/COVER DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77277-2_29

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.