Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 32 Núm. 65 (2023)
Julio-Septiembre 2023 (Publicación Continua)

Articulos

Tendencias globales sobre normatividad y temas regulatorios en el área de nanotecnología

Publicado 2023-09-30

  • María-Mercedes Cely-Bautista
    • ,
  • Grey-Cecilia Castellar-Ortega
    • ,
  • Javier-Enrique Jaramillo-Colpas
    • ,
  • Oscar-Fabián Higuera-Cobos

María-Mercedes Cely-Bautista
Universidad del Atlantico

Grey-Cecilia Castellar-Ortega
Universidad Autónoma de Caribe

Javier-Enrique Jaramillo-Colpas
Universidad de la Costa

Oscar-Fabián Higuera-Cobos
Universidad del Atlántico

Resumen

Este artículo presenta un análisis sobre tendencias globales sobre Normatividad y temas regulatorios en el área de nanotecnología mediante un estudio bibliométrico. Se utilizaron palabras clave como regulations, legislation, policy; nanotechnology, nanomaterials, nanoparticle y risk. Se encontraron 1202 documentos científicos refinados y 4914 patentes. Se evaluaron aspectos como artículos con mayor número de citaciones, países de mayor producción académica, instituciones con más documentos, autores más representativos, correlación entre autores, análisis de palabras clave, entre otros. Para el análisis fueron utilizadas las bases de datos Scopus y Journal citation report; el software VosViewer y diferentes herramientas informáticas como OpenRefine y Excel. Los resultados indican que Estados Unidos (33.5%) es el país con mayor producción, seguido de Reino Unido, India y Alemania con un 10.9%, 10.3% y 6.7% respectivamente. Se evidencia un grado de colaboración entre Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y Alemania hacia 2014 y entre China e India hacia 2018 y 2019. Por otra parte, de acuerdo con los análisis de palabras clave, solo el 10% de la producción científica habla directamente de normativas y políticas relacionadas con los efectos en la salud humana, con un escaso impacto sobre el medio ambiente. 

Palabras clave

Regulaciones, Legislación, Políticas, Nanotecnología, Riesgo por Nanotecnología;

PDF (English) XML (English)

Citas

  1. L. Trans, J. Navas, “Las NA y la salud la nanotoxicología y la evaluación del riesgo de las nanopartículas artificiales (ERNA),” Seguridad y medio ambiente, vol. 114, pp. 6-16, 2009.
  2. P. K. Pullela, S. Korrapati, K. Sharan Teja Reddy, V. Uthirapathy, “Concentration of gold nanoparticles at near Zero-cost,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 54, pp. 255-258, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.306
  3. X. Joseph, V. Akhil, A. Arathi, P. V. Mohanan, “Nanobiomaterials in support of drug delivery related issues,” Materials Science and Engineering: B, vol. 279, e115680, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115680
  4. A. Haleem, M. Javaid, R. P. Singh, S. Rab, R. Suman, “Applications of nanotechnology in medical field: a brief review,” Global Health Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 70-77, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2023.02.008
  5. M. Azzawi, A. Seifalian, W. Ahmed, “Nanotechnology for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases,” Nanomedicine, vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 2025-2027, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-8000
  6. M. Ullah et al., “Modified gold and polymeric gold nanostructures: Toxicology and biomedical applications,” Colloid and Interface Science Communications, vol. 42, e100412, May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100412
  7. M. Usman et al., “Nanotechnology in agriculture: Current status, challenges and future opportunities,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 721, e137778, Jun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137778
  8. K. Neme, A. Nafady, S. Uddin, Y. B. Tola, “Application of nanotechnology in agriculture, postharvest loss reduction and food processing: food security implication and challenges,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, e08539, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08539
  9. G. Pandey, “Challenges and future prospects of agri-nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture in India,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 11, pp. 299–307, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.06.012
  10. X. Zhang, X. Cheng, Q. Zhang, “Nanostructured energy materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage: A review,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 967–984, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.11.003
  11. M. Abdullah, S. K. Kamarudin, “Titanium dioxide nanotubes (TNT) in energy and environmental applications: An overview,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 212-225, Sep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.057
  12. S. Shen et al., “Titanium dioxide nanostructures for photoelectrochemical applications,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 98, pp. 299–385, Oct. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.07.006
  13. S. Kour et al., “Artificial intelligence and nanotechnology for cervical cancer treatment: Current status and future perspectives,” Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology., vol. 83, e104392, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104392
  14. H. Singh, K. Kaur, “Role of nanotechnology in research fields: Medical sciences, military & tribology- A review on recent advancements, grand challenges and perspectives,” Materials Today: Proceedings, In-Press, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.061
  15. O. Spykman, A. Emberger-Klein, A. Gabriel, M. Gandorfer, “Autonomous agriculture in public perception - German consumer segments’ view of crop robots,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 202, e107385, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107385
  16. Y. Yang, P. Jiao, “Nanomaterials and nanotechnology for biomedical soft robots,” Materials Today Advances, vol. 17, e100338, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100338
  17. R. K. Ibrahim, M. Hayyan, M. A. AlSaadi, A. Hayyan, S. Ibrahim, “Environmental application of nanotechnology: air, soil, and water,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 13754-13788, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6457-z
  18. S. Khan, M. Naushad, A. Al-Gheethi, J. Iqbal, “Engineered nanoparticles for removal of pollutants from wastewater: Current status and future prospects of nanotechnology for remediation strategies,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, e106160, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106160
  19. G. Chellasamy, R. M. Kiriyanthan, T. Maharajan, A. Radha, K. Yun, “Remediation of microplastics using bionanomaterials: A review,” Environmental Research, vol. 208, e112724, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112724
  20. W. K. Dodds, J. P. Guinnip, A. E. Schechner, P. J. Pfaff, E. B. Smith, “Fate and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials in the environment: A meta-analysis,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 796, e148843, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148843
  21. S. A. Younis et al., “Advancements of nanotechnologies in crop promotion and soil fertility: Benefits, life cycle assessment, and legislation policies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 152, e111686, Dec. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111686
  22. Y. Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Gu, C. Chen, Y. Zhao, “Toxicity of manufactured nanomaterials,” Particuology, vol. 69, pp. 31-48, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2021.11.007
  23. H. R. Tschiche et al., “Environmental considerations and current status of grouping and regulation of engineered nanomaterials,” Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management, vol. 18, e100707, Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100707
  24. Y. Wen, “China’s industrial revolution: A new perspective,” China Economic Review, vol. 69, e101671, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101671
  25. H. Dong, Y. Gao, P. J. Sinko, Z. Wu, J. Xu, L. Jia, “The nanotechnology race between China and the United States,” Nano Today, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7-12, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.02.001
  26. H. Wu, J. Lin, H.-M. Wu, “Investigating the real effect of China’s patent surge: New evidence from firm-level patent quality data,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 204, pp. 422-442, Dec. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.004
  27. G. C. Delgado-Ramos, “Nanotechnology in Mexico: Global trends and national implications for policy and regulatory issues,” Technology in Society, vol. 37, pp. 4-15, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.005
  28. G. Foladori, “Políticas Públicas En Nanotecnología En América Latina,” Problemas del Desarrollo, vol. 47, no. 186, pp. 59-81, Jul. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpd.2016.03.002
  29. L. Klüver et al., “EUROpTA: European Participatory Technology Assessment - Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making,” Copenhagen, DK., 2000. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/europta-european-participatory-technology-assessment-participator
  30. P. F. C. Fonseca, T. S. Pereira, “The governance of nanotechnology in the Brazilian context: Entangling approaches,” Technology in Society, vol. 37, pp. 16-27, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.07.003
  31. S. A. Martel Estrada, “Reflexiones éticas relacionadas con el uso e investigación de la nanotecnología,” Espacio I+D, Innovación más Desarrollo, vol. 11, no. 29, pp. 62-85, Feb. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31644/IMASD.29.2022.a05
  32. M. Vanegas-Chamorro, M. M. Cely-Bautista, E. Villicaña-Ortiz, D. Mendoza-Cáceres, V. Visbal-Vanegas, “Current Status of Solar-Thermal and Solar-Photovoltaic Technology Development at the International Level,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 112-122, Nov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13699
  33. N. J. van Eck, L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523-538, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  34. M. Akbari, M. Khodayari, M. Danesh, A. Davari, H. Padash, “A bibliometric study of sustainable technology research,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 7, e1751906, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1751906
  35. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), World Intellectual Property Indicators, Switzerland, 2022. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.47082
  36. G. Gaurav, A. Sharma, G. S. Dangayach, M. L. Meena, “Bibliometric analysis of machining of titanium alloy research,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 44, pp. 4031-4038, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.217
  37. M. D. Cobb, J. Macoubrie, “Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 395-405, Aug. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4
  38. M. R. Wiesner, G. V. Lowry, P. Alvarez, D. Dionysiou, P. Biswas, “Assessing the Risks of Manufactured Nanomaterials,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 4336-4345, Jul. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062726m
  39. K. Donaldson et al., “Carbon Nanotubes: A Review of Their Properties in Relation to Pulmonary Toxicology and Workplace Safety,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 5-22, Jul. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj130
  40. Q. Chaudhry et al., “Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector,” Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 241-258, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701744538
  41. S. Bhattacharya, J. Pushkaran, Nanotechnology Development in India: Investigating Ten Years of India’s Efforts in Capacity Building, India, 2016. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4409.8967
  42. R. Malik, S. Patil, “Nanotechnology: Regulatory Outlook on Nanomaterials and Nanomedicines in United States, Europe and India,” Applied clinical research, clinical trials and regulatory, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225-236, Dec. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2174/2213476X06666191129094236
  43. M. M. Cely-Bautista, G. Castellar-Ortega, J. Jaramillo-Colpas, “Emerging Technologies in the Development of Metallic and Bimetallic Nanoparticles in the Last Decade: A Scientometric Analysis,” Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 177-188, Jun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.2.7
  44. M. Bottini, A. Magrini, N. Bottini, A. Bergamaschi, “Nanotubes and fullerenes: An overview of the possible environmental and biological impact of bio-nanotechnologies,” Medicina del Lavoro, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 497-505, 2003. https://hdl.handle.net/2108/50323
  45. Nature, Nanotech is not so scary, Jan. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1038/421299a
  46. A. J. Kattoor, N. V. K. Pothineni, D. Palagiri, J. L. Mehta, “Oxidative Stress in Atherosclerosis,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 19, no. 11, e42, Nov. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-017-0678-6
  47. A. Kahru, H.-C. Dubourguier, “From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology,” Toxicology, vol. 269, no. 2–3, pp. 105-119, Mar. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.016
  48. G. Bystrzejewska-Piotrowska, J. Golimowski, P. L. Urban, “Nanoparticles: Their potential toxicity, waste and environmental management,” Waste Management, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2587-2595, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.04.001
  49. H. Bouwmeester et al., “Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 52-62, Feb. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.008
  50. G. Oberdörster, “Safety assessment for nanotechnology and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 89-105, Jan. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02187.x
  51. A. Rathore, G. Mahesh, “Public perception of nanotechnology: A contrast between developed and developing countries,” Technology in Society, vol. 67, e101751, Nov. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101751

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a