Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Morphological Description of Lucilia purpurascens (Walker, 1836) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), Boyacá-Colombia Strain

Abstract

Flies of the family Calliphoridae are relevant in medico-legal investigations. Lucilia purpurascens is a specie belonging to this family which has been reported in different countries, including Colombia. Although there are records for Boyacá, there are no scientific publications to support them. The genus Lucilia has challenges in taxonomically separating its species due to synonyms, and L. purpurascens is an example of this. taking into account the above, the study aimed to identify and describe the main morphological characteristics of L. purpurascens from the Department of Boyacá. Adults, including males and females from L. purpurascens were collected and colonized under laboratory conditions. Daily individuals of all stages of development were taken out. Larvae were rinsed and fixed on permanent plates. A distinctive feature of the third-instar larva was the pattern of double-ended spines. Regarding adults, there was a marked sexual dimorphism, evident in the silver parafacial in males and orange in females, as well as a difference in the size of the mean ocellus. In general, taxonomic characters of the calyptras, ampulla, and wings were described, which combined are relevant for the taxonomic identification of the species using both males and females. The characters were registered photographically, which will facilitate the correct identification through traditional taxonomy. The present work presents for the first time the complete description of the female of L. purpurascens.

Keywords

Forensic Entomology, Lucilia purpurascens, Morphology, Calliphoridae, Taxonomy, Lucilia purpurescens

PDF (Español)

References

  1. B. Greenberg, «Flies as forensic indicators», J. Med. Entomol., vol. 28, n.o 5, pp. 565-577, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/28.5.565
  2. J. D. Wells y B. Greenberg, «Resource use by an introduced and native carrion fly», Oecologia, vol. 99, n.o 1, pp. 181-187, sep. 1994, doi: 10.1007/BF00317099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317099
  3. S. A. Marshall, Fliesthe natural history & diversity of diptera, n.o 595.77 M3. 2012.
  4. J. H. Byrd y J. K. Tomberlin, Forensic Entomology: The Utility of Arthropods in Legal Investigations, Third Edition. CRC Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351163767
  5. M. Wolff, S. S. Nihei, y C. J. B. D. Carvalho, «Catalogue of Diptera of Colombia: an introduction», Zootaxa, vol. 4122, n.o 1, p. 8, jun. 2016, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4122.1.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4122.1.3
  6. T. Pape, M. Wolff, y E. Amat, «Los califóridos, éstridos, rinofóridos y sarcofágidos (Diptera: Calliphoridae, Oestridae, Rhinophoridae, Sarcophagidae) de Colombia», Biota Colomb., vol. 5, pp. 201-208, ene. 2004.
  7. M. A. T. Marinho, M. Wolff, Y. Ramos-Pastrana, A. M. L. de Azeredo-Espin, y D. de S. Amorim, «The first phylogenetic study of Mesembrinellidae (Diptera: Oestroidea) based on molecular data: clades and congruence with morphological characters», Cladistics, vol. 33, n.o 2, pp. 134-152, abr. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cla.12157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12157
  8. J. H. Byrd y J. L. Castner, «Forensic entomology the utility of arthropods in legal investigations», 2001. http://www.crcnetbase.com/isbn/9781420036947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420036947
  9. G. Anderson, «The use of Insects in Death Investigations: An Analysis of Cases in British Columbia over a Five-Year Period», Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J., vol. 28, pp. 277-292, ene. 1995, doi: 10.1080/00085030.1995.10757488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.1995.10757488
  10. M. Arnaldos, M. Garcia, E. Romera, J. Presa, y A. Luna, «Estimation of postmortem interval in real cases based on experimentally obtained entomological evidence», Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 149, n.o 1, pp. 57-65, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.087
  11. C. Costa, S. Ide, y C. E. Simonka, Insetos imaturos: metamorfose e identificação. Holos Editora, 2006.
  12. E. Martinez, P. Duque, y M. Wolff, «Succession pattern of carrion-feeding insects in Paramo, Colombia», Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 166, n.o 2, pp. 182-189, mar. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.027
  13. N. A. Segura, W. Usaquén, M. C. Sánchez, L. Chuaire, y F. Bello, «Succession pattern of cadaverous entomofauna in a semi-rural area of Bogotá, Colombia», Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 187, n.o 1-3, Art. n.o 1-3, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.018
  14. Y. Samung, K. Palakul, C. Apiwathnasorn, S. Prummongkol, A. Asavanich, y S. Leemingsawat, «Laboratory colonization of Mansonia mosquitoes with an emphasis on Ma. annulata and Ma. bonneae», Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, vol. 37, n.o 4, p. 656, 2006.
  15. J. Amendt, M. L. Goff, C. P. Campobasso, y M. Grassberger, Eds., Current Concepts in Forensic Entomology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9684-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9684-6
  16. E. P. Catts, «Problems in Estimating the Postmortem Interval in Death Investigationsl», J. Agric. Entomol., vol. 9, n.o 4, Art. n.o 4, 1992.
  17. E. Florez y M. Wolff, «Descripción y clave de los estadios inmaduros de las principales especies de Calliphoridae (Diptera) de importancia forense en Colombia», Neotrop. Entomol., vol. 38, n.o 3, pp. 418-429, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2009000300019
  18. R. Carmo, D. Oliveira, T. Barbosa, T. Soares, J. Souza, y S. Vasconcelos, «Visitors versus colonizers: An empirical study on the use of vertebrate carcasses by necrophagous Diptera in a rainforest fragment», Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., vol. 110, n.o 5, pp. 492-500, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/sax045
  19. D. Martín-Vega, C. Martín Nieto, B. Cifrián, A. Baz, y L. M. Díaz-Aranda, «Early colonisation of urban indoor carcasses by blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae): An experimental study from central Spain», Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 278, pp. 87-94, sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.036
  20. F. Masiero, M. Aquino, M. Nassu, D. Pereira, D. Leite, y P. Thyssen, «First record of larval secretions of Cochliomyia macellaria (Fabricius, 1775) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa», Neotrop. Entomol., vol. 46, n.o 1, pp. 125-129, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-016-0444-4
  21. L. Davydov, «Maggot Therapy in Wound Management in Modern Era and a Review of Published Literature», J. Pharm. Pract., vol. 24, pp. 89-93, feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0897190010366938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190010366938
  22. A. Jones y K. Lagan, «Larval therapy in wound management: A review», Int. J. Clin. Pract., vol. 61, pp. 488-93, abr. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01238.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01238.x
  23. A.-K. Pöppel et al., «Lucimycin, an antifungal peptide from the therapeutic maggot of the common green bottle fly Lucilia sericata», Biol. Chem., vol. 395, n.o 6, pp. 649-656, jun. 2014, doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2013-0263
  24. R. A. Sherman, «Maggot Therapy for Foot and Leg Wounds», Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds, vol. 1, n.o 2, pp. 135-142, jun. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1534734602001002009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734602001002009
  25. A. K. Sig, O. Koru, y E. Araz, «Maggot debridement therapy: Utility in chronic wounds and a perspective beyond», oct. 2018.
  26. R. A. Sherman, «Maggot therapy for treating diabetic foot ulcers unresponsive to conventional therapy», Diabetes Care, vol. 26, n.o 2, pp. 446-451, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2.446
  27. M. Araghi, F. Eskandari, y E. Gilasian, «Avian wound myiasis caused by Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in an immature migrating eastern imperial eagle (Aquila heliacal Savigny) (Aves: Accipitridae) in south-western Iran», J Vet Sci Technol, vol. 6, p. 212, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000212
  28. A. Fenton, R. Wall, y N. French, «The effect of farm management strategies on the incidence of sheep strike in Britain: a simulation analysis», Vet. Parasitol., vol. 79, n.o 4, pp. 341-357, nov. 1998, doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00174-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00174-5
  29. E. Amat, M. C. Vélez, y M. Wolff, «CLAVE ILUSTRADA PARA LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LOS GÉNEROS Y LAS ESPECIES DE CALIFÓRIDOS (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) DE COLOMBIA», Caldasia, vol. 30, n.o 1, Art. n.o 1, 2008.
  30. C. J. Carvalho y C. A. Mello-Patiu, «Key to the most common forensic species of Diptera in South America», Rev. Bras. Entomol., vol. 52, n.o 3, Art. n.o 3, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262008000300012
  31. N. Jones, T. Whitworth, y S. Marshall, «Blow flies of North America: Keys to the subfamilies and genera of Calliphoridae, and to the species of the subfamilies Calliphorinae, Luciliinae and Chrysomyinae.», Can. J. Arthropod Identif., n.o 39, 2019.
  32. C. Kosmann, R. P. De Mello, É. S. H. Souza, y J. R. P. Luz, «A list of current valid blow fly names (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in the Americas South of Mexico with key to the Brazilian species», EntomoBrasilis, vol. 6, n.o 1, pp. 74-85, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v6i1.266
  33. Y. Velásquez, A. I. Martínez-Sánchez, A. Thomas, y S. Rojo, «Checklist and distribution maps of the blow flies of Venezuela (Diptera, Calliphoridae, Mesembrinellidae)», ZooKeys, vol. 645, pp. 103-132, ene. 2017, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.645.6972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.645.6972
  34. T. Whitworth, «Keys to the genera and species of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of the West Indies and description of a new species of Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy», Zootaxa, vol. 2663, pp. 1-35, nov. 2010, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.2663.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2663.1.1
  35. T. Whitworth, «A revision of the Neotropical species of Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Calliphoridae)», Zootaxa, vol. 3810, n.o 1, Art. n.o 1, may 2014, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3810.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3810.1.1
  36. C. De Carvalho y P. Ribeiro, «Chave de identificação das espécies de Calliphoridae (Diptera) do Sul do Brasil», Rev Bras Parasitol Vet, vol. 9, n.o 2, pp. 169-173, 2000.
  37. X. Acosta, N. D. Centeno, A. X. González-Reyes, y J. A. Corronca, «Contributions to the Estimation of the Postmortem Interval Through the Length and Body Weight of Two Indigenous Species of South America: Lucilia ochricornis (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and Lucilia purpurascens», J. Med. Entomol., vol. 58, n.o 2, pp. 548-557, mar. 2021, doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa224
  38. X. Acosta, A. X. González-Reyes, J. A. Corronca, y N. D. Centeno, «Estimation of the Postmortem Interval Through the Use of Development Time of Two South American Species of Forensic Importance of the Genus Lucilia (Diptera: Calliphoridae)», J. Med. Entomol., vol. 58, n.o 3, pp. 1064-1073, may 2021, doi: 10.1093/jme/tjab001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab001
  39. S. Córdoba-Córdoba, K. G. Borja Acosta, y C. A. Medina-Uribe, «Caracterización rápida de flora y fauna de Gachantivá, Reservas naturales de la sociedad civil Cochauira, Furatena, Buenavista», 2017.
  40. C. Pérez, N. A. Segura, M. A. Patarroyo, y F. J. Bello, «Evaluating the Biological Cycle and Reproductive and Population Parameters of Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Reared on Three Different Diets», J. Med. Entomol., vol. 53, n.o 6, pp. 1268-1275, nov. 2016, doi: 10.1093/jme/tjw114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjw114
  41. N. A. Segura y Camacho, G. P., «Procedimiento Estandarizado de Trabajo-CICLO DE VIDA DE DÍPTEROS COLONIZADORES (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) DE CADÁVERES HUMANOS EN BOGOTÁ D.C. COMO HERRAMIENTA PARA LA DETERMINACIÓN DEL TIEMPO DE MUERTE». Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses.
  42. K. Smith, A Manual of Forensic Entomology. Cromwell Road, London: British Museum & Connel University Press, 1986.
  43. N. Bunchu, C. Thaipakdee, A. Vitta, S. Sanit, K. Sukontason, y K. L. Sukontason, «Morphology and developmental rate of the blow fly, Hemipyrellia ligurriens (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Forensic entomology applications», J. Parasitol. Res., vol. 2012, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/371243
  44. M. Esposito y F. Carvalho, «Composição e abundância de califorídeos e mesembrinelídeos (Insecta, Diptera) nas clareiras e matas da base de extração petrolífera, Bacia do Rio Urucu, Coari, Amazonas», presentado en II Workshop de Avaliação Técnica e Científica, Manaus, 2006.
  45. J. C. MARILUIS, «DESCRIPCION DE LOS ESTADOS EVOLUTIVOS DE PHAENICIA PURPURESCENS (WALKER, 1837) (CALLIPHORIDAE, CALLIPHORINAE, LUCILIINI).», Rev. Soc. Entomológica Argent., vol. 47, n.o 1-4, 1989.
  46. M. Begon, C. R. Townsend, y J. L. Harper, Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
  47. K. Clark, L. Evans, y R. Wall, «Growth rates of the blowfly, Lucilia sericata, on different body tissues», Forensic Sci. Int., vol. 156, n.o 2-3, pp. 145-149, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.12.025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.