Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 7 No. 28 (2021)
Cuestiones de Filosofía

ARTICLES

The problem of evil in Arendt's work Analysis of the legal dimension

https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.11495

Published 2021-04-29

  • María Elena Wagon

María Elena Wagon
Universidad Nacional del Sur / CONICET, Argentina

Abstract

Radical evil and the banality of evil are the two ways in which Arendt has cataloged totalitarian evil at different stages of his work. The aim of this paper is to approach the different Arendtian conceptions of evil from a legal perspective in order to determine whether there are continuities or whether, on the contrary, there is an abrupt change in Arendt’s thinking. The difficulty that must be faced is that the problem of evil and the legal question are not issues addressed by Arendt directly but are transversal contents that must be traced in the totality of his work. It is concluded that radical evil and the banality of evil are not mutually exclusive notions but rather function as expressions that refer to two different levels, one more general and structural and the other linked to the behavior of individuals within the government structures studied.

Keywords

radical evil, banality of evil, legal dimension, law

HTML (Español) PDF (Español)

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1964). Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the Banality of Evil. New York: The Viking Press.
  2. Arendt, H. (1972). Civil Disovedience. Crises of the Republic (pp. 49-102). San Diego / New York / London: Harcourt Brace & Company.
  3. Arendt, H. (1998a). Intercambio epistolar entre Gershom Scholem y Hannah Arendt. Raíces, 36, pp. 23-33. https://majshavot.org/includes/uploads/articulos/e56db-intercambio-epistolar-entre-scholem-y-arendt.pdf
  4. Arendt, H. (1998b). Los orígenes del totalitarismo. Buenos Aires: Taurus.
  5. Arendt, H. (2003). Eichmann en Jerusalén. Un estudio sobre la banalidad del mal. Barcelona: Lumen.
  6. Arendt, H. (2006). Sobre la revolución. Madrid: Alianza.
  7. Arendt, H. (2007). Algunas cuestiones sobre filosofía moral. Responsabilidad y juicio (pp. 75-150). Barcelona: Paidós.
  8. Bernstein, R. (2000). ¿Cambió Hannah Arendt de opinión? Del mal radical a la banalidad del mal. F. Birulés (Ed.), Hannah Arendt y el orgullo de pensar (pp. 235-257). Barcelona: Gedisa.
  9. Bernstein, R. (2004). El mal radical: una indagación filosófica. Buenos Aires: Lilmod.
  10. Birulés, F. (2007). Una herencia sin testamento: Hannah Arendt. Barcelona: Herder.
  11. Canclini, R. (2016). Un mundo para la acción. Subjetividades políticas y ley en Hannah Arendt. Bahía Blanca: Ediuns.
  12. Clarke, B. (1980). Beyond ‘The Banality of Evil’. British Journal of Political Science, 10 (4), pp. 417-439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002325
  13. Di Pego, A. (2007). Las concepciones del mal en la obra de Hannah Arendt. Crítica de la modernidad y retorno a la filosofía. Al Margen, 21-22 (1), pp. 1-15. http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.8413/pr.8413.pdf
  14. Formosa, P. (2007). Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical? Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33 (6), pp. 717-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707080585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707080585
  15. Hayden, P. (2010). The Relevance of Hannah Arendt’s Reflections on Evil: Globalization and Rightlessness. Human Rights Review, 11 (4), pp. 451-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0157-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0157-8
  16. Ilivitzky, M. (2017). Del “mal radical” a la “banalidad del mal”. Buenos Aires: Teseo.
  17. Kauppinen, J. (2010). Hannah Arendt’s Thesis on Different Modes of Evil. M. Ojakangas (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: Practice, Thought and Judgement (pp. 48-66). Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies.
  18. Marrades, J. (2002). La radicalidad del mal banal. Logos. Anales del seminario de metafísica, 35, pp. 79-103. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/ASEM0202110079A
  19. Pendas, D. (2007). Eichmann in Jerusalem, Arendt in Frankfurt: The Eichmann Trial, the Auschwitz Trial, and the Banality of Justice. New German Critique, 100, pp. 77-109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27669188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-2006-019
  20. Villa, D. (1999a). Conscience, the Banality of Evil, and the Idea of a Representative Perpetrator. Politics, Philosophy, Terror. Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt (pp. 39-60). Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823161.39
  21. Villa, D. (1999b). Terror and Radical Evil. Politics, Philosophy, Terror. Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt (pp. 11-38). Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823161
  22. Young-Bruehl, E. (1993). Hannah Arendt. Valencia: Edicions Alfons el Magnànim-IVEI.
  23. Young-Bruehl, E. (2004). Hannah Arendt. For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.