Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 30 No. 58 (2021)
October-December 2021 (Continuous Publication)

Papers

Conceptions and Perceptions of Software Industry Professionals on Team Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Comparative Study

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v30.n58.2021.13817

Published 2021-12-10

Sandra-Marcela Guerrero-Calvache
Universidad de Nariño

Giovanni Hernández
Universidad Mariana

Abstract

Agile software development (ASD) has generated different benefits in organizations and in the Software Industry, mainly in improving productivity. For ASD teams this indicator plays a fundamental role since it helps determine their performance. However, evaluating productivity is a great challenge and the way in which this concept has been approached in the literature is very limited. The objective of this article is to contrast the conceptions of productivity at the team level from an ASD perspective with the perceptions that professionals in the software industry have. For the methodological design, the notions of team productivity presented in the literature were identified and compared with the perceptions of 72 professionals from the software industry collected through a survey following the protocol proposed by Kitchenham and Pfleeger. The main results show that the concept of team productivity in the literature is associated with a set of dimensions related to satisfaction, delivery of functional software, and knowledge transfer. On the part of the respondents, a perception of general productivity centered on dimensions of customer satisfaction, activity management, and early identification of the problem to be solved is evidenced. It can be concluded that the professionals' imaginaries focus on presenting productivity from a generic perspective and its dimensions do not necessarily involve teamwork.

Keywords

Agile Software Development, Productivity Conceptions, Productivity Perceptions, Team, Team Productivity

PDF XML

Author Biography

Sandra-Marcela Guerrero-Calvache

Roles: Conceptualization, Research, Content -Curation, Methodology, Writing -Original draft, Writing –Review &editing.

Giovanni Hernández

Roles: Conceptualization, Research, Content-Curation, Methodology, Writing -Original draft, Writing –Review &editing.

References

  1. A. Hernández-López, “Medidas de productividad en los proyectos de desarrollo de software: una aproximación por puestos de trabajo,” Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, España, 2014. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/29406077.pdf
  2. A. Hernández, R. Colomo, Á. García, “Productivity in software engineering: A study of its meanings for practitioners: Understanding the concept under their standpoint,” in 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012), Madrid, España, 2012, pp. 1–6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6263205
  3. M. A. Maldonado-Arango, “Factores que afectan la productividad en equipos Scrum analizados con pensamiento sistémico,” Master Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia 2017.https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/59778/71275549.2017.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  4. E. Oliveira, T. Conte, M. Cristo, E. Mendes, “Software Project Managers’ Perceptions of Productivity Factors: Findings from a Qualitative Study,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Ciudad Real, España 2016, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962626
  5. G. Hernández, A. Navarro, R. Jiménez, F. Jiménez, “Cómo los profesionales perciben la relevancia de las métricas de productividad para un equipo ágil de desarrollo de software,” Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologías de Informação, no. E32, pp. 596–609, 2020
  6. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, J. Ron, J. Kern, B. Marick, R. Martin, S. Mellor, K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, D. Tho, Manifiesto por el Desarrollo Ágil, 2001. https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/es/manifesto.html
  7. E. Mike, S. Joanne, M. Tanner, J.-P. Van Belle, S. Watt, “The Impact of Collocation on the Effectiveness of Agile IS Development Teams,” Communications of the IBIMA, vol. 2010, no. 2010, pp. 1-11, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.959194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2010.959194
  8. D. C. Smith, M. Harris, P. Myersclough, A. Wood. “Building Highly Effective Information Systems Project Teams: An Explanatory Study”, in Project Management Research at the Turn of the Millennium, Paris, France. 2000, pp. 419–429. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/building-information-systems-project-teams-1074
  9. G. Hernández, Á. Martínez, R. Jiménez, F. Jiménez, “Métricas de productividad para equipo de trabajo de desarrollo ágil de software: una revisión sistemática,” TecnoLógicas, vol. 22, pp. 63–81, 2019. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.1510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.1510
  10. S. M. A. Shah, E. Papatheocharous, J. Nyfjord, “Measuring Productivity in Agile Software Development Process: A Scoping Study,” in International Conference on Software and System Process, Tallinn, Estonia, 2015, pp. 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785592.2785618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2785592.2785618
  11. C. Melo, D. S. Cruzes, F. Kon, R. Conradi, “Agile Team Perceptions of Productivity Factors,” in Agile Conference, Salt Lake City, USA, 2011, pp. 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.35
  12. C. de O. Melo, D. S. Cruzes, F. Kon, R. Conradi, “Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 412–427, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.09.004
  13. I. Fatema, K. Sakib, “Factors Influencing Productivity of Agile Software Development Teamwork: A Qualitative System Dynamics Approach,” in 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), Nanjing, China, 2017, pp. 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2017.95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2017.95
  14. J. Iqbal, M. Omar, A. Yasin, “An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Agile Teams on Software Productivity,” in 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan, 2019, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMET.2019.8673413
  15. S. L. Ramírez-Mora, H. Oktaba, “Team Maturity in Agile Software Development: The Impact on Productivity,” in IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), Madrid, España, 2018, pp. 732–736, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00091
  16. F. Tavakoli, T. J. Gandomani, “A Novel Team Productivity Model for XP Teams,” Journal of Cases on Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 93–109, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2018100106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2018100106
  17. K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, M. Mattsson, “Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering,” in 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Italia, 2008, pp. 68–77. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2227115.2227123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8
  18. Elsevier, Scopus, La mayor base de datos de bibliografía revisada por pares, 2021. https://www.elsevier.com/es-mx/solutions/scopus
  19. B. A. Kitchenham, S. L. Pfleeger, “Chapter 3 Personal Opinion Surveys,” in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, London: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp-63-92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_3
  20. S. L. Ramírez-Mora, H. Oktaba, “Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study,” in 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT), Merida, Mexico, 2017, pp. 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00013

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.