Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 25 No. 43 (2016)

Papers

Production of building elements based on alkali-activated red clay brick waste

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v25.n43.2016.5294

Published 2016-09-01

  • Rafael Andres Robayo-Salazar
    • ,
  • Ruby Mejía de Gutiérrez
    • ,
  • Alexandra Jimena Mulford-Carvajal

Rafael Andres Robayo-Salazar
Universidad del Valle (Cali – Valle del Cauca, Colombia).

Ruby Mejía de Gutiérrez
Universidad del Valle (Cali – Valle del Cauca, Colombia).

Alexandra Jimena Mulford-Carvajal
Universidad del Valle (Cali – Valle del Cauca, Colombia).

Abstract

This paper analyzes the feasibility of reusing a red clay brick waste (RCBW) in order to produce building elements such as blocks, pavers and tiles, by using the technique of alkaline activation. The production of these building elements was based on the design of a hybrid mortar with 48.61 MPa of compressive strength, at 28 curing days at room temperature (25 °C). The hybrid mortar was synthesized by adding 10% by weight of Portland cement (OPC) to the RCBW, Red Clay Brick Waste. As alkaline activators were used commercial industrial grade sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3). Building elements were physically and mechanically characterized, according to Colombian Technical Standards (NTC). This technology process is presented as an alternative for the reuse of RCBW and its contribution to the environmental sustainability.

Keywords

alkaline activation, building elements, geopolymer mortars, Red Clay Brick Waste (RCBW)

PDF (Español) HTML (Español)

References

  1. Habla Zig-Zag Kilns, “Brick Market”, 2015, Disponible en: http://www.hablakilns.com/pages/industry/brick-market.
  2. F. Pacheco-Torgal et al., Eco-efficient Masonry Bricks and Blocks, Design, Properties and Durability, Cap 1. “Introduction to eco-efficient masonry bricks and blocks”, pp. 1-10, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-305-8.00001-2
  3. F. Pacheco-Torgal and S. Jalali, “Reusing ceramics waste in concrete,” Construct. Build. Mater., vol. 24 (5), pp. 832-838, May. 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.023
  4. L. Reig et al., “Properties and microstructure of alkali-activated red clay brick waste,” Construct. Build. Mater., vol. 43, pp. 98-106, Jun. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.031
  5. . J. Xiao et al., “An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996-2011),” Construct. Build. Mater., vol. 31, pp. 364-383, Jun. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.074
  6. H. Yuan et al., “A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste,” Waste Management, vol. 32 (3), pp. 521-531, Mar. 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.006
  7. European Commission, “Resource Efficient Use of Mixed Wastes; Environment, Waste, Studies,” 2015. Disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/mixed_waste.htm.
  8. M. Bravo et al., “Mechanical performance of concrete made with aggregates from construction and demolition waste recycling plants,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 99, pp. 59-74, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.012
  9. A. Chávez, N. Guarín, and M. C. Cortés, “Determinación de propiedades físico-químicas de los materiales agregados en muestra de escombros en la ciudad de Bogotá,” Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, vol. 12 (22), pp. 45-58, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v12n22a4
  10. N. L. Guarín et al., “Estudio comparativo en la gestión de residuos de construcción y demolición en Brasil y Colombia,” Revista Gestión Integral en Ingeniería Neogranadina, vol. 3 (2), pp. 14, 2011.
  11. J. Castaño et al., “Gestión de residuos de construcción y demolición (RCD) en Bogotá: Perspectivas y limitantes,” Revista Tecnura, vol. 38 (17), pp. 121-129, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.tecnura.2013.4.a09
  12. R. Robayo et al., “Los residuos de la construcción y demolición en la ciudad de Cali: un análisis hacia su gestión, manejo y aprovechamiento,” Revista Tecnura, vol 19 (44), pp. 157-170, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.tecnura.2015.2.a12
  13. F. Puertas et al., “Residuos cerámicos para su posible uso como materia prima en la fabricación de Clinker de cemento portland: Caracterización y activación alcalina,” Mater. Construcc., vol. 56 (281), pp. 7-84, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2006.v56.i281.94
  14. A. Allahverdi and E. N. Kani, “Construction waste as raw materials for geopolymer binders,” Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng., vol. 7 (3), pp. 154-160, 2009.
  15. A. Allahverdi and E. N. Kani, “Use of construction and demolition waste (CDW) for alkali-activated or geopolymer cements,” Handbook of recycled concrete and demolition waste. Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering, Capítulo 18, pp. 439-475, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857096906.3.439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096906.3.439
  16. Z. Sun et al., “Synthesis and thermal behavior of geopolymer-type material from waste ceramic,” Construct. Build. Mater., vol. 49, pp. 281-287, Dec. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.063
  17. K. Komnitsas et al., “Effect of synthesis parameters on the quality of construction and demolition wastes (CDW) geopolymers,” Adv. Powder Technol., vol. 26 (2), pp. 368-376, Mar. 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.11.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.11.012
  18. Grupo Materiales Compuestos (GMC). Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia. Disponible en: http://investigaciongmc.univalle.edu.co/index.html.
  19. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 2017), “Adoquines de concreto para pavimentos,” Bogotá, Icontec, 2004.
  20. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 2086), “Tejas de arcilla,” Bogotá, Icontec, 1996.
  21. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 4024), “Muestreo y ensayo de prefabricados de concreto reforzados y vibrocompactados,” Bogotá, Icontec, 2001.
  22. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 4026), “Unidades de concreto (bloques y ladrillos), para mampostería estructural,” Bogotá, Icontec, 1997.
  23. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 220), “Determinación de la resistencia de morteros de cemento hidráulico usando cubos de 50 mm o 50,8 mm de lado,” Bogotá, Icontec, 2004.
  24. Norma técnica colombiana (NTC 118), “Método de ensayo para determinar el tiempo de fraguado del cemento hidráulico mediante el aparato de Vicat,” Bogotá, Icontec, 2004.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.