Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022)
Julio - Diciembre

ARTICULOS DE INVESTIGACION

Comparative analysis of assertiveness for three built-up zone indexes applied to Colombian cities

https://doi.org/10.19053/1900771X.v22.n2.2022.15018

Published 2022-09-29

  • Julián Leal Villamil
    • ,
  • Mauricio Alejandro Perea Ardila
    • ,
  • Gabriel Alexis Santa Ramírez

Julián Leal Villamil
Universidad del Tolima, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Grupo Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Fruticultura Tropical, Colombia

Mauricio Alejandro Perea Ardila
Centro de Investigaciones Oceanográficas e hidrográficas del Pacífico-CCCP, Área de Manejo Integrado de Zona Costera - AMIZC, Colombia

Gabriel Alexis Santa Ramírez
Corporación Autónoma Regional del Tolima – CORTOLIMA, Colombia

Abstract

The delimitation and Spatio-temporal characterization of built-up or urbanized areas in cities is a fundamental input for
territorial planning. Built-up Zone Indices are used to identify urban areas using remote sensing. The objective of this
study was to evaluate the multitemporal assertiveness (1997, 2002, 2007 and 2018) of three Built-up Zone Indices (NDBI,
UI and IBI) calculated in Landsat images for three Colombian cities. The images were enhanced through Remote Sensing
techniques and the Built-up Zone Indices were determined by taking into account the parameters established by their
creators. It means that 700 ground truth points (350 for the built-up zone and 350 for the non-built-up zone) were used to establish the multitemporal assertiveness using the Kappa Index. The results show that the index with the best overall multitemporal assertiveness was the NDBI (Kappa = 0.382), which was also the best performing for the largest city (Kappa = 0.566); for the intermediate size city, the most successful index was the UI (Kappa = 0.545). The evaluated indexes had null
Kappa values in the city of Espinal; discarding the results obtained in the latter city, the global assertiveness of the indexes can be increased to 0.573. Further research is needed to evaluate in detail the applicability and assertiveness of the indices
in the Colombian context, as well as the adjustments to the optimal value range for each particular city according to its architectural characteristics.

Keywords

Kappa Index, Landsat 8, Urban planning, Remote sensing, Urban area

PDF (Español)

Author Biography

Julián Leal Villamil

Ingeniero forestal y candidato a doctor en Planificación y Manejo Ambiental de Cuencas Hidrográficas de la Universidad del Tolima, becario doctoral mediante convocatoria 755/2016 COLCIENCIAS. Magíster en Planificación y Manejo Ambiental de Cuencas Hidrográficas, especialista en Formulación y Desarrollo de Proyectos e Ingeniero Forestal de la Universidad del Tolima. Ha sido reconocido a nivel nacional en varias oportunidades por su desempeño académico e investigativo, Investigador en grupos de investigación reconocidos por COLCIENCIAS como son el Grupo Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Fruticultura Tropical (Universidad del Tolima – AGROSAVIA), Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias del Suelo – GRICIS (Universidad del Tolima) y el Grupo de Investigación en Cuencas Hidrográficas (Universidad del Tolima). Autor de varios artículos en el campo del sensoramiento remoto, erosión de suelos, deslizamientos y cuencas hidrográficas en revistas científicas nacionales e internacionales, a su vez, ha sido ponente en varios congresos internacionales y par evaluador para diversas publicaciones científicas de orden nacional.

Mauricio Alejandro Perea Ardila

Ingeniero Forestal, Especialista en Geomática y MSc en Geographical Information System, Investigador científico del laboratorio de SIG y Sensores remotos del Área de Manejo integrado de Zona Costera del Centro de Investigaciones Oceanográficas e Hidrográficas del Pacífico-CCCP, experiencia interpretación y procesamiento de imágenes de sensores remotos de observación de la tierra en aplicaciones para la gestión y administración de los recursos naturales en ecosistemas andinos y marino-costeros; experiencia específica en el área de la Geomática para el monitoreo de bosques y el análisis espacial de información geográfica.

Gabriel Alexis Santa Ramírez

Ingeniero forestal de la Universidad del Tolima, ha sido autor de artículos en revistas indexadas nacionales al igual que ponente en las IX Jornadas de Educación en Percepción Remota y SIG para Centroamérica y el Caribe “Educación e innovación para el desarrollo sostenible”. Además, autor principal del artículo científico “caracterización morfométrica de deslizamientos presentados en la cuenca del río Combeima (Ibagué - Tolima, Colombia)”.

References

  1. W. Tu et al., “Portraying Urban Functional Zones by Coupling Remote Sensing Imagery and Human Sensing Data,” Remote Sen., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-20, Ene. 2018. https://doi. 10.3390/rs10010141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010141
  2. S. S. Bhatti and N. K. Tripathi, “Built-up area extraction using Landsat 8 OLI imagery,” GIScience Remote Sens., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 445-467, Jul. 2014. https://doi. 10.1080/15481603.2014.939539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2014.939539
  3. R. C. Estoque and Y. Murayama, “Classification and change detection of built-up lands from Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI/TIRS imageries: A comparative assessment of various spectral indices,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 56, pp. 205-217, Sep.2015. https://doi. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.037
  4. H. Xu, “A new index for delineating built‐up land features in satellite imagery,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 4269-4276, Jul. 2008. https://doi. 10.1080/01431160802039957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802039957
  5. Y. Zha, J. Gao, and S. Ni, “Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 583-594, Ene. 2003. https://doi.10.1080/01431160304987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160304987
  6. M. Kawamura, S. Jayamanna, and Y. Tsujiko, “Relation between social and environmental conditions in Colombo Sri Lanka and the urban index estimated by satellite remote sensing data,” Int. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 321-326, 1996. Disponible en: https://a-a-r-s.org/proceeding/ACRS1996/Papers/GLE96-3.htm
  7. M. Ichsan Ali, A. Hafid Hasim, and M. Raiz Abidin, “Monitoring the Built-up Area Transformation Using Urban Index and Normalized Difference Built-up Index Analysis,” Int. J. Eng., vol. 32, no. 5, May 2019. Disponible en: http://eprints.unm.ac.id/13396/8/Turnitin_Monitoring%20the%20Built-up%20Area%20Transformation%20Using%20Urban%20Index%20and%20Normalized%20Difference%20Built-up%20Index%20Analysis.pdf DOI:10.5829/ije.2019.32.05b.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2019.32.05b.04
  8. Shahfahad et al., “Indices based assessment of built-up density and urban expansion of fast growing Surat city using multi-temporal Landsat data sets,” GeoJournal, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1607-1623, Ago. 2021. https://doi.10.1007/s10708-020-10148-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10148-w
  9. P. Sinha, N. K. Verma, and E. Ayele, “Urban Built-up Area Extraction and Change Detection of Adama Municipal Area using Time-Series Landsat Images,” Int. J. Adv. Remote Sens. GIS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1886-1895, Ago. 2016. https://doi. 10.23953/cloud.ijarsg.67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23953/cloud.ijarsg.67
  10. Abhishek Bhatt, S. K. Ghosh, and Anil Kumar, “Spectral Indices Based Change Detection in an Urban Area Using Landsat Data,” en Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, K. Pant, M., Deep, K., Bansal, J., Nagar, A., Das, Ed. Singapur: Springer, 2016, pp. 425-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0451-3_39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0451-3_39
  11. C. Salas Pérez, D. Coy Castro, K. Acuña Ramírez, L. Páez Cuervo, and E. Upegui, “Crecimiento urbano e impermeabilización del suelo alrededor de la Reserva Forestal Thomas van der Hammen, en la ciudad de Bogotá,” Ambient. y Desarro., vol. 23, no. 44, Feb. 2019. https://doi.10.11144/Javeriana.ayd23-44.cuis DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ayd23-44.cuis
  12. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, “Proyecciones de población municipal para el periodo 2018 – 2035 con base en el CNPV 2018,” Secretaría Distrital de Planeación, 2019. Disponible en: https://www.sdp.gov.co/gestion-estudios-estrategicos/estudios-macro/censo-2018/proyecciones-de-poblacion.
  13. USGS, “Landsat Collection 2 level-1,” EarthExplorer, 2021. Disponible en: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
  14. A. Ariza, “Descripción y Corrección de Productos Landsat 8 LDCM (Landsat Data Continuity Mission) Versión 1.0,” 2013. Disponible en: https://www.un-spider.org/sites/default/files/LDCM-L8.R1.pdf
  15. G. Yin, G. Mariethoz, and M. McCabe, “Gap-Filling of Landsat 7 Imagery Using the Direct Sampling Method,” Remote Sens., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-20, Dic.2016. https://doi. 10.3390/rs9010012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010012
  16. QGIS, “QGIS Development Team ‘QGIS,’” Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2019. https://qgis.org/es/site/.
  17. R. G. Congalton, “A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 35-46, Jul. 1991,https://doi. 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
  18. S. V. Stehman, “Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 5243-5272, Sep. 2009. https://doi.10.1080/01431160903131000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903131000
  19. J. Cohen, “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37-46, Abr. 1960.https://doi.10.1177/001316446002000104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  20. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 159, Mar. 1977. https://doi.10.2307/2529310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  21. Y. XI, N. X. Thinh, and C. LI, “Preliminary comparative assessment of various spectral indices for built-up land derived from Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2A MSI imageries,” Eur. J. Remote Sens., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 240-252, Ene. 2019 https://doi.10.1080/22797254.2019.1584737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2019.1584737
  22. D. K. Ghosh, A. C. Mandal, R. Majumder, P. Patra, and G. S. Bhunia, “Analysis for Mapping of Built-Up Area Using Remotely Sensed Indices – A Case Study of Rajarhat Block in Barasat Sadar Sub-Division in West Bengal (India),” J. Landsc. Ecol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 67-76, Nov. 2018. https://doi.10.2478/jlecol-2018-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2018-0007
  23. F. Yulianto, B. Tjahjono, and S. Anwar, “Detection Settlements and Population Distribution Using GIS And Remotely Sensed Data, In The Surrounding Area of Merapi Volcano, Central Java, Indonesia,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1-10, Mar. 2014. Disponible en: https://ijetae.com/files/Volume4Issue3/IJETAE_0314_01.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.