Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021)
Septiembre-Diciembre

PAPERS

Phytosociology of weeds associated with carrot crops in two municipalities of boyacá

https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v18.n3.2021.13752

Published 2021-12-11

  • Luis David Cordoba Patiño
    • ,
  • Elberth Hernando Pinzón-Sandoval

Luis David Cordoba Patiño
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:4:"UPTC";}

Elberth Hernando Pinzón-Sandoval
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (Tunja Colombia)

Abstract

In order to know the phytosociology of the weeds associated with a carrot crop (Daucus carota L.) under conditions of the municipalities of Ventaquemada and Jenesano-Boyacá, a lot was selected per municipality for carrot cultivation and a plot was made W-shaped covering an area of ​​500 m2. Relative density, relative frequency, relative dominance and the importance value index (IVI) were calculated, as well as the Alpha and Beta diversity indices for the sampled areas. A total of 6 families and 11 species were counted, of these 63.64% were represented by annual plants and 36.36% by perennial plants. The class Liliopsida (Monocotyledonous) was represented by the family Poaceae. While the Magnoliopsida (Dicotyledonous) class was represented by the families: Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Boraginaceae, Leguminosaceae, Polygonaceae, the latter being the one that contributed the largest number of species. The species R. crispus and P. nepalense were those that presented the highest values ​​of Importance value index (IVI) with 0.953 and 0.959, respectively. Accordingly, with the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Simpson dominance, the evaluated areas presented a low species diversity and a high probability of dominant species. The results found can serve as a basis and tool for the carrot producers in the evaluated areas, to define the management plans of the associated weeds and thus optimize the yields in this crop.

Keywords

Competence, Diversity, Daucus Carota, Polygonum nepalense, Rumex crispus

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

References

  1. Agronet. (2020). Estadisticas Agricolas. Área, producción, rendimiento y participación municipal en el departamento por cultivo. Estadisticas Agricolas. http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=1#
  2. Banda S., L., Fuentes, C. L., & Chaves, B. (2012). Producción de semilla de cilantro (Coriandrum sativum L.) bajo la incidencia de malezas y Alternaria Nees. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 5(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2011v5i2.1274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2011v5i2.1274
  3. Bastidas, J., & López, G. (1972). Caracteres cuantitativos y reconocimientos de malezas en praderas artificiales de clima frio del altiplano de Pasto. Rev. Ciencias Agrícolas, 4(2), 83–97.
  4. Biffe, D. F., Constantin, J., & Oliveira Junior, R. S. de. (2018). Interferência das plantas daninhas nas plantas cultivadas. In Hortaliças-fruto-EDUEM, 339–355.. https://doi.org/10.7476/9786586383010.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9786586383010.0012
  5. Booth, B. D., Murphy, S. D., & Swanton, C. J. (2003). Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Systems. In CABI Publishing. 313 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995281.0000
  6. Cabrera, D. C., Chaila, S., Sobrero, M. T., & Varela, A. E. (2019). Phytosociological survey of sugarcane crop weeds in different agroecological areas in TucumÁn Province, Argentina. Planta Daninha, 37, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582019370100027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100027
  7. Cardenal Rubio, C. Z., Torres Hernández, D., Dotor Robayo, M. Y., & Morillo Coronado, A. C. (2016). Characterization of the active seed bank in carrot crops in the municipallity of Villa Pinzón (Cundinamarca). Rev. U.D.C.A Act. & Div. Cient., 19(2), 297–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v19.n2.2016.83
  8. Carvalho, L. B., & Guzzo, C. D. (2008). Increased beet density in weed management. Planta Daninha, 26(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000100008
  9. Carvalho, L. B., Pitelli, R. A., Cecílio Filho, A. B., Bianco, S., & Guzzo, C. D. (2008). Interferência e estudo fitossociológico da comunidade infestante em beterraba de semeadura direta. Planta Daninha, 26(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582008000200005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200005
  10. Coelho, M., Bianco, S., & Carvalho, L. . (2009). Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da cenoura (Daucus carota). Planta Daninha, 27(spe), 913–920. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582009000500004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000500004
  11. Concenço, G., Silva, C. J., Staut, L. A., Pontes, C. S., Laurindo, L. C. A. S., & Souza, N. C. D. S. (2012). Weeds occurrence in areas submitted to distinct winter crops. Planta Daninha, 30(4), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582012000400008
  12. Concenço, G, Salton, J. ., Secretti, M. ., Mendes, P. ., Brevilieri, R. ., & Galon, L. (2011). Effect of long-term agricultural management systems on occurrence and composition of weed species. Planta Daninha, 29(3), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582011000300005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000300005
  13. Concenço, Germani, Farias, P. M. de, Quintero, N. F. A., Schreiber, F., Galon, L., Tomazi, M., Moisinho, I. S., Coradini, M. C., Ceolin, W. C., & Andres, A. (2017). Phytosociological Surveys in Weed Science: Old Concept, New Approach. Plant Ecology - Traditional Approaches to Recent Trends. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69083
  14. Dotor R., M. Y., González Mendoza, L. A., & Morillo C., A. C. (2018). Período crítico de competencia de la Zanahoria (Daucus carota L.) y malezas asociadas al cultivo. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas, 35(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.183501.78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.183501.78
  15. Fuentes, C., Eraso, E., Sequeda, O., & Piedrahita, W. (2011). Flora arvense del antiplano Cundiboyacense de Colombia (B. CropScience & Universidad Nacional de Colombia (eds.). 350 p.
  16. Gámez, A., Rojas, L., Jaramillo, M., Cruz, E., Hoyos, V., Cepeda, J., & Plaza, G. (2018). Guía Ilustrada De Plantas Arvenses Del Centro Agropecuario Marengo (Cam). 382 p.
  17. Kuva, M. A., Pitelli, R. A., Salgado, T. P., & Alves, P. L. C. A. (2007). Fitossociologia de comunidades de plantas daninhas em agroecossistema cana-crua. Planta Daninha, 25(3), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000300009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000300009
  18. López, A. J. G., Hernández, M., & Díaz, R. (2012). Caracterización de la flora arvense asociada a un cultivo de maíz bajo riego para producción de jojotos. Agronomía Trop., 61(2), 133–139.
  19. Moreno, C. (2001). Métodos para medir la biodiversidad, edición electrónica. (M&T–Manual, Issue January 2001). 84p.
  20. Patkowska, E. (2021). Cover crops and soil-borne fungi dangerous towards the cultivation of daucus carota L. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus, 20(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2021.2.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2021.2.1
  21. Pitelli, R. A. (1987). COMPETIÇÃO E CONTROLE DAS PLANTAS DANINHAS EM ÁREAS AGRÍCOLAS. Série Técnica IPEF, Piracicaba, 4(12), 1–24.
  22. Plaza, G. A., & Pedraza, M. (2007). Reconocimiento y caracterización ecológica de la flora arvense asociada al cultivo de uchuva. Agronomia Colombiana, 25(2), 306–313.
  23. Poggio, S. L. (2012). Cambios florísticos en comunidades de malezas: Un marco conceptual basado en reglas de ensamblaje. Ecologia Austral, 22(2), 150–158.
  24. Poleshi Chaitra, A., Manikanta, D. S., & Cholin, S. (2018). Understanding the genetic variability, heritability and association pattern for the characters related to reproductive phase of carrots (Daucus carota L.) in tropical region. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 20(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.37855/JAH.2018.V20I03.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2018.v20i03.39
  25. Prates, C. J. N., Viana, A. E. S., Cardoso, A. D., São José, A. R., Viana, B. A. R., & Dutra, F. V. (2019). Weed Phytosociology in Cassava Cultivation in Two Periods in Southwestern Bahia, Brazil. Planta Daninha, 37(019184596), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100107
  26. Quintero-Pertuz, I., Carbonó-Delahoz, E., Hoyos, V., Jarma-Orozco, A., & Plaza, G. (2021). Phytosociology of weeds in banana plantations in the department of Magdalena, Colombia. Caldasia, 43(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.83554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.83554
  27. RamÍrez, J., Hoyos, V., & Plaza, G. (2015). Fitosociología de malezas asociadas al cultivo de arroz en el departamento del Tolima, Colombia. Agronomia Colombiana, 33(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n1.46747
  28. Reginaldo, L. T. R. T., Lins, H. A., Sousa, M. D. F., Teófilo, T. M. D. S., Mendonça, V., & Silva, D. V. (2021). Weed interference in carrot yield in two localized irrigation systems. Revista Caatinga, 34(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rc DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n113rc
  29. Resende, G. M., Yuri, J. E., Costa, N. D., & Mota, J. H. (2016). Desempenho de cultivares de cenoura em sistema orgânico de cultivo em condições de temperaturas elevadas. Horticultura Brasileira, 34(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620160000100018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620160000100018
  30. Schmid, C., Sharma, S., Stark, T. D., Günzkofer, D., Hofmann, T. F., Ulrich, D., Dunemann, F., Nothnagel, T., & Dawid, C. (2021). Influence of the abiotic stress conditions, waterlogging and drought, on the bitter sensometabolome as well as agronomical traits of six genotypes of daucus carota. Foods, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071607
  31. Vera Ojeda, P. A., & Enciso Garay, C. R. (2017). Critical period of weed interference in carrot crop. Investigación Agraria, 19(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2017.diciembre.77-85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2017.diciembre.77-85

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)