Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023)

PAPERS

Analysis of the Correlation Between Phenotypic and Seminal Characteristics in Bos indicus Breeding Bulls

https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v20.n3.2023.16776

Published 2023-09-01

  • Enith Mayte Bulla-Arias
    • ,
  • Karen Patricia Montoya-Andrade
    • ,
  • Melisa Daniela Munevar-Romero
    • ,
  • Sergio Ulloa-Torres

Enith Mayte Bulla-Arias
Investigador independiente, Tunja, Colombia

Karen Patricia Montoya-Andrade
Universidad de Cundinamarca, Fusagasugá, Colombia

Melisa Daniela Munevar-Romero
Investigador independiente, Tunja, Colombia

Sergio Ulloa-Torres
Investigador independiente, Tunja, Colombia

Abstract

In the cattle context of Casanare, where access to technologies to evaluate seminal quality is limited, it would be beneficial to anticipate the seminal characteristics of bulls based on their physical attributes without resorting to specific and costly methodologies would be beneficial. This could improve herd reproductive efficiency, resulting in increased pregnancy rates and annual calf production. In an experimental study with 238 bulls, we measured various physical and seminal characteristics. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relationships between these characteristics. Our findings indicate that 57.1 % of the bulls were classified as very good, while 7.6 % were considered poor quality. The bulls had an average age of 5.5 years. Their semen motility and vitality were both 76% on average, and their average sperm concentration was 610 million. Strong negative correlations were found between libido, erection, protrusion, ejaculation and ejaculation type with seminal characteristics such as volume, lumps, motility, vitality and sperm concentration. Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between sperm concentration and scrotal circumference (SC), suggesting that an increase in SC may lead to an increase in sperm concentration. These correlations provide valuable information for selecting breeders and improving reproductive programs on livestock farms in Colombia, particularly in the case of cattle breeding.

Keywords

sperm quality, reproductive efficiency, potential fertility, breeder

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Adona, P. R., Souza, Y. L., Miranda, M. S., Rodrigues, I., Guemra, S., & Ferreira, M. B. (2022). Fertility analysis of bovine semen by in vitro fertilization. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54(2), Artículo 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03147-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03147-1
  2. Alexandre, G., Rodriguez, L., Arece, J., Delgadillo, J., Garcia, G. W., Habermeier, K., Almeida, A. M., Fanchone, A., Gourdine, J.-L., & Archimède, H. (2021). Agroecological practices to support tropical livestock farming systems: a Caribbean and Latin American perspective. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53(1), Artículo 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02537-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02537-7
  3. Boe-Hansen, G. B., Rêgo, J. P. A., Satake, N., Venus, B., Sadowski, P., Nouwens, A., Li, Y., & McGowan, M. (2020). Effects of increased scrotal temperature on semen quality and seminal plasma proteins in Brahman bulls. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 87(5), 574–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23328
  4. Bustos Obregón, E., & Torres-Díaz, L. (2012). Reproducción estacional en el macho. International Journal of Morphology, 30(4), 1266–1279. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022012000400004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000400004
  5. Chacón, L., Navarro, O., Ladino, C., Martins, J., Perez, J., & Ardila, A. (2022). Sexual behavior and seminal characteristics of Brahman bulls in the Colombian tropical flooded savanna: effects of reproductive management systems and climatic periods. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54(1), Artículo 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03087-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03087-w
  6. Christensen, P., Labouriau, R., Birck, A., Boe-Hansen, G. B., Pedersen, J., & Borchersen, S. (2011). Relationship among seminal quality measures and field fertility of young dairy bulls using low-dose inseminations. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(4), 1744–1754. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3087
  7. De Loyola Oriyés, C. J., Fiss Poll, Á. A., Vázquez Montes de Oca, R., & Ramírez Oriyés J. Á. (2014). Influencia de la condición corporal en la libido sexual de receladores vacunos con fimosis artificial. Revista Producción. Animal, 26(3). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268092318.pdf
  8. Fair, S., & Lonergan, P. (2018). Review: Understanding the causes of variation in reproductive wastage among bulls. Animal: an International Journal of Animal Bioscience, 12(Sup. 1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000964
  9. FAO. (2023). Producción animal. https://www.fao.org/animal-production/es
  10. Fordyce, G., McGowan, M. R., Lisle, A., Muller, T., Allen, J., Duff, C., Holroyd, R. G., Corbet, N. J., & Burns, B. M. (2014). Scrotal circumference of Australian beef bulls. Theriogenology, 81(6), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.12.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.12.020
  11. Hashem, N. M., & Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. (2021). Nanotechnology and reproductive management of farm animals: challenges and advances. Animals, 11(7), Artículo 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071932
  12. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA). (2023). Censos Pecuarios Nacional. Https://Www.Ica.Gov.Co/Areas/Pecuaria/Servicios/Epidemiologia-Veterinaria/Censos-2016/Censo-2018
  13. Koziol, J. H., Sheets, T., Wickware, C. L., & Johnson, T. A. (2022). Composition and diversity of the seminal microbiota in bulls and its association with semen parameters. Theriogenology, 182, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.01.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.01.029
  14. Kumar, U., Gawande, A. P., Sahatpure, S. K., Patil, M. S., Lakde, C. K., Bonde, S. W., Borkar, P. L., Poharkar, A. J., & Ramteke, B. R. (2015). Assessment of semen quality in pure and crossbred Jersey bulls. Veterinary World, 8(10), 1266–1272. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1266-1272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1266-1272
  15. Macías Moreira, Y. A., Zambrano Villacís, J. J., Zambrano Aguayo, M. D., & Andrade Yucailla, V. C. (2020). Evaluación de toros mestizos en el trópico seco en explotación extensiva como predictor de la relación toro/vaca. Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología, 9(1), 81–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59410/RACYT-v09n01ep05-0128
  16. Mandal, D. K., Kumar, M., & Tyagi, S. (2022). Effect of seasons and photoperiods on seminal attributes and sperm morphology in Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal crossbred dairy bulls. International Journal of Biometeorology, 66(11), 2223–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02350-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02350-x
  17. Maurat-Rosero, E. R., Oleas-Carrillo, E. R., Vaca-Cárdenas, M. L., & Condolo-Ortiz, L. A. (2020). Valoración de la calidad seminal en toros charoláis de la provincia de Morona Santiago. Polo del Conocimiento, 5(4), 33–51.
  18. Memili, E., Moura, A. A., & Kaya, A. (2020). Metabolomes of sperm and seminal plasma associated with bull fertility. Animal Reproduction Science, 220, Artículo 106355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106355
  19. Mendivelso, F. (2022). Prueba no paramétrica de correlación de Spearman. Revista Médica Sanitas, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.578
  20. Monina, M. I., Heritier, J. M., Della Croce, M. R., Galetti, E. J. R., Ierace, A. J. M., Juan, F. M., Olivares, M. D., Pechin, G., Rossetto, L., Vera, O. A., Verna, M., & Véspoli Pucheu, M. V. (2000). Evaluación ultrasonográfica de las gónadas del toro. Ciencia Veterinaria, 2(1), 91–102.
  21. Otasevic, V., Kalezic, A., Macanovic, B., Jankovic, A., Stancic, A., Garalejic, E., Korac, A., & Korac, B. (2019). Evaluation of the antioxidative enzymes in the seminal plasma of infertile men: contribution to classic semen quality analysis. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 65(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2019.1600171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2019.1600171
  22. Páez-Barón, E. M., & Corredor-Camargo, E. S. (2014). Evaluación de la aptitud reproductiva del toro. Ciencia y Agricultura, 11(2), 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.3837
  23. Parra-Bracamonte, M. G., Magaña-Monforte, J. G., De la Rosa-Reyna, X. F., Martínez-González, J. C., Jahuey-Martínez, F. J., & Moreno-Medina, V. R. (2023). Genome-wide association study for identification of associated variations to scrotal circumference in Charolais cattle. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 31(Sup.), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.310515
  24. Perumal, P. (2014). Scrotal circumference and its relationship with testicular growth, age, and body weight in Tho Tho (Bos indicus) bulls. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, Artículo 249537. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/249537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/249537
  25. Reynolds, L. P., Borowicz, P. P., Caton, J. S., Crouse, M. S., Dahlen, C. R., & Ward, A. K. (2019). Developmental programming of fetal growth and development. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 35(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.02.006
  26. Romero Hernández, A. M. (2022). Sostenibilidad de la ganadería bovina en la Orinoquía: caso municipio de Paz de Ariporo, Casanare [Tesis de maestría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia]. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/83494/1032463135.2023.pdf
  27. Ruiz-Sesma, B., Herrera-Haro, J. G., Rojas-Martínez, R. I., Mendoza-Nazar, P., Ruiz-Sesma, H., & Ruiz-Hernández, H. (2021). Caracterización del sistema doble propósito bovino y evaluación reproductiva de toros en el estado de Chiapas. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios, 8(2), Artículo e2811. https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a8nii.2811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a8nII.2811
  28. Souza, F. A., Martins, J. A. M., Emerick, L. L., Laskoski, L. M., Perez-Osorio, J., Souza, F. F., Cañon, A. L. P., & Vale Filho, V. R. (2021). Seminal plasma insulin-like growth factor I and total protein concentration in peripubertal period of the Gyr bulls. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 56(10), 1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13987
  29. Sylla, L., Palombi, C., Stradaioli, G., Vagniluca, A., & Monaci, M. (2015). Effect of semen collection by transrectal massage of accessory sexual glands or artificial vagina on the outcome of breeding soundness examinations of Italian yearling beef bulls. Theriogenology, 83(5), 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.011
  30. Vince, S., Žura Žaja, I., Samardžija, M., Majić Balić, I., Vilić, M., Đuričić, D., Valpotić, H., Marković, F., & Milinković-Tur, S. (2018). Age-related differences of semen quality, seminal plasma, and spermatozoa antioxidative and oxidative stress variables in bulls during cold and warm periods of the year. Animal, 12(3), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001811
  31. Weiss, R. R., Abreu, A. C. M. R., Busato, E. M., Galan, T. G. B., Bertol, M. A. F., Bortoleto, C., & Lara, N. S. S. (2019). Ejaculação induzida em touro (Bos taurus indicus) por estimulação manual do pênis. Archives of Veterinary Science, 24(2), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v24i2.59558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v24i2.59558

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)