Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Identification of the main active ingredients of agrochemicals used around the Lake of Tota, Colombia

Abstract

This paper presents a descriptive study aimed at identifying the main active ingredients, frequency of use, and the processes employed in the application of the agrochemicals most used around the Lake of Tota, which is considered the most important freshwater ecosystem in Colombia. A key source for this study is a survey to farmers, which sampling frame was established from a Geographical Institute Agustin Codazzi (IGAC) digital map, considering only the plots with some agricultural activity and runoff into the lake. This information was supplemented with geographic data obtained from Google Maps®. As control mechanism, two additional sources were used: i) a manual count of packaging of agrochemicals in a certified collection center, and ii) a census of stores that supply such products in the study area. The results allow knowing the set of agrochemicals most used around the lake, their active ingredients, and the most common farming practices, some of which could entail some risk to farmers, consumers and the environment.

Keywords

agriculture, environmental impact, land use, pollution, Tota Lake, water management

PDF (Español)

References

  1. (1) Conpes 3801 de 2014, Manejo Ambiental Integral de la Cuenca Hidrográfica del Lago de Tota, Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social CONPES - Departamento Nacional de Planeación - Republica de Colombia, Bogotá D.C. Available: http://portalterritorial.gov.co/apc-aa-files/40743db9e8588852c-19cb285e420affe/conpes-3801.pdf.
  2. (2) Primer Censo del Cultivo de Cebolla Larga, Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, DANE, 2001. Available: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/enda/ena/Cebolla_Boyaca_Reg_Laguna_Tota.pdf.
  3. (3) Pinzón Ramírez, H, La cebolla de rama y su cultivo, Fierro Lu Ed., Produmedios, Ed. Tibaitatá, Mosquera, Colombia: Corpoica, Asohofrucol (Online) 2004. Available: http://conectarural.org/sitio/sites/default/files/documentos/.
  4. (4) WWN Commite (Internet Web Page). Bucarest: World Wetland Network Wetland Globes, (Online) (Accessed on July 2012). Available: http://www.worldwetnet.org/.
  5. (5) Günter, H. Declaración de la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre el Medio Humano (Declaración de Estocolmo), de 1972, y Declaración de Río sobre Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo, 1992, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, (Online) 2012. Available: http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/dunche/dunche_s.pdf.
  6. (6) Naciones Unidas, Documento Final de la Conferencia, Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas Sobre el Desarrollo Sostenible Rio+20, Río de Janeiro (Brasil) 20 a 22 de junio de 2012, Río de Janeiro, Brasil, ONU: 1-59 (Online) 2012, Available: https://rio20.un.org/sites/rio20.un-.org/files/a-conf.216-l-1_spanish.pdf.
  7. (7) Decreto 2811 de 1974, Código Nacional de Recursos Naturales Renovables y de Protección al Medio Ambiente, Presidencia de la República de Colombia, Bogotá D.C. (Diario Oficial No 34.243, del 27 de enero de 1975). Available: http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/decreto_2811_1974.html.
  8. (8) Decreto 1541 De 1978, Reglamenta la Parte III del Libro II del Decreto-Ley 2811 de 1974: “De las aguas no marítimas” y parcialmente la Ley 23 de 1973 República de Colombia. (Diario Oficial No. 35078 de 21 de agosto de 1978). Ministerio de Agricultura. Available: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/.
  9. (9) Ley 99 de 1993, Ley General Ambiental de Colombia, (Diario Oficial No. 41.146, de 22 de diciembre de 1993) Congreso de la República de Colombia, Bogotá D.C. Available: http://oab.ambientebogota.gov.co/.
  10. (10) Ley 373 de 1997, Programa para el uso eficiente y ahorro del agua, (Diario Oficial No. 43.058 del 11 de junio de 1997). Congreso de la República de Colombia. Available: http://www.emdupar.gov.co/.
  11. (11) Corporaciones Autónomas Regionales y Desarrollo Sostenible, Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública de la República de Colombia, 2010. Available: http://portal. dafp.gov.co/.
  12. (12) China’s Water Crisis Part I Introduction, China Water Risk PI, (Online) 2010. p. 13, Available from: http://chinawaterrisk.org/.
  13. (13) China’s Water Crisis Part II Water Facts at a Glance, China Water Risk PII (Online) 2010. Available: http://chinawaterrisk.org/.
  14. (14) Charting Our Water Future - Economic frameworks to inform decision-making, The 2030 Water Resources Group (Online) 2009: 1-32. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com/.
  15. (15) Peng X, Chao-yang F, Hong-wen C, Zhigang L, Bin L and Ming-lei F, Establishment of Water Quality Monitoring Database in Poyang Lake. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2011; 10: 2581-2586.
  16. (16) Botta F., Lepot B., Leoz-Garziandia E., and Morin A., Estimation of sampling uncertainty in lake-water monitoring in a collaborative field trial. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2012; 36: 176-184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2011.12.007.
  17. (17) McCullough I. M., Loftin C. S., and Sader S. A. High-frequency remote monitoring of large lakes with MODIS 500m imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012; 124: 234-241. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.018.
  18. (18) Kutser T. The possibility of using the Landsat image archive for monitoring long time trends in coloured dissolved organic matter concentration in lake waters. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012; 123: 334-338. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.004.
  19. (19) FAO, Encuestas agrícolas con múltiples marcos de muestreo. Rome, Italy: Roma (Italia). FAO, vol. 1. (Online) 1996. Available: http://www.fao.org/.
  20. (20) FAO, Encuestas agrícolas con múltiples marcos de muestreo. Rome, Italy: Roma (Italia). FAO, vol. 2. (Online) 1998. Available: http://www.fao.org/.
  21. (21) Bush J. and House C. The area frame: a sampling base for establishment surveys, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Establishment Surveys, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, 1993, 335-344.
  22. (22) Ferraz C. Improving methods for linking area frames with list frames: literature review preliminary results, Pernambuco, 1-12, (Online) 2013. Available: http://www.fao.org/.
  23. (23) Pérez García A. J. and Macías Acevedo J. P, Plan de Ordenamiento y Manejo de la Cuenca del Lago de Tota Convenio número 038 de 2004. CORPOBOYACA-PUJ. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, (Online) 2005. Available: http://www.corpoboyaca.gov.co/.
  24. (24) Cordero R. D, Ruiz J. E, and Vargas E. F, Spatial temporal determination of phosphorus concentration in Lake of Tota. Revista Colombiana de Química, 2005; 34(2): 211-218.
  25. (25) Noriega M, Jorge Ari A, Castillo D, Vásquez A, Estudio preliminar del estado de la microcuenca Los Pozos y su posible efecto en un sector de la laguna de Tota, Boyacá, Colombia. Journal of Technology, 2010; 9(2):145-164.
  26. (26) Mojica Andrea, Guerrero Jairo A. Evaluación del movimiento de plaguicidas hacia la cuenca del Lago de Tota, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Química, 2013; 42(2): 29-38.
  27. (27) Rojas LM, Lesmes FC, Rodríguez CJ. Pesticide Flow Analysis in the Tota Lake Watershed in the Boyacá Region in Colombia. Conference paper on Annual International Conferences on Earth, Geology and Geography, pp 48-49, 2015.
  28. (28) Ramírez A. Lizeth N., Torres B. Nixon H., Caracterización de la zona de influencia del cultivo de cebolla larga y la determinación de tasas de usos de los agroquímicos en el Lago de Tota. Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Facultad Seccional Sogamoso, Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, 2014.
  29. (29) Campolimpio.org., CampoLimpio Web Site. (Online). Available: http://campolimpio.org/.
  30. (30) Mostafalou S. and Abdollahi M, Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives, Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2013; 268(2): 157-177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.01.025.
  31. (31) Nordby K., Andersen A, Irgens L. M, and Kristensen P, Indicators of Mancozeb exposure in relation to thyroid cancer and neural tube defects in farmers’ families, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2005; 31(2): 89-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.855.
  32. (32) Rasgele P. G, Muranli F. D. G, and Kekecoglu M, Assessment of the genotoxicity of Propineb in mice bone marrow cells using micronucleus assay, Cytology and Genetics, 2014; 48(4): 233-237. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S0095452714040045.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.