The phenomenology of embodied heuristics in contemporary art: exploring novel modes of cognition and thought
Abstract
This paper focuses on the problem of the entirety of knowledge of the world, in particular the problem of knowledge of the “invisible”. The authors use a phenomenological research method, complemented by elements of the naturalistic method. These methods complement each other and create the conditions for a new understanding of the body, the corporeal and its functional capacities. Contemporary art uses this methodological synthesis and creates context to form new cultural meanings. It shows that the artist’s aim is to search for new semantic contexts that fit organically into the theory of the embodied mind. Architectural and sculptural art indirectly activated questions of knowledge, creating a sense of “height” through one’s own body as a path to the transcendent and access to the mystery of the “invisible”. The modern cognitive paradigm is in crisis: the development of cognition based on rational tools is unable to grasp the objectivity of the world in its totality. The artist activates an inner attunement to specific trajectories of thought, thus destroying the limits of knowledge and expanding its boundaries. The philosophical analysis of the activation of the senses, taking into account bodily capacities and embodied rationality, points to a possible path for the development of knowledge in the future.
Keywords
phenomenology, cognition, invisible, body, transcendent
References
- Caputo, J. (2013). The Insistence of God: A Theology of Perhaps (Philosophy of Religion). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Dolska, O. and Lobas, V. (2021). Embodied Rationality as a Mode of the Visibility of Ethics (To the Question of the Toolkit of Constructivism). Filosofiya-Philosophy, 30 (2), pp. 126-138. https://doi.org/10.53656/phil2021-02-03
- Fichant, M. (2009). Michel Henry et l’histoire de la philosophie. Brohm, J. et Leclercq, J. (dir.) Michel Henry. Paris : L’âge d’homme.
- Gramont, J. (2013). Au commencement: parole, regard, affect. Paris: Cerf.
- Gumbrecht, H. (2003). Presence production: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Heidegger, M. (2013). Phanomenologische Interpretationen Zu Aristoteles: (Anzeige der Hermeneutischen Situation). Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
- Heidegger, M. (1995). Einleitung in die Phänomenologie der Religion. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, pp. 3-159. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann
- Heinämaa, S. (2018). Embodiment and Bodily Becoming. Zahavi, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology (pp. 533‒557). Oxford: University Press.
- Henry, M. (1973). The Essence of Manifestation. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenological Constitution. Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer Academic.
- Kаndinsky, V. (1951). Du Spirituel dans l’art. Paris: Éditions de Beaune.
- Kearney, R. (2011). Anatheism: Returning to God after God. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind & its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basics Books.
- Laval-Jeantet, M. (2020). Art and the Microbiome. Performance Research, 25 (3), pp. 158-163.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1985). L’œil et L’esprit. Paris: Gallimard.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Cézanne’s Doubt. Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
- Murawska, M. (2020). The postphenomenological corporeity: artistic practices on the borderline between art and science. Analiza i Egzystencja, 49, pp. 31-51. https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2020.49-02
- Seel, M. (2014). Aktive Passivität: Über den Spielraum des Denkens, Handelns und anderer Künste. Frankfurt a. M.: S. Fischer.
- Jimenez, M. (2016). Art et technosciences. Bioart, neuroesthétique. Paris: Klincksieck.