Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 17 Núm. 33 (2019)
Enero - Junio

Artículos

El origen de los desplazados por la conservación. Las paradójicas consecuencias de la protección ambiental en la India

https://doi.org/10.19053/16923936.v17.n33.2019.13706

Publicado 2019-01-05

  • Anju Lis Kurian
    • ,
  • John Maximino Muñoz-Telles
    • ,
  • Daniel Rigoberto Bernal-Gomez
    • ,
  • C Vinodan

Resumen

La conservación de la biodiversidad y los recursos naturales puede ayudar a ofrecer un suministro sostenible de bienes y servicios para cumplir los derechos de las personas a su desarrollo y sustento. Sin embargo, cuando se consideran los impactos sociales económicos y culturales en la población local, de la conservación ambiental ciertos resultados no son alentadores en la India (ni en todo el mundo). Los proyectos de conservación que excluyen a los habitantes de dichas áreas pueden conservar los recursos naturales hasta cierto punto, pero no el acceso a los medios de vida de estas personas. Por tanto, siendo la India un país densamente poblado no puede alentar la estrategia de "naturaleza prístina" en sus iniciativas de conservación.

Palabras clave

Derecho Ambiental, refugiados, cambio climático, desarrollo sostenible, conservacionismo.

PDF

Biografía del autor/a

Anju Lis Kurian

Becaria postdoctoral de la Comisión de Becas Universitarias de la India-UGC, por sus siglas en inglés

(University Grants Comission)

John Maximino Muñoz-Telles

Abogado de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Especialista en Desarrollo Humano y candidato a Magister en Desarrollo Humano de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. FLACSO-Argentina y Member of HDCA-Human Development and Capability Association.

Daniel Rigoberto Bernal-Gomez

Abogado de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Especialista en Derecho privado Económico. Magíster en Derecho Administrativo de la Universidad Libre de Bogotá. Estudiante de Doctorado en Derecho Universidad Nacional de Mar de Plata, Argentina. Docente Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia

C Vinodan

Profesor en la Escuela de Relaciones Internacionales Mahatma Gandhi de la Universidad Kottayam en la India

Citas

  1. Agrawal, A. y Redford, K. (2009). “Conservation and Displacement: An Over view,” Conservation and Society, Vol 7, No 1, pp. 1–10.
  2. Awuh, Harrison Esam. (2011). “A Critique of the Global Literature on the Conservation Refugee Problem”, Master of Science thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
  3. Ayyappan, R. (2016). “UNDP Calls for Revision of Mountain Landscape Project,” Deccan Chronicle, 7 septiembre. Recuperado de: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/pets-and-environment/070916/undp-calls-for-revision-of-mountainlandscape-project.html.
  4. Bhatt, Seema et al. (2012). Community Conserved Areas in South Asia: Case Studies and Analyses from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, New Delhi: Kalpavriksh.
  5. Brockington, Dan and Jim Igoe. (2006). “Eviction for Conservation: A Global Overview”, Conservation and Society, Vol 4, No 3, pp. 424–70.
  6. Cernea, M.y Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2003). “Biodiversity Conservation versus Population Resettlement: Risks to Nature and Risks to People,” paper presented at the International Conference on Rural Livelihoods, Forests and Biodiversity, Bonn, 19–23 de mayo.
  7. Chapin, M. (2004). “A Challenge to Conservationists”, World Watch Magazine, noviembre-diciembre.
  8. Damayanti, E. (2008). “Legality of National Parks and Involvement of Local People: Case Studies in Java, Indonesia and Kerala, India”, PhD thesis, University of Tsukuba.
  9. Damayanti, E. y Masuda, M. (2008). “National Park Establishment in Developing Countries: Between Legislation and Reality in India and Indonesia”, Tropics, Vol 17, No 2, pp. 119–33.
  10. Dowie, M. (2005). “Conservation Refugees: When Protecting Nature Means Kicking People Out,” Orion, November–December, pp. 16–27.
  11. Dowie, M. (2006). “Conservation Refugees: When Protecting Nature Means Kicking People Out,” Seedling, January, pp. 6–12.
  12. Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation Refugees: The Hundred- Year Conflict between Global Conservation and Native Peoples, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Down to Earth. (2016). “Animals in Our Backyard,” viewed on 13 de febrero de 2017. Recuperado de: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/factsheet/everythingyouneedtoknowaboutthemananimalconflict54347.
  14. Ghate, R. y Suresh, G. (2011). “A Story of Conservation Refugees: Vulnerability and Coping Strategies”, paper presented at ICARUS-2 conference, University of Michigan, 5–8 de mayo.
  15. Government of Kerala. (2003). “Notifi cation of MSNP”, Kerala Gazette Extraordinary, GO (MS) No 50/2003/F&WLD, Forest and Wildlife (F) Department, Thiruvananthapuram.
  16. Government of Kerala. (2009–2018). “First Management Plan of Mathikettan Shola National Park,” Department of Forests and Wildlife, Thiruvananthapuram.
  17. Jitendra. (2016). “Collector’s Cry,” Down to Earth, Vols. 6–30, noviembre, pp. 14–16.
  18. Kabra, Asmita (2009). “Conservation-induced Displacement: A Comparative Study of Two Indian Protected Areas”, Conservation and Society, Vol 7, No 4, pp. 249–67.
  19. Kabra, Asmita (2013). “Conservation-induced Displacement: The Anatomy of a Win-win Solution”, Social Change, Vol. 43, No 4, pp. 533–50.
  20. Karanth, K U. y Krithi K K. (2007). “Free to Move: Conservation and Voluntary Resettlements in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, India”, Protected Areas and Human Displacement: A Conservation Perspective, Kent H Redford and Eva Fearn (eds), New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.
  21. Kochupura, S. (2017). Highrange Samrakshana Samiti, Convenor, entrevista personal 29 de junio de 2017.
  22. Kurian, A. L. (2016a). “Climate Change and Environmental Protection in South Asia: The Making of Conservation Refugees”, International Seminar on Environmental Security and Sustainable Development, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 19–21 de octubre.
  23. Kurian, A. L. (2016b). “Environmental Governance and Conservation Refugees: The Kerala Experience”, International Conference on Decentralisation, Poverty and Marginalisation, Kerala Institute of Local Administration (KILA), Thrissur, 19–22 de noviembre.
  24. Kurian, A. L. (2017). “Environmental Governance and Human Rights in India”, UGC National Seminar on Facets of Human Rights Discourse in India, University of Calicut, 31 de enero-1° de febrero.
  25. Lasgorceix, A.y Kothari, A. (2009). “Displacement and Relocation of Protected Areas: A Synthesis and Analysis of Case Studies”, Economic y Political Weekly, Vol. 44, No 49, pp. 37–47.
  26. Lockwood, I. (2015). “The Dilemma and Complications of Non-native Timber Plantations in the Palani Hills”, Frontline, 13 de noviembre, pp. 67–82.
  27. MoEF. (2013). “Directions under Section 5 of Environment Protection Act 1986”, Prohibitory order issued by MoEF, 13 de noviembre de 2013. Recuperado de: http://www.moef.gov.in/sites/default/.files/3%20Directions%20dated%2013.11.2013%20under%20Section%205%20of%20EPAct%2C%201986%20on%20WEstern%20Ghats%20ESA.pdf.
  28. Njogu, J. G. (2004). “Community-based Conservation in an Entitlement Perspective: Wildlife and Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Taita, Kenya”, research report, African Studies Centre, Leiden.
  29. Paxton, M. (2016). “Burning Bright: UNDP and GEF in the Tiger Landscape”, United Nations Development Programme, Global Environmental Finance, New York.
  30. Radhakrishnan, K. S. (2013). Judgment, Writ Petition (Civil) No 337 of 1995 with IA No 3452 in WP(C) No 202 of 1995, Supreme Court of India, Civil Original Jurisdiction, I A No 100.
  31. Rice, M. W. (2012). “In the Name of the Tiger: Narrative Analysis on Conservation and Indigenous Forest Rights in India”, unpublished thesis, Department of Environmental Studies, Mount Holyoke College.
  32. Schmidt-Soltau, K. y Brockington, D. (2007). “Protected Areas and Resettlement: What Scope for Voluntary Relocation?” World Development, Vol. 35, No 12, pp. 2182–202.
  33. Shahabuddin, G. y Bhamidipati, P. (2014). “Conservation-induced Displacement: Recent Perspectives from India,” Environmental Justice, Vol. 7, No 5, pp. 122–29.
  34. Springer, J. y Almeida, F. (2015). “Protected Areas and the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities: Current Issues and Future Agenda”, Report of Rights and Resources Initiative.
  35. Sridhar, V. K. (2015). “Supreme Court: Mining, Forest Encroachments and Rehabilitation from Kudremukh National Park,” Social Change and Development, Vol. 12, No 1, pp. 62–76.
  36. Thomas, D.(2011). An Introduction to Conservation and Human Rights for BirdLife Partners, Cambridge: BirdLife International.
  37. Torri, Maria Costanza. (2011). “Conservation, Relocation and the Social Consequences of Conservation Policies in Protected Areas: Case Study of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India,” Conservation and Society, Vol. 9, No 1, pp. 54–64.
  38. UNDP. (2014). “India High Range Landscape Project”, United Nations Development Programme, New Delhi.
  39. Upadhyay, S. y Sane, A. (2009). Conserving Protected Areas and Wildlife: A Judicial Journey, New Delhi: WWF.
  40. Wani, M.y Kothari, A. (2007). “Protected Areas and Human Rights in India: The Impact of the Official Conservation Model on Local Communities”, Policy Matters, Vol. 15, pp. 100–14.
  41. Wildlife Institute of India. (2017). “ENVIS Centre on Wildlife & Protected Areas”, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, viewed. 29 de junio de 2017. Recuperado de: http://wiienvis.nic.in/Database/Protected_Area_854.aspx.
  42. - Young, Z. (2010). “Strategies for Effective and Just Conservation: The Global Environment Facility and India Eco-development—Growing the Ineffi cient Economic Approach to Conservation”, Current Conservation, Vol. 3, No 3, pp. 27–30.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.