Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Diagnosis of TPACK of initial computer science training students: lesson study in the Colombian Caribbean

Abstract

The objective of this study was to diagnose the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in computer science teachers in training (5 units of analysis) during their participation in Lesson Study (LS). A qualitative-interpretative methodology with case study design was used, employing questionnaires, interviews, observations, focus groups, documentary review and audiovisual record to analyze and understand TPACK. The results indicate that Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is used more frequently in the planning and during the development of the class, while Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) is highlighted in the moment of reflection. It is concluded that the combination of TPACK with LS constitutes an important alternative to develop the basic knowledge of TPACK (pedagogical, content, technological) through a collective and reflexive process based on curricular and didactic experimentation of real situations faced by teachers in training.

Keywords

TPACK, lesson study, teacher trainees, pedagogical practice

PDF (Español)

Author Biography

Angel Alfonso Jiménez-Sierra

Licenciado en Informática, Magíster en Tecnología Educativa

Jorge Mario Ortega-Iglesias

Licenciado en Informática, Doctor en Educación.

Yilmar Daniel Polo-Altuve

Licenciado en Informática.

Yeison Andrés Duica-Galofre

Licenciado en Informática, Magíster en Tecnología Educativa.


References

  1. Alayyar, G., & Fisser, P. (2019). Human and blended support to assist learning about ict integration in (Pre-service) teacher design teams. In Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_11
  2. Anci, F. F., Paristiowati, M., Budi, S., Tritiyatma, H., & Fitriani, E. (2021). Development of TPACK of chemistry teacher on electrolyte and non-electrolyte topic through lesson study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041804
  3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009a). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52 (1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  4. Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2010). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  5. Basori, Yudhi, A., Sahiruddin, Ribeh, N. M., & Dian, K. O. (2023). Exploring EFL Teachers ’ Development of TPACK in A Lesson Study . The Journal of Asia TEFL, 20 (3), 739–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.3.18.739
  6. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1968). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
  7. Cabero-Almenara, J. (2020). Aprendiendo del tiempo de la COVID-19. Revista Electrónica Educare, 24(Suplemento), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-s.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-S.2
  8. Cabero-Almenara, J. & Valencia-Ortiz, R. (2021). And COVID-19 transformed the educational system: reflections and experiences to learn. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 218–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5246
  9. Candela-Rodriguez, B. F. (2020). El conocimiento tecnológico y pedagógico del contenido: marcos que direccionan el diseño de ambientes de aprendizaje. In B. F. Cadena (Ed.), Integrando las TIC a la escuela de la sociedad del conocimiento, 67–82. Universidad del Valle. https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/j.ctv1k03n33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1k03n33.9
  10. Chamrat, S., Apichatyotin, N., & Puakanokhirun, K. (2018). The use of high impact practices (HIPs) on chemistry lesson design and implementation by pre-service teachers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923 (1), 30009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019500
  11. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In: Wittrock, M.C., Ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd Edition, Macmillan, New York.
  12. Class, B. (2023). Teaching research methods in education: using the TPACK framework to reflect on praxis. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426
  13. Da Ponte, J. P. (2023). Prospective mathematics teachers’ views of their learning in a lesson study. Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 17 (2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v17i2.23896 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v17i2.23896
  14. Danday, B. A. (2019). Active vs. Passive microteaching lesson study: Effects on Pre-service Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18 (6), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.6.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.6.11
  15. Darsih, E., Suherdi, D., & Safrina. (2021). Changes in Indonesian EFL Lecturers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) after Lesson Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1752 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012070
  16. Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating Technology in Elementary Preservice Teacher Education: Orchestrating Scientific Inquiry in Meaningful Ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13 (4), 303–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022535516780
  17. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese Approaches to Professional Development: The Case of Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (5), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237394
  18. Gess‐Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 28–42.
  19. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Content Knowledge : Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers ’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39 (4), 372–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372
  20. Huang, B., Siu-Yung Jong, M., Tu, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., Chai, C. S., & Yi-Chao Jiang, M. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 189, 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577
  21. Huang, X., Lai, M. Y., & Huang, R. (2021). Teachers’ learning through an online lesson study: an analysis from the expansive learning perspective. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 10 (2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2020-0076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2020-0076
  22. Isoda, M. (2007). Where did the lesson study begin, and how far has it come?. In Isoda, Stephen, Ohara, & Miyakawa (Eds.), Japanese Lesson Study in Mathematics, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/6339
  23. Jackson, P. W. (1968). 2. La vida en las aulas. https://www.uv.mx/mie/files/2012/10/lavidaenlasaulas.pdf
  24. Jiménez-Sierra, A. (2020). Evaluación de las TIC en los procesos de enseñanza en los docentes de la básica primaria; un estudio de caso. Convergencia, 1, 2–46.
  25. Jiménez-Sierra, Á. A., Ortega-Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913
  26. Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: a theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12 (4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9102-7
  27. Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher Knowledge of Educational Technology: A Case Study of Student/Mentor Teacher Pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26 (4), 427–462. https://doi.org/10.2190/JXBR-2G0G-1E4T-7T4M DOI: https://doi.org/10.1092/KQCF-BLX2-TCHV-AGA4
  28. Marron, S., & Coulter, M. (2021). Initial teacher educators’ integrating iPads into their physical education teaching. Irish Educational Studies, 40 (4), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1971103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1971103
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
  30. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006b). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teacher College Record, 6 (108), 1017–1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  31. Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (5), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
  32. Niess, M. L. (2018). Scaffolding subject matter content with pedagogy and technologies in problem-based learning with the online TPACK learning trajectory. In Teacher Training and Professional Development: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2, 914–931. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5631-2.ch040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5631-2.ch040
  33. Ortega-Iglesias, J. M. (2018). Del sentido reflexivo y formativo: un aporte a la evaluación con carácter diagnóstico formativo ECDF. Praxis, 14 (2), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2913
  34. Perafán-Echeverri, G. (2015). Conocimiento profesional docente y prácticas pedagógicas. Bogotá, Colombia: Aula.
  35. Pérez-Gómez, Á. I., & Soto-Gómez, E. (2015). Lesson Study, Investigación acción cooperativa para formar docentes y recrear el curriculum. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 84 (29.3), 11-12.
  36. Pierson, M. E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (4). https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325
  37. Ribeiro, C., Monteiro, R., & Carrillo, J. (2010). ¿Es el conocimiento matemático del profesorado específico de su profesión? Discusión de la práctica de una maestra. Educación Matemática, 22 (2), 123–138.
  38. Rivas, A. (2020). Pedagogía de la excepción. Universidad de San Andrés, 1–14. https://n9.cl/xnlt1
  39. Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Kestianty, J., Kindy, N., & Rukayadi, Y. (2019). The analysis of biology teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development in lesson study in West Java Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8 (2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19303
  40. Rojas-Moreno, I., & Ducoing-Watty, P. (2022). Políticas docentes para la formación del profesorado en Brasil y Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 27 (94), 911–938.
  41. Rueda-Ortiz, R., & Franco-Avellaneda, M. (2018). Políticas educativas de TIC en Colombia: entre la inclusión digital y formas de resistencia-transformación social. Pedagogía y Saberes, 48, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num48-7370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num48-7370
  42. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967
  43. Schön, D. (1983). El profesional reflexivo. 1–5.
  44. Schubatzky, T., Burde, J.-P., Große-Heilmann, R., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Riese, J., & Weiler, D. (2023). Predicting the development of digital media PCK/TPACK: The role of PCK, motivation to use digital media, interest in and previous experience with digital media. Computers & Education, 206, 104900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104900
  45. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in teaching. American Educational Research Association, 15 (2), 4–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  46. Stake, R. (2007). Investigación con estudio de casos. Morata.
  47. Stenhouse, L. (2004). La investigación Como Base de la enseñanza. Morata.
  48. UNESCO. (2010). Fronteras. Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad: Nueva Época, 15 (2), 215–235. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000259388
  49. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja, N., Tondeur, J., & Braak, J. (2013). Pedagógico tecnológico conocimiento del contenido: una revisión de la literatura. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  50. Wood, P., Larssen, D. L. S., Helgevold, N., & Cajkler, W. (2019). Lesson Study in Initial Teacher Education: Principles and Practices. In: Phil Wood, D. et al. (Eds.), Lesson Study in Initial Teacher Education: Principles and Practices, 105-118. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787567979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787567979
  51. Yin, R. (1994). Investigación sobre estudio de casos: diseño y métodos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.