Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)

Other species section

Effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on the phenology of the Amarilla maranganí quinoa cultivar

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i1.13440

Published 2022-01-01

  • Jeimmi Liliana Amado-Rodríguez
    • ,
  • Narda Paola Humeje-Pan
    • ,
  • Jorge Orlando Blanco-Valvuena
    • ,
  • Nidia Yaneth Torres-Merchán
    • ,
  • Miguel Angel García-Parra

Jeimmi Liliana Amado-Rodríguez
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín

Narda Paola Humeje-Pan
Institución Educativa Colegio Luis Carlos Galán Sarmiento, Bogota

Jorge Orlando Blanco-Valvuena
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja

Nidia Yaneth Torres-Merchán
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja

Miguel Angel García-Parra
Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander, Ocaña

Quinoa plant. Photo: M.A. García-Parra

Abstract

Bacteria associated with plant roots can generate different responses on the growth and development of plants which affect yield. For this reason, a test was conducted and aimed at evaluating the effects of plant growth promoting bacteria’s inoculation on the yield of the Amarilla Maranganí quinoa cultivar, using bacterial strains such as Bacillus macerans, Bacillus laterosporus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus cereus, Actinobacillus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Consortia (a combination of the characterized bacteria), and DIPEL (Bacillus thuringensis var. Kurstaki). The study included the evaluation of the length of the plants and panicles as well as the number of inflorescences and seed production using a completely randomized experimental design. The results showed that the microorganisms had a large impact on plant growth. Actinobacillus increased the number of panicles while P. aeruginosa improved grain production. These results allowed us to confirm that the use of microorganisms favors the growth parameters of quinoa and allowed us to recognize the biological potential of growth promoting bacteria in this crop under conditions of poor water and nutrient availability.

Keywords

Soil bacteria, Inoculation, Vegetable performance, Yield, Andean cultivars

PDF

References

  • Ávila-Martínez, E., Lizarazo-Forero, L. and Cortés-Pérez, F. (2015). Promoción del crecimiento de Baccharis macrantha (Asteraceae) con bacterias solubilizadoras de fosfatos asociadas a su rizósfera. Acta Biológica Colombiana. 20(3), 121-131. 10.15446/abc.v20n3.44742
  • Baldi, E. and M. Toselli. 2014. Mineralization dynamics of different commercial organic fertilizers from agro-industry organic waste recycling: An incubation experiment. Plant Soil and Environ. 60(3), 93-99. Doi: 10.17221/735/2013-PSE
  • Bazile, D., S.-E. Jacobsen, and A. Verniau. 2016. The global expansion of quinoa: Trends and limits. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 622. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00622
  • Bello, O.F., J.F. García, and W.J. Cuervo. 2016. Cuantificación de diazótrofos en la rizósfera del olivo (Olea europaea L.) cultivado en Boyacá, Colombia. Acta Agron. 65(2), 109-115. Doi: 10.15446/acag.v65n2.44270
  • Cameron, K.A., A.J. Hodson, and A.M. Osborn. 2012. Carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycling potentials of supraglacial cryoconite communities. Polar Biol. 35(9), 1375-1393. Doi: 10.1007/s00300-012-1178-3
  • Christiansen, J.L., S-E. Jacobsen, and S.T. Jørgensen. 2010. Photoperiodic effect on flowering and seed development in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 60(6), 539-544. Doi: 10.1080/09064710903295184
  • García-Parra, M.A., L.A. Cuellar-Rodríguez, and H.E. Balaguera-López. 2022. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A systematic review. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín 75(1). Doi: 10.15446/rfnam.v75n1.95754
  • García-Parra, M., J. Garcia-Molano and Y. Deaquiz-Oyola. 2019. Physiological perfomance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under agricultural climatic conditions in Boyaca, Colombia. Agron. Colomb. 37(2). 144-152. Doi: 10.15446/agron.colomb.v37n2.76219
  • García-Parra, M.A. and N.Z. Plazas-Leguizamón. 2018. La quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en los sistemas de producción agraria. Rev. P + L 13(1), 112-119. Doi: 10.22507/pml.v13n1a6
  • García, J.F. 2006. Principios generales de la agricultura orgánica. Fundación Universitaria Juan de Castellanos, Tunja, Colombia.
  • Geren, H. 2015. Effects of different nitrogen levels on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under mediterranean climatic conditions. Turk. J. Field Crops 20(1), 59-64. Doi: 10.17557/.39586
  • Gholamalizadeh, R., G. Khodakaramian, and A.A. Ebadi. 2017. Assessment of rice associated bacterial ability to enhance rice seed germination and rice growth promotion. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 60, 1-13. Doi: 10.1590/1678-4324-2017160410
  • Glick, B. 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria : Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012, 963401. Doi: 10.6064/2012/963401
  • Gómez, L. and E. Aguilar. 2016. Guía de cultivo de la quinua. FAO; Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima.
  • Hinojosa, L., J.A. González, F.H. Barrios-Masias, F. Fuentes, and K.M. Murphy. 2018. Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants 7(4), 106. Doi: 10.3390/plants7040106
  • Hussain, M.I., A.J. Al-Dakheel, and M.J. Reigosa. 2018. Genotypic differences in agro-physiological, biochemical and isotopic responses to salinity stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants: Prospects for salinity tolerance and yield stability. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 129, 411-420. Doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.06.023
  • Issa-Ali, O., R. Fghire, F. Anaya, O. Benlhabib, and S. Wahbi. 2019. Physiological and morphological responses of two quinoa cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought stress. Gesunde Pflanzen 71(2), 123-133. Doi: 10.1007/s10343-019-00460-y
  • Jacobsen, S-E. 2003. The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev. Int. 19(1-2), 167-177. Doi: 10.1081/FRI-120018883
  • Kansomjet, P., P. Thobunluepop, S. Lertmongkol, E. Sarobol, P. Kaewsuwan, P. Junhaeng, N. Pipattanawong, and M.T. Ivan. 2017. Response of physiological characteristics, seed yield and seed quality of quinoa under difference of nitrogen fertilizer management. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 12(1), 20-27. Doi: 10.3923/ajpp.2017.20.27
  • Ku, Y., G. Xu, X. Tian, H. Xie, X. Yang, C. Cao, and Y. Chen. 2018. Root colonization and growth promotion of soybean, wheat and Chinese cabbage by Bacillus cereus YL6. PLoS ONE 13(11), e0210035. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210035
  • Lesjak, J. and D.F. Calderini. 2017. Increased night temperature negatively affects grain yield, biomass and grain number in Chilean quinoa. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 352. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00352
  • Linu, M., Asok, A., Thampi, M., Sreekumar, J. and Jisha, M. (2019). Plant Growth Promoting Traits of Indigenous Phosphate Solubilizing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Chilli (Capsicumannuum L.) Rhizosphere. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 50(4), 444-457. Doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1566469
  • Mehnaz, S., T. Kowalik, B. Reynolds, and G. Lazarovits. 2010. Growth promoting effects of corn (Zea mays) bacterial isolates under greenhouse and field conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42(10), 1848-1856. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.003
  • Melo, D.I. 2016. Studio di adattabilità colturale della quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Italia Settentrionale. PhD thesis. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Piacenza, Milan, Italia.
  • Nishukawa. 2012. Manual de nutrición y fertilización de la quinua. Editorial Funart, Lima
  • Ortuño, N., J.A. Castillo, M. Claros, O. Navia, M. Angulo, D. Barja, and V. Angulo. 2013. Enhancing the sustainability of quinoa production and soil resilience by using bioproducts made with native microorganisms. Agronomy 3(4), 732-746. Doi: 10.3390/agronomy3040732
  • Pérez-Moncada, U.A., M. Ramírez-Gómez, Y.A. Zapata-Narváez, and J.M. Córdoba-Sánchez. 2015. Efecto de la inoculación simple y combinada con Hongos Formadores de Micorriza Arbuscular (HFMA) y Rizobacterias Promotoras de Crecimiento Vegetal (BPCV) en plántulas micropropagadas de mora (Rubus glaucus L.). Corpoica Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecu. 16(1), 95-103. Doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol16_num1_art:383
  • Sanabria, K.M. and H. Lazo. 2018. Aclimatación a la alta temperatura y tolerancia al calor (TL 50) en 6 variedades de Chenopodium quinoa. Rev. Peru. Biol. 25(2), 147-152. Doi: 10.15381/rpb.v25i2.14689
  • Schindler, D.W., R.E. Hecky, D.L. Findlay, M.P. Stainton, B.R. Parker, M.J. Paterson, K.G. Beaty, M. Lyng, and S.E.M. Kasian. 2008. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(32), 11254-11258. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805108105
  • Sharifi, R. and C.M. Ryu. 2018. Revisiting bacterial volatile-mediated plant growth promotion: Lessons from the past and objectives for the future. Ann. Bot. 122(3), 349-358. Doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy108
  • Singh, R.P. and P.N. Jha. 2016. A halotolerant bacterium Bacillus licheniformis HSW-16 augments induced systemic tolerance to salt stress in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum). Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1890. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01890
  • Steindler, L., I. Bertani, L. De Sordi, S. Schwager, L. Eberli, and V. Venturi. 2009. LasI/R and RhlI/R quorum sensing in a strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa beneficial to plants. Appl. Environ. Microb. 75(15). Doi: 10.1128/AEM.02914-08
  • Sousa, A.M., M.O. Pereira, and A. Lourenço. 2015. MorphoCol: An ontology-based knowledgebase for the characterization of clinically significant bacterial colony morphologies. J. Biomed. Infor. 55, 55-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.03.007
  • Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2006. Fisiología vegetal. Universitat Jaume I, Castellon de la Plana, Spain.
  • Torres, J., H. Vargas, G. Corredor, and L.M. Reyes. 2000. Caracterización morfo agronómica de diecinueve cultivares de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en la sabana de Bogotá. Agron. Colomb. 17, 60-68.
  • Yang, A., S.S. Akhtar, S. Iqbal, M. Amjad, M. Naveed, Z.A. Zahir, and S-E. Jacobsen. 2016. Enhancing salt tolerance in quinoa by halotolerant bacterial inoculation. Funt. Plant Biol. 43(7), 632-642. Doi: 10.1071/FP15265

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.