Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)

Vegetable section

Heterotic groups of onions (Allium cepa L.) for the development of low-pungency hybrids

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i1.13584

Published 2022-01-01

  • Fátima Rosangela de Souza Saraiva
    • ,
  • Rita Carolina de Melo
    • ,
  • Paulo Henrique Cerutti
    • ,
  • Jefferson Luís Meirelles Coimbra
    • ,
  • Daniel Pedrosa Alves
    • ,
  • Altamir Frederico Guidolin

Fátima Rosangela de Souza Saraiva
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages

Rita Carolina de Melo
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages

Paulo Henrique Cerutti
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages

Jefferson Luís Meirelles Coimbra
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages

Daniel Pedrosa Alves
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (EPAGRI), Ituporanga

Altamir Frederico Guidolin
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages

Abstract

The growing demand for low-pungency cultivars onion has opened new market niches. The objective of this study was to characterize heterotic onion groups to develop low-pungency hybrid cultivars. A field experiment with a randomized block design and two factors (genotype and fertilization) arranged in split plots was carried out in Ituporanga-SC (Brazil), in 2019. The plots corresponded to two fertilization levels (with and without sulfur), and the subplots corresponded to 26 onion genotypes, where the germplasm was derived from different (male-sterile-LA and maintainer-LB) lines, advanced populations and cultivars. The bulbs were evaluated for the following traits: pyruvic acid (indicator of pungency), sulfur content and bulb yield. The genotype performance differed according to the fertilization level. In the sulfur-free treatments, four heterotic groups were identified. The genetic variation in the crosses LA11 × LB24 and LA15 × LB19 could be exploited for negative selection for pungency and positive selection for bulb yield.

Keywords

Bulb yield, Ideotype, Multivariate analysis, Pyruvic acid content, Standardized canonical coefficient

PDF

References

  1. Buzar, A.G.R., V.R. Oliveira, and L.S. Boiteux. 2007. Estimativa da diversidade genética de germoplasma de cebola via descritores morfológicos, agronômicos e bioquímicos. Hortic. Bras. 25(4), 527-532. Doi: 10.1590/s0102-05362007000400007
  2. Coca, A.C., C.E. Carranza, D. Miranda, and M.H. Rodríguez. 2013. Efecto del NaCl sobre los parámetros de crecimiento, rendimiento y calidad de la cebolla de bulbo (Allium cepa L.) bajo condiciones controladas. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 6(2), 196-212. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2012v6i2.1977
  3. CQFSRS/SC, Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo – RS/SC Brazil. 2016. Manual de adubação e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. 11th ed. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  4. Cramer, C.S., S. Mandal, S. Sharma, S.S. Nourbakhsh, I. Goldman, and I. Guzman. 2021. Recent advances in onion genetic improvement. Agronomy 11(3), 482. Doi: 10.3390/agronomy11030482
  5. Cruz, C.D., A.J. Regazzi, and P.C.S. Carneiro. 2012. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 4th ed. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
  6. Denre, M., S. Pal, A. Chattopadhyay, D. Mazumdar, A. Chakravarty, and A. Bhattacharya. 2011. Antioxidants and pungency of onion. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 17(3), 233-245. Doi: 10.1080/19315260.2010.543452
  7. Donald, C.M. 1968. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17(3), 385-403. Doi: 10.1007/BF00056241
  8. EPAGRI, Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina Brazil. 2013. Sistema de produção para a cebola - Santa Catarina. 4th ed. Florianópolis, Brazil.
  9. EPAGRI/CEPA, Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina/Centro de Socioeconomia e Planejamento Agrícola Brazil. 2019. Síntese Anual da Agricultura de Santa Catarina 2018-2019. Vol. 1. Florianópolis, Brazil.
  10. Falconer, D.S. and T.F.C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics.‎ 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK
  11. Faria, M.V., W.L. Zaluski, J. Rosa, E.S. Rossi, J. Resende, R.F. Kobori, R.L. Santos, and P.R. Da-Silva. 2019. Genetic divergence among inbred onion lines and correlation with heterosis and combining ability. Genet. Mol. Res. 18(3), gmr18316. Doi: 10.4238/gmr18316
  12. Hair, J.F.J., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham. 2009. Análise multivariada de dados. 6th ed. Bookmam, São Paulo, Brazil.
  13. Hamilton, B.K., K. Sun Yoo, and L.M. Pike. 1998. Changes in pungency of onions by soil type, sulphur nutrition and bulb maturity. Sci. Hortic. 74(4), 249-256. Doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00089-2
  14. IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística Brazil. 2020. Índice nacional de preços ao consumidor-INPC/Séries históricas. In: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/precos-e-custos/9258-indice-nacional-de-precos-ao-consumidor.html?edicao=26615&t=series-historicas; consulted: September, 2021.
  15. Kim, H.Y., D. Jackson, K. Adhikari, C. Riner, and G. Sanchez-Brambila. 2017. Relationship between consumer acceptability and pungency-related flavor compounds of Vidalia onions. J. Food Sci. 82(10), 2396-2402. Doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13915
  16. Khandagale, K. and S. Gawande. 2019. Genetics of bulb colour variation and flavonoids in onion. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 94(4), 522-532. Doi: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1543558
  17. Lo Scalzo, R., M. Fibiani, V. Picchi, and B. Parisi. 2021. Low pungency and phytochemicals relationship during bulb assessment in the sweet onion breeding program. Sci. Hortic. 285(2021), 110191. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110191
  18. Lee, E.J., K.S. Yoo, J. Jifon, and B.S. Patil. 2009. Application of extra sulfur to high-sulfur /soils does not increase pungency and related compounds in shortday onions. Sci. Hortic. 123(2), 178-183. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.009
  19. Liu, S., H. He, G. Feng, and Q. Chen. 2009. Effect of nitrogen and sulfur interaction on growth and pungency of different pseudostem types of Chinese spring onion (Allium fistulosum L.). Sci. Hortic. 121(1), 12-18. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.019
  20. Mallor, C., M. Balcells, F. Mallor, and E. Sales. 2011. Genetic variation for bulb size, soluble solids content and pungency in the Spanish sweet onion variety Fuentes de Ebro. Response to selection for low pungency. Plant Breed. 130(1), 55-59. Doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01737.x
  21. Mallor, C. and E. Sales. 2012. Yield and traits of bulb quality in the Spanish sweet onion cultivar ‘Fuentes de Ebro’ after selection for low pungency. Sci. Hortic. 140, 60-65. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2012.04.003
  22. Melchinger, A.E. and R.K. Gumber. 1998. Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. pp. 29-44. In: Larnkey, K.R. and J.E. Staub (eds.). Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants. Vol. 25. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Doi: 10.2135/cssaspecpub25.c3
  23. Menezes Júnior, F.O.G. 2016. Aspectos fitotécnicos. pp. 41-48. In: Menezes Júnior, F. and L.L. Marcuzzo (Orgs.). Manual de boas práticas agrícolas: guia para sustentabilidade das lavouras de cebola do Estado de Santa Catarina. EPAGRI, Florianópolis, Brazil.
  24. Pevicharova, G., S. Genova, E. Nacheva, and N. Penov. 2020. Heterosis expression toward technological parameters in F1 onion hybrids for drying. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 21(2), 338-343. Doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/21.2.2487
  25. Porta, B., M. Rivas, L. Gutiérrez, and G.A. Galván. 2014. Variability, heritability, and correlations of agronomic traits in an onion landrace and derived S1 lines. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 14(1), 29-35. Doi: 10.1590/s1984-70332014000100005
  26. Santos, C.A.F., J.E. Yuri, and N.D. Costa. 2019. Efeito do enxofre na produtividade e no teor de ácido pirúvico em cultivares de cebola. Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina, Brazil.
  27. Schunemann, A.P., R. Treptow, D.L. Leite, and J.L. Vendruscolo. 2006. Pungência e características químicas em bulbos de genótipos de cebola (Allium cepa L.) cultivados no Alto Vale do Itajaí, SC, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Agrociênc. 12(1), 77-80.
  28. Schwimmer, S. and W.J. Weston. 1961. Onion flavor and odor, enzymatic development of pyruvic acid in onion as a measure of pungency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 9(4), 301-304. Doi: 10.1021/jf60116a018
  29. Tedesco, M.J., C. Gianello, C.A. Bissani, H. Bohnen, and S. Volkweiss. 1995. Análises de solo, plantas e outros materiais. Bol. Tec. 5. 2nd ed. UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  30. Tóth, T., J. Bystrická, J. Tomáš, P. Siekel, J. Kovarovič, and M. Lenková. 2018. Effect of sulphur fertilization on contents of phenolic and sulphuric compounds in onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Food Nutr. Res. 57(2), 170-178.
  31. Wall, M.M. and J.N. Corgan. 1992. Relationship between pyruvate analysis and flavor perception for onion pungency determination. HortScience 27(9), 1029-1030. Doi: 10.21273/hortsci.27.9.1029
  32. Yoo, K.S., D. Leskovar, B.S. Patil, and E.J. Lee. 2019. Effects of leaf cutting on bulb weight and pungency of short-day onions after lifting the plants. Sci. Hortic. 257, 108720. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108720
  33. Yoo, K.S., L.M. Pike, B.S. Patil, and E.J. Lee. 2020. Developing sweet onions by recurrent selection in a short-day onion breeding program. Sci. Hortic. 266, 109269. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109269

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.