Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024)
Julio-Diciembre

Articles

Interactions between social metacognitive regulation and problem representation in the design of virtual learning environments

https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.20278306.v14.n2.2024.18157

Published 2024-08-15

Juan Carlos Solano-Guerrero
Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia

Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ortega
Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia image/svg+xml

Angélica María Rodríguez-Ortiz
universidad autonoma de manizalez, manizales, Colombia image/svg+xml

Oscar Eugenio Tamayo-Alzate
Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia image/svg+xml

Abstract

The study aims to understand interactions between social metacognitive regulation and collaborative problem solving, in particular, problem representation, in the design of virtual learning environments. The phenomenon is investigated in an online learning environment that uses a videoconferencing system, based on the recording of verbal interactions. The participants were students of a course on learning and technology, from two initial teacher education programs at a public university. The methodological strategy used was discourse analysis, from the perspective of discursive psychology. Three models of discursive interaction were characterized, namely: individual disconnection, individual connection and group connection. The recognition or not of one's own and others' versions of problem representation fosters discursive dynamics that strengthen or not the agreement and consensus and the relationships of solidarity and trust.

Keywords

metacognitive regulation, problem representation, virtual learning environments, discursive psychology

PDF (Español)

Author Biography

Juan Carlos Solano-Guerrero

Ingeniero de Sistemas, Magíster en Tecnologías de la Información Aplicadas a la Educación, Estudiante del Doctorado en Ciencias Cognitivas de la Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.

Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ortega

Licenciado en Biología y Química, Doctor en Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales.

Angélica María Rodríguez-Ortiz

Licenciada en Filosofía y Letras (Filosofía), Doctora en Filosofía.

Oscar Eugenio Tamayo-Alzate

Licenciado en Biología y Química, Doctor en Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales.

References

  1. Ader, M., Hassane, S., van Bruggen, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2023). Comparing metacognitive regulation and socially shared metacognitive regulation in face-to-face and online learning settings in ill-structured problem solving. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100684
  2. Ball, L. J., & Christensen, B. T. (2019). Advancing an understanding of design cognition and design metacognition: progress and prospects. Design Studies, 65, 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.003
  3. Candela, A. (2001). Ciencia en el aula. Los alumnos entre la argumentación y el consenso. Paidós.
  4. Candela, A. (2020). 30 años de investigación sobre ciencia en el aula. Investigación en la escuela, 100, 23-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IE.2020.i100.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/IE.2020.i100.03
  5. Castellanos, J. C., & Onrubia, J. (2018). Group characteristics and profiles of shared regulation in collaborative environments involving asynchronous communication. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41 (2), 369-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1434037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1434037
  6. Coll, C. (2019). Aprender y enseñar con las TIC: expectativas, realidad y potencialidades. En R. Carneiro, J. C. Toscano, & T. Díaz (Edits.), Los desafíos de las TIC para el cambio educativo, 113-126. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. http://bit.ly/3mCSi2K
  7. Condor, S., & Antaki, C. (2000). Cognición social y discurso. En T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), El discurso como estructura y proceso, 453-490. Gedisa.
  8. Dang, B., Vitiello, R., Nguyen, A., Rosé, C., & Järvelä, S. (2023). How do students deliberate for socially shared regulation in collaborative learning? A process-oriented approach. En Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2023, 59–66. International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/9265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2023.280974
  9. De Backer, L. (2015). Fostering university students’ individual and socially shared metacognitive regulation through reciprocal same-age peer tutoring : a study into the impact and interaction processes (Tesis doctoral). Ghent University. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-6850913
  10. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2016). Eliciting reciprocal peer-tutoring groups’ metacognitive regulation through structuring and problematizing scaffolds. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84 (4), 804-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1134419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1134419
  11. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2020). Variations in socially shared metacognitive regulation and their relation with university students’ performance. Metacognition and Learning, 15 (2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09229-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09229-5
  12. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. SAGE.
  13. Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1622
  14. González, C., & Cubero, R. (2014). What do students do to agree on academic knowledge? Structured tasks and non-structured tasks for classroom-based learning. Cultura y Educación, 26 (3), 505-534. http://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.973669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.973669
  15. Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P., & Hesse, F. (2018). Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19 (2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244
  16. Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2018). Introduction: Relationships between classroom dialogue and support for metacognitive, self-regulatory development in educational contexts. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 162, 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20258
  17. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. En P. Alexander, D. Schunk, & J. Greene (Edits.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 83-106. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048.ch6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
  18. Hennessy, S., Howe, C., Mercer, N., & Vrikki, M. (2020). Coding classroom dialogue: methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100404
  19. Huma, B., Alexander, M., Stokoe, E., & Tileaga, C. (2020). Introduction to special issue on discursive psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17 (3), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1729910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1729910
  20. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. En G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation, 13-31. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
  21. Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems. A handbook for designing problem solving learning environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847527
  22. Khosa, D. K., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: can it explain differences in students’ conceptual understanding? Metacognition and Learning, 9, 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z
  23. Kim, D., & Lim, C. (2018). Promoting socially shared metacognitive regulation in collaborative project-based learning: a framework for the design of structured guidance. Teaching in Higher Education, 23 (2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379484
  24. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2017). Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co- and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning. Contemporary Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.009
  25. Mendoza, J. (2021). Construyendo y compartiendo el conocimiento: una perspectiva discursiva en el aula. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. https://bit.ly/40IzjnA
  26. Mercer, N. (2019). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. En N. Mercer, Language and the joint creation of knowledge. The selected works of Neil Mercer, 45-67. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400759-4
  27. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework. En PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving, 131-188. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-8-en
  28. Sawyer, R. K. (2022). An introduction to the learning sciences. En R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888295.002
  29. Tamayo, O. E. (2006). La metacognición en los modelos para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de las ciencias. En A. Martínez, O. L. Riveros, C. Silva, J. Rojano, C. Ojeda, J. C. Echeverry,. O. E. Tamayo, Los bordes de la pedagogía: del modelo a la ruptura, 275-306. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
  30. Uttamchandani, S., & Lester, J. N. (2021). Qualitative approaches to language in CSCL. En U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Edits.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning, 605-624. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_33
  31. Valencia, T., Serna, A., Ochoa, S., Caicedo, A. M., Montes, J. A., & Chávez, J. D. (2016). Competencias y estándares TIC desde la dimensión pedagógica: una perspectiva desde los niveles de apropiación de las TIC en la práctica educativa docente. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. https://bit.ly/3QZZ7bv
  32. Vauras, M., Volet, S., & Iiskala, T. (2021). Socially-shared metacognitive regulation in collaborative science learning. En D. Moraitou, & P. Metallidou (Edits.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research across the life span, 83-102. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51673-4_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51673-4_5
  33. Volet, S., & Vauras, M. (2013). The study of interpersonal regulation in learning and its challenge to the research methodology. En S. Volet, & M. Vauras (Edits.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation. Methodological advances, 1-13. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117736
  34. Whitebread, D., Grau, V., & Somerville, M. P. (2018). Commentary: Relationships between classroom dialogue and support for metacognitive, self-regulatory development in educational contexts. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 162, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20257
  35. Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology. Theory, method and applications. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983335

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.