Jean Tirole and Economic Science New Identity

Jean Tirole y la nueva identidad de la ciencia económica

Main Article Content

Alexander Tobón

Abstract

In Economics for the Common Good, Jean Tirole sets a turning point in the way of conceiving the problems and methods used in economics. This article attempts to show that these components define a new identity for economic science, but without economic theory. To this end, Tirole's position according to which economics must be relocated within the social and human sciences is refuted. Consequently, this article contributes to reflection on the analytical scope of the new economic science and the meaning of what economists do nowadays.

Keywords:

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biography (SEE)

Alexander Tobón, Profesor, Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia

Doctor en Ciencias Económicas, profesor titular del Departamento de Economía, Grupo de Macroeconomía Aplicada, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

References (SEE)

Arrow, K. (1969). The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Nonmarket Allocation. In Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2. General Equilibrium (pp. 500-518). Belknap Press.

Aumann, R. J. (2008) Game Theory. In S. Durlauf & L. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics vol. 3, (2nd ed.), (pp. 529-558). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bassett, D. & Claveau, F. (2011) The Economic Entomologist: An Interview with Alan Kirman, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 4(2), 42-66. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v4i2.80

Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(3), 489-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00253

Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2012) Laws and Norms. IZA Discussion Paper, (6290). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1999318, https://doi.org/10.3386/w17579

Debreu, G. (1952). A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 38(10), 886-93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.10.886

Durand, J. P. & Weill, R. (1989). Sociologie contemporaine. Vigot.

Fudenberg, D. & Tirole, J. (1991). Game Theory. MIT Press.

Guerrien, B. (1995). La théorie des jeux, (2eme édi.). Economica.

Hahn, Frank (1981) General Equilibrium Theory. In Bell and Kristol (Eds.), Crisis in Economic Theory (pp. 123-138). Basic Books.

Harsanyi, J. (1967-68) Game with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Parts I, II, and II. Management Science, 14, 159-502. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486

Laffont, J-J. (1980). Essays in the Economics of Uncertainty. Harvard University Press.

Monsalve, S. (2018). Competencia bajo equilibrio de Nash. Curso fundamental de Microeconomía, vol. 3. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Pignol, C. (2017). La théorie de l’équilibre général. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.34888

Rodrik, D. (2016). Las leyes de la economía: aciertos y errores de una ciencia en entredicho. Deusto.

Seabright, P. (2012). La société des inconnus: histoire naturelle de la collectivité humaine. Editions Markus Haller.

Shubik, M. (1982). Game Theory in the Social Sciences, Volume I. MIT Press.

Shubik, M. (1984). Game Theory in the Social Sciences, Volume II. MIT Press.

Sorin, S. (1999). Von Neuman-Morgenstern, Nash et Arrow-Debreu : théories des jeux et équilibre général. Cahiers, d'économie politique, 35, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.1999.1259

Tirole, J. (2017). La economía del bien común. Taurus, Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.