Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Leadership of the United States and China in Global Value Chains

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the participation and position of the United States and China in global value chains during the period 1995-2020. For this, the methodology proposed by Koopman et al. (2014) is used, who suggest some more reliable indicators to measure the value contributed by a given country in global value chains. The results show that from 1995 to 2014, China was characterized as a more backward-oriented economy participating in global value chains, due to its predominant role as an assembly and manufacturing country, which brought with it a high flow of imports of raw materials and technological components from other economies to incorporate them into the production of final goods. This trend seems to be reversing starting in 2015, as there is a growing forward participation in global value chains, which warns of a strong threat to the United States, which usually maintains a strong forward participation, that is, a leadership position in the creation of high value added through product design and technological innovation, inputs that are essential for global production, which in turn gives it great influence and leadership in the world economy.

Keywords

leadership in the creation of added value, protectionism, fragmentation of international production, global value chains, United States of America, China


Author Biography

Alejandro Molina-Vargas

Doctor en Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Estancia Posdoctoral Académica CONAHCYT-Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana,

Isaí Contreras-Álvarez

Doctor en Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Profesor-Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Centro Universitario Valle de México,

Carlos Gómez-Chiñas

Doctor en Ciencias Económicas por el Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Profesor-Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.


References

  1. Ahmad, N., Araújo, S., Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2013). Using Trade Microdata to Improve Trade in Value-Added Measures: Proof of Concept Using Turkish Data. In A, Mattoo., Z. Wang & S. Wei (Eds.), Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank
  2. Aslam, A., Novta, N., & Rodrigues, F. (2017). Calculating Trade in Value Added. IMF Working Paper No. WP/17/178. International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2017/178/article-A001-en.xml
  3. Augustyniak, B., Ebeke, C., Klein, N., & Zhao, H. (2013). German-Central European Supply Chain-Cluster. Report–First Background Note–Trade Linkages. IMF Multi-Country Report No. 13/263. International Monetary Fund.
  4. Barría, C. (2018, 7 de mayo). No más zapatillas, ropa y juguetes baratos: cómo es el ambicioso plan "Made in China 2025" con el que Pekín quiere conquistar el mundo. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-43888013
  5. Basu, P. & Ray, P. (2022), China-Plus-One: Expanding Global Value Chains. Journal of Business Strategy, 43(6), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2021-0066
  6. Cui, L. (2007). China: creciente dependencia externa. Finanzas & Desarrollo. IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/spa/2007/09/pdf/cui.pdf
  7. Feenstra, R. (1998). Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.31
  8. Gandoy, R., Díaz-Mora, C. & González, B. (2018). El papel de los servicios en las cadenas globales de valor de las manufacturas. Papeles de Economía Española, (158), 139-153.
  9. González, J. (2020). Causas, evolución y perspectivas de la guerra comercial para China. Análisis Económico, 35(89), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2020v35n89/Gonzalez
  10. Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(91), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
  11. Javorsek, M., & Camacho, I. (2015). Trade in Value Added: Concepts, Estimation and Analysis. ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 150. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/145386
  12. Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012). Fragmentation and Trade in Value Added over Four Decades. NBER Working Paper 18186. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18186
  13. Johnson, R., & Noguera, G. (2016). A Portrait of Trade in Value Added over Four Decades. NBER Working Paper No. 22974. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22974
  14. Koopman, R., Powers, W., & Wang, Z. (2010). Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Productions Chains. Working Paper 16426. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16426
  15. Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. (2014). Tracing Value-Added & Double Counting
  16. in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459
  17. Mancini, M. E. (2016). Inserción en cadenas de valor globales y patrones de innovación de empresas de países en desarrollo: las pymes de Argentina. Economía: Teoría y Práctica, (45), 5-37. https://doi.org/10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/452016/Mancini
  18. Mattoo, A., Wang, Z. & Wei, S. (2013). Measuring Trade in Value Added when Production is Fragmented across Countries: An Overview. In A, Mattoo., Z. Wang, Z., & Wei, S. (Eds.), Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank
  19. OECD-WTO (2024). OECD-WTO: Statistics on Trade in Value Added. OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/tiva-data-en
  20. OMC. (2015). Estadísticas del comercio internacional. WTO. https://www.wto.org/spanish/res_s/statis_s/its2015_s/its2015_s.pdf
  21. Riera, O., & Paetzold, P. (2020). Global Value Chains and Trade in the EBRD Regions. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/economic-research-and-data/cse-economists/global-value-chains-and-trade-in-ebrd-regions.html
  22. Rodil, O. & López, J. (2021). Fragmentación productiva e integración económica en América del Norte: fuerzas centrífugas y centrípetas. Problemas del Desarrollo, Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 51(200), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2020.200.68317
  23. Romero, I. (2009). Pymes y cadenas de valor globales. Implicaciones para la política industrial en las economías en desarrollo. Análisis Económico, 24(57), 199-2016. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41312227010
  24. Simone, C., Gunnella, V., & Quaglietti, L. (2022). Global Value Chains: Measurement, Trends and Drivers. European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op289~95a0e7d24f.en.pdf
  25. Stephenson, S. (2013). Global Value Chains: The New Reality of International Trade. In Global Value Chains: Proposals and Analysis (pp. 7-18). ICTSD & WEF.
  26. UNCTAD. (2013). World Investment Report. Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2013_en.pdf
  27. Vrh, N. (2018). What Drives the Differences in Domestic Value Added in Exports between Old and New E.U. Member States? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 645-663, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1438910
  28. WITS. (2024). The World Integrated Trade Solution. https://wits.worldbank.org/default.aspx?lang=en
  29. World Bank (2023). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
  30. Xing, Y. (2020, June). Global Value Chains and the “Missing Exports” of the United States. China Economic Review, 61, 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101429

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.