The Leadership of the United States and China in Global Value Chains
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to analyze the participation and position of the United States and China in global value chains during the period 1995-2020. For this, the methodology proposed by Koopman et al. (2014) is used, who suggest some more reliable indicators to measure the value contributed by a given country in global value chains. The results show that from 1995 to 2014, China was characterized as a more backward-oriented economy participating in global value chains, due to its predominant role as an assembly and manufacturing country, which brought with it a high flow of imports of raw materials and technological components from other economies to incorporate them into the production of final goods. This trend seems to be reversing starting in 2015, as there is a growing forward participation in global value chains, which warns of a strong threat to the United States, which usually maintains a strong forward participation, that is, a leadership position in the creation of high value added through product design and technological innovation, inputs that are essential for global production, which in turn gives it great influence and leadership in the world economy.
Keywords
leadership in the creation of added value, protectionism, fragmentation of international production, global value chains, United States of America, China
Author Biography
Alejandro Molina-Vargas
Doctor en Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Estancia Posdoctoral Académica CONAHCYT-Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana,
Isaí Contreras-Álvarez
Doctor en Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Profesor-Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Centro Universitario Valle de México,
Carlos Gómez-Chiñas
Doctor en Ciencias Económicas por el Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Profesor-Investigador de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
References
- Ahmad, N., Araújo, S., Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2013). Using Trade Microdata to Improve Trade in Value-Added Measures: Proof of Concept Using Turkish Data. In A, Mattoo., Z. Wang & S. Wei (Eds.), Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank
- Aslam, A., Novta, N., & Rodrigues, F. (2017). Calculating Trade in Value Added. IMF Working Paper No. WP/17/178. International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2017/178/article-A001-en.xml
- Augustyniak, B., Ebeke, C., Klein, N., & Zhao, H. (2013). German-Central European Supply Chain-Cluster. Report–First Background Note–Trade Linkages. IMF Multi-Country Report No. 13/263. International Monetary Fund.
- Barría, C. (2018, 7 de mayo). No más zapatillas, ropa y juguetes baratos: cómo es el ambicioso plan "Made in China 2025" con el que Pekín quiere conquistar el mundo. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-43888013
- Basu, P. & Ray, P. (2022), China-Plus-One: Expanding Global Value Chains. Journal of Business Strategy, 43(6), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2021-0066
- Cui, L. (2007). China: creciente dependencia externa. Finanzas & Desarrollo. IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/spa/2007/09/pdf/cui.pdf
- Feenstra, R. (1998). Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.31
- Gandoy, R., Díaz-Mora, C. & González, B. (2018). El papel de los servicios en las cadenas globales de valor de las manufacturas. Papeles de Economía Española, (158), 139-153.
- González, J. (2020). Causas, evolución y perspectivas de la guerra comercial para China. Análisis Económico, 35(89), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2020v35n89/Gonzalez
- Hummels, D., Ishii, J., & Yi, K. M. (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics, 54(91), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3
- Javorsek, M., & Camacho, I. (2015). Trade in Value Added: Concepts, Estimation and Analysis. ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 150. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/145386
- Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012). Fragmentation and Trade in Value Added over Four Decades. NBER Working Paper 18186. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18186
- Johnson, R., & Noguera, G. (2016). A Portrait of Trade in Value Added over Four Decades. NBER Working Paper No. 22974. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22974
- Koopman, R., Powers, W., & Wang, Z. (2010). Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Productions Chains. Working Paper 16426. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16426
- Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. (2014). Tracing Value-Added & Double Counting
- in Gross Exports. American Economic Review, 104(2), 459-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459
- Mancini, M. E. (2016). Inserción en cadenas de valor globales y patrones de innovación de empresas de países en desarrollo: las pymes de Argentina. Economía: Teoría y Práctica, (45), 5-37. https://doi.org/10.24275/ETYPUAM/NE/452016/Mancini
- Mattoo, A., Wang, Z. & Wei, S. (2013). Measuring Trade in Value Added when Production is Fragmented across Countries: An Overview. In A, Mattoo., Z. Wang, Z., & Wei, S. (Eds.), Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank
- OECD-WTO (2024). OECD-WTO: Statistics on Trade in Value Added. OECD iLibrary. https://doi.org/10.1787/tiva-data-en
- OMC. (2015). Estadísticas del comercio internacional. WTO. https://www.wto.org/spanish/res_s/statis_s/its2015_s/its2015_s.pdf
- Riera, O., & Paetzold, P. (2020). Global Value Chains and Trade in the EBRD Regions. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/economic-research-and-data/cse-economists/global-value-chains-and-trade-in-ebrd-regions.html
- Rodil, O. & López, J. (2021). Fragmentación productiva e integración económica en América del Norte: fuerzas centrífugas y centrípetas. Problemas del Desarrollo, Revista Latinoamericana de Economía, 51(200), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2020.200.68317
- Romero, I. (2009). Pymes y cadenas de valor globales. Implicaciones para la política industrial en las economías en desarrollo. Análisis Económico, 24(57), 199-2016. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41312227010
- Simone, C., Gunnella, V., & Quaglietti, L. (2022). Global Value Chains: Measurement, Trends and Drivers. European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op289~95a0e7d24f.en.pdf
- Stephenson, S. (2013). Global Value Chains: The New Reality of International Trade. In Global Value Chains: Proposals and Analysis (pp. 7-18). ICTSD & WEF.
- UNCTAD. (2013). World Investment Report. Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2013_en.pdf
- Vrh, N. (2018). What Drives the Differences in Domestic Value Added in Exports between Old and New E.U. Member States? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 645-663, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1438910
- WITS. (2024). The World Integrated Trade Solution. https://wits.worldbank.org/default.aspx?lang=en
- World Bank (2023). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
- Xing, Y. (2020, June). Global Value Chains and the “Missing Exports” of the United States. China Economic Review, 61, 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101429