Global Industrial Production Chains in Latin America From A Structuralist Perspective
Abstract
Recovering the main concepts of Latin American structuralism, this article examines the potentialities and limitations regarding the new development paradigm, the Global Value Chain approach, which over the last two decades has had an important influence among academic community and within international organizations. To achieve this, the authors analyze the exacerbation of the peripheral condition of the Latin American productive structures associated with their insertion in global production, contrasting them with the successful experiences of structural transformation of the East Asian countries. From the analysis, the authors draw some elements to rethink the importance of industrialization for development, and the policies needed to promote it in the current scenario of global production chains.
Keywords
industrialization, economic growth, economic de, global value chains, Latin
Author Biography
Carolina Teresita Lauxmann
Doctor in Social Sciences from the University of Buenos Aires. Master in Economic History and Economic Policies from the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires. National public accountant of the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the National University of the Litoral. Professor-researcher of the Faculties of Economic Sciences and Humanities and Sciences of the National University of the Litoral, Santa Fe
Manuel Trevignani
Candidate for a doctorate in International Studies from the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Master in International Relations and Negotiations from the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences and Universidad de San Andrés. Degree in Administration from the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Professor-researcher at the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina
Víctor Ramiro Fernández
Doctor in Political Science from the Autonomous University of Madrid. Master in Social Sciences from the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO), Buenos Aires. Lawyer from the Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences of the Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Independent researcher of the National Council for Scientific Research (CONICET). Professor at the Faculty of Humanities and Sciences of the Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe
References
1. Akamatsu, K. (1962). A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. The Developing Economies, 1(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1962.tb01020.x
2. Amsden, A. (2001). The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford University Press.
3. Arceo, E. (2005). El impacto de la globalización en la periferia y las nuevas y viejas formas de la dependencia en América Latina. Cuadernos del CENDES, 22(60), 25–61.
4. Arceo, E. (2011). El largo camino a la crisis. Centro, periferia y transformaciones en la economía mundial. Cara o Ceca.
5. Arrighi, G. (1999). El largo siglo XX. Akal.
6. Arrighi, G., Silver, B., & Brewer, B. (2003). Industrial Convergence, Globalization, and the Persistence of the North-South Divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(1), 3–31.
7. Baldwin, R. (2011). Trade and Industrialization after Globalisation´S 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining Supply Chains Are Different and Why it Matter. NBER Working Paper, n. w17716. National Bureau of Economic Research
8. Bair, J., & Gereffi, G. (2001). Local Clusters in Global Chains: The Causes and Consequences of Export Dynamism in Torreon’s Blue Jeans Industry. World Development, 29(11), 1885–1903.
9. Banco Mundial (2020). Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank.
10. Beeson, M. (2009). Developmental States in East Asia: A Comparison of the Japanese And Chinese Experiences. Asian Perspective, 33(2), 5-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42704671
11. Benavente, J. M., Crespi, G., Katz, J., & Stumpo, G. (1998). Nuevos problemas y oportunidades en el desarrollo industrial de América Latina. En G. Stumpo (Ed.), Empresas transnacionales, procesos de reestructuración industrial y políticas económicas en América Latina. Alianza.
12. Bértola, L., & Ocampo, J. A. (2013). El desarrollo económico de América Latina desde la independencia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
13. Blyde, J. (2013). The Participation of Mexico in Global Supply Chains. The Challenge of Adding Mexican Value. Inter-American Development Bank, Technical Note No. IDB-TN-596.
14. Blyde, J., & Trachtenberg, D. (2020). Global Value Chains and Latin America: A Technical Note. Inter-American Development Bank, technical note nro. 1853.
15. Bustelo. (1999). Teorías contemporáneas del desarrollo económico. Síntesis.
16. Castells, M. (1990). El impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en la economía internacional. Implicaciones para la economía española. Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda.
17. CEPAL (1951). Estudio económico de América Latina, 1949. Naciones Unidas.
18. CEPAL (1988). La industrialización en América Latina: evolución y perspectivas. Naciones Unidas.
19. Dicken, P. (2011). Global Shift. Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. The Guilford Press.
20. Durán Lima, J. & Zaclicever, D. (2013). América Latina y el Caribe en las cadenas internacionales de valor. CEPAL-Naciones Unidas.
21. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press.
22. Fajnzylber, F. (1983). La industrialización trunca de América Latina. Centro Editor de América Latina.
23. Fajnzylber, F. (1976). Oligopolio, empresas transnacionales y estilos de desarrollo. El Trimestre Económico, 43(171), 625–656.
24. Fajnzylber, F. (1992). Industrialización en América Latina. De la “caja negra” al “casillero vacío”. Nueva Sociedad, 118, 21–28.
25. Fernández, V. R. (2015). Global Value Chain in Global Political Networks: Tool for Development or Neoliberal Device? Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613414532769
26. Fernández, V. R. (2017). La trilogía del erizo-zorro. Redes globales, trayectorias nacionales y dinámicas regionales desde la periferia. Anthropos-UNL.
27. Férnandez, V. R., & Lauxmann, C. T. (2014). ¿Cuál(es) camino(s) conduce(n) a Roma? Estado y políticas industriales en los desafíos del desarrollo latinoamericano. Cuadernos del CENDES, 31(86), 49-72.
28. FitzGerald, V. (1998). La CEPAL y la teoría de la industrialización. CEPAL, (número Extraordinario: CEPAL cincuenta años), 47–61.
29. Fröbel, F., Heinrichs, J., & Kreye, O. (1977). The Tendency Towards a New International Division of Labor: The Utilization of a WorldWide Labor Force for Manufacturing Oriented to the World Market. Fernand Braudel Center, 1(1), 73–88.
30. Gereffi, G. (1996). Commodity Chains and Regional Divisions of Labour in East Asia. Jorunal of Asian Business, 12(1), 75-112.
31. Gereffi, G. (1999). International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the apparel Commodity Chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00075-0
32. Gereffi, G. (2005). The Global Economy: Organization, Governance, and Development. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Second Edition (pp. 160-182). Princeton University Press.
33. Gereffi, G. (2014). Global Value Chains in a Post-Washington Consensus World. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
34. Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (1994). Commodity Chain and Global Capitalism. Greenwood Publishing Group.
35. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. (2001). The Value of Value Chains: Spreading the Gains from Globalisation. IDS Bulletin, 32(3).
36. Giuliani, E., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotii, R. (2005). Upgrading in Global Value Chains : Lessons from Latin American Clusters. World Development, 33(4), 549–573.
37. Glassman, J. (2018). Drums of War, Drums of Development. The Formation of A Pacific Ruling Class and Industrial Transformation in East and Southeast Asia, 1945-1980. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004377523
38. Gore, C. (2000). The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries. World Development, 28(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00160-6
39. Guillén Romo, A. (2008). Modelos de desarrollo y estrategias alternativas en América Latina. En E. Correa, J. Déniz, & A. Palezuelos (Eds.), America Latina y desarrollo económico. Estructura, inserción externa y sociedad (pp. 15-42). Akal.
40. Gurrieri, A. (2011). O Manifesto Latino-Americano e Outros Ensaios. Contraponto.
41. Hamilton, G., & Gereffi, G. (2009). Global Commodity Chains, Market Makers, and the Rise of Demand-Responsive Economies. In J. Bair (Ed.), Frontiers of Commodity Chains Research. Stanford University Press.
42. Hauge, J. (2020). Industrial Policy in the Era of Global Value Chains: Towards A Developmentalist Framework Drawing on the Industrialisation Experiences of South Korea and Taiwan. The World Economy, 00, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12922
43. Hirschman, A. (1968). La economía política de la industrialización a través de la sustitución de importaciones en América Latina. El Trimestre Económico, 35(140), 625–658.
44. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How Does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000022198
45. Jenkins, R. (2010). China's Global Expansion and Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(4), 809-837
46. Julio, L.G. (2008). Keynes in Latin America and Latin American Keynesianism. En: Forstater M., Wray L.R. (eds) Keynes for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A Handbook for Value Chain Research. IDRC.
48. Katz, J. (2000). Reformas estructurales, productividad y conducta tecnológica en América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica- CEPAL.
49. Katz, J., & Cimoli, M. (2001). Reformas estructurales, brechas tecnológicas y el pensamiento del Dr. Raúl Prebisch. CEPAL, Serie Desarrollo Productivo y Empresarial.
50. Kerner, D. (2003). La CEPAL, las empresas transnacionales y la búsqueda de una estrategia de desarrollo latinoamerica. CEPAL, 79, 85–99.
51. Kotz, D., & McDonough, T. (2010). Global Neoliberalism and the Contemporary Social Structure of Accumulation. In T. McDonough, M. Reich, & D. Kotz (Eds.), Contemporary Capitalism and its Crises: Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press.
52. Lemoine, F. & Ünal-Kesenci, D. (2004). Assembly Trade and Technology Transfer: The Case of China. World Development, 32(5), 829-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.01.001
53. Mesquita, L., & Lazzarini, S. (2008). Horizontal and Vertical Relationships in Developing Economies: Implications for SMEs’ Access to Global Markets. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 359-380.
54. Milberg, W., Jiang, X. & Gereffi, G. (2014). Industrial Policy in the Era of Vertically Specialized Industrialization. In J. M. Salazar-Xirinachs, I. Nübler, & R. Kozul-Wright (Eds.), Transforming Economies: Making Industrial Policy Work for Growth, Jobs and Development. International Labour Organization.
55. Nahón, C., Rodríguez Enríquez, C., & Schorr, M. (2006). El pensamiento latinoamericano en el campo del desarrollo del subdesarrollo: trayectoria, rupturas y continuidades. CLACSO.
56. Neilson, J. (2014). Value Chains, Neoliberalism and Development Practice: The Indonesian Experience. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 38-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.809782
57. Ocampo, J. A. & Martin, J. (2004). América Latina y el Caribe en la era global. Alfaomega.
58. Onis, Z., & Senses, F. (2005). Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus. Development and Change, 36(2), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00411.x
59. Peck, J. (2017). Offshore: Exploring the Worlds of Global Outsourcing. Oxford University Press.
60. Prebisch, R. (1949). El desarrollo económico de América Latina y sus principales problemas. CEPAL.
61. Quadros, R. (2002). Global Quality Standards, Chain Governance and the Technological Upgrading of Brazilian Auto-Components Producers. IDS Working Paper 156.
62. Riffo, L. (2011). Desigualdades económicas regionales en América Latina y el Caribe. En CEPAL Reuniones de Expertos sobre Población, Territorio y Desarrollo Sostenible.
63. Rodríguez, O. (2006). El estructuralismo latinoamericano. Siglo XXI-CEPAL.
64. Schmitz, H. (1999). Global Competition and Local Cooperation: Success and Failure in the Sinos Valley, Brazil. World Development, 27(9), 1627-1650.
65. Schteingart, D., Santarcángelo, J., & Porta, F. (2017). La inserción Argentina en las cadenas globales de valor. Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(3), 45-82.
66. Sugihara, K. (2019). The Asian Path of Economic Development: Intra-regional Trade, Industrialization and the Developmental State. In T. Shiraishi and T. Sonobe (Eds.), Emerging States and Economies. The Origins, Drivers, and Challenges Ahead. Springer.
67. Stamm, A., & Von Drachenfels, C. (2011). Value Chain Development: Approaches and Activities by Seven UN Agencies and Opportunities for Interagency Cooperation. International Labour Office.
68. Stumpo, G. (1998). Empresas transnacionales, procesos de reestructuración industrial y políticas económicas en América Latina. Alianza.
69. Svampa, M. (2016). Debates latinoamericanos. Indianismo, desarrollo, dependencia y populismo. Edhasa.
70. Szirmai, A. (2013). Manufacturing and Economic Development. In A. Szirmai, W. Naudé, & L. Alcorta (Eds.), Pathways to Industrialization in the Twenty-First Century. New Challenges and Emerging Paradigms. Oxford University Press.
71. Torres González, J. (2018). El Pacífico suramericano y su integración con China y Asia. Apuntes del Cenes, 37(65), 77-116. https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v37.n65.2018.5886
72. Trevignani, M., & Fernández, V. (2020). The Institutional Process of the GVC Approach: From The Academic Field to the International Organizations. In S. Faust (Ed.), Understanding Value Chains. Nova Science Publishers.
73. Unceta Satrústegui, K. (2009). Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, maldesarrollo y postdesarrollo. Carta Latinoamericana, 7, 1-34.
74. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of the Goverment in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton University Press.
75. Wahren, P., Cúneo, D., Di Giovambattista, A., & Gárriz, A. (2018). Cadenas globales de valor: la reinterpretación de los organismos internacionales. Realidad Económica, 314 (47), 37-69.
76. Wallerstein, I. (1993). The Geoculture of Development, or Transformation of our Geoculture? Asian Perspective, 17(2), 211–225.
77. Werner, M., Bair, J. & Fernández, V. (2014). Linking Up to Development? Global Value Chains and the Making of a Post Washington Consensus. Development and Change, 45(6), 1219-1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12132
78. Yeung, H. W. C. (2014). Governing the Market in A Globalizing Era: Developmental States, Global Production Networks and Inter-Firm Dynamics in East Asia. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 70-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.756415