Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022)

Vegetable section

Study of the technical efficiency of the sweet chili (Capsicum chinense) in the producing regions of the Colombian Caribbean

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i1.13056

Published 2022-01-01

  • Antonio María Martínez-Reina
    • ,
  • Lilibet Tordecilla-Zumaqué
    • ,
  • María del Valle Rodríguez-Pinto
    • ,
  • Liliana María Grandett-Martínez
    • ,
  • Carina Cecilia Cordero-Cordore
    • ,
  • Ender Manuel Correa-Álvarez

Antonio María Martínez-Reina
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

Lilibet Tordecilla-Zumaqué
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

María del Valle Rodríguez-Pinto
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

Liliana María Grandett-Martínez
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

Carina Cecilia Cordero-Cordore
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

Ender Manuel Correa-Álvarez
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria- Agrosavia, Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete

Abstract

Sweet pepper cultivation is one of the more important activities in the Caribbean region, cultivated by approximately 4,284 farmers with the family farming system, in areas ranging from 0.25 to 2.0 ha. In the literature for this region, there is no evidence of a study that has investigated the technical efficiency of this production system. For this reason, this study aimed to evaluate the technical efficiency of the use of resources by sweet chili farmers in the Caribbean producing areas of Colombia. The sample was 62 farmers, surveyed via simple random sampling from the use of statistics from the Ministry of Agriculture of Colombia. A Cobb Douglas-type functional model was formulated. The contribution of the variables seed, labor, fertilizer, weeds and yields in the productive units was determined. The results showed that labor and weed management had a positive effect on production increases. There was inefficiency with production gaps of 0.18% and efficiency of 82%; a production deficit of 1 t ha-1 was observed. There were returns on an increasing scale that was explained by the direct relationship between the inputs of labor and weed management.

Keywords

Technology, Response technologies, Physical returns, Productivity, Inputs, Products

PDF

Author Biography

Antonio María Martínez-Reina

Investigador PhD. Socieconomia

References

  1. Abate, T.M., A.B. Dessie, and T.M. Mekie. 2019. Technical efficiency of smallholder farmers in red pepper production in North Gondar zone Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. J. Econ. Struct. 8, 18. Doi: 10.1186/s40008-019-0150-6
  2. Agronet. 2018. Ají. In: Evaluaciones Agropecuarias Municipales, Ministerio dde Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural Colombia, shorturl.at/wATV8; November, 2021.
  3. Agronet. 2019. Área cosechada, producción y rendimiento de ají dulce 2006-2018. In: https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx; November, 2021.
  4. Asravor, J., E.E. Onumah, and Y.B. Osei-Asare. 2016. Efficiency of chili pepper production in the volta region of Ghana. J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev. 8(6), 99-110. Doi: 10.5897/JAERD2016.0765
  5. Cárdenas, G., D.V. Vedenov, and J.E. Houston. 2005. Analysis of production efficiency of Mexican coffee-producing districts. ID 19470. En: Annual meeting. American Agricultural Economics Association, Providence, RI.
  6. Carvalho, S.I.C. and L.B. Bianchetti. 2008. Botanica e recursos genéticos. pp. 39-54. Ribeiro, C.S.C., C.A. Lopes, S.I.C. Carvalho, G.P. Henz, and F.J.B. Reifschneider (eds.). Pimentas Capsicum. Embrapa, Brasilia, DF.
  7. Carvalho, S.I.C., L.B. Bianchetti, C.F. Ragassi, C.S.C. Ribeiro, F.J.B. Reifschneider, G.S.C. Buso, and F.G. Faleiro. 2017. Genetic variability of a Brazilian Capsicum frutescens germplasm collection using morphological characteristics and SSR markers. Genet. Mol. Res. 16(3), gmr16039689. Doi: 10.4238/gmr16039689
  8. Colque Tancara, J. 2019. Evaluación económica de la producción de pequeños productores de cebollas (Allium cepa L.) en municipios de Achacachi y Ancoraimes del departamento de La Paz. Rev. Investig. Innov. Agropecu. Recur. Nat. 6(1), 70-78.
  9. Correa-Álvarez, E., R. León-Pacheco, M. Lobato-Ureche, M. García-Davila, C. Muñoz-Perez, and H. Aramendiz-Tatis. 2019. Caracterización morfoagronómica de la colección de germoplasma de ají dulce (Capsicum spp.) del caribe colombiano. Temas Agrarios 24(2), 81-95. Doi: 10.21897/rta.v24i2.1998
  10. Costa, G.N., B.M.P. Da Silva, A.C.A. Lopes, L.C.B. Carvalho, and R.L.F. Gomes. 2019. Selection of pepper accessions with ornamental potential. Rev. Caatinga 32(2), 566-574. Doi: 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n230rc
  11. De los Ríos, C. 2006. La eficiencia técnica en la agricultura peruana. El caso del algodón Tangüis en los valles de Huaral, Cañete y Chincha. Debate Agrario 40/41, 141-168.
  12. Douglas, P.H. 1976. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: Its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. J. Political Econ. 84(5), 903-915. Doi: 10.1086/260489
  13. Duran Ramírez, F. 2013. Cultivo de pimientos, chiles y ajíes. Grupo Latino Editores, Bogota.
  14. FAO. 2014. El estado mundial de la agricultura y la alimentación, 2014 Resumen. In: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4036s.pdf; consulted: November, 2021.
  15. FAO. 2021. FAOSTAT - Data - Production. In: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC; consulted: November, 2021.
  16. Fonseca-Carreño, N., J. Salamanca-Merchan, and Z. Vega-Baquero. 2019. La agricultura familiar agroecológica, una estrategía de desarrollo rural incluyente. Una revisión. Temas Agrarios 24(2), 96-107. Doi: 10.21897/rta.v24i2.1356
  17. Ismail, S.M. 2010. Influence of deficit irrigation on water use efficiency and bird pepper production (Capsicum annuum L.). J. King Abdulaziz Univ. Mar. Sci. 21(2), 29-43. Doi: 10.4197/met.21-2.3
  18. Joshua, T., J. Zalkuwi, and M. Audu. 2019. Analysis of cost and return in cowpea production: A case study Mubi south local government area of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Agric. Sci. Technol. 11(2), 144-147. Doi: 10.15547/ast.2019.02.023
  19. Márquez Contreras, T.E., A.R. Velasquez González, J.O. Flores Gutiérrez, S.L. Flores Márquez, and H.J. Garzón Martínez. 2015. Factores determinantes en la eficiencia técnica de explotaciones de frijol. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 11(Pub. Esp.), 2067-2073.
  20. Martínez-Reina, A.M., L. Tordecilla-Zumaqué, L.M. Grandett-Martínez, S.M. Regino-Hernández, L.L. Luna-Castellanos, and S.P. Pérez-Cantero. 2021. Analysis of the technical efficiency of the cultivation of yam (Dioscorea spp.) in the Caribbean Region of Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 15(2), e12445. Doi: 10.17584/rcch.2021v15i2.12445
  21. Martínez-Reina, A.M., L. Tordecilla-Zumaqué, L.M. Grandett-Martínez, M.V. Rodríguez-Pinto, C.C. Cordero-Cordero, G.E. Silva-Acosta, J.L. Romero-Ferrer, E.M. Correa-Álvarez, and A.R. Orozco-Guerrero. 2019. Análisis económico de la producción de berenjena (Solanum melongena L.) en dos zonas productoras del Caribe colombiano: Sabanas de Sucre y Valle del Sinú en Córdoba. Cienc. Agric. 16(3), 17-34. Doi: 10.19053/01228420.v16.n3.2019.9514
  22. Moses, M. and P. Umaharan. 2012. Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships of Capsicum chinense. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 137(4), 250-262. Doi: 10.21273/JASHS.137.4.250
  23. Orewa, S.I. and O.B. Izekor. 2012. Technical efficiency analysis of yam production in Edo state: A stochastic frontier approach. Int. J. Dev. Sustain. 1(2), 516-526.
  24. Perdomo Calvo, J.A. and D.L. Hueth. 2011. Funciones de producción, análisis de economías a escala y eficiencia técnica en el eje cafetero colombiano: una aproximación con frontera estocástica. Rev. Colomb. Estad. 34(2), 377-402.
  25. Quevedo, M. and H. Laurentin. 2020. Caracterización fenotípica de tres cultivares de ají dulce (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) venezolano. Agron. Mesoam. 31(3), 729-741. Doi: 10.15517/am.v31i3.40302
  26. Rahman, K.M.M., M.I.A. Mia and M.K.J. Bhuiyan. 2012. A stochastic frontier approach to model technical efficiency of rice farmers in Bangladesh: An empirical analysis. Agriculturists 10(2), 9-19. Doi: 10.3329/agric.v10i2.13132
  27. Rodríguez Osuna, J. 2005. Métodos de muestreos, casos prácticos. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Madrid.
  28. Rugeles Chacón, L.E. 2011. Agenda prospectiva de investigación en la cadena hortícola del ají en Colombia: éxitos e incertidumbres. In: Proc. VI Congreso Internacional de Sistemas de Innovación para la Competitividad 2011: Agentes de la Innovación: hacia una economía sostenible en I+D+i. Leon, Mexico.
  29. Saravia, S. 2007. A stochastic frontier model of the Nicaraguan coffee sector: Analyzing efficiency and performance under changing political environment. In: II International Symposium on Economic Theory, Policy and Application, Athens, Greece.
  30. Srivastava, A. and M. Mangal. 2019. Capsicum breeding: history and development. pp. 25-55. In: Ramchiary, N. and C. Kole (eds). The Capsicum genome: Compendium of plant genomes. Springer, Cham. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97217-6_3
  31. Toro, P., A. García, C. Aguilar, R. Acero, J. Perea, and R. Vera. 2010. Modelos econométricos para el desarrollo de funciones de producción. Universidad de Cordoba. Documentos de Trabajo Producción Animal y Gestión 1, DT 13.
  32. Urbina, J. 2017.Technical efficiency in coffee production: a stochastic frontier analysis for Nicaragua. MPRA Paper No. 82690. Banco Central de Nicaragua, Managua.
  33. Wahid, U., S. Ali, and N.A. Hadi. 2017. On the estimation of technical efficiency of tomato growers in Malakand, Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agric. 33(3), 357-365. Doi: 10.17582/journal.sja/2017/33.3.357.365

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.