Heideggers Denken. Anmerkungen zur Rezeptionsgeschichte der Philosophie

Resumen

The present paper starts on the affirmation that the history of philosophy is been objectified in writings, works and speeches, which constitute the basis of its reception. The second point inquires if this reception allows us to grasp the most characteristic of what philosophy is, and no only the understanding of it from the European perspective. Based on this starting point we reflect around the character of philosophy in Martin Heidegger, highlighting its influence beyond academic-institutional reception (the case of the black notebooks, for example). The fundamental points that are enunciated in this matter are: a) it cannot be said that Heidegger has a philosophy, since he himself does not admit any label, b) if the philosophical activity becomes a profession -it is institutionalized-, whose technique consists of simply putting in relation the reading of texts, what really must happen is lost there: c) that is why thinking itself is not about results around knowledge, but about paths and routes (Be-Wegung), d) such thinking does not produce stable concepts, but words that in the movement of thinking are transformed and lead to neologisms, e) in this way the matter of thinking is a Nicht-Sache or an Un-Sache, something not to be pointed out, f) in the question of the sense of being unfolds the space and time in which thinking can be directed.