Peer evaluation process

The manuscripts received by the Enletawa Journal are by external peer-reviewed and follow the evaluation system (double-blind), that is, the identity of both evaluators and authors is reserved to promote the greatest possible independence in decision-making.

The evaluated article may have three (3) results: publishable, publishable with corrections, rejected; when this is considered as publishable with corrections, the author is informed, who decides whether or not to undertake to carry them out; if she/he does not do so, she/he must communicate her/his decision in writing to the Editorial Committee. The evaluation process of the article will last a maximum of two (2) months from the date of receipt, and the jurors will have a maximum period of fifteen (15) calendar days to consider its quality. The Editorial Committee will be the one who finally decides the publication or not of the articles and the number of the edition in which they will be included.