Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

No. 17 (2018)
The teaching of history

SPECIAL SECTION

The contribution of linguistics to history education

https://doi.org/10.19053/20275137.n17.2018.7449

Published 2018-08-14

  • Rodrigo Fernando Henríquez
    • ,
  • Miguel Fuentes Cortés

Rodrigo Fernando Henríquez
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Miguel Fuentes Cortés
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Abstract

The objective of this article is to review the main contributions of linguistics to the teaching of history and to evaluate its contributions to the ield. More speciically, the themes of historical writing and interactions in the history class will be dealt with. At present, knowledge systems and disciplines are more open to inter- and trans-disciplinary dialog. In this context, linguistics, a science that specializes in language, has permitted the study of how scientiic communities read and write in order to build their knowledge. In the case of history teaching in schools, the contributions of linguistics are varied; among them, the explicit ways in which history is taught and learned through the mediation of language. For this, different references are presented, such as the school of Sydney, Australia; Caroline Cofin, in the United Kingdom; Mary Schleppegrell, in the United Stated, and Teresa Oteíza, Mariana Achugar and the Urdimbre group in Latin America. In reviewing some works by these authors, we provide a panoramic view of some of the focuses that linguistic research in the teaching of history has had in the west to date. It is expected that this article will motivate interdisciplinarity and creativity to employ the language in our history classes.

Keywords

history teaching;, linguistics;, historical writing;, classroom interaction;

PDF (Español) Xml (Español)

Author Biography

Rodrigo Fernando Henríquez

Doctor en Historia, profesor asociado Instituto de Historia-Facultad de Educación, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Líneas de investigación: Alfabetización histórica, Historia de la escritura histórica, Historia del Estado.

Miguel Fuentes Cortés

Profesor de Historia y Geografía, Magíster en Estudios latinoamericanos de la Universidad de La Serena, y Doctor (c) en Lingüística de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

References

  1. Achugar, Mariana, y Oteíza, Teresa. «Recontextualización del pasado reciente: prácticas sociales multisemióticas”. Discurso & Sociedad. 8 (1) (2014): 1-11.
  2. Achugar, Mariana. «The Intergenerational Transmission of Recent Past:Learning about the Dictatorship in the History Classroom,” Proceedings of the VII International Congress of ALSFAL, 11-23. Montevideo: ALSFAL: 2013
  3. Achugar, Mariana. Discursive Processes of Intergenerational Transmission of Recent History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137487339
  4. Brophy, Jere., y VanSledright, Bruce. Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press, 1997.
  5. Cazden, Courtney. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (2a ed). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2003.
  6. Coffin, Caroline. Historical discourse. The language of time, cause and evaluation. Londres: Continuum, 2006.
  7. Concha, Soledad., Aravena, Soledad., Coloma, Carmen y Romero, Verónica. Escritura expositiva en tres niveles de escolaridad: coherencia y dominio de recursos lingüísticos. Literatura y Lingüística. 21 (2010): 75-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29344/0717621X.21.135
  8. Cox, Cristián. «Currículo escolar en Chile: génesis, implementación y desarrollo». Revista International de Education de Sevres. 56 (2011):1-9.
  9. Edwards-Groves, Christine. On Task: Focused Literacy Learning. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association, 2003.
  10. Evans, Richard. «Teacher conceptions of history revisited: Ideology, curriculum, and student belief. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18 (2014): 101-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1990.10505608
  11. Hodge, Robert y Kress, Gunther. Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.
  12. Kress, Gunther. y van Leeuwen, Theo. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. Londres: Arnold, 2001.
  13. Leinhardt, Gaea .«Weaving instructional explanations in history». British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (1993): 1-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01041.x
  14. Leinhardt, Gaea. «Instructional Explanations in History.» International Journal of Educational Research, 27 (3) (1997): 221-232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89730-3
  15. Manghi, Dominique, Badillo, Carolina., y Villacura, Paula. «Alfabetización semiótica en en clases de historia. Estrategias de mediación desde un enfoque multimodal». Revista Perfiles educativos. 36 (146), (2014) 63-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-2698(14)70128-X
  16. Martin, James. Life as a noun. En Halliday, MAK y Martin, James (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (221-267). London: Falmer. 1993.
  17. Martin , James., y White, Peter. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in english. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  18. Martin, James. y Rose, David. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Londres: Continuum, 2008.
  19. Martin, James. y Rose, David. Genre relations: Mapping culture. Londres: Equinox, 2008.
  20. Martin, James y Maton, Karl. (eds) «Cumulative Knowledge-building in Secondary Schooling», special edition of Linguistics and Education 24 (1) (2013): 1–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.003
  21. Matruglio, Erika., Maton, Karl y Martin, James. (2013). Time travel: The role of temporality in anabling semantic waves in secondary school teaching, Linguistics and Education 24: 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.007
  22. Maton, Karl. Building powerful knowledge: The significance of Semantic Waves. En Brian Barrett & Elizabeth Rata (Eds.). Knowledge and the Future of the Curriculum: International Studies in Social Realism, Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429261_12
  23. Mercer, Neil, y Karen Littleton. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Londres: Routledge, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
  24. MINEDUC Ministerio de Educación, Chile, MINEDUC Programa de Estudio. Historia, Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. Tercer año medio. (2015) [Link]: www.curriculumenlineamineduc.cl/605/articles-30013_recurso_30_2.pdf
  25. Monte-Sano, Chauncey. (2010). Disciplinary literacy in history: An exploration of the historical nature of adolescents’ writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4) (2010): 539-568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2010.481014
  26. Moss, Gillian., Barletta, Norma., Chamorro, Diana. y Mizuno, Jorge. La metáfora gramatical en los textos escolares de ciencias sociales en español. Onomázein. (28), (2013): 88-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.28.3
  27. Oteíza, Teresa. Solidaridad ideológica en el discurso de la historia: Tensión entre orientaciones monoglósicas y heteroglósicas. Revista Signos, 42 (70), (2009): 219-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342009000200004
  28. Oteíza, Teresa., Henríquez, Rodrigo., y Pinuer, Claudio. History Classroom Interactions and the Transmission of the Recent Memory of Human Rights Violations in Chile. Journal of educational media, memory, and society. 7 (2), (2015): 44-67. Doi: 10.3167/jemms.2015.070204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2015.070204
  29. Oteíza, Teresa., Pinuer, Claudio., y Henríquez, Rodrigo. Significación histórica y aproximaciones axiológicas y epistemológicas: interacción en clases de historia sobre memorias del pasado reciente de violación a los derechos humanos en Chile.
  30. Reisman, Abby. Entering the Historical Problem Space: Whole-Class Text-Based Discussion in History Class. Teachers College Record, 17. (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700206
  31. Schleppegrell, Mary., Achugar, Mariana., y Oteíza, Teresa. The grammar of history: enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (1), (2004): 67–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588259
  32. Schleppegrell, Mary. y Oliveira, Luciana. An integrated language and content approach for history teachers. Journal of English for academic purposes. 5 (4): (2006): 254-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.003
  33. Toledo, María Isabel., Gazmuri, Renato., y Magendzo, Abraham (2010)Toledo Jofré, M. I., Magendzo Kolstrein, A., Gutiérrez Gianella, V., & Iglesias Segura, R. (2015). Enseñanza de 'temas controversiales' en la asignatura de historia y ciencias sociales desde la perspectiva de los profesores. Estudios Pedagógicos, 41(1), 275-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052015000100016
  34. Van Dijk, Teun. Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17 (3), (2006): 359-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
  35. Snow, C. y P. Uccelli. «the challenge of academic language». En Olson, D. y Torrance, N.(Eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New york: Cambridge University Press, (2008): 112-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609664.008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.