Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2022)

Vegetable section

Seeking long-lasting resistance to black node disease in common beans: Development of interspecific populations

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.14402

Published 2022-05-01

  • Gustavo Adolfo Ligarreto-Moreno
    • ,
  • Luz Nayibe Garzón-Gutiérrez
    • ,
  • Christian Camilo Pimentel-Ladino

Gustavo Adolfo Ligarreto-Moreno
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Bogota

Luz Nayibe Garzón-Gutiérrez
Universidad Industrial de Santander, Escuela de Biología, Bucaramanga

Christian Camilo Pimentel-Ladino
Semillas Valle S.A., Investigación adaptativa, Yumbo

Phaseolus vulgaris x Phaseolus polyanthus: improved red bean line. Photo: G.A. Ligarreto-Moreno

Abstract

There are no known common bean materials that are resistant to the black node disease (Boeremia noackiana [Allesch.] Aveskamp, Gruyter & Verkley). However, some studies have reported common bean genotypes that exhibit an intermediate reaction to this disease, but these materials lack stability in this trait. The secondary gene pool for beans (Phaseolus polyanthus Grenm.) has been screened since 1995 for this resistance. This population shows a varied response to this disease but lacks the characteristics of commercial grains. The study was carried out during 2017-2018 in Bogota under greenhouse conditions with interspecific crosses of commercial bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Colombia and resistant genotypes from the ASC population of P. polyanthus, CIAT origin. To carry out the crosses, the hybridization technique with emasculation was followed, both in direct and reciprocal crosses. Low-efficiency viability in interspecific crosses from cytoplasmic genetic compatibility problems has been reported in different studies. However, in this study, the efficiency of the percentage of viable interspecific crosses increased significantly in the F1 populations and backcrosses, reaching 67%. Interspecific populations of Bacata × ASC 160 and Bacata × ASC 162 were formed with the seeds, which constituted the starting point for a breeding program for resistance to the black node disease in common beans using susceptible commercial cultivars.

Keywords

Boeremia noackiana (Allesch.) Aveskamp, Gruyter & Verkley; Phaseolus, Phaseolus, Plant breeding, Genetic diversity, Varietal resistance, Ascochyta

PDF

References

  1. Barrios, E., C. López, J. Kohashi, A. Acosta, S. Miranda, and N. Mayek. 2011. Advances in México on bean breeding for tolerance to high temperature and drought. Rev. Fitot. Mex. 34(4), 247-255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2011.4.247
  2. Beebe, S. and M. Corrales. 1991. Breeding for disease resistance. pp. 561-610. In: Schoonhoven A. and O. Voyset (eds.). Common beans: Research for crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  3. Berke, T.G. 2000. Hybrid seed production in Capsicum. J. New Seeds 1, 49-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J153v01n03_02
  4. Blair, M.W., L.N. Garzón, C. Jara, G, Castellanos, G. Mosquera, G.A. Ligarreto, O.A. Oliveros, C.M. Rivera, and P. Villarraga. 2011. Resistance to and diversity of ascochyta blight in common beans. Bean Improv. Coop. 54, 118-119.
  5. Camarena, F. and J.P. Baudoin. 1987. Obtention des premiers hybrides interspecifiques entre Phaseolus vulgaris et Phaseolus polyanthus avec le cytoplasme de cette derniere forme. Bull. Rech. Agron. Gembloux 22, 43-55.
  6. Chávez, J.R. 2017. Proximidad filética, valoración taxonómica y sistemática de tres especies del género Phaseolus: P. vulgaris, P. coccineus y P. polyanthus. Caxamarca 16, 137-150.
  7. Cheng, S.S., M.J. Bassett, and K.H. Quesenberry. 1981. Cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids between common bean and scarlet runner bean. Crop Sci. 21, 75-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010021x
  8. Garzón, L., M. Blair, C. Jara, G. Castellanos, G. Mosquera, C. Cajiao, S. Beebe, G.A. Ligarreto, O.A. Oliveros, and P. Villarraga. 2011. Disease response of inter-specific common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) x scarlet runner bean (P. coccineus) breeding lines for Ascochyta blight resistance. Bean Improv. Coop. 54, 122-123.
  9. Geerts, P., A. Toussaint, G. Mergeai, and J.P. Baudoin. 2002. Study of the early abortion in reciprocal crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus polyanthus Greenm. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 6, 109-119.
  10. Geerts, P., A. Toussaint, G. Mergeai, and J.P. Baudoin. 2011. Phaseolus immature embryo rescue technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 710, 117-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61737-988-8_10
  11. Gepts, P. 1981. Hibridaciones interespecíficas para el mejoramiento de Phaseolus vulgaris L. CIAT, Santiago de Cali, Colombia.
  12. Hadley, H.H. and S.J. Openshaw. 1980. Hybridization of crop plants. American Society of Agronomy - Crop Science Society of America, South Segoe Road, Madison, WI.
  13. Hanson, M., M. Corrales, and J. Kornegay. 1993. Heritability and sources of Ascochyta blight resistance in common bean. Plant Dis. 77, 711-714. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-77-0711
  14. Ibrahim, A.M. and D.P. Coyne. 1975. Genetics of stigma shape, cotyledon position and flower color in reciprocal crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus coccineus (Lam). and implications in breeding. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100, 622-626. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.100.6.622
  15. Manshardt, R.M. and J.G. Waines. 1983. lsozyme variation and the origin old domesticated tepary beans (Phaseofus acutífolíus Gray). Bean Improv. Coop. 26, 18-19.
  16. Miranda, Y., Rincón, L. and L.N. Garzón. 2021. Diagrammatic scales for the estimation of black node disease severity in common bean. Cienc. Rural 51(3), 1-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200347
  17. Montejo, L.M., P.E. McClean, J.S. Serena, S. Markell, and J.M. Osorno. 2022. Bean rust resistance in the Guatemalan climbing bean germplasm collection. Legume Sci. e149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.149
  18. Muñoz, L.C. and R. Hidalgo. 1986. Problemas en la hibridación interespecífica del género Phaseolus: Aborto del embrión. Ensayo preliminar de cultivo de embriones. Acta Agron.36, 17-27.
  19. Nguema Ndoutoumou, P., A. Toussaint and J.P. Baudo. 2007. Embryo abortion and histological features in the interspecific cross between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 88(3), 329-332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9198-8
  20. Pimentel, C.C., L.N. Garzón, and G.A. Ligarreto. 2021. Métodos de manejo de la enfermedad mancha anillada en fríjol. pp. 78-92. In: Garzón, L.N., G.A. Ligarreto, L.M. Miranda, Y. Miranda, C.C. Pimentel, and J.E. Sepúlveda (eds.). La mancha anillada en el cultivo de fríjol. Publicaciones UIS, Bucaramanga.
  21. Powers, S.E. and D. Thavarajah. 2019. Checking Agriculture’s Pulse: Field Pea (Pisum Sativum L.), Sustainability, and Phosphorus Use Efficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 1489. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01489
  22. Schoonhoven, A.V. and M.A. Pastor-Corrales. 1987. Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. CIAT, Santiago de Cali, Colombia.
  23. Silue, S., I.J. Fofana, N. Diarrassouba, A. Toussaint, G. Mergeai, and J.P. Baudoin. 2014. Les hybridations interspecifiques dans le genre Phaseolus: selection des genotypes compatibles et caracterisation des hybrides interspecifiques. Agron. Afr. 26, 193-204.
  24. Singh, S.P., H. Terán, A. Molina, and J.A. Gutiérrez. 1991. Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Andean origin. Plant Breed. 107, 254-257. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb01215.x
  25. Toussaint, A., P. Geerts, F. Clement, G. Mergeai, and J.P Baudoin. 2004. Early abortion in reciprocal crosses between Phaseolus vulgaris and Phaseolus polyanthus, and in vitro culture of immature embryos from these species. Belg. J. Bot. 137(1), 47-54.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.