Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2023)

Other species section

Agronomic evaluation of quinoa intercropped with coffee at an altitude of 1,800 m a.s.l.

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2023v17i3.16195

Published 2023-09-01

  • Wilson Anchico-Jojoa
    • ,
  • Consuelo Montes-Rojas
    • ,
  • Andrea Mosquera-Chacón
    • ,
  • Dayana Maryid Samboni-Zemanate

Wilson Anchico-Jojoa
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (AGROSAVIA), Centro de Investigación Turipaná, Cerete; Universidad del Cauca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Popayan

Consuelo Montes-Rojas
Universidad del Cauca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Popayan

Andrea Mosquera-Chacón
Universidad del Cauca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Popayan

Dayana Maryid Samboni-Zemanate
Universidad del Cauca, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Popayan

Quinoa intercropped with coffee. Photo: W. Anchico-Jojoa

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) exhibits great potential for adaptation to various agroecological conditions, making it a diversification option for different production systems. In this regard, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the agronomic characteristics of different progenies intercropped with coffee (Coffea arabica) cultivation under Popayan (Colombia) conditions, in order to determine their adaptation potential in coffee regions of Colombia. The research was conducted at the Experimental Farm "La Prosperidad", located in the municipality of Popayan, Colombia, at an altitude of 1,800 m. Ten genotypes were evaluated: five selected from BRS Syetetuba (Brazil), three from Colombia (San José, Aurora, and Blanca Dulce de Jericó), and two from Ecuador (Piartal and Tunkahuan). The planting was done between the coffee rows in the zoca stage, in an experimental area of 406 m2, following a completely randomized block design with four replications. Characteristics such as plant height, panicle size, central panicle perimeter, weight of 1,000 grains, grain yield, dry mass yield, harvest index, and phenological stages were evaluated. All quinoa materials showed an early cycle with a maximum value of 118 days, with ‘San José’, ‘Aurora’, ‘BCX1’, and ‘BCX4’ standing out with averages below 110 days. Grain yields ranged from 1,120 to 2,900 kg ha-1, with the genotype BCX6 standing out with 2,900 kg ha-1 and ‘Piartal’ with 2,883 kg ha-1. The weight of 1,000 grains averaged 2.62 g, and the harvest index was 27.96%. Meanwhile, the contribution of dry matter to the intercropped system was 7,799.50 kg ha-1. The genotypes showed adaptation potential in the intercropping system with coffee. A high variability of quinoa genotypes was observed, which is an interesting characteristic for specific selection processes in diversified production arrangements.

Keywords

Chenopodium quinoa, Coffea arabica, Genetic variability, Agronomic characteristics

PDF

References

  1. Álvarez, M., J. Pavón, and S. Von Rütte. 1990. Caracterización. pp. 5-30. In: Wahli, C. (ed.). Quinua: hacia su cultivo comercial. Latinreco, Quito.
  2. Anchico, W., C.R. Spehar, and M.S. Vilela. 2020. Adaptability of quinoa genotypes to altitudes and population densities in Colombia. Biosci. J. 36(Suppl. 1), 14-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n0a2020-48243
  3. Anchico-Jojoa, W., J.R. Peixoto, and A.A.D. Oliveira Júnior. 2023. Physicochemical characterization and antioxidant capacity of quinoa progenies from Colombia, Brazil and Ecuador produced in the Brazilian Savanna. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 17(1), e15696. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2023v17i1.15696
  4. Anchico-Jojoa, W., J.R. Peixoto, C.R. Spehar, and M.S. Vilela. 2021. Calculation of the thermal units for 13 codes of the BBCH scale of 12 progenies of quinoa in the growing conditions of the Brazilian savanna. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 15(3), e13109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2021v15i3.13109
  5. Bazile, D., E.A. Martínez, F.F. Fuentes, E. Chia, M. Namdar-Irani, P. Olguín, C. Saa, M. Thomet, and A. Vidal. 2014. La quinoa en Chile. pp. 477-502. In: Bazile D., D. Bertero, and C. Nieto (eds.). Estado del arte de la quinua en el mundo en 2013. FAO; CIRAD, Santiago; Montpellier, France.
  6. Bertero, H.D., A.J. de la Vega, G. Correa, S.E. Jacobsen, and A. Mujica. 2004. Genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield and grain size of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as revealed by pattern analysis of international multi-environment trials. Field Crops Res. 89(2-3), 299-318. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.006
  7. Bertero, H.D. and R.A. Ruiz. 2008. Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 28(3), 186-194. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.002
  8. Bhargava, A., S. Shukla, and D. Ohri. 2007. Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Res. 101(1), 104-116. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.10.001
  9. Boero, C., J.A. González, and F.E. Prado. 2000. Efecto de la temperatura sobre la germinación de diferentes variedades de quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Lilloa 40(1), 103-108.
  10. Bonifacio, A., A. Mujica, A. Alvarez, and W. Roca. 2004. Mejoramiento genético, germoplasma y producción de semilla. pp. 125-187. In: Mujica, A., S. Jacobsen, J. Izquierdo, and J.P. Marathee (eds). Quinua: ancestral cultivo andino, alimento del presente y futuro. FAO; UNA, CIP, Santiago, Chile.
  11. Burbano-Figueroa, O., A. Sierra-Monroy, A. David-Hinestroza, C. Whitney, C. Borgemeister, and E. Luedeling. 2022. Farm-planning under risk: an application of decision analysis and portfolio theory for the assessment of crop diversification strategies in horticultural systems. Agric. Syst. 199, 103409. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103409
  12. CAMP, Colombia Alcaldía Municipal de Popayán. 2022. Nuestra geografía. In: http://popayan.gov.co/ciudadanos/popayan/nuestra-geografia; consulted: July, 2023.
  13. Delgado, A.I., J.H. Palacios, and C. Betancourt. 2009. Evaluación de 16 genotipos de quinua dulce (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) en el municipio de Iles, Nariño (Colombia). Agron. Colomb. 27(2), 159-167.
  14. FAO. 2011. La quinua: cultivo milenario para contribuir a la seguridad alimentaria mundial. In: https://www.fao.org/3/aq287s/aq287s.pdf; consulted: July, 2023.
  15. Fernández-Paredes, M.E., L.C. Zumba-Montes, and G.M. López-Castillo. 2017. Evaluación de la calidad nutritiva de un ensilado para la alimentación de ganado lechero a partir de los residuos provenientes del trillado de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) y sangorache (Amaranthus hybridus L.). Roca 13(4), 438-450.
  16. FNC, Federación Nacional de Cafeteros. 2018. Informe de gestión Comité de Cafeteros del Cauca 2017. In: https://issuu.com/cafedecolombiacauca/docs/informe_de_gesti__n_2017; consulted: July, 2023.
  17. García-Parra, M.A., D.F. Roa-Acosta, R. Stechauner-Rohringer, F. García-Molano, D. Bazile, and N. Plazas-Leguizamón. 2020. Effect of temperature on the growth and development of quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A review on a global scale. Sylwan 164(5), 411-433.
  18. López, J.P., M.F. Timaran, and C. Betancourth. 2008. Evaluación de 16 selecciones de quinua dulce (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) en el municipio de Guaitarilla, Nariño. Rev. Cienc. Agric. 25(1-2), 130-149.
  19. Montes, C., G.A. Burbano, and E.F. Muñoz. 2020. Evaluación del rendimiento de quinua bajo diferentes densidades, fertilizacion y métodos de siembra en Cauca. Rev. Bio. Agro 18(1), 46-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa.v18n1.1410
  20. Montes, C., G.A. Burbano, E.F. Muñoz, and Y. Calderon. 2018. Descripción del ciclo fenológico de cuatro ecotipos de (Chenopodium quinua Willd.), en Purace – Cauca, Colombia. Rev. Bio. Agro 16(2), 26-37. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18684/BSAA(16)26-37
  21. Moreno, A.M. and P.M. Sánchez. 2013. Reduzca los costos en el establecimiento del café: intercale cultivos transitorios. Avances Técnicos No. 419. Cenicafé, Manizales, Colombia.
  22. Nieto, C., C. Vimos, C. Monteros, C. Caicedo, and M. Rivera. 1992. INIAP-Ingapirca e INIAP-Tunkahuan: dos variedades de quinua de bajo contenido de saponina. Boletín Divulgativo No. 228. INIAP, Quito.
  23. Ocampo, O.L. and L.M. Álvarez. 2017. Tendencia de la producción y el consumo del café en Colombia. Apuntes del Cenes 36(64), 139-165. Doi: https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v36.n64.2017.5419
  24. Pereira, E., C. Encina-Zelada, L. Barros, U. Gonzales-Barron, V. Cadavez, and I.C.R. Ferreira. 2019. Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (quinoa) grains: a good alternative to nutritious food. Food Chem. 280, 110-114. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.068
  25. Sañudo, B., G. Arteaga, C. Betancourth, J. Zambrano, and E. Burbano. 2005. Perspectivas de la quinua dulce para la región Andina de Nariño. Universidad de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia.
  26. SESAN, Guatemala Secretaría de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutricional. 2013. Investigación sobre el cultivo de la quinua o quinoa (Chenopodium quinua). Guatemala.
  27. SGC, Servicio Geológico Colombiano. 2013. Memoria explicativa de la zonificación de susceptibilidad y amenaza relativa por movimientos en masa escala 1:100.000, plancha 342 – Popayán, departamento del Cauca. In: https://recordcenter.sgc.gov.co/B23/AmeMM342_Popayan/Documento/Pdf/Anexo_C.pdf; consulted: September, 2023.
  28. Sharma, A., R. Deepa, S. Sankar, M. Pryor, B. Stewart, E. Johnson, and A. Anandhi. 2021. Use of growing degree indicator for developing adaptive responses: a case study of cotton in Florida. Ecol. Indic. 124, 107383. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107383
  29. Souza, F.F.J., J.E.A. Souza, N.O.S. Souza, C.R. Spehar, and T.F. de Jesus. 2017. Standardizing germination tests for quinoa seeds. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 12(3), 155-160. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11820
  30. Spehar, C.R. and R.L. Santos. 2007. Exigência nutricional e adubação. pp. 59-64. In: Spehar, C.R. and R.L. Santos. Quinoa: alternativa para a diversificação agrícola e alimentar. Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/570429
  31. Spehar, C.R., J.E.S. Rocha, and R.L.B. Santos. 2011. Desempenho agronômico e recomendações para cultivo de quinoa (BRS Syetetuba) no Cerrado. Pesq. Agropec. Trop. 41(1), 141-147. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5216/pat.v41i1.9395
  32. Veloza, C., G. Romero, and J.J. Gomez. 2016. Respuesta morfoagronómica y calidad en proteína de tres accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en la Sabana norte de Bogotá. Rev. UDCA Act. Div. Cient. 19(2), 325-332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v19.n2.2016.86
  33. Wahli, C. 1990. Quinua hacia su cultivo comercial. Latinreco, Quito.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.