Planting methods and depths for the yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) crop

Mateus Augusto Lima Quaresma; Fábio Luiz de Oliveira; José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral; Magno do Carmo Parajara; Leandro Pin Dalvi; Ariany das Graças Teixeira

doi:10.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.9562

Authors

Mateus Augusto Lima Quaresma Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Department of Plant Production, Alegre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0622-0955
Fábio Luiz de Oliveira Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Department of Plant Production, Alegre http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-6988
José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Department of Plant Production, Alegre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-4830
Magno do Carmo Parajara Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Department of Crop Science, Viçosa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-883X
Leandro Pin Dalvi Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Department of Plant Production, Alegre https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-8007
Ariany das Graças Teixeira Instituto Federal do Espirito Santo, campus Santa Teresa, Department of Agronomy, Santa Teresa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-521X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.9562

Keywords:

Smallanthus sonchifolius, Plantation crops, Spacing, Root vegetables, Altitude, Ridge tillage, Planting depth

Abstract

Crop management is necessary in sprouting, cycle and productivity of most plants of commercial interest. However, recommendations and information are scarce for yacon cultivation, mainly regarding the possible interferences of planting method and depth in the crop development and production. Therefore, the objective was to study the influence of the planting methods and depths on yacon tuberous roots development and production in high altitude conditions. The experiment was a randomized complete block design, with four replications, in a subdivided plots scheme. The plots consisted of three planting methods (groove, pit and ridge) and subplots characterized by four planting depths (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm). Evaluations were carried out from the sprouting process of the rhizophores to the yield of tuberous roots. The planting methods in a pit and ridge had lower seedling mortality rates (27.5 and 20.2% lowers than grooves) and higher yields of tuberous roots (31.2 and 21.4% higher than grooves). The planting depths of 5 and 10 cm of the rhizophores were shown to be the most suitable for yacon cultivation for the three planting methods.

JEL Classification

Array

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albuquerque, E.N. and P.M. Rolim. 2012. Potencialidades do yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) no diabetes Mellitus. Rev. Ciênc. Méd. 20(3), 99-108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24220/2318-0897v20n3/4a584

Alves, A.U., E.A. Cardoso, T.F. Alixandre, I.H.L. Cavalcante, and M.Z. Beckmann-Cavalcante. 2014. Emergência de plântulas de fava em função de posições e profundidades de semeadura. Biosci. J. 30(1), 33-42.

Amaya, J.E. 2000. Efeitos de doses crescentes de nitrogenio e potássio na produtividade de yacon (Polymnia sonchifolia Poep. & Endl.). MSc thesis. Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.

Erlacher, W.A., F.L. Oliveira, G.S. Fialho, D.M.N. Silva, and A.H. Carvalho, 2016. Modelos de determinação indireta da área foliar em yacon. Hortic. Bras. 34(3), 422-427. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362016003019

Fontes, P.C.R., J.C.S. Nunes, H.C. Fernandes, and E.F. Araújo. 2007. Características físicas do solo e produtividade da batata dependendo de sistemas de preparo do solo. Hortic. Bras. 25(3), 335-339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362007000300007

Genta, S.B., W.M. Cabrera, M.I. Mercado, A. Grau, C.A. Catalán, and S.S. Sánchez. 2010. Hypoglycemic activity of leaf organic extracts from Smallanthus sonchifolius: constituents of the most active fractions. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 185(2), 143-152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2010.03.004
7
Grotta, D.C.C., C.E.A. Furlani, R.P. Silva, G.N. Reis, J.W. Cortez, and P.J. Alves. 2008. Influência da profundidade de semeadura e da compactação do solo sobre a semente na produtividade do amendoim. Ciênc. Agrotecnol. 32(2), 547-552. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000200031

Howeler, R.H., H.C. Ezumah, and D.J. Midmore. 1993. Tillage systems for root and tuber crops in the tropics. Soil Till. Res. 27(4), 211-240. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(93)90069-2

INMET, Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. 2016. BDMEP Dados históricos. In: http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/index.php?r=bdmep/bdmep; consulted: July, 2013.

Kirkham, M.B. 2005. Principles of soil and plant water relations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.

Maguire, J.D. 1962. Speed of germination - aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Sci. 2(2), 76-177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200020033x

Modolo, A.J., E. Trogello, A.L. Nunes, H.C. Fernandes, J.C.M. Silveira. and M.P. Dambrós. 2010. Efeito de cargas aplicadas e profundidades de semeadura no desenvolvimento da cultura do feijão em sistema plantio direto. Ciênc. Agrotecnol. 34(3),739-745. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000300029

Otsubo, A.A., O.R. Brito, D.P. Passos, H.S. Araújo, F.M. Mercante, and V.H.N. Otsubo. 2012. Formas de preparo de solo e controle de plantas daninhas nos fatores agronômicos e de produção da mandioca. Semina: Ciênc. Agrár. 33(6) 2241-2246. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6p2241

Pequeno, M.G., O.S. Vidigal Filho, C. Tormena, M. Kvitschal, and M. Manzotti. 2007. Efeito do sistema de preparo do solo sobre características agronômicas da mandioca (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Ver. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambient. 11(3), 476-481. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662007000500005

Pezzopane, J.E.M., F.S. Castro, J.R.M. Pezzopane, and R.A. Cecílio. 2012. Agrometeorologia: aplicações para o Espírito Santo. CAUFES, Alegre, ES.

Rós, A.B. 2017. Sistemas de preparo do solo para o cultivo da batata-doce. Bragantia 76(1), 113-124. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.607

Santana, I. and M.H. Cardoso. 2008. Raiz tuberosa de yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius): potencialidade de cultivo, aspectos tecnológicos e nutricionais. Ciênc. Rural 38(3), 898-905. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000300050

Santos, H.G., P.K.T. Jacomine, L.H.C. Anjos, V.A. Oliveira, J.F. Lumbreras, M.R. Coelho, J.A. Almeida, T.J.F. Cunha, and J.B. Oliveira. 2013. Sistema brasileira de classificação de solos. Embrapa, Brasília.

Seminário, J., M. Valderrama, and I. Manrique. 2003. El yacon: fundamentos para el aprovechamiento de un recurso promisorio. Centro International de la Papa (CIP); Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca; Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación (COSUDE), Lima.

Silva, D.M.N., F.L. Oliveira, P.C. Cavatte, and M.A.L. Quaresma. 2018a. Growth and development of yacon in different periods of planting and growing conditions. Acta Sci. Agron. 40, 1-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v40i1.39442

Silva, D.M.N., C.H.P. Venturim, M.E.O.V. Capucho, F.L. Oliveira, and E.S. Mendonça. 2018b. Impact of soil cover systems on soil quality and organic production of yacon. Sci. Hortic. 235, 407-412. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.024

Silva, D.M.N., F.L. Oliveira, M.A.L. Quaresma, W.A. Erlacher, and T.P. Mendes, 2019. Yacon production at different planting seasons and growing environments. Biosci. J. 35(4), 992-1001. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/bj-v35n4a2019-42091.

Sumiyanto, J., F.E. Dayan, A.L. Cerdeira, Y.H. Wang, I.A. Khan, and R.M. Moraes. 2012. Oligofructans content and yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) cultivated in Mississippi. Sci. Hortic. 148, 83-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.020

Teodoro, R.B., F.L. Oliveira, D.M.N. Silva, C. Fávero, and M.A.L. Quaresma. 2011. Leguminosas herbáceas perenes para utilização como coberturas permanentes de solo na Caatinga Mineira. Rev. Ciênc. Agron. 42(2), 292-300. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902011000200006