Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2023)
Enero-Junio

Artículos

Mapping, evolution, and application trends in co-citation analysis: a scientometric approach

https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v13.n1.2023.16070

Publicado 2023-02-15

  • Sebastian Robledo-Giraldo
    • ,
  • Jose Gregorio Figueroa-Camargo
    • ,
  • Martha Viviana Zuluaga-Rojas
    • ,
  • Sol Beatriz Vélez-Escobar
    • ,
  • Pedro Luis Duque- Hurtado

Sebastian Robledo-Giraldo
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia

Jose Gregorio Figueroa-Camargo
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia

Martha Viviana Zuluaga-Rojas
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia, Dosquebradas, Colombia

Sol Beatriz Vélez-Escobar
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia

Pedro Luis Duque- Hurtado
Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia

Resumen

Este estudio tiene como objetivo explorar el mapeo, la evolución y las tendencias de aplicación del análisis de citas conjuntas. Se realizó una búsqueda utilizando Scopus y Web of Science, lo que resultó en 1298 estudios relevantes. Se realizó un análisis adicional sobre la producción científica, el país, el autor, la revista y los datos de la red. Se aplicó el algoritmo Tree of Science para demostrar el desarrollo del análisis de cocitación. Los resultados hacen tres contribuciones significativas a la investigación cienciométrica: se presenta un mapeo científico destacando la producción científica, las principales revistas y los investigadores clave; los avances del análisis de cocitación se presentan a través de la metáfora del Árbol de la Ciencia; también se identifican los tres subtemas principales dentro del análisis de citas conjuntas a través del análisis de citas. Estos hallazgos ayudarán a los investigadores y bibliotecarios a reconocer las contribuciones y aplicaciones cruciales del análisis de citas conjuntas.

Palabras clave

cienciometría;, co-citaciones;, documento;, autor

PDF (English) XML (English)

Biografía del autor/a

Sebastian Robledo-Giraldo

Ingeniero Industrial, Doctor en Ingeniería

Jose Gregorio Figueroa-Camargo

Ingeniero de Minas, Estudiante Maestría Administración de Empresas

Martha Viviana Zuluaga-Rojas

Licenciada en Biología y Química, Doctora en Ciencias Biomédicas

Sol Beatriz Vélez-Escobar

Contadora Pública, Magíster en Dirección y Administración de Empresas

Pedro Luis Duque- Hurtado

Administrador de Empresas, Magíster en Administración

Citas

  1. Grisales-Aguirre, A. M., Robledo, S., & Zuluaga, M. (2023). Topic Modeling: Perspectives From a Literature Review. IEEE Access, 11, 4066–4078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3232939
  2. Araújo, P. C., & Bufrem, L. S. (2021). The intellectual foundation of the elite of Brazilian researchers on knowledge organization domain. Transinformação, 33. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202133e200068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202133e200068
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  4. Barrera-Rubaceti, N. A., Robledo-Giraldo, S., & Zarela-Sepulveda, M. (2021). Una revisión bibliográfica del Fintech y sus principales subáreas de estudio. Económicas CUC, 43 (1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.43.1.2022.econ.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.43.1.2022.Econ.4
  5. Blaizot, A., Veettil, S. K., Saidoung, P., Moreno-Garcia, C. F., Wiratunga, N., Aceves-Martins, M., Lai, N. M., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2022). Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods, 13 (3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1553
  6. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008 (10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  7. Boiko, K. (2021). R&D activity and firm performance: mapping the field. Management Review Quarterly, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00220-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00220-1
  8. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419
  9. Bu, Y., Wang, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Sugimoto, C. R., Huang, Y., & Huang, W.-B. (2020). Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 57 (6), 102300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102300
  10. Cardona-Arbeláez, D. A., Del Río-Cortina, J. L., Romero-Severiche, A. K., & Lora-Guzmán, H. (2019). La curva de aprendizaje y su contribución al desempeño del talento humano en las organizaciones: una revisión teórica. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 10 (1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v10.n1.2019.10010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v10.n1.2019.10010
  11. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
  12. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (7), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
  13. Clavijo-Tapia, F. J., Duque-Hurtado, P. L., Arias-Cerquera, G., & Alejandra, Tolosa-Castañeda Maria. (2021). Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020. Clío América, 15 (29), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897848.4311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/23897848.4311
  14. Diez, D., Díaz-Ospina, J., Robledo, S., & Rodríguez-Córdoba, M. del P. (2022). Tendencias teóricas y desafíos en la comunicación de la responsabilidad social corporativa. Anagramas - DOI: https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n40a7
  15. Rumbos Y Sentidos de La Comunicación, 20 (40), 146–176. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8419182
  16. Duque, P., Meza, O. E., Giraldo, D., & Barreto, K. (2021). Economía Social y Economía Solidaria: un análisis bibliométrico y revisión de literatura. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 138, e75566. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566
  17. Durán-Aranguren, D. D., Robledo, S., Gomez-Restrepo, E., Arboleda-Valencia, J. W., & Tarazona, N. A. (2021). Scientometric Overview of Coffee By-Products and Their Applications. Molecules, 26 (24), 7605. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247605
  18. Eggers, F., Risselada, H., Niemand, T., & Robledo, S. (2022). Referral campaigns for software startups: The impact of network characteristics on product adoption. Journal of Business Research, 145, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.007
  19. Fire, M., & Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action. GigaScience, 8 (6). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz053
  20. Ghane, R., Alizade-Zowj, H., & Ehsanifar, F. (2019). Identifying Information Retrieval Research Trends Using Author Co-Citation Network. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 17 (2), 99–117. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3674027
  21. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57 (1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023619503005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023619503005
  22. Gómez-Tabares, A. S. (2021). Perspectivas de estudio sobre el comportamiento suicida en niños y adolescentes: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura utilizando la teoría de grafos. Psicología Desde El Caribe, 38 (3), 408–451. https://doi.org/10.14482/psdc.38.3.362.28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14482/psdc.38.3.362.28
  23. González-Valiente, C. L., León-Santos, M., Arencibia-Jorge, R., Noyons, E., & Costas, R. (2021). Mapping the Evolution of Intellectual Structure in Information Management Using Author Co-citation Analysis. Mobile Networks and Applications, 26 (6), 2374–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01231-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01231-9
  24. Hadj-Taieb, M. A., Ben-Aouicha, M., & Turki, H. (2021). Paper co-citation analysis using semantic similarity measures. In A. Abraham, P. and Siarry, K. Ma., & A. Kaklauskas (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 264–277. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49342-4_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49342-4_26
  25. He, Y., & Cheung Hui, S. (2002). Mining a Web Citation Database for author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 38 (4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00046-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00046-2
  26. Hurtado-Marín, V. A., Agudelo-Giraldo, J. D., Robledo, S., & Restrepo-Parra, E. (2021). Analysis of dynamic networks based on the Ising model for the case of study of co-authorship of scientific articles. Scientific Reports, 11 (1), 5721. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85041-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85041-8
  27. Jeong, Y. K., Song, M., & Ding, Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.001
  28. Karaulova, M., Nedeva, M., & Thomas, D. A. (2020). Mapping research fields using co-nomination: the case of hyper-authorship heavy flavour physics. Scientometrics, 124 (3), 2229–2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03538-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03538-x
  29. Köseoglu, M. A. (2020). Identifying the intellectual structure of fields: introduction of the MAK approach. Scientometrics, 125 (3), 2169–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03719-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03719-8
  30. Li, P., Yang, G., & Wang, C. (2019). Visual topical analysis of library and information science. Scientometrics, 121 (3), 1753–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03239-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03239-0
  31. Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Neumann, M., Kinney, R., & Weld, D. (2020). S2ORC: The semantic scholar open research corpus. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447
  32. López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Verdú, F. (2021). Assessing the Origins, Evolution and Prospects of National Innovation Systems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13 (1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00712-7
  33. Macías-Quiroga, I. F., Henao-Aguirre, P. A., Marín-Flórez, A., Arredondo-López, S. M., & Sanabria-González, N. R. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in wastewater treatment: global and Ibero-American research trends. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28 (19), 23791–23811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11333-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11333-7
  34. Macías-Rojas, M., Caro, E. O., & Fernández-Morales, F. H. (2022). Las mediaciones TIC en la resolución de problemas matemáticos, un abordaje documental. Gestión y Desarrollo Libre, 7 (14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/2539-3669/gestionlibre.14.2022.9384
  35. Ramos-Enríquez, V., Duque, P., & Salazar, J. A. V. (2021). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Emprendimiento: evolución y tendencias de investigación. Desarrollo Gerencial, 13 (1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.13.1.4210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.13.1.4210
  36. Robledo, S., Duque, P., & Grisale-Aguirre, A. M. (2023). Word of Mouth Marketing: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Scientometric Research, 11 (3), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.47
  37. Robledo, S., Eider, V. J., Darío, D.-M. N., & Duque-Uribe, V. (2022). Networking as an entrepreneurial marketing tool: the link between effectuation and word of mouth. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-08-2020-0112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-08-2020-0112
  38. Robledo, S., Grisales-Aguirre, A. M., Hughes, M., & Eggers, F. (2021). “Hasta la vista, baby” – will machine learning terminate human literature reviews in entrepreneurship? Journal of Small Business Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125
  39. Robledo, S., Zuluaga, M., Valencia, L. A., Arbelaez-Echeverri, O., Duque, P., & Alzate-Cardona, J.-D. (2022). Tree of Science with Scopus: A Shiny Application. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 100. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698
  40. Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author co-citations: Definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (6), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10401
  41. Sanguri, K., Bhuyan, A., & Patra, S. (2020). A semantic similarity adjusted document co-citation analysis: a case of tourism supply chain. Scientometrics, 125 (1), 233–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03608-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03608-0
  42. Schneider, J. W., Larsen, B., & Ingwersen, P. (2009). A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 80 (1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2019-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2019-y
  43. Sepúlveda-López, J. J., Ramírez-Castañeda, L. A., Bautista-Sáenz, D. P., Marín-Florez, A., & Arredondo-López, S. M. (2021). Revisión de literatura sobre modelamiento y simulación de fenómenos sociotecnológicos mediante minería de datos en bases de datos académicas. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 44 (2), e339215. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v44n2e339215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v44n2e339215
  44. Simao, L. B., Carvalho, L. C., & Madeira, M. J. (2021). Intellectual structure of management innovation: bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 71 (3), 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00196-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00196-4
  45. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  46. Sud, A., Cheng, D. K., Moineddin, R., Zlahtic, E., & Upshur, R. (2021). Time series-based bibliometric analysis of a systematic review of multidisciplinary care for opioid dose reduction: exploring the origins of the North American opioid crisis. Scientometrics, 126 (11), 8935–8955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04154-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04154-z
  47. Sun, L., Wu, L., & Qi, P. (2020). Global characteristics and trends of research on industrial structure and carbon emissions: a bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27 (36), 44892–44905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10915-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10915-9
  48. Trejos-Salazar, D. F., Duque-Hurtado, P. L., Montoya-Restrepo, L. A., & Montoya-Restrepo, I. A. (2021). Neuroeconomía: una revisión basada en técnicas de mapeo científico. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 11 (2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v11.n2.2021.12754
  49. Valencia-Hernandez, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque-Méndez, N. D., & Olivar-Tost, G. (2020). SAP algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to tree of Science. Ingeniería E Investigación, 40 (1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
  50. Van-Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614 (7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
  51. Van-Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  52. Vargas-Zapata, M., Medina-Sierra, M., Galeano-Vasco, L. F., & Cerón-Muñoz, M. F. (2022). Algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina para la predicción de propiedades fisicoquímicas del suelo mediante información espectral: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 12 (1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n1.2022.14206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n1.2022.14212
  53. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  54. Zhao, D. (2006). Towards all-author co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 42 (6), 1578–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.022
  55. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Comparing all-author and first-author co-citation analyses of information science. Journal of Informetrics, 2 (3), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.004
  56. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2020). Telescopic and panoramic views of library and information science research 2011–2018: a comparison of four weighting schemes for author co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 124 (1), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03462-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03462-0
  57. Zheng, J., Zhou, R., Meng, B., Li, F., Liu, H., & Wu, X. (2021). Knowledge framework and emerging trends in intracranial aneurysm magnetic resonance angiography: a scientometric analysis from 2004 to 2020. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 11 (5), 1854–1869. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-20-729
  58. Zuluaga, M., Robledo, G., Osorio-Zuluaga, G. A., Yathe, L., Gonzalez, D., & Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and pesticides: systematic literature review using graph theory for analysis of references. Nova, 14 (25), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.1735
  59. Zuluaga, M., Robledo, S., Arbelaez-Echeverri, O., Osorio-Zuluaga, G. A., & Duque-Méndez, N. (2022). Tree of Science - ToS: A Web-based Tool for Scientific Literature Recommendation. Search Less, Research More! Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 100. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2696
  60. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.