Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sociodemographic factors of families in the Patriotas neighborhood of Tunja

Abstract

The present study was the first approach by Family Medicine at the community level in the city of Tunja, exploring non-classical settings to provide health care. It is a descriptive study where the data was collected through a family file designed to collect information in the Project Promotion and maintenance of the health of the individual, family and community of the Los Patriotas neighborhood of the municipality of Tunja: 2019-2020 by the group of family doctors in training from the first cohort of the Family Medicine Specialization of the UPTC. 45 families were characterized and analyzed, with 151 members, finding that the households are multidimensional, with a population of children under 15 years of age (25.4% ), adolescents and adults, aged between 15 and 59 years, comprise 71.2% of the population, and 3.4% are adults over 65 years of age. Indicating that 28% of the individuals in the families are probably dependent on some other member. It was possible to determine that a large part of the population is in a productive stage and corresponds to nuclear families, but it was evidenced that the head of the household in single-parent families corresponds to 100% of the cases, presence of economic dependence, illiteracy and predominant occupation in jobs informal or low paid. We found that almost the entire population is affiliated with the health system, however, health barriers related to situations related to the use of services could be detected. Although some variables such as family dynamics and handling of rules and limits at home were not objectively estimated, some situations such as the stay at home of minors in the care of other minors and / or elderly adults were observed. The lack of recreational spaces and nearby green areas was observed, as well as the presence of outlets for psychoactive substances in the neighborhood, which deserve a more in-depth study in the future in order to propose contextualized solutions to the realities of this sector in the city of Tunja. In the context shown during the development of the research, multiple intervention opportunities were found at the individual, family and community levels by the Family Doctor, which allowed the development of health actions contextualized to the vulnerable environment in the urban area and that achieved an approach of Primary Health Care to the different scenarios of development of the population as proposed by the Comprehensive Health Care Policy (PAIS).

Keywords

family, social environment, physical environment, multimorbidity, socioeconomic position, socioeconomic status, social class, sociodemographics

PDF (Español)

References

  • Atauje Yance CA. Factores Asociados al uso de servicios de salud por adultos mayores en comunidades de los andes peruanos. [Online].; 2017 [cited 2020 04 01. Available from: http://www.repositorioacademico.usmp.edu.pe/bitstream/ha ndle/usmp/3006/atauje_yca.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.
  • OMS/OPS. Vulnerabilidad Social y su Efecto en Salud en Chile. [Online].; 2016. Available from: https://medicina.udd.cl/files/2016/03/Libro-Completo2016.pdf.
  • Peña-Montoya M, Garzón-Duque M, Cardona-Arango D, Segura-Cardona A. Access to health services for older adults. Antioquia - Colombia. Univ Salud. ; 18(2): p. 219 - 231.
  • Palomino-Moral P, Grande-Gascón M, Linares-Abad M. La salud y sus determinantes sociales. Desigualdades y exclusión en la sociedad del siglo XXI. Revista Internacional de Sociología. 2014; 72(1): p. 71-91.
  • Vidal-Gutierrez D, Chamblas-García I, Zavala-Gutierrez M, Muller-Gilchrist R, Rodríguez-Torres MC, ChavezMontecino A. Social determinants of health and lifestyles in adult population Conception, Chile. Ciencia y Enfermería. 2014 Diciembre; 20(1).
  • Pathirana T, Jackson C. Socioeconomic status and multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018; 42(2): p. 186-194.
  • Davies J, Sleeman K, Leniz J, et al. Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul; 16(7).
  • Mustafa D, Gioli G, Memon M, Noshirwani M, Idris I, Ahmed N. Pinning down social vulnerability in Sindh Province, Pakistan: from narratives to numbers, and back again. Disasters. 2019 Apr; 43(2): p. 311 - 315.
  • Naess O, Claussen B. Four indicators of socioeconomic position: Relative ranking across causes of death. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2005; 33: p. 215-221.
  • Suárez Ortiz L, Urrego Murillo. Relacion familia - escuela, una mirada desde las practicas pedagogicas. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Familia. 2014;: p. 6, 97-113.
  • Mazo González I, Mejia Ruiz A, Muñoz Palacio P. Calidad de vida: la familia como una posibilidad transformadora. Revista Poiésis. enero-junio, 2019;: p. 98- 110.
  • Golovanevsky L. Características sociodemográficas y composición y dinámica de las familias como una de las dimensiones de la vulnerabilidad de los hogares en argentina a comienzos del siglo XXI.; 2008.
  • Stahlmann K, Hebestreit A, DeHenauw S, Hunsberger M, Kaprio J, et al. A cross-sectional study of obesogenic behaviours and family rules according to family structure in European children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 5; 17(1): p. 32.
  • Lafta R, Hayawi A, Khudhairi J. Medical and social problems among women headed families in Baghdad. Qatar Med J. 2013 Nov; 2: p. 51 - 58.
  • Mesquita Ayres RdC, Paiva V, França, Jr, , Garavato N, Della Negra M. Vulnerability, Human Rights, and Comprehensive Health Care Needs of Young People Living With HIV/AIDS. Am J Public Health. 2006 June; p. 96(6): 1001–1006.
  • Ortiz Ruiz, Díaz Grajales. Una mirada a la vulnerabilidad social. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 2018 julioseptiembre: p. 611-638.
  • Cruz Castillo. Activos sociales, vulnerabilidad y estructura de oportunidades. Aportes para los estudios de hábitat. Traza. 2014: p. 62-70.
  • OPF OdPdlF. Tipologías de Familias en Colombia: Evolución 1993 - 2014. Bogota; Noviembre 2015.
  • Mair F, Jani B. Emerging trends and future research on the role of socioeconomic status in chronic illness and 66 multimorbidity. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar; 5(3): p. e128 - e129.
  • Mercer S, Zhou Y, Humphris G, McConnachie A, Bakhshi A, et al. Multimorbidity and Socioeconomic Deprivation in Primary Care Consultations. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar 16; 16(2): p. 127 - 131.
  • Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). DANE - Nota Metodológica - Índice de Vulnerabilidad por Manzana. [Online].; 2020. Available from: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/comunicados/Nota_metodologica_indice_de_vulnerabilidad.pdf.
  • Gobernación de Boyacá. Gobernación de Boyacá. [Online].; 2018. Available from: https://www.boyaca.gov.co/secretariasalud/category/direcci ones/direccion-de-salud-publica/asis-analisis-de-lasituacion-en-salud/.
  • Li X, Cai L, Cui W, Wang X, Li H, et al. Association of socioeconomic and lifestyle factors with chronic noncommunicable diseases and multimorbidity among the elderly in rural southwest China. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Mar 12;: p. pii: fdz020.
  • Lindemberg S. Social rationality, self-regulation and well-being: The regulatory significance of needs, goals, and the self. In Press SU. Manual de Rational Choice Social Research. Standford: R. Wittek, TAB Snijders y V. Nee (Eds.); 2013. p. 72 - 112.
  • Barrera Sánchez L, Ospina Díaz J, Tejedor Bonilla M. Prevalencia de Síndrome Metabólico en estudiantes universitarios de Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia, 2014. Investigación En Enfermería: Imagen Y Desarrollo. 19(1): p. 81-93.
  • Blanquet M, Legrand A, Pélissier A, Mourgues C. Socioeconomics status and metabolic syndrome: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019; 13(3): p. 1805-1812.
  • Municipio de Paipa (Boyacá). Análisis de la situación en salud con el modelo de los determinantes sociales de la salud, municipio de Paipa, Boyacá 2018. [Online].; 2018 [cited 2020 04 05. Available from: https://www.boyaca.gov.co/SecSalud/images/Documentos/ Asis2018/asis_paipa_2018.pdf.
  • Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística - (DANE). Nomenclaturas y Clasificaciones CIUO - 88 A.C. [Online].; 2020 [cited 2020 04 02. Available from: http://formularios.dane.gov.co/senApp/nomModule/aym_index.php?url_pag=clasificaciones&alr=&cla_id=1&url_sub_ pag=a&&alr=&.
  • Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística - (DANE). Observatorio de Familia - DANE. [Online].; 2020 [cited 2020 Julio 07. Available from: https://observatoriodefamilia.dnp.gov.co/Sistema-demonitoreo/Indicadoressociodemogr%C3%A1ficos/Tipologias-defamilias/Paginas/estructura-familiar-padres.aspx.
  • Golovanevsky L. Asociación Latinoamericana de Población. [Online].; 2008 [cited 2020 Julio 07. Available from: http://www.alapop.org/alap/SerieInvestigaciones/Investigaci onesSI1aSi9/P&VT5.pdf.
  • Solhi M, Shabani-Hamedan M, Salehi M. A PRECEDEPROCEED based educational intervention in quality of life of women-headed households in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Sep; 26(30): p. 417.
  • Santander S, Támara-Zubarew G, Santelices L, Argollo P, Cerda J, et al. Family influence as a protective factor against riskbbehaviors in Chilean Adolescents. Rev Med Chile. 2008; p. 317-324.
  • Porcentaje de Víctimas con afiliación al SGSSS. [Online].; 2020. Available from: https://sinergiapp.dnp.gov.co/#IndicadorProgEnt/26/1186/4 791.
  • Iguacel I, Fernández-Alvira J, Bammann K, Chadjigeorgiou C, De Henauw S, Heidinger-Felső R, et al. Social vulnerability as a predictor of physical activity and screen time in European children. Int J Public Health. 2018 Mar; 63(2): p. 283 - 295.
  • Chamberlain A, Finney-Rutten L, Wilson P, Fan C, Boyd C, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is 67 associated with multimorbidity in a geographically-defined community. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 6; 20(1): p. 13.
  • Frølich A, Ghith N, Schiøtz M, Jacobsen R, Stockmarr A. Multimorbidity, healthcare utilization and socioeconomic status: A register-based study in Denmark. PLoS One. 2019 Ago 1; 14(8).
  • Contant E, Loignon C, Bouhali T, Almirall J, Fortin M. A multidisciplinary self-management intervention among patients with multimorbidity and the impact of socioeconomic factors on results. BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Abr 22; 20(1): p. 53.
  • Henriquez J, Velasco C. Las desigualdades en salud en los últimos 20 años. Propuesta de Política Pública. Centro de Estudios Públicos - Chile. 2015;(13): p. 1-51.
  • Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística - (DANE). Observatorio de Familia - DANE. [Online].; 2020. Available from: https://observatoriodefamilia.dnp.gov.co/Sistema-demonitoreo/Indicadoressociodemogr%C3%A1ficos/Tipologias-defamilias/Paginas/estructura-familiar-padres.aspx.
  • Gobernación de Boyacá. Gobernación de Boyacá. [Online].; 2018 [cited 20 Mayo 2020. Available from: https://www.boyaca.gov.co/SecSalud/images/Documentos/ Asis2018/asis_tunja_2018.pdf.
  • Palomino P, Grande ML. THE SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTHInequalities and exclusion in XXIst century societies. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE SOCIOLOGÍA. 2014; p. 71-91.
  • Vidal D, Chamblas I. Social determinants of health and lifestyles in adult population concepción, chile. Ciencia y Enfermeria. 2014; p. 61-74.
  • salud Cddsdl. Construyendo laNueva Agenda Social, desde la mirada delos Determinantes Sociales de la Salud. In Síntesis del ciclo de diálogos.; 2006.
  • Naess, Claussen. Four indicators of socioeconomic position: relative ranking across causes of death. Scand J Public Health. 2005: p. 215-21.
  • Palomino P, Grande ML. the social determinants of health inequalities and exclusion in xxist century societies. revista internacional de sociología. 2014; p. 71-91.
  • Vidal D, Chamblas I. Social determinants of health and lifestyles in adult population concepción, chile. Ciencia y Enfermeria. 2014: p. 61-74.
  • Naess, Claussen. Four indicators of socioeconomic position: relative ranking across causes of death. Scand J Public Health. 2005: p. 215-21.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.