Innovation practices in SMEs in Boyacá

Main Article Content


Jaime Ignacio Bermúdez Guerrero
Óscar Gutiérrez Molina


The investigation Data, indicators, information and knowledge of innovation in Colombia (agreement between Universities: EAFIT, Surcolombiana, Tecnológica de Bolivar and Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia), presents evidences of innovation in a group of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of Boyacá. Furthermore, it examines best practices of innovation (BPI) in groupsrepresentative of SMEs: producing goods(agribusiness, manufacturing, textile and clothing industry) and the other group consists of service providers (in the areas of tourism, ICT, health and transport), located in the cities of Tunja, Paipa, Duitama and Sogamoso. Innovation profiles made by managers and entrepreneurs about innovative practicesin products orservices, processes, management and marketing, show that all of the SMES are, mostly, in a takeoff or development stage, with significant gaps in the four types of innovation that were considered


Article Details


By submitting articles for evaluation, the author agrees to transfer the publishing rights to Revista Apuntes del CENES for publishing in any format or mean and that the attached partial use license will be signed. To increase their visibility, documents are sent to databases and indexing systems also can be viewed on the website and Redalyc - EBSCO - ProQuest - EconLit - DOAJ -  Scielo - Dialnet - ESCI(WoS) - Latindex  - DOTEC - REPECERIH PLUS - The WZB library -  Actualidad Iberoamericana  -   Publindex  - VCU -  Econpapers - EconBib - Bibilat  -  REDIB  -   Crossref - Worldcat -  CLASE - SHERPA ROMEO - Academia - EconBiz - Socionet - Vlex

The journal is under licence Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

For CC licenses, the principle is the creative freedom. This system complements the copyright without oppose it. The content of the items is the responsibility of each author, and does not compromise in any way, magazine or institution.

Publishing and reproduction of titles, abstracts and full content for academic, scientific, cultural and nonprofit purposes is allowed, when the respective source is acknowledged. This work cannot be used for commercial purposes.

Apuntes del Cenes is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

Apuntes del Cenes  does not charge authors for submission or publication

Form 6 Copyright Transfer Form

When sending an article to submit to the Apuntes del CENES journal, the author(s) certify and accept:

1.That the article has not been accepted for evaluation in another journal, nor has it been published.
2.That, in case a publication of a previous version as a working paper (or 'gray literature') has been reported on a website, and that, in the case of publication being accepted, it will be removed from the Internet site, where
will leave only the title, abstract, keywords and hyperlink to the journal.

That once published in Apuntes del CENES will not be published in another magazine.


Amit,R.ySchoemaker,P.J.H.(1993).Strategic assets and organizational rents. Strategic Management Journal 14(1),33-46.

Chandler, A. (1988). La mano visible: revolución en dirección de la empresa norteamericana. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.

Dierickx, I. yCool, K.(1982).Assetstock, accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35(12), 1504-1511.

Doving, E. y Gooderham, P.N. (2008). Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: the case ofsmall firm accountancy practices. Strategic Management Journal 29 (8), 841-857.

Drucker, P. (1999). Los desafíos de la gerencia para el siglo XXI. Bogotá: Norma.

Eisenhardt, K. M. yMartin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10/ 11),1105-1121.

ESE. (2010). The most innovative companies. Centro de Emprendimiento e Innovación de la Universidad del Desarrollo. Escuela de Negocios, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile.

European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions. Brussel: Flagship Initiative Innovation Union.

EUROSTAT.(2011).PROINNOEUROPE, INNO METRICS, Europe Innovation Union Scorebard 2010.

Fernández, R. Z. (1993). La organización interna como ventaja competitiva para la empresa. Papeles de Economía Española 56 (1), 178-193.

Garrido, M. (2003). Sistema Nacional de Innovación y centros de desarrollo tecnológico en Colombia. Primer Congreso Iberoamericano de Centros Tecnológicos, llevado a cabo en Valencia, España.

Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33 (3), 114-135.

Helfat, C. E. y Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal 24 (10), 997-1010.

Koeller, C. T. (1995). Innovation, market structure and firm size: a simultaneous equations model. Managerial and Decision Economics 16, 259-269.

Malaver, F. y Vargas, M. (2006). La innovación en Colombia 1990-2004. Innovación y Ciencia. Asociación Colombiana para el Avance de la Ciencia, Bogotá, Colombia, 13 (3), 34- 39.

Malaver, F. yVargas, M. (2005). Políticas y avances en la ciencia, la tecnología y la innovación en Colombia 1990-2005. Cuadernos de Administración, Bogotá, Colombia, 18 (30), 39-78).

Mc Craw, T. (2007). Prophet of Innovation. USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Monroy, S. E. (2006). Nuevas políticas y estrategias de articulación del sistema de ciencia y tecnología e innovación colombiano. Innovar 16 (28), 157-172.

Montenegro, T. I., (2007) Existe un Sistema Nacional de Innovación en Colombia. Bogotá: Subdirección de Investigación y DesarrolloColciencias.

Nelson, R. y Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theoryof economic change. In D.C. North (Ed.), 1994, Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review84 (3), 359-368.

OCDE. (1992). Manual de Oslo. Principios básicos propuestos para la recogida e interpretación de datos de innovación tecnológica. París: s.n.

OCDE. (2002). Manual de Frascati. Propuesta de norma práctica para encuestas de investigación y desarrollo experimental. Madrid: Fundación Española Ciencia yTecnología.

Parra, R. D., Mesa, J., Corrales, S. y Aguirre, V. M. (2007). La auditoría de la innovación: un grupo de empresas del Área Metropolitana de Medellín. Medellín, Colombia: Fondo Editorial EAFIT.

Penrose, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. NewYork: Wiley.

Prahalad,C.K. yHamel, G. (1990).Thecore competence ofthe corporation. Harvard Business Review68 (3), 79-91.

Perdomo, G. (2009) ¿Por qué, cómo y para qué estudiarlos Sistemas Nacionales de Innovación y Estilos de innovación en Colombia? Pensamiento y Gestión. Barranquilla, Colombia: Universidad del Norte.

Robledo, V.J., Malaver, R. F. yVargas, P. M. (2009). Encuestas, datos y descubrimientos des conocimientossobre la innovación en Colombia. Bogotá: Javegraf, Universidad Pontificia Javeriana.

Robledo,J. yEchavarría, E. S. (2006). Un Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación: hacia la necesaria integración de la investigación y la innovación. Innovación y Ciencia. Asociación Colombiana para el Avance de laCiencia, Bogotá, Colombia, 13 (3), 34-39.

Schilling, M. A. y Hill, C. W. L. (1998). Managing the new product development process: strategic imperatives. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 67-81.

Schreyogg, G. yKliesch-Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal 28 (9), 913-933.

Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalismo, socialismo y democracia. México: McGraw-Hill.

Shumpeter, J. (1997). Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M.A. y Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environment to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academic of Management Review32 (1), 273-292.

Subramaniam, M. yYoundt, M. A.(2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal 48 (3), 450-463.

Teece, D. J. (1982). Toward an economic theory ofthe multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (1), 39-63.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. yShuen,A.(1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509-533.

Varma,R.(1995). RestructuringCorporate RyD: from an autonomous to a linkage model. Technology Analysis y Strategic Management 7, 231-248.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 15, 171-180.

Wernerfelt,B. (1995). The resource-based view ofthe firm: ten years later. Strategic Management Journal 16 (3), 171-174.

Winter, S.(2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10), 991-995.


Download data is not yet available.