Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Septiembre-Diciembre

PAPERS

Complementary foliar fertilization improves the yield, health and profitability of cocoa in rainfed agroecosystems

https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v19.n3.2022.14569

Published 2022-12-12

  • Erick Humberto Bravo Palma
    • ,
  • Galo Cedeño García
    • ,
  • Jessenia Rosanna Castro Olaya
    • ,
  • George Alexander Cedeño García

Erick Humberto Bravo Palma
Universidad Técnica de Manabí

Galo Cedeño García
Escuela Superior Politécnica Agropecuaria de Manabí

Jessenia Rosanna Castro Olaya
Universidad Técnica de Manabí

George Alexander Cedeño García
Universidad Técnica de Manabí

Abstract

Foliar fertilization allows supplementing crop nutrition under limiting soil and climate conditions. The aim of the research was to evaluate the effectiveness of complementary foliar nutrition on the yield, health and profitability of national cocoa under rainfed conditions. The treatments evaluated were foliar fertilization with NPK (T1), macro and micronutrients + diatomaceous earth (T2), macro and micronutrients + phytoregulators + diatomaceous earth (T3), macro and micronutrients + phytoregulators + amino acids + diatomaceous earth (T4), NPK soil fertilization (T5) and control treatment (T6). A randomized complete block design was used, with four replicates and 24 experimental units. The main variables recorded were incidence of diseased ears (IDE), dry grain yield (DGY) and net economic benefit (NEB). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test of means (α = 0.05). The results indicated significant statistical differences (p<0.05) for the IDE and the DGY. The T4 treatment reached the lowest IDE with 40.87%, in relation to the control treatment that showed an IDE of 65.02%.Similarly, treatment T4 achieved the highest DGY with 1395 kg ha-1, which represented an increase of 13.41, 20.28, 35.85, 41.37 and 57.39%, compared to treatments T3, T2, T1, T5 and T6, respectively. The T4 treatment also achieved the highest NEB with 802 USD ha-1, compared to the rest of the treatments evaluated. It is concluded that complementary foliar fertilization is economically viable for national cocoa in rainfed agroecosystems.  

Keywords

Theobroma cacao, Foliar Nutrition, Productivity, Health Status, Economic Benefit

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Antolinez, E., P. Almanza, A. Barona, E. Polanco, & P. Serrano. (2020). Estado Actual de la Cacaocultura: Una Revisión de sus Principales Limitantes. Ciencia y Agricultura, 17(2): 1 - 11. https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v17.n2.2020.10729
  2. Barrera, V., Alwang, J., Casanova, T., Domínguez, J., Escudero, L., Loor, G., Peña, G., Párraga, J., Arévalo, J., Quiroz, J., Tarqui, O., Plaza, L., Sotomayor, I., Zambrano, F., Rodríguez, G.; García, C., & Racines, M. (2019). La cadena de valor del cacao y el bienestar de los productores en la provincia de Manabí-Ecuador. INIAP. Libro técnico No. 171. ARCOIRIS Producciones gráficas. Quito, Ecuador. 204 pp.
  3. Constantinescu, D., Lupu, C., & Oancea, F. (2020). Siliceous Natural Nanomaterials as Biorationals—Plant Protectants and Plant Health Strengtheners. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111791
  4. De Bang, T., Husted, S., Laursen, K., Persson, D., Schjoerring, J. (2021). The molecular-physiological functions of mineral macronutrients and their consequences for deficiency symptoms in plants. New Phytol, 229(5):2446-2469. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17074
  5. Dewi, E., Yudono, P., Putra, E. & Purwanto, B. (2020). Physiological and biochemical activities of cherelle wilt on three cocoa clones (Theobroma cacao) under two levels of soil fertilities. Biodiversitas, 21(1): 187 – 194. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210124
  6. Dewi, E. (2021). Tingkat Layu Pentil (Cherelle Wilt) Pada Berbagai Klon kakao (Theobroma cacao L). Jurnal Agropet, 18(2): 1-13.
  7. Duicela, L., y L. Ponce. (2015). Uso de fungicidas sistémicos en el control de la roya del cafeto (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. & Br.) en la provincia de Manabí. Revista La Técnica, 15: 6 – 17.
  8. Erwiyono, R., Sucahyo, A. & Winarso, D. (2006). Effectiveness of Foliar Application of Potassium on Flowering and Fruiting of Cocoa. Pelita Perkebunan, 22(1): 13-24.
  9. Fageria, N., Filho, M., Moreria, A. & Guimarães, M. (2009). Foliar Fertilization of Crop Plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32(6): 1044-1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160902872826
  10. Kouadio, S., Tienebo, E., Kouamé, K., Koko, L. & Abo, K. (2017). Foliar Application of Boron during Flowering Promotes Tolerance to Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) Swollen Shoot Viral Disease. European Scientific Journal, 13:21. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n21p387
  11. Lahive, F., Hadley, P. & Daymond, A. (2019). The physiological responses of cacao to the environment and the implications for climate change resilience. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 39:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0552-0
  12. Lallié, H., Oro, F., Nekkal, N. & El Hattimy, F. (2021). Effect of biostimulant Banzaï and fertilizer on the yield of cocoa trees in the locality of N’gouanmoinkro, Central Côte d'Ivoire. E3S Web of Conferences 319, 02011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131902011
  13. Loor, R., T. Casanova, & L. Plaza. (2016). Mejoramiento y homologación de los procesos de investigación, validación y producción de servicios en cacao y café. Publicación miscelánea No. 433, 1a ed. INIAP (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias), EET-Pichilingue, Mocache, Ecuador. 103 p. ISBN: 978-9942-22-103-2. Disponible en: https://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/bitstream/41000/5093/4/iniapeetpPM433.pdf
  14. Lovatt, C. (2013). Properly Timing Foliar-applied Fertilizers Increases Efficacy: A Review and Update on Timing Foliar Nutrient Applications to Citrus and Avocado. HorTechnology, 23(5): 536 – 541. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.23.5.536
  15. MAE (Ministerio de Ambiente del Ecuador). 2013. Sistema de Clasificación de los Ecosistemas del Ecuador Continental. Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Natural. Quito, EC. 232 pp.
  16. Macías, R., Cuenca, G., Intriago, F., Caetano, C., Menjivar, J., & Pacheco, H. (2019). Vulnerability to climate change of smallholder cocoa producers in the province of Manabí, Ecuador. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín, 72(1): 8707-8716. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v72n1.72564
  17. Marrocos, P., Loureiro, G., de Araujo, Q., Sodré, G., Ahnert, D., Escalona-Valdez, R. & Baligar, V. (2020). Mineral nutrition of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): relationships between foliar concentrations of mineral nutrients and crop productivity. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(10): 1498 – 1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1739295
  18. Melnick, R., Strem, M., Crozier, J., Sicher, R. & Bailey, B. (2013). Molecular and metabolic changes of cherelle wilt of cacao and its effect on Moniliophthora roreri. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 84, 153e162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2013.09.004
  19. Melnick, R.L. (2016). Cherelle Wilt of Cacao: A Physiological Condition. In: Bailey, B., Meinhardt, L. (eds) Cacao Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_15
  20. Motato, N. & Pincay, J. (2015). Calidad de los suelos y aguas para riego en áreas cacaoteras de Manabí. Revista La Técnica, 14: 6 – 23.
  21. Moale, C., Ghiurea, M., Sîrbu, C., Somoghi, R., Cioroianu, T., Faraon, V., Lupu, C., Trica, B., & Constantinescu, D. (2021). Effects of Siliceous Natural Nanomaterials Applied in Combination with Foliar Fertilizers on Physiology, Yield and Fruit Quality of the Apricot and Peach Trees. Plants 2021, 10, 2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112395
  22. Minyaka, E., Madina, C., Kusznierewicz, B., Doungous, O., Haouni, S., Hawadak, J., Niemenak, N. & Omokolo, D. (2018). Effect of MgSO4 Nutrition on Theobroma cacao Susceptibility to Phytophthora megakarya Infection. Plant Protect. Sci., 54(2): 74–82. https://doi.org/10.17221/124/2016-PPS
  23. Nadeem, F., Asif, M., Irfan, M. & Mushtaq, Z. (2018). Role of Macronutrients and Micronutrients in the Growth and Development of Plants and Prevention of Deleterious Plant Diseases – A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences, 13:31-52.
  24. Neenu, S. & Ramesh, K. (2020). Weather - Micronutrient Interactions in Soil and Plants– A Critical Review. Chem Sci Rev Lett, 9(33), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.37273/chesci.CS20510136
  25. Niu, J., Liu, C., Huang, M., Liu, K., & Yan, D. (2020). Effects of Foliar Fertilization: a Review of Current Status and Future Perspectives. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00346-3
  26. Oro, F., Lallie, H., Silue, S., N’dri, K. & Diallo, H. (2020). Antifungal effect of the cumulative application of biostimulant and fertilizers on young cocoa fruits rot at Tafissou site, Centre-East of Côte d'Ivoire. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 14(9): 2965-2979. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i9.1
  27. Pérez, R., Hinostroza, M., & Manzaba, J. (2018). The Irrigation Regime for Crops in Manabí, Ecuador: Climatological Study. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias 27(1): 5-12.
  28. Plett, D., Ranathunge, K., Melino, V., Kuya, N., Uga, Y., & Kronzucker, H. (2020). The intersection of nitrogen nutrition and water use in plants: new paths toward improved crop productivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 71(15): 4452–4468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa049
  29. Priyono, J. (2020). Foliar Application of Liquid-Silicate Rock Fertilizer Reduced Pest and Disease Attacks and Improved Bean Production of Cocoa. Journal of Agriculture and Crops, 6(5): 68-72. https://doi.org/10.32861/jac.65.68.72
  30. Rouphael, Y. & Colla, G. (2020). Editorial: Biostimulants in Agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 11:40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00040
  31. Ruales, J., Burbano, H. & Ballesteros, W. (2011). Efecto de la fertilización con diversas fuentes sobre el rendimiento de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). Revistas de Ciencias Agrícolas 28(2): 81 – 94.
  32. Shaner, G. & Finney, R. (1977). The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on the Expression of Slow-Mildewing Resistance in Knox Wheat. Phytopathology, 67: 1051 - 1056.
  33. Sherefu, A. & Zewide, I. (2021). Review Paper on Effect of Micronutrients for Crop Production. J. Nutrition and Food Processing, 4(7); https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8914/063
  34. Shiferaw, D. (2017). Water-Nutrients Interaction: Exploring the Effects of Water as a Central Role for Availability & Use Efficiency of Nutrients by Shallow Rooted Vegetable Crops - A Review. Journal of Agriculture and Crops 3(10): 78-93.
  35. Suárez-Parra, K. V., Castañeda-Serrano, C. S., Forero-Ulloa, F. E., Almanza-Merchán, P. J., & Serrano-Agudelo, P. C. (2022). Aplicaciones encalántes y el índice de clorofilas SPAD y la conductancia estomática de cacao expuesto a cadmio en el suelo. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 16(2), e14530. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.14530
  36. Vassallo, M. (2015). Diferenciación y agregado de valor en la cadena ecuatoriana del cacao. 1ª. ed. Editorial IAEN. ISBN: 978-9942-950-51-2. Quito-Ecuador. 156 pp.
  37. Zahed, Z., Kumar, S., Mahale, A., Krishna, R. & Mufti, S. (2021). Foliar Micro-nutrition of Vegetable Crops - A Critical Review. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 40(7): 1-12.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)