Effects of branch dimensions of fodder trees on their utilization by ruminants

Main Article Content

Autores

Ángel Arturo Santana-Pérez, Ph. D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-9162
Luis Miguel Borrás-Sandoval, Ph. D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-027X
Long Cheng, Ph. D.
Danis Manuel Verdecia-Acosta, Ph. D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-4438
Jesús Manuel Iglesias-Gómez, Ph. D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-1938
Ana Mercedes Vega-Albi, Ph. D.
Jorge Luis Ramírez-de-la-Ribera, Ph. D.

Abstract

To determine the stem measurements (length and diameter) up to which forage trees (Leucaena leucocephala, LL; Albizia lebbeck, AL; Gliricidia sepium, GS; Moringa oleifera, MO; Samanea saman, SS) are consumed by cattle and sheep (young or adult), these foliages were daily offered to the animals and the minimal diameters of the refused branches were measured (maximal diameter of the eaten fragment). More than 300 dimensions of stem length vs. its corresponding diameter were paired. It was done a triple analysis of variance (5x2x2) being the factors: forage species, animal species and animal age. A simple regression analysis was done between length and diameter of the stalks, as well as a probability test of Z to consider 5% refuse of the foliage by the animals. The results showed that the diameters of the eaten stems are different for each foliage species, being GS>LL>MO>SS>AL, this means that each one has to be cut at a different dimension, this cut must be different for cattle and sheep, but not between ages of them and that sheep do not consume any stem of SS and GS. Finally, it is recommended the exact dimensions of the stems (diameter and length) to cut each species and the evaluation methodology to be used for other fodder evaluations.

Keywords:

Article Details

Licence

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licencia de Creative Commons

All papers included in the Revista Ciencia y Agricultura are published under  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

References

ACPA-SOCUPER (2002). Ovino Pelibuey: Manual. Cuba: Asociación Cubana de Producción Animal.

Agreil, C., Fritz, H., & Meuret, M. (2005). Maintenance of Daily Intake through Bite Mass Diversity Adjustment in Sheep Grazing on Heterogeneous and Variable Vegetation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91(1-2), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.029.

Aregheore, E. M. (2003). Nutritional Characterization and Evaluation of Batiki Grass (Ischaemum aristatum var. indicum) and Batiki Grass-Legume Mixtures with Steer Calves. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2(7), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00198-6.

Avendaño, J., Ovalle, C. M., & Ramírez, M. (2003). Caracterización de los componentes vegetales consuidos por ovinos y bovinos en plantas de Tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus ssp. palmensis). Agricultura Técnica, 63(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0365-28072003000100006.

Bonnet, O. J. F., Meuret, M., Tischler, M. R., Cezimbra, I. M., Azambuja, J. C. R., & Carvalho, P. C. F. (2015). Continuous Bite Monitoring: A Method to Assess the Foraging Dynamics of Herbivores in Natural Grazing Conditions. Animal Production Science, 55(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14540.

Cáceres, O., & González, E. (2000). Metodología para la determinación del valor nutritivo de los forrajes tropicales. Pastos y Forrajes, 23(2), 87-103.

Clark, A., 2000. Controlling broom (Cytisus scoparius) in pasture on the Barrington Tops—a graziers perspective. Plant Protection Quarterly, 15, 161-162.

Delgado, D.C., Hera, R., Cairo, J. & Orta, Y. (2014). Samanea saman, a multi-purpose tree with potentialities as alternative feed for animals of productive interest. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 48(3), 205-212.

Dziba, L. E., Scogings, P. F., Gordon, I. J., & Raats, J. G. (2003). Effects of Season and Breed on Browse Species Intake Rates and Diet Selection by Goats in the False Thornveld of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 47(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00235-3.

FAO-UNESCO (1988). Soil Map of the World. Revised Legend. World Soil Resources. Rome, Italy: FAO-UNESCO.

Fisher, D. S. (2002). A Review of a Few Key Factors Regulating Voluntary Feed Intake in Ruminants. Crop Science, 42(5), 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1651.

Flores, G., Amor J., Resch, C., & González, A. (2000). Valor nutritivo del ensilaje de hierba en las explotaciones ganaderas de Galicia. Pastos, 30(2), 149-191.

Flores, S. J., Vermont-Ricalde, M. R., & Kantún-Balam, M. J. (2006). Leguminosae Diversity in the Yucatan Peninsula and its Importance for Sheep and Goats Feeding. In C.A. Sandoval-Castro, F.D. Hovel, J.F.J. Torres-Acosta & A. Ayala-Burgos (eds.). Herbivores: The Assessment of Intake, Digestibility and the Roles of Secondary Compounds. 291-299. Nottingham, United Kingdom: Nottingham University Press.

Forbes J. M. (2000). Physiological and Metabolic Aspects of Feed Intake Control. In J.P.F. D´Mello (ed), Farm Animal Metabolism Nutrition. United Kingdom: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993782.0319.

Funes, F., & Jordán, H. (1987). Leche. En T. Ruiz (Ed.). Leucaena, una opción para la alimentación bovina en el trópico y el subtrópico. Ed. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Cuba: 129 p.

García, D. E., Medina, M. G., & Ojeda, F. (2005). Carbohidratos solubles en cuatro variedades de morera (Morus alba Linn.). Pastos y Forrajes, 28(3), 233-239.

García, R. & O. Cáceres. (1984). Nuevos sistemas para expresar el valor nutritivo de los alimentos y el requerimiento y racionamiento de los rumiantes. EEPF “Indio Hatuey”, Matanzas. Cuba. 44 p.

Geisert, B. G. (2007). Development of a Set of Forage Standard to Estimate in vivo Digestibility of Forages and Prediction of Forage Quality of Diets Consumed by Cattle Grazing Nebraska Sandhills Range Pastures. (Tesis de Doctorado). University of Nebraska, Lincoln. USA. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscidiss/2.

González-García, E., Cáceres, O., Archimède, H., & Santana, H. (2009). Nutritive Value of Edible Forage from Two Leucaena leucocephala Cultivars with Different Growth Habit and Morphology. Agroforestry Systems, 77(2), 131-141. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9188-4.

González-Pech, P. G., Torres-Acosta, J. F., & Sandoval-Castro, J. (2014). Adapting a Bite Coding Grid for Small Ruminants Browsing a Deciduous Tropical Forest. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 17, 63-70.

Gutiérrez, O., Delgado, D., Oramas, A., & Cairo, J. (2005). Consumo y digestibilidad de materia seca y nitrógeno total en vacas en pastoreo durante la época de lluvias, con bancos de proteína y sin ellos. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 39(4), 593-597. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v7.n2.2015.264.

Hernández, I., & Sánchez, M. D. (2014). Small Ruminant Management and Feeding with High Quality Forages in the Caribbean. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana: IICA.

Iglesias, J. M., Matías, C., & Pérez, A. (2003). Cría de hembras bovinas en desarrollo en condiciones de silvopastoreo. Pastos y Forrajes, 26(1), 35-46.

Ingram, R.S., Doran, M.P. & Nader, G. (2013). Planned Herbivory in the Management of Wildfire Fuels In B. Barros & M.E.B. Fernandes (eds.), Herbivory InTech. 61-86. Rijeka. Croacia. https://doi.org/10.5772/2718.

Kapinga, P. X., Bitende, S. N., & Mulangila, R. C. T. (1993). Evaluation of Sesbania sesban and Sesbania goetzei Accessions in Subhumid Coastal Area of Tanga, Tanzania. En J. Ndikumana & P. de-Leeuw (eds), Proceedings of the Second African Feed Resources Network, 46-51. Zimbabwe: Harare.

Karsli, M. A., & Russell, J. R. (2002). Prediction of the Voluntary Intake and Digestibility of Forage-Based Diets from Chemical Composition and Ruminal Degradation Characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 26, 249-255.

Laca, E. A., Shipley, L. A., & Reid, E. D. (2001). Structural Anti-Quality Characteristics of Range and Pasture Plants. Journal of Range Management, 54(4), 413-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003112.

Lowry, J. B. (1990). Toxic Factors and Problems: Methods of Alleviating them in Animals. En: C. Devendra (ed.), Proceedings of a workshop in Denpasar, 76-91. Indonesia.

Marais, J. P. (2000). Use of Markers. En J.P.F. D´Mello (ed.), Farm Animal Metabolism Nutrition, 255-277. United Kingdom: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993782.0255.

NRC (2005). Mathematics and 21st Century Biology. Committee on Mathematical Sciences Research for DOE’s Computational Biology, National Research Council. Recuperado de: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11315.html.

Mathews, G. L., & Ellinbank, G. A. C. (1989). Utilization of Tagasaste. Tagasaste, Research Results and Farmer Experiences. Small Ruminant Research, 59(2-3), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.003.

Parissi, Z. M., & Nastis, A. S. (2007). Nutritive Value of White Oak (Quercus pubescens Wild.) Browsed by Goats. In A. Priolo, L. Biondi, H. Ben Salem, H. & P. Morand-Fehr (eds.), Advanced Nutrition and Feeding Strategies to Improve Sheep and Goat, 193-196. Zaragoza: CIHEAM.

Paterson, R. T., Quiroga, L., Sauma, G., & Samur, C. (1983). Crecimiento de novillas Cebú-Criollo en la época de seca con acceso limitado a la Leucaena. Producción Animal, 8, 150-162.

Pontes, L. S., Agreil, C., Magda, D., Gleizes, B., & Fritz, H. (2010). Feeding Behavior of Sheep on Shrubs in Response to Contrasting Herbaceous Cover in Rangelands Dominated by Cytisus scoparius L. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124(1-2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.02.002.

Provenza, F. D., & Ropp, J. (2001). Understanding Herbivore Response to anti-Quality Factors in Forages. In K. Launchbaugh (ed.), Antiquality Factors in Rangeland and Pastureland Forages, 5-12. USDA: Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i4_launchbaugh.

Santana, A. A., Pernía, L. A., & Santana, D. A. (2015). Historical, Mathematical and Nutritional Bases of Pearson Square as a Fit Method for Ruminant Rations. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 49(3), 279-288.

Sebata, A., & Ndlovu, L. R. (2010). Effect of Leaf Size, Thorn Density and Leaf Accessibility on Instantaneous Intake Rates of Five Woody Species Browsed by Matebele Goats (Capra hircus L) in a Semi-Arid Savanna, Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environment, 74(10), 1281-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.028.

Sebata, A. 2013. Woody Plant-Herbivore Interactions in Semi-Arid Savanna Ecosystems. En B. Barros & M.E.B. Fernandes (eds.), Herbivory InTech, 1-17. Rijeka. Croacia. https://doi.org/10.5772/2718.

Valenciaga, D. & Chongo, B. (2004). La pared celular. Influencia de su naturaleza en la degradación microbiana ruminal de los forrajes. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 38(4), 343-350.

White, D. A., & Hood, C. S. (2004). Vegetation Patterns and Environmental Gradients in Tropical Dry Forest of the Northern Yucatan Peninsula. Journal Vegetation Science, 15(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02250.x.

Wilson, S. L., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2003). Bite Diameter Selection by Thicket Browsers: The Effect of Body Size and Plant Morphology on Forage Intake and Quality. Forest Ecology and Management, 181(1-2), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00114-2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.