Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Use of metribuzin, associated with different foliar fertilizers, on carrot crops

Forked carrots by herbicide intoxication. Photo: G. Soares da Silva

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the use of different foliar fertilizers, associated or not associated with metribuzin, in terms of carrot yield. The experiments were carried out over two crop years with treatments in a 2×4 factorial scheme. The first factor was the absence or presence of metribuzin (0 and 288 g ha-1 a.i.) and the second factor was the foliar fertilizers: FertiG, FertiB, sucrose and no application. In crop year 1, the commercial yield increased with FertiG with metribuzin, and the forked/total discard ratio decreased when the foliar fertilizers were applied together with metribuzin. The isolated metribuzin decreased the total yield and the commercial/total yield ratio in crop year 1; however, the stress was attenuated when FertiG was applied. In crop year 2, the metribuzin, isolated or associated with FertiG, increased the commercial yield. The FertiB decreased the forked/total discard ratio. The metribuzin, isolated or associated with FertiG, and FertiB obtained similar results for the commercial/total yield ratio in crop year 2. FertiG satisfactorily attenuated the stress caused by metribuzin in the carrot plants, with a positive effect on the commercial yield of the carrot crop.

Keywords

Daucus carota, herbicide, commercial yield, safener.

PDF

References

  1. Agrofit. 2017. Sistema de Agrotóxicos Fitossanitário. In: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento do Brasil, http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons; consulted: January, 2017.
  2. Bezerra, P.S.G., L.C. Grangeiro, M.Z. Negreiros, and J.F. Medeiros. 2007. Utilização de bioestimulante na produção de mudas de alface. Científica 35(1), 46-50.
  3. Bita, C. and T. Gerats. 2013. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 273. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273
  4. Blat, S., E. Suguino, R.B.F. Branco, M.J. Perdoná, J.R. Scarpellini, and O. Gentilin Junior. 2010. Reguladores vegetais no crescimento e produção da batata (online). Pesqui. Tecnol. 7(1), Jan-Jun.
  5. Carneiro, G.D.O.P. 2016. Ácido salicílico e sacarose na redução de estresse causado pelo metribuzin na cultura da cenoura. M.Sc thesis. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, Brazil.
  6. Ceagesp. 2015. Normas de classificação – cenoura. In: Companhia de Entrepostos e Armazéns Gerais de São Paulo, http://www.ceagesp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/cenoura.pdf; consulted: February, 2015.
  7. Coelho, M., S. Bianco, and L.B. Carvalho. 2009. Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura da cenoura (Daucus carota). Planta Daninha 27(Special Number), 913-920. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000500004
  8. Couée, I., C., Sulmon, G. Gouesbet, and A. Amrani. 2006. Involvement of soluble sugars in reactive oxygen species balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 57(3), 449-459. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj027
  9. Dubey, R.S. 2010. Metal toxicity, oxidative stress and antioxidative defense system in plants. pp. 178-203. In: Gupta, S.D. (ed.). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in higher plants. Science Publishers, Enfield, UK. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439854082-10
  10. Gazziero, D.L.P. 2015. Misturas de agrotóxicos em tanque nas propriedades agrícolas do Brasil. Planta Daninha 33(1), 83-92. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582015000100010
  11. Grabowska, A., E. Kunicki, A. Sękara, A. Kalisz, and R. Wojciechowska. 2012. The effect of cultivar and biostimulant treatment on the carrot yield and its quality. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 77, 37-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-012-0014-1
  12. Jensen, K.I.N., D.J. Doohan, and E.G. Specht. 2004. Response of processing carrot to metribuzin on mineral soils in Nova Scotia. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84(2), 669-676. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-083
  13. Lang-Mladek, C., O. Popova, K. Kiok, M. Berlinger, B. Rakic, W. Aufsatz, and C. Luschnig. 2010. Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 3(3), 594-602. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq014
  14. Li, M., L. Ji, X. Yang, Q. Meng, and S. Guo. 2012. The protective mechanisms of CaHSP26 in transgenic tobacco to alleviate photoinhibition of PSII during chilling stress. Plant Cell Rep. 31(11), 1969-1979. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1309-x
  15. Reis, M.R., C.A.D. Melo, G.S. Silva, and A.A. Silva. 2016. Manejo de plantas daninhas. pp. 142-161. In: Nick, C. and A. Borém (ed.). Cenoura - do plantio à colheita. Editora UFV, Viçosa, Brazil.
  16. Silva, A.A., F.A. Ferreira, and L.R. Ferreira. 2007. Herbicidas: classificação e mecanismos de ação. pp.83-148. In: Silva, A.A. and J.F. Silva, (ed.). Tópicos em manejo de plantas daninhas. Editora UFV, Viçosa, Brazil.
  17. Silva, D.J., P.C.S. Leão, and L.S. Brandão. 2012. Efeito de bioestimulantes no desenvolvimento de mudas de videira. p. 22. In: Artigo em anais de congresso, Congresso Brasileiro de Fruticultura. Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura. Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
  18. Silva, G.S. 2015. Fertilizantes foliares como atenuadores de intoxicação da cenoura pelo metribuzin. MSc thesis. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
  19. Soares, L.H. 2013. Manejo fisiológico com base em tratamento de sementes e aplicação de organominerais via foliar para sistemas de alto potencial produtivo de soja. M.Sc thesis. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  20. Sousa, M.C. 2016. Reguladores vegetais e nutrientes minerais no metabolismo de plantas de tomateiro. M.Sc thesis. Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil.
  21. Sugio, A., R. Dreos, F. Aparicio, and A.J. Maule. 2009. The cytosolic protein response as a subcomponent of the wider heat shock response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21(2), 642-654. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.062596
  22. Tahir, M.A., T. Aziz, and Rahmatullah. 2011. Silicon-induced growth and yield enhancement in two wheat genotypes differing in salinity tolerance. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 42(4), 395-407. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2011.542219
  23. Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2013. Respostas e adaptações ao estresse abiótico. pp. 753-780. In: Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. Fisiologia vegetal. Editora Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  24. Vidal, R.A., A. Merotto Jr., E. Schaedler, F.P. Lamego, J. Portugal, J. Mendes, L.A. Kozlowski, M.M. Trezzi, and R. Prado. 2014. Mecanismo de ação de herbicidas. pp. 235-256. In: Monquero, P.A. (ed.). Aspectos da biologia e manejo das plantas daninhas. Editora RiMa, São Carlos, Brazil.
  25. Waraich, E.A., R. Ahmad, M.Y. Ashraf, Saifullah, and M. Ahmad. 2011. Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agric. Scand. B.S.P. 61(4), 291-304. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2010.491954
  26. Waraich, E.A., R. Ahmad, A. Halim, and T. Aziz. 2012. Alleviation of temperature stress by nutrient management in crop plants: a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12(2), 221-244. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162012000200003

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.