Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Sustainability in Mexico a bibliometric analysis of the scientific research field in the last 28 years

Abstract

The current economic, social, and environmental problems caused by global population growth and the over- exploitation of the planet's resources generate an increasing interest in sustainability driven studies as a priority issue for nations. The objective of the present paper is to apply bibliometric techniques for the analyses of the evolution of the scientific publications with focus on sustainability driven topics authored or coauthored by at least one researcher with affiliation to an institute located in the Mexican Republic. In total, 2,629 articles published in the last 28 years were identified by the designed methodical search in the Web of Science scientific database. The results are organized in tables that show the most influential articles in the area, the journals with the highest number of publications, the most productive authors, the most relevant research areas, and the most representative organizations. These results are complemented by visual network maps developed with the software VOSviewer. The results show the predominant thematic trends, in addition to a clear increase in participatory disciplines, with special emphasis on social disciplines.

Keywords: Sustainability, Bibliometrics, Network Maps, Regional Analysis, Mexico.

JEL Classification: Q56, Q01, Y1.

Received: 21/07/2020. Accepted: 05/11/2020.  Published: 01/12/2020

Keywords

Sustainability, Bibliometrics, Network Maps, Regional Analysis, Mexico

PDF (Español)

References

  1. Aguayo Gonzalez, F., Lama Ruiz, J. R., & Peralta Alvarez, M. E. (2011). Ingeniería sostenible de la cuna a la cuna: una arquitectura de referencia abierta para el diseño c2c sustainable. DYNA Ingenieria E Industria, 86(3), 199–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6036/3873
  2. Alfaro-García, Víctor G., Merigó, J. M., Alfaro-calderó, G. G., Plata-Pérez, L., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2018). A citation analysis overview of fuzzy research. Lectures on Modelling and Simulation, Best of Ma, 1–6.
  3. Alfaro-García, Victor G., Merigó, J. M., Alfaro Calderón, G. G., Plata-Pérez, L., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). A citation analysis of fuzzy research by universities and countries. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179629
  4. Bilas Roy, S., & Basak, M. (2013). Journal of Documentation : A bibliometric study. Library Philosophy Practices, (945), 1–10.
  5. Blanco-Mesa, F., León-Castro, E., & Merigó, J. M. (2019, August 1). A bibliometric analysis of aggregation operators. Applied Soft Computing Journal, Vol. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105488
  6. Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2017). Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 32, pp. 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640
  7. Bugge, M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the Bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
  8. Buter, R. K., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2013). Identification and analysis of the highly cited knowledge base of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 253–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0185-1
  9. Cancino, C. A., Merigo, J. M., Torres, J. P., & Diaz, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of venture capital research. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 23(45), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2018-0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2018-0016
  10. Carabias Barcelo, V. (2018). Conciencia ambiental y comportamiento ecológico. Un análisis de la escala GEB (General Ecological Behavior) de Kaiser. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 60(33), 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2002.i33.733
  11. Carabias, J. (2019). Políticas económicas con sustentabilidad ambiental/Economic policies with environmental sustainability. Journal of Economic Literature, 16(42), 118–125.
  12. Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Diaz, S., … Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5), 1305–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106
  13. Chaudhary, R. (2018). Green buying behavior in India: an empirical analysis. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(2), 179–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-12-2017-0058
  14. Clark, R. A., Haytko, D. L., Hermans, C. M., & Simmers, C. S. (2019). Social Influence on green consumerism: country and gender comparisons between China and the United States. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1527740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1527740
  15. Diodato, V. P. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics (1st ed.). New York: Haworth Press.
  16. Espitia-Moreno, I. C., & Pedraza, O. H. (2010). El comportamiento del consumidor y el manejo sustentable de envases. (1ra ed.). México: Univ. Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Inst. de Investigaciones Económicas y Empresariales.
  17. García-Orozco, D., Alfaro-García, V. G., Espitia-Moreno, I. C., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2020). Forgotten effects analysis of the consumer behavior of sustainable food products in Mexico. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Pre-press, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189194
  18. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
  19. Giovannoni, E., & Fabietti, G. (2013). What Is Sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In Integrated Reporting (pp. 21–40). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2
  20. Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806
  21. Gómez, C. (2006). El desarrollo sostenible: conceptos básicos, alcance y criterios para su evaluación. Cuestiones de Sociología (5-6), 295–312.
  22. Heo, J., & Muralidharan, S. (2019). What triggers young Millennials to purchase eco-friendly products?: the interrelationships among knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness, and environmental concern. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(4), 421–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2017.1303623
  23. Heywood, V., Casas, A., Ford-Lloyd, B., Kell, S., & Maxted, N. (2007). Conservation and sustainable use of crop wild relatives. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 121(3), 245–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.014
  24. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  25. Holdren, J. P. (2008). Science and Technology for sustainable well-being. Association Affairs, 319(5862), 424–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1153386
  26. Jones, D., Watkins, A., Braganza, K., & Coughlan, M. (2007). The great global warming swindle": a critique. Bull. Aust. Meteor. Ocean. Soc, 20(3), 63–72.
  27. Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-008-0053-1
  28. Kajikawa, Y., Ohno, J., Takeda, Y., Matsushima, K., & Komiyama, H. (2007). Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustainability Science, 2(2), 221–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0027-8
  29. Kajikawa, Y., Tacoa, F., & Yamaguchi, K. (2014). Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 431–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0244-x
  30. Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., … Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11(4), 261–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
  31. Larrondo, D., Bernal, E., & López, M. (2015). Marketing sustentable. Donde la innovación crea valor. Retrieved October 19, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283317009
  32. Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science, 279(5350), 491–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.491
  33. McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care? Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 108–114. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094
  34. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). Los límites del crecimiento: Informe al Club de Roma sobre el predicamento de la humanidad. Fondo de Cultura Económica, No. HC59.(L42), 255.
  35. Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677
  36. Merigó, J. M., Blanco-Mesa, F., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2017). Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems : a bibliometric review. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(5), 526–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21859
  37. Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054
  38. Miguel, S., Moya–Anegón, F., & Herrero–Solana, V. (2006). El análisis de co-citas como método de investigación en Bibliotecología y Ciencia de la Información. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 21(43). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2007.43.4129
  39. Organización de las Naciones Unidas [ONU]. (2015). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sustentable 2015-2030. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/sustainable-consumption-production/
  40. Raven, P. H. (2002). Presidential address: Science, Sustainability, and the Human Prospect. Science, 297(5583), 954–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.297.5583.954
  41. Rothenberg, L., & Matthews, D. (2017). Consumer decision making when purchasing eco-friendly apparel. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(4), 404–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2016-0099
  42. Santibañez-Aguilar, J. E., González-Campos, J. B., Ponce-Ortega, J. M., Serna-González, M., & El-Halwagi, M. M. (2014). Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 270–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.004
  43. Santillo, D. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability (7 pp). Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International, 14(1), 60–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375
  44. Simon, D. (1987). Our common future: report of the world commission on environment and development (Book Review). Third World Planning Review, 9(3), 285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/twpr.9.3.x4k73r2p72w22402
  45. Stevens, J. (2000). The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57(3), 476–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724
  46. Torregrosa, C. G. (2005). Un estudio analítico de la relación entre los negocios internacionales y el desarrollo sustentable en el contexto de los tratados de libre comercio: la experiencia práctica (An Analytical study of the relation between international business and sustainable development in the context of free trade agreements: practical experience). Innovaciones de Negocios, 1–14.
  47. Torres-Hernández, T., Barreto, I., & Rincón Vásquez, J. C. (2015). Creencias y normas subjetivas como predictores de intención de comportamiento proambiental. Suma Psicológica, 22(2), 86–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sumpsi.2015.09.003
  48. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  49. Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732–739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
  50. Yılmaz, B., Dinçol, M. E., & Yalçın, T. Y. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 77(8), 574–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
  51. Zhang, L., Zhong, Y., & Geng, Y. (2019). A bibliometric and visual study on urban mining. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118067

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)