Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2023)
Inquietud Empresarial 23(2) Julio-Diciembre 2023

EMPRENDIMIENTO

Emprendimiento social e innovación social: un análisis bibliométrico

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.15874

Publicado 06-07-2023

  • Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana
    • ,
  • Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
    • ,
  • Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum
    • ,
  • Maricela Castillo-Leal

Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum
Desarrollo de Negocios; Universidad Tecnológica de Culiacán; carretera Culiacán-Imala, km 2, Los Ángeles, c.p. 80014, Culiacán Rosales, Sinaloa, México.

Maricela Castillo-Leal
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Resumen

Existe un creciente interés académico por el emprendimiento social (ES) y la innovación social (IS), debido a su importancia para influir en el desarrollo de las regiones. El objetivo del estudio es realizar una revisión bibliométrica de la literatura existente sobre ES e IS, a través de una visión integradora cuantitativa. Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico en el periodo 1989-2022 con información obtenida de la base de datos Scopus. Se revisaron 475 publicaciones con los métodos de análisis de rendimiento y cartografía científica. En el análisis de rendimiento se emplearon como indicadores el índice h, el umbral de citas y las dimensiones de temporalidad. En la cartografía científica se aplicaron las técnicas de co-citas y co-ocurrencia, y se crearon mapas de redes utilizando el software Vosviewer®. Los resultados mostraron que Reino Unido es el país con mayor productividad e influencia en el campo de ES e IS. Los autores más representativos fueron Tina Dacin, Peter Dacin, Paul Tracey, Gregory Dees, Patrick Dawson y Lisa Daniel. La empresa social, la responsabilidad social empresarial y el capital social son temas estrechamente vinculados con el ES y la IS. Las tendencias futuras estarán alineadas con los enfoques de la sustentabilidad y su impacto en el desarrollo de las regiones, orientándose hacia consideraciones teóricas y prácticas en las que los individuos logran cooperar para alcanzar metas sociales.

Códigos JEL: O31, Y10, Z00
Recibido: 15/04/2023. Aceptado: 01/06/2023. Publicado: 05/07/2023.

 

Palabras clave

emprendimiento social, innovación social, análisis bibliométrico, cartografía científica

PDF XML

Biografía del autor/a

Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana

 

 

 

 

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera

 

 

Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum

 

 

Maricela Castillo-Leal

 

 

Citas

  1. Alexandre-Leclair, L. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation as a tool of women social inclusion and sustainable heritage preservation: the case of the Sougha Establishment in UAE. International Journal Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(3), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2017.084846
  2. Aria, M., y Cucurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  3. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., y Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
  4. Baron, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 683-717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00154.x
  5. Battilana, J., y Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
  6. Biggs, R., Westley, F., y Carpenter, S. (2010). Navigating the bach loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03411-150209
  7. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008.
  8. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W., y Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  9. Campigotto-Sandri, E., Caciatori-Junior, I., Chapaval-Pimentel, P., y Meira-Teixeira, R. (2020). Empreendedorismo social e inovação social: uma análise bibliométrica. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3886
  10. Casillas, J., y Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00092.x
  11. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., y Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  12. Cruz-Cabrera, B. C., Valadez-Solana, B. D., Regino-Maldonado, J., Acevedo-Martínez, J. A., y Ríos-Castillo, M. (2022). Una revisión bibliométrica de la literatura sobre innovación social. Revista Inquietud Empresarial, 22(2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.13922
  13. Dacin, T., Dacin, P., y Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and futures directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
  14. Dawson, P., y Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
  15. Dees, G., y Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. En R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), (pp. 39-66). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_11
  16. Defourny, J., y Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
  17. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., y Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
  18. Farinha, L., Sampaio, C., y Lopes, J. (2020). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: discovering origins, exploring current and future trends. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00243-6
  19. Foroudi, P., Akarsu, T. N., Marvi, R., y Balakrishnan, J. (2021). Intellectual evolution of social innovation: A bibliometric analysis and avenues for future research trends. Industrial Marketing Management, (93), 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.026
  20. Ganne, B. (1989). Regional dynamics of innovation: A look at the Rhône-Alpes region. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985628900000013
  21. Gaviria-Marín, M., Merigó, J. M., y Baier-Fuentes, H. (2018). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (140), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
  22. Guzmán, A., y Trujillo, M. A. (2008). Emprendimiento social. Revisión de la literatura. Estudios Gerenciales, 24(109), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(08)70055-X
  23. Hernández-González, V., Sans-Rosell, N., Jové-Deltell, C., y Reverter-Masia, J. (2016). Comparación entre web of science y scopus, estudio bibliométrico de las revistas de anatomía y morfología. International Journal of Morphology, 34(4), 1369-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000400032
  24. Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  25. Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., y Narayanamurthy, G. (2019). Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(166), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
  26. Howaldt, J., y Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
  27. Maier, D., Maier, A., Aschilean, I., Anastasiu, L., y Gavris, O. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-20. https://doi:10.3390/su12104083
  28. Mair, J., y Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
  29. Mair, J., y Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006
  30. Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C., Coronado, F., y Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 559-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4
  31. Moulaert, F., Maccallum, D., Mehmood, A., y Hamdouch, A. (2013). The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337 /9781849809993
  32. Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. MIT Press, 1(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
  33. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., y Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. The Young Foundation.
  34. Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34, (4), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
  35. Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M., y Whelan, C. (2015). New frontiers in social innovation research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801
  36. Peredo, A. M., y Mclean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
  37. Pérez González, M., y Lutsak-Yaroslava, N. (2017). La producción científica sobre la innovación social para el desarrollo local: una revisión bibliométrica la estructura y la evolución del campo de dominio científico. Prisma Social, (19), 146-182. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=353754089006
  38. Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47
  39. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’regan, N., y James, P. (2014). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: a systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
  40. Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Bachrach, D., y Podsakoff, N. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980 and 1990. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
  41. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., y Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308319533
  42. Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., y Palacios-Marqués, D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
  43. Seelos, C., y Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006
  44. Sharir, M., y Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.004
  45. Shaw, E., y Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship. Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529
  46. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the science literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  47. Spear, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a different model?. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660670
  48. Terán-Yépez, E., y Guerrero-Mora, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41(7), 7-22. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n07/a20v41n07p07.pdf
  49. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
  50. Tracey, P., y Stott, N. (2017). Social innovation: a window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
  51. Van Der Have, R., y Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010.
  52. Weerawardena, J., y Sullivan, G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001
  53. Westley, F., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., y Bodin, Ö. (2013). A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327
  54. Yunus, M. (2008). Un mundo sin pobreza. Paidós.
  55. Zupic, I., y Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.