Main Article Content
The article proposes a new tariff for paying tuition UPTC. The formula has these characteristics: 1) Ses the recovery taking account socio-economic capabilities of students and not according to the career, 2) Keeps the total amount of revenue received by the university fromtuition fees, 3) It is equitable because peoplewith lower income pay relatively less, 4)Does not affect current structure of household consumption.
The design of the tariff wasmade after reviewing the formulas of other public universities, and to examine the characteristics socioeconomic families of those admitted to in the context UPTC general household surveys
COASE, Ronald (1946). “The Marginal Cost Controversy”, en Económica, volumen 13, N.o 51, 169-182, en COASE, Ronald (1988), The Firm, the Market, and the Law, University of Chicago Press, 33-55, Chicago, en WILLIAMSON, Oliver and WINTER, Sidney (1993), The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolution, and Development, Oxford University Press, 75-93, New York.
DEATON, Angus (1972), “Wealth Effects on Consumption in a Modified Life-Cycle Model”, en Review of Economic Studies, volume 39, N.o 4, 443-453.
ENGEL, Ernst (1895), “Die Lebenkosten Belgischer Arbeiter-Familien Fruher und Jetzt”, International Statistical Institute Bulletin, volume 9, N.o1, 1-74.
PHLIPS, Louis (1983), Applied Consumption Analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam.
SAMUELSON, Paul (1954), “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures”, Review of Economics and Statistics, volume 36, N.o 4, 387-389.
STIGLITZ, Joseph (2000), Economics of the Public Sector, Norton, New York.