Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Bibliometric Analysis of Innovation Research in Public Administration

Abstract

The objective of this work was to identify the main thematic trends in the study of innovation strategies within public administration. For this purpose, a bibliometric analysis was carried out based on articles obtained from the Scopus database, where quantity, quality and structure indicators were calculated. The period 2018 - 2020 was identified with the highest productivity around the subject under study; in addition, quantity and quality indicators reflect a concentration of publications and their citations in industrialized countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark. Thus, it is concluded that studies around the topic in regions such as Latin America should be further explored, since there is a high concentration of specialized literature from the perspective of developed economies.

Keywords

quantitative analysis;, state;, government;, scientific innovations

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Lemy Bran-Piedrahita

Administrador en Salud, Magíster en Gobierno y Políticas Públicas

Alejandro Valencia-Arias

Ingeniero Administrador, Doctor en Ingeniería: énfasis en Industria y

Lucía Palacios-Moya

Administradora en Salud, Magíster en Salud Pública

Francisco Javier Arias-Vargas

Ingeniero Químico, Doctor en Administración y Dirección de Empresas


References

  1. Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., & Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18 (2), 296-309. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26806079/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
  2. Agarwal, R., Mittal, N., Patterson, E., & Giorcelli, M. (2021). Evolution of the Indian LPG industry: Exploring conditions for public sector business model innovation. Research Policy, 50 (4), Article 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104196
  3. Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2016). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 17(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216672500
  4. Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2017). Towards an integrated and inclusive platform for open innovation in the public sector. In International Conference on e-Democracy, 228-243. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_16
  5. Arguelles, E., & Villavicencio, D. (2018). Un acercamiento al concepto de la innovación en los servicios públicos. Entreciencias: Diálogos en la sociedad del conocimiento, 6 (18), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2018.18.64794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2018.18.64794
  6. Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48 (3), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
  7. Aziz, E., Mustapha, H., & Jamila, E. (2020). A bibliometric study of the recent advances in open innovation concept. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 683-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.100
  8. Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84 (2), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318761797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318761797
  9. Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210449357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210449357
  10. Cortés-Sánchez, J. D. (2019). Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: crammed and fading away. Scientometrics, 121 (2), 869-895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03201-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03201-0
  11. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research. Public Administration, 94 (1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
  12. Demircioglu, M. (2017). Reinventing the Wheel? Public Sector Innovation in the Age of Governance. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 800-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12821
  13. Doberstein, C., & Charbonneau, É. (2020). Experimenting with public sector innovation: Revisiting Gow for the digital era. Canadian Public Administration, 63(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12353
  14. Faruk, M., Rahman, M., & Hasan, S. (2021). How digital marketing evolved over time: A bibliometric analysis on scopus database. Heliyon, 7 (12), Article e08603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08603
  15. Gaete, R., Acevedo, S., Carmona, G., & Palta, O. (2019). Generando buenas prácticas de innovación pública desde las regiones: “piensa con i”. Innovar, 29 (74), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v29n74.82095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v29n74.82095
  16. Gil-García, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being Smart: Emerging Technologies and Innovation in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 31, I1-I8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
  17. Jukić, T., Pevcin, P., Benčina, J., Dečman, M., & Vrbek, S. (2019). Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation. Administrative Sciences, 9 (4), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040090
  18. Khan, N. A., & Khan, A. N. (2019). What followers are saying about transformational leaders fostering employee innovation via organisational learning, knowledge sharing and social media use in public organisations?. Government Information Quarterly, 36 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.003
  19. Kondratenko, V., Okopnyk, O., Ziganto, L., & Kwillinski, A. (2020). Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-06
  20. Korableva, O. N., Gorelov, N. A., & Shulha, M. V. (2017). Risk component of innovation management strategy. In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 837-843. Academic Conferences International Limited.
  21. Kourouklis, D. (2021). Public subsidies for R&D and public sector pharmaceutical innovation. Applied Economics, 53 (32), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1885614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1885614
  22. Mairal, P. (2020). Innovación pública: una propuesta de análisis de los factores que inciden en los procesos de innovación en el sector público local. Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública, 7 (1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.5209/cgap.68849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/cgap.68849
  23. Marulanda, N., & Múnera, R. (2019). Decisiones estratégicas de operaciones en la producción sostenible: análisis de tendencias en investigación. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 16 (1), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v16n1a4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v16n1a4
  24. Monteiro-Martins, T. C., Zambalde, A. L., Grützmann, A., de Souza-Bermejo, P. H., de Almeida, E. L., & Pinheir do Nascimento, T. B. (2019). Value Innovation in the Public Sector: Concept, Determining Factors and Framework. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 163-175. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_12
  25. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura, UNESCO. (2021). Aumenta la inversión en investigación y desarrollo en el mundo, pero continúa muy concentrada. https://es.unesco.org/news/aumenta-inversion-investigacion-y-desarrollo-mundo-pero-continua-muy-concentrada
  26. Polbitsyn, S. N. (2021). The role of universities in the development of public sector innovations. Innovation Journal, 26 (1), Article 3. https://www.innovat3.mywhc.ca/scholarly-style/2021_26_1_3_polbitsyn_role-universities.pdf
  27. Ramió, C. (2016). Una administración pública de futuro sostenible económicamente e innovadora en el contexto de la globalización. Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública, 3 (2), 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/CGAP.55083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/CGAP.55083
  28. Rana, N. P., Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Piercy, N. C. (2014). Profiling existing research on social innovation in the public sector. Information Systems Management, 31 (3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923271
  29. Santos, H. R., Kapoor, K., Tonelli, D. F., Weerakkody, V., Sousa, D., & Souza-Bermejo, P. H. D. (2015). Collaborative innovation in the public sector a case of the Brazilian Federal Government. In International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, 132-145. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_10
  30. Schmidthuber, L., Piller, F., Bogers, M., & Hilgers, D. (2019). Citizen participation in public administration: investigating open government for social innovation. R & D Management, 49 (3), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12365
  31. Sinni, G. (2017). Participatory Design for Public Services. Innovation in Public Administration. The Design Journal, 20 (1), S3368-S3379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352841
  32. Solaimani, S., Talab, A., & Rhee, B. (2019). An integrative view on Lean innovation management. Journal of Business Research, 105, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.0422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.042
  33. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43 (8), 842-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
  34. Soto, J., Villamar, C., Vinueza, J., Astudillo, A., & Correa, M. (2018). Estudios bibliométricos de la influencia tecnológica en el desarrollo productivo sostenible en artículos publicados en SCOPUS 2012-2016. INNOVA Research Journal, 3 (4), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v3.n4.2018.509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v3.n4.2018.509
  35. Stamhus, J., & Nielsen, R. N. (2021). Collaboration as a cornerstone in public sector innovation–the case of Denmark. In Globalisation, New and Emerging Technologies, and Sustainable Development, 130-146. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037750-10
  36. Sucupira, G., Saab, F., Demo, G., & Bermejo, H. (2019). Innovation in public administration: Itineraries of Brazilian scientific production and new research possibilities. Innovation & Management Review, 16 (1), 72-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2018-000 44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2018-0004
  37. Tadmor, D. (2019). The State of Innovation in Latin America. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655231
  38. Tidd, J., & Thuriaux, B. (2016). Innovation management practices: cross‐sectorial adoption, variation, and effectiveness. R & D Management, 46 (S3), 1024-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12199
  39. Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
  40. Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2017). Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies. Research Policy, 46 (5), 900-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.009
  41. Vera-Rivera, D., & Blanco-Barbeito, N. (2019). ¿Son los estudios bibliométricos valiosos para medir indicadores de calidad de una revista o de investigaciones en sí mismas? Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 18 (1), 176-178. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=180460574016
  42. Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13 (5-6), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019961
  43. Vorre-Hansen, A., Fuglsang, L., Liefooghe, C., Rubalcaba, L., Gago, D., Mergel, I., Haug, N., Taivalsaari, M., & Mureddu, F. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: insights from a European case study. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11 (9/10), 47-58. https://dx.doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1464
  44. Yuriev, A., Boiral, O., & Talbot, D. (2021). Is there a place for employee-driven pro-environmental innovations? The case of public organizations. Public Management Review, 24 (9), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1900350

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.