Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

HUELLA HÍDRICA Y PARÁMETROS PRODUCTIVOS EN GANADERÍA DE LECHE DE BOYACÁ, COLOMBIA

Abstract

In recent decades, water use in livestock production has been a relevant issue in the discussion on sustainable food systems and competition for water resources. This research analyzed the relationship between productive efficiency, stocking rate and water footprint in primary milk production in high mountain farms in the central zone of the department of Boyacá. A quantitative and correlational study was carried out in 50 livestock systems whose main objective is milk production. The following parameters were calculated: percentage of milking females, production per area, per year and per female, and stocking rate. The water footprint was estimated and divided into three categories: blue, green and gray. The data were processed with Rstudio, Shapiro-Wilk test, eSpearman correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Total HH (x̅ 10.12 m3/L), HA (x̅ 0.01m3/L), HV (x̅ 1.99 m3/L) and HG (x̅ 8.13 m3/L) were identified as results. The variables Porhembras, ProductKg/Female/Year and ProductKg/Ha/Year show the highest correlation coefficients, being stronger with HA. The potential for improving the environmental sustainability of dairy production through the adoption of efficient practices, especially in the animal component, is evident.

Keywords

water, cattle, climate change, pollution, statistics, environment, temperature.


References

  1. Alqaisi, O., & Schlecht, E. (2020). Feeding models to optimize dairy feed rations in view of feed availability, feed prices and milk production scenarios. Sustainability, 13(1), 215.
  2. Chapagain,A.K. & Hoekstra,A.Y. (2004). Water footprints of nations. Volume 1: Main Report. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16. UNESCO-IHE. p. 76.
  3. FAO (2023). Informe OCDE-FAO Perspectivas agrícolas 2023-2032 describe las principales tendencias en la producción, el consumo y el comercio
  4. Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2013). The water footprint of poultry, pork and beef: A comparative study in different countries and production systems. Water resources and industry, 1, 25-36.
  5. Grossi, G., Vitali, A., & Lacetera, N. (2022). Impact of summer cooling management on milk water footprint in dairy cows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 133062.
  6. Heinke, J., Lannerstad, M., Gerten, D., Havlík, P., Herrero, M., Notenbaert, A. M. O., ... & Müller, C. (2020). Water use in global livestock production—opportunities and constraints for increasing water productivity. Water Resources Research, 56(12), e2019WR026995.
  7. Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M. y Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard (1a ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775526
  8. Hill JP (2017) Assessing the overall impact of the dairy sector. In: van Belzen N (ed) Achieving sustainable production of milk. Volume 2. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 82 High Street, Sawston, Cambridge, CB22 3HJ, UK. pp. 291–314.
  9. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2010). A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat. Hydrology and earth system sciences, 14(7), 1259-1276.
  10. Naranjo, A., Johnson, A., Rossow, H., & Kebreab, E. (2020). Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit of production of the California dairy industry over 50 years. Journal of dairy science, 103(4), 3760-3773.
  11. Ridoutt, B. G., Williams, S. R. O., Baud, S., Fraval, S., & Marks, N. (2010). The water footprint of dairy products: Case study involving skim milk powder. Journal of dairy science, 93(11), 5114-5117.
  12. Ridoutt, B. G., Sanguansri, P., Freer, M., & Harper, G. S. (2012). Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 165-175.
  13. Smith NW, Fletcher AJ, Hill JP, Dave LA, McNabb WC (2021) Use of the DELTA model to understand the food system and global nutrition. J Nutr 151:3253–3261
  14. Thomassen, M. A., Dalgaard, R., Heijungs, R., & De Boer, I. (2008). Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(4), 339-349.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.