Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022)
Julio-Diciembre

Articles

E-government through different digital platforms in a group of citizens from an Argentinean city

https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15255

Published 2022-08-15

María Verónica Alderete
Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca

Lucía Andrea Díaz
Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca

Nicolás Álvarez
Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca

Abstract

This work analyzes the socio-demographic determinants of the adoption of electronic government by citizens through different digital platforms. A descriptive exploratory analysis is carried out with data from an online survey conducted between October and November 2020 to a group of citizens from Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Three models were estimated according to the definition of electronic government (EG): broad EG (web and social networks), traditional EG (web) and EG by social networks. Among the results, it stands out that citizens use the web more than social networks to contact the local government. The older the citizen, or the higher their educational level, the greater the propensity to EG, except in the last model. Likewise, the female gender positively explains the propensity to perform EG in all the models. In the traditional model, both EG experience and social influence and occupation have a positive effect.

Keywords

electronic government;, social networks;, ICT;, citizen participation

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

María Verónica Alderete

Licenciada en Economía, Doctora en Economía

Lucía Andrea Díaz

Licenciada en Economía

Nicolás Álvarez

Licenciado en Economía

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Al-Jamal, N., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2015). Exploring the Gender Digital Divide in Jordan. Gender Technology and Development, 19 (1), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852414563201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852414563201
  3. Alderete, M. V., & Diaz, L. A. (2020). ¿Participa la ciudadanía en el Gobierno Electrónico? El caso de la ciudad de Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal (DAAPGE), 20 (34), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.14409/daapge.v20i34.10058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/daapge.v20i34.10058
  4. Alguliyev, R. M., Aliguliyev, R. M., & Niftaliyeva (Iskandarli), G. Y. (2019). A Method for Social Network Extraction From E-Government. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), 11 (3), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2019070103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2019070103
  5. Akman, I., Yazici, A., Mishra, A., & Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-government a global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22 (2), 239-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2004.12.001
  6. Amin-Almaiah, M., & Nasereddin, Y. (2020). Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordian citizens. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 16 (3), 236-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2020.108453
  7. Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Orús, C. (2016). City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities. Cities, 50, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016
  8. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (1), 30-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
  9. Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627
  10. Chen, C. W. (2010). Impact of quality antecedents on taxpayer satisfaction with online tax-filing systems—An empirical study. Information & Management, 47 (5-6), 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.06.005
  11. Choi, J., & Song, C. (2020). Factors explaining why some citizens engage in E-participation, while others do not. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (4), 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101524
  12. Ciucci, F., Díaz, L., Alderete, M. V., & Linares, S. (2019). Construcción de un índice para medir la transparencia municipal: Buenos Aires, Bahía Blanca y las capitales de provincia de Argentina. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales, 20 (10), 54-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-17902019000200059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-17902019000200059
  13. Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Gil, O. (2018). Engagement en ciudades inteligentes. Diseño de un marco de análisis teórico y aplicado para la participación ciudadana. Nueva Época, 19, 50-69. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i19.10505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i19.10505
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  15. De Grande, P. (2020). Gobierno electrónico y accesibilidad: Disponibilidad de servicio en las plataformas online estatales de la Argentina. Ciencias Administrativas, 15, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/23143738e051
  16. Gao, X., & Lee, J. (2017). E-government services and social media adoption: Experience of small local governments in Nebraska state. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (4), 627-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.005
  17. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cis, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: an integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33 (3), 524-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
  18. Gupta, K. P., Singh, S., & Bhaskar, P. (2016). Citizen adoption of e-government: a literature review and conceptual framework. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 12 (2), 160-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.076134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.076134
  19. Hung, S-Y., Chen, K., & Su, Y-K. (2020). The effect of communication and social motives on E-government services through social media groups. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39 (7), 741-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1610907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1610907
  20. Medaglia, R., & Zheng, L. (2017). Mapping government social media research and moving it forward: A framework and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (3), 496-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.001
  21. Medina, O. C., Marciszack, M. M., & Groppo, M. A. (2018). Aproximación Descriptiva a las Buenas Prácticas de Gobierno Electrónico y a su incorporación en el Modelado Conceptual de Sitios Web Públicos de Argentina. Revista Tecnología y Ciencia, 31, 99-110.
  22. Mensah, I. K., & Mi, J. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Demographic Factors on E-Government Services Adoption. Information Resources Management Journal, 31 (3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2018070101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2018070101
  23. Mensah, I. K., Zeng, G., & Luo, C. (2020). E-Government Services Adoption: An extension of the Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption. SAGE Open, 10 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020933593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020933593
  24. Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30 (4), 327-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015
  25. Pando, D., & Fernández Arroyo, N. (2013). El gobierno electrónico a nivel local: experiencias, tendencias y reflexiones, Buenos Aires, Fundación CIPPEC.
  26. Pizarro, M. A. (2014). El uso del celular en los sectores populares entre sentidos y prácticas comunicativas. Question/Cuestión, 1 (41), 248-263.
  27. Poggi, E. (2013). Gobierno electrónico, gobierno local y gestión tecnológica, en Pando, D. y Fernández Arroyo, N. (comp.), El gobierno electrónico a nivel local. Experiencias, tendencias y reflexiones, Buenos Aires, CIPPEC y Universidad de San Andrés.
  28. Ramilo-Araujo, M. C., & Fernández-Rupérez, R. (2012). Ciudadanía y participación en la Sociedad de la Información y del Conocimiento. GIGAPP Estudios Working Papers, 2 (21), 1-27.
  29. Ribeiro, M. M., Cunha, M. A., & Fernandes-Barbosa, A. (2018). E-participation, social media and digital gap: challenges in the brazilian context, en Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, New York, Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209373
  30. Rodrigues, G., Sarabdeen, J., & Balasubramanian, S. (2016). Factors that Influence Consumer Adoption of E-government Services in the UAE: A UTAUT Model Perspective. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2015.1121460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2015.1121460
  31. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
  32. Sawalha, S., Al-Jamal, M., & Abu-Shanab, E. (2018). The influence of utilising Facebook on e-government adoption. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 15 (1), 11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2019.096573
  33. Sharma, S. K. (2015). Adoption of e-government services. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9 (2), 207-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0324-0.ch025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-10-2014-0046
  34. Tellechea, T. (2018). El gobierno electrónico como derecho y la brecha digital en Argentina. Informe Integrar, 112, 2-26.
  35. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  36. Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Hindi, N., & Osman, I. (2016). Are U.K. Citizens Satisfied With E-Government Services? Identifying and Testing Antecedents of Satisfaction. Information Systems Management, 33 (4), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.