Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023)

Artículos

Changes in urban land rent due to the use of land-use planning regulatory instruments, Chapinero district, Bogotá, Colombia

https://doi.org/10.19053/01233769.14495

Published 2023-01-01

  • Cesar Augusto Rojas
    • ,
  • Agapito Bautista Yepes

Cesar Augusto Rojas
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia

Agapito Bautista Yepes
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia

Abstract

Urban land rent is one of the main attributes of the housing market that enable public space management. This paper evaluates the effect on urban land rent in the Chapinero district (Bogotá, Colombia) of using Decree 120, 2018. This decree is an instrument that enables the development of collective facilities in any area of the city, even where the current
regulations do not allow it. This involves a change in the usage and, in some areas, an increase in the maximum buildability, thus generating a higher land value and influencing the rent calculation. The determination of the differential rent consisted of a property and regulatory
analysis and the application of the residual and market comparison methods for determining commercial real estate values and thus determining the changes in land values before and after the regulatory instrument. Consequently, land management based on the development of collective facilities in different areas of the city is an opportunity for owners or developers, both public and private, to implement this type of use, thus improving the conditions of the right to the city of the inhabitants in general through the satisfaction of basic needs complementary to housing and the enjoyment of collective spaces for public use.

Keywords

urban land, instrument, real state market, valuation, rent, geography

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Cesar Augusto Rojas

Magister en Economía del Turismo y Economía Ambiental, Docente de la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia

Agapito Bautista Yepes

Ingeniero Catastral y Geodesta de la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Colombia

References

  1. Anwar, A., Younis, M., & Ullah, I. (2020). Impact of Urbanization and Economic Growth on CO2 Emission: A Case of Far East Asian Countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2531. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17072531
  2. Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2016). Soil “ecosystem” services and natural capital: Critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 4, 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041
  3. Borrero, O. & Rojas, J. (2020) Contribución de mejoras en América Latina. Experiencias, desafíos y oportunidades. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  4. Brevik, E. C., Pereg, L., Steffan, J. J., & Burgess, L. C. (2018). Soil ecosystem services and human health. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COESH.2018.07.003
  5. Buettner, T. & Holm-Hadulla, F. (2013). City size and the demand for local public goods. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 16-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046212000919
  6. Carrión, A., Vieyra, A., Arenas, F., & Alvarado, V. (2020). Políticas y prácticas de ordenamiento territorial en América Latina. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 77, 5-10.
  7. Checa, J. & Nel·lo, O. (2021). Residential Segregation and Living Conditions. An Analysis of Social Inequalities in Catalonia from Four Spatial Perspectives. Urban Science, 5(2), 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5020045
  8. Costamagna, P. (2020). Reflexiones y debates sobre el desarrollo territorial: nuevas miradas frente a realidades complejas. Desarrollo y Territorio, 7, 7-16.
  9. Dahmann, N., Wolch, J., Joassart-Marcelli, P., Reynolds, K., & Jerrett, M. (2010). The active city? Disparities in provision of urban public recreation resources. Health & Place, 16(3), 431-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2009.11.005
  10. Decreto 120 de 2018 (febrero 27), “por medio del cual se armonizan las normas de los Planes Maestros de Equipamientos, de Servicios Públicos y de Movilidad con las normas de las Unidades de Planeamiento Zonal (UPZ), las disposiciones que orientan la formulación de los planes directores, de implantación y de regularización y manejo y se dictan otras disposiciones”. Registro Distrital nº 6267 del 2 de marzo de 2018.
  11. Decreto 2090 de 1989 (septiembre 13), “por el cual se aprueba el reglamento de honorarios para los trabajos de arquitectura”. https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=27983#
  12. Dociu, M. & Dunarintu, A. (2012). The socio-economic impact of urbanization. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 2(1), 47-52. https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2014/06/The%20Socio-Economic%20Impact%20of%20Urbanization.%20Dociu%20Madalina%20and%20Dunarintu%20Anca.pdf
  13. Feiock, R. C., Tavares, A. F., & Lubell, M. (2008). Policy instrument choices for growth management and land use regulation. Policy Studies Journal, 36(3), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-0072.2008.00277.X
  14. Freeman, A. M. (1981). Hedonic Prices, Property Values and Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Survey of the Issues. In Measurement in Public Choice (pp. 13-32). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05090-1_2
  15. Glaeser, E. L. (2012). The challenge of urban policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/PAM.20631
  16. Goodall, B. (2013). The economics of urban areas. Pergamon Press. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=IBslBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=urban+land+use+economics+&ots=LIt9wLeb3C&sig=casa1P7SK_25YksDq8aKvrvwNW8
  17. Gudiño, M. E. (2015). El ordenamiento territorial como política de Estado. Perspectiva Geográfica, 20(1), 11-36.
  18. Haaland, C. & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. (2015). Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 760-771. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886671500103X
  19. Harrison, A. J. (2017). Economics and Land Use Planning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315112022
  20. Henao, O. M. E. (2002). Comentarios para una crítica a los planes de ordenamiento territorial en Colombia. Territorios, 8, 127-166.
  21. Isunza-Vizuet, G., Castro, E., & Munévar, C. (2021). La plusvalía como sistema de financiación urbana: estudio comparativo en Ciudad de México y Manizales, Colombia. EURE (Santiago), 47(142), 229-248.
  22. Jaramillo, S. (2010). Hacia una teoría de la renta del suelo urbano. (2ª ed.). Ediciones Uniandes.
  23. Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J., Kronenberg, J., & Haase, D. (2016). Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: Integration challenges in complex urban settings—Case of Stockholm. Ecosystem Services, 22(Part A), 204-212. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000546
  24. Keil, R. (2020). The limits of global urbanization and the challenges to planning. disP - The Planning Review, 56(1), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2020.1756620
  25. Lindsey, G., Maraj, M., & Kuan, S. C. (2001). Access, Equity, and Urban Greenways: An Exploratory Investigation. Professional Geographer, 53(3), 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00288
  26. Montes Lira, P. F. (2001). El ordenamiento territorial como opción de políticas urbanas y regionales en América Latina y el Caribe. Cepal.
  27. Ortiz, Y. C. (2021). Instrumentos de captura de valor: evolución de la participación en plusvalía en Colombia 1997-2017. Investigaciones Regionales - Journal of Regional Research, 51, 167-187.
  28. Parsons, T. (2021). The Weight of Cities: Urbanization Effects on Earth’s Subsurface. AGU Advances, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000277
  29. Pereira, P., Bogunovic, I., Muñoz-Rojas, M., & Brevik, E. C. (2018). Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COESH.2017.12.003
  30. Pereira-Corona, A., Adame-Martínez, S., Rosete-Verges, F. A., & Alvarado-Granados, A. R. (2018). Construcción metodológica de un modelo de ordenamiento territorial para América Latina. Ra Ximhai, 14(1), 111-131.
  31. Resolución 620 de 2008 (septiembre 23), “por la cual se establecen los procedimientos para los avalúos ordenados dentro del marco de la Ley 388 de 1997”. https://www.igac.gov.co/es/contenido/resolucion-620-de-2008
  32. Richardson, H. W., Vipond, J., & Furbey, R. A. (1974). Determinants of Urban House Prices. Urban Studies, 11(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420987420080341
  33. Secretaría Distrital de Planeación de Bogotá. (2022, octubre 7). Norma Urbana. https://www.sdp.gov.co/gestion-territorial/norma-urbana/normas-urbanisticas-vigentes/upz
  34. Steel, G., Noorloos, F. van, & Klaufus, C. (2017). The urban land debate in the global South: New avenues for research. Geoforum, 83, 133-141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718516301890
  35. Torres-Tovar, C. A. (2016). Segregación, espacio público y vivienda. Las ciudades iberoamericanas en la era neoliberal. Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 26(1), 7-8.
  36. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. ST/ESA/SER.A/420. United Nations.
  37. Vergara, A., Gierhake, K., Jardon, C., Hernández García, J., Vidal, A., & Carranza, E. (2015). Espacio público en Latinoamérica: de la fragmentación espacial y la segregación social hacia la cohesión territorial. Nuevos retos a viejos problemas. [Discussion Papers nº 73]. Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
  38. Winding, A., Singh, B. K., Bach, E., Brown, G., Zhang, J., Cooper, M., Dion, P., Mele, P., Eisenhauer, N., Pena-Neira, S., & Lindo, Z. (2020). State of Knowledge of Soil Biodiversity - Status, Challenges and Potentialities. FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/CB1928EN
  39. Zlotnik, H. (2017). World urbanization: Trends and prospects. In New Forms of Urbanization: Beyond the Urban-Rural Dichotomy (pp. 43-64). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248073-3/WORLD-URBANIZATION-TRENDS-PROSPECTS-HANIA-ZLOTNIK

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.