Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Economic Science in Crisis Times

Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of critical pluralism, responsibility, primun non nocere and caution principles, in a scheme of ethical reflection of economics as a science and as a technique. For this purpose, an institutional analysis of policies, standards and guidelines is carried out in a sample of 10 countries: 8 from Latin America, along with the United States, and England. The main result indicates that the current institutional regime, both legislative and ethical, does not solve the tension generated by private interest and public interest in the professional performance of an economist in a market economy. It is necessary to incorporate a flexible articulation that facilitates a simple and concrete interpretation that guides the improvement of the quality of the private and public service that an economist plays.

Keywords

scientific approach, scientific knowledge, case studies

HTML (Español) PDF (Español)

Author Biography

William Orlando Prieto Bustos

Magister en Economía y Economista. Docente de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas de la Universidad Católica de Colombia

Joan Miguel Tejedor Estupiñán

PhD (c) in Economics, Magister en Derechos Humanos y Economista. Docente de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas de la Universidad Católica de Colombia


References

  1. Allais, M. (1978). La economía como ciencia. En C. Dagum (comp.) Metodología y crítica económica (p. 661). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  2. Asamblea Legislativa de Costa Rica. (1998). Ley Orgánica del Colegio de Profesionales en Ciencias Económicas. Recuperado de http://www.cpcecr.com/leyesyreglamentos.html.
  3. Asamblea Legislativa de Puerto Rico. (2007). Reglamento y Código Ético, Asociación de Economistas de Puerto Rico. Recuperado de http://www.oslpr.org/v2/documentos.aspx
  4. Bejarano, J. (1999). La profesionalización en economía. En J. Bejarano (comp.) Hacia dónde va la ciencia económica en Colombia. Siete ensayos exploratorios. Bogotá: Colciencias, Tercer Mundo Editores y Universidad Externado de Colombia, primera edición.
  5. Bloom, L. (2004, September-October). Professions and the Public Interest. Contingencies, 30-34. Retrieved from http://www.contingencies.org/septoct04/professions1.pdf
  6. Buiter, W. (2009). The Unfortunate Uselessness of Most “State of the Art” Academic Monetary Economics. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2009/03/the-unfortunate-uselessness-of-most-state-of-the-art-academic-monetary-economics/
  7. Cohen, P. (2007, July 11). In Economics Departments, A growing Will to Debate Fundamental Assumptions. The New York Times, Section B. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/education/11economics.html?ex=1341806400&en=bf38f9dddc8c8ecc&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
  8. Colander, D., Follmer, H., Haas, A., Goldberg, M., Juselius, K, Kirman, A., Lux, T. & Sloth, B. (2009). The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, working paper (1489). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/kie/kieliw/1489.html
  9. Congreso de la República Argentina. (1973). Ley 20488. Normas referentes al ejercicio de las profesiones relacionadas con las ciencias económicas. Recuperado de http://www.eco.unrc.edu.ar/auditoria/ley-20488-codigo-de-etica-rt-7/.
  10. Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1990). Ley 37 de 1990, sobre la reglamentación del ejercicio de la profesión de economista. Recuperado de http://www.conalpe.gov.co/ltindex.htm.
  11. Congreso de la República de Venezuela. (1971). Ley de ejercicio de la profesión de economista. Recuperado de http://www.gobiernoenlinea.ve/legislacion-view/sharedfiles/272.pdf.
  12. Congreso de la República Peruana. (1986). Ley del ejercicio de la profesión de economista. Recuperado de http://www.cept.org.pe/leyaconomis.pdf.
  13. Congreso de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (1993). Ley reglamentaria del artículo 5 constitucional, relativo al ejercicio de las profesiones en el Distrito Federal. Recuperado de http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/208.pdf.
  14. Congreso Nacional de Ecuador. (2004). Ley 102. Ley sustitutiva a la ley de Ejercicio Profesional de los Economistas y Doctores en Ciencias económicas. Recuperado de http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oG76slcAxMd0YAdFlXNyoA?p=Ley+Sustitutiva+a+la+ley+de+Ejercicio+Profesional+de+los+Economistas+y+Doctores+en+Ciencias+econ%C3%B3micas+and+ecuador&fr2=sb-top&fr=yfp-t-701&sao=1.
  15. DeMartino, G. (2005). A Professional Ethics Code for Economists. Challenge, 48(4), 88-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2005.11034308
  16. DeMartino, G. (2009). On the Need for Professional Economic Ethics. Challenge, 52(4), 6-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132520401
  17. Freeman, A. (1999). The Emperor´s Tailor: The Economics and the Crash on ’98. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper (6712). Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6712/
  18. Freeman, A. (2009). The Economist of Tomorrow: The Case for a Pluralist Subject Benchmark Statement for Economics. International Review of Economics Education, 8(2), 23-40. Retrieved from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/iree/v8n2/freeman.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30070-0
  19. Galbraith, J. (2010). James Galbraith on Economic Theory as a Disgraced Profession, ZeroHedge. Retrieved from http://www.zerohedge.com/article/james-galbraith-economic-theory-disgraced-profession.
  20. Garoupa, N. (2004). Regulation of Professions in Portugal: A Case Study in Rent-Seeking. In II Conferência sobre Desenvolvimento Económico Português no Espaço Europeu. Retrieved from http://www.bportugal.pt/pt-PT/EstudosEconomicos/Conferencias/Documents/2004DesenvEcon/13_NGaroupa.pdf
  21. Herman, C. & Flecker, J (2003). Code of Professional Conduct in Socio-Economic Research, and Database of Professional Bodies. Brighton: The Institute for Employment Studies. Retrieved from http://www.respectproject.org/standards/prof_conduct.pdf
  22. Kaletsky, A. (2009). Economist are the Forgotten Guilty Men. TimesOnline. Retrieved from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/anatole_kaletsky/article5663091.ece
  23. Krugman, P. (2009). How did Economist get it so Wrong? New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?_r=1
  24. Mayer, T. (2009) Honesty and Integrity in Economics, Department of Economics UCDavis, Working Paper Series, 09-2. Retrieved from http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/working_papers/09-2.pdf
  25. McCloskey, D. (2009). Rhetoric Matters. Ethical Standards in a Humanistic Science of Economics. Challenge, 52(4), 25-31. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40722588?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132520403
  26. Ministerio de Educación de Colombia (1977). Decreto 1268 del 6 de junio de 1977, Código de Ética Profesional del Economista. http://www.conalpe.gov.co/ltindex.htm.
  27. National Association of Forensic Economics (2004). Statement of Ethical Principles and Principles of Professional Practice, NAFE. Retrieved from http://nafe.net/resources/Documents/NAFE_Ethics_2014.pdf
  28. Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.619.5274&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  29. OIT. (2008). Clasificación internacional de ocupaciones. Recuperado de http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco88/2441.htm
  30. Presidencia del Gobierno de España. (1977, 28 de abr.). Estatuto Profesional de Economistas y de Profesores y Peritos Mercantiles, de España. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Recuperado de http://www.ecova.es/docs/25_estatuto_profesional.pdf.
  31. Smith, A. (1988). La riqueza de las naciones. Barcelona: Oikos-Tau.
  32. Stiglitz, J. (2008, December 5). The Triumphant Return of John Maynard Keynes, Project Syndicate. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/stiglitz107/English
  33. Stephen, F. (2004). The Market Failure Justification for the Regulation of Professional Service Markets and the Characteristics of Consumers. In C.D. Ehlermann & I. Atanasiu (eds.), European Competition Law Annual 2004: The Relationship between Competition Law and (Liberal) Professions. Oregon: Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland.
  34. Stephen, F., Ehlermann, C-D. (Ed.) & Atanasiu, I. (Ed.) (2006). The Market Failure Justification for the Regulation of Professional Service Markets and the Characteristics of Consumers. In European Competition Law Annual 2004: The Relationship between Competition Law and (Liberal) Professions. Hart Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-market-failure-justification-for-the-regulation-of-professional-service-markets-and-the-characteristics-of-consumers(2bb7e944-feaa-4315-b1c8-983f44bc42c5).html
  35. Samuel, G. (2000, September). Governing the Professions: Does Self-regulation Equal Self-Interest? Review. Retrieved from http://www.ipa.org.au/library/Review52-3%20Governing%20professions.pdf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.