Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023)
Inquietud Empresarial 23(2) Julio-Diciembre 2023

ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.15874

Published 2023-07-06

  • Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana
    • ,
  • Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
    • ,
  • Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum
    • ,
  • Maricela Castillo-Leal

Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum
Desarrollo de Negocios; Universidad Tecnológica de Culiacán; carretera Culiacán-Imala, km 2, Los Ángeles, c.p. 80014, Culiacán Rosales, Sinaloa, México.

Maricela Castillo-Leal
División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación; Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca; avenida ing. Víctor Bravo Ahuja no. 125 esquina calzada tecnológico, c.p. 68030, Oaxaca de Juárez, Oaxaca, México.

Abstract

There is a growing academic interest in social entrepreneurship (SE) and social innovation (SI) due to its importance in influencing the development of regions. The objective of the study is to carry out a bibliometric review of the existing literature on SE and IS through a quantitative integrative vision. A bibliometric analysis was carried out in the period 1989-2022 with information obtained from the Scopus database. 475 publications were reviewed using the performance analysis and scientific cartography methods. In the performance analysis, the h-index, citation threshold, and temporality dimensions were used as indicators. In scientific cartography, co-citation and co-occurrence techniques were applied, and network maps were created using the Vosviewer® software. The results showed that the United Kingdom is the country with the highest productivity and influence in the field of SE and SI. The most representative authors were Tina Dacin, Peter Dacin, Paul Tracey, Gregory Dees, Patrick Dawson, and Lisa Daniel. The social enterprise, corporate social responsibility and social capital are issues closely linked to SE and SI. Future trends will be aligned with the approaches to sustainability and its impact on the development of the regions, oriented towards theoretical and practical considerations in which individuals manage to cooperate to achieve social goals.

 JEL Codes: O31, Y10, Z00

Received: 15/04/2023.  Accepted: 01/06/2023.  Published: 05/07/2023. 

Keywords

social entrepreneurship, social innovation, bibliometric analysis, scientific cartography

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Brenda Dennís Valadez-Solana

 

 

 

 

Blasa Celerina Cruz-Cabrera

 

 

Martín Isimayrt Huesca-Gastélum

 

 

Maricela Castillo-Leal

 

 

References

  1. Alexandre-Leclair, L. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation as a tool of women social inclusion and sustainable heritage preservation: the case of the Sougha Establishment in UAE. International Journal Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 31(3), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2017.084846
  2. Aria, M., y Cucurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  3. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., y Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
  4. Baron, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 683-717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00154.x
  5. Battilana, J., y Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
  6. Biggs, R., Westley, F., y Carpenter, S. (2010). Navigating the bach loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03411-150209
  7. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008.
  8. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W., y Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
  9. Campigotto-Sandri, E., Caciatori-Junior, I., Chapaval-Pimentel, P., y Meira-Teixeira, R. (2020). Empreendedorismo social e inovação social: uma análise bibliométrica. Estudios Gerenciales, 36(157), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2020.157.3886
  10. Casillas, J., y Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00092.x
  11. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., y Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  12. Cruz-Cabrera, B. C., Valadez-Solana, B. D., Regino-Maldonado, J., Acevedo-Martínez, J. A., y Ríos-Castillo, M. (2022). Una revisión bibliométrica de la literatura sobre innovación social. Revista Inquietud Empresarial, 22(2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.13922
  13. Dacin, T., Dacin, P., y Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and futures directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
  14. Dawson, P., y Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.033125
  15. Dees, G., y Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. En R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field. ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series, 1(3), (pp. 39-66). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_11
  16. Defourny, J., y Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
  17. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., y Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
  18. Farinha, L., Sampaio, C., y Lopes, J. (2020). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: discovering origins, exploring current and future trends. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00243-6
  19. Foroudi, P., Akarsu, T. N., Marvi, R., y Balakrishnan, J. (2021). Intellectual evolution of social innovation: A bibliometric analysis and avenues for future research trends. Industrial Marketing Management, (93), 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.026
  20. Ganne, B. (1989). Regional dynamics of innovation: A look at the Rhône-Alpes region. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985628900000013
  21. Gaviria-Marín, M., Merigó, J. M., y Baier-Fuentes, H. (2018). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (140), 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
  22. Guzmán, A., y Trujillo, M. A. (2008). Emprendimiento social. Revisión de la literatura. Estudios Gerenciales, 24(109), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(08)70055-X
  23. Hernández-González, V., Sans-Rosell, N., Jové-Deltell, C., y Reverter-Masia, J. (2016). Comparación entre web of science y scopus, estudio bibliométrico de las revistas de anatomía y morfología. International Journal of Morphology, 34(4), 1369-1377. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000400032
  24. Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  25. Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., y Narayanamurthy, G. (2019). Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(166), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04129-4
  26. Howaldt, J., y Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
  27. Maier, D., Maier, A., Aschilean, I., Anastasiu, L., y Gavris, O. (2020). The Relationship between Innovation and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-20. https://doi:10.3390/su12104083
  28. Mair, J., y Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
  29. Mair, J., y Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006
  30. Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C., Coronado, F., y Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 559-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4
  31. Moulaert, F., Maccallum, D., Mehmood, A., y Hamdouch, A. (2013). The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337 /9781849809993
  32. Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. MIT Press, 1(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
  33. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., y Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. The Young Foundation.
  34. Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34, (4), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
  35. Nicholls, A., Simon, J., Gabriel, M., y Whelan, C. (2015). New frontiers in social innovation research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801
  36. Peredo, A. M., y Mclean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
  37. Pérez González, M., y Lutsak-Yaroslava, N. (2017). La producción científica sobre la innovación social para el desarrollo local: una revisión bibliométrica la estructura y la evolución del campo de dominio científico. Prisma Social, (19), 146-182. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=353754089006
  38. Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47
  39. Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’regan, N., y James, P. (2014). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: a systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
  40. Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Bachrach, D., y Podsakoff, N. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980 and 1990. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454
  41. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., y Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308319533
  42. Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., y Palacios-Marqués, D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033
  43. Seelos, C., y Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006
  44. Sharir, M., y Lerner, M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.004
  45. Shaw, E., y Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship. Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529
  46. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the science literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  47. Spear, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a different model?. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290610660670
  48. Terán-Yépez, E., y Guerrero-Mora, A. (2020). Teorías de emprendimiento: revisión crítica de la literatura y sugerencias para futuras investigaciones. Revista Espacios, 41(7), 7-22. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a20v41n07/a20v41n07p07.pdf
  49. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238
  50. Tracey, P., y Stott, N. (2017). Social innovation: a window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
  51. Van Der Have, R., y Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010.
  52. Weerawardena, J., y Sullivan, G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001
  53. Westley, F., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., y Bodin, Ö. (2013). A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327
  54. Yunus, M. (2008). Un mundo sin pobreza. Paidós.
  55. Zupic, I., y Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.