Modelo de articulación productiva como sistema regional de innovación.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11337Palabras clave:
Modelo de articulación de productividad, Triple hélice, sistema regional de innovacionResumen
Este documento presenta un modelo de articulación productivo que sirve de base para desarrollar y mejorar los sistemas regionales de innovación. El objetivo principal es generar un proceso de vinculación entre el sector industrial, la academia y el gobierno dentro del cual se puedan resolver problemas regionales específicos mediante la intervención efectiva de cada uno de los actores. Además del proceso, se presenta una historia de éxito del Estado de Guanajuato, México, que sirve para visualizar como un proceso claro y definido de articulación que permite una transferencia de conocimiento entre los actores.
Palabras clave: Modelo de articulación de productividad; sistema regional de innovación; triple hélice.
Códigos JEL: L38, O18
Recibido: 30/06/2020. Aceptado: 05/11/2020. Publicado: 01/12/2020
Descargas
Referencias
Alfaro-Calderón G.G., Zaragoza A., Alfaro-García V.G., Gil-Lafuente A.M. (2020) Innovation Capabilities and Innovation Systems: A Forgotten Effects Analysis of Their Components. In: Ferrer-Comalat J., Linares-Mustarós S., Merigó J., Kacprzyk J. (eds) Modelling and Simulation in Management Sciences. MS-18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 894. Springer, Cham DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15413-4_5
Alfaro-García V.G., Gil-Lafuente A.M., Alfaro Calderón G.G. (2018) Innovation Capabilities Using Fuzzy Logic Systems. In: Gil-Lafuente A., Merigó J., Dass B., Verma R. (eds) Applied Mathematics and Computational Intelligence. FIM 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 730. Springer, Cham DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75792-6_20
Alfaro-Garcia, V. (2019). Toma de decisiones en la incertidumbre: técnicas y herramientas ante escenarios altamente desafiantes. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(2), I-III. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11034
Alfaro-García, V.G., Gil-Lafuente, A.M. and Alfaro Calderón, G.G. (2017), "A fuzzy methodology for innovation management measurement", Kybernetes, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 50-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2016-0153
Anne-Mette Hjalager (2010) Regional Innovation Systems: The Case of Angling Tourism, Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, 12:2, 192-216, DOI: 10.1080/14616681003725201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616681003725201
Asheim, B. (2012). The changing role of learning regions in the globalizing knowledge economy: A theoretical re-examination. Regional Studies, 46(8), 993-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.607805
Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional studies, 45(7), 893-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
Asheim, B. T., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In Handbook on the geographies of innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710774.00010
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of industrial organization, 11(2), 253-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157670
Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European planning studies, 6(2), 131-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319808720451
Baez-Palencia, D., Olazabal-Lugo, M., & Romero-Muñoz, J. (2019). Toma de decisiones empresariales a través de la media ponderada ordenada. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(2), 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.9843
Berman, A., Marino, A., & Mudambi, R. (2020). The global connectivity of regional innovation systems in Italy: a core–periphery perspective. Regional Studies, 54(5), 677-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1672865
Blanco-Mesa, F., León-Castro, E., & Merigó, J. M. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of aggregation operators. Applied Soft Computing, 81 (4), 105488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105488
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002
Braczyk, H. J., & Cooke, P. P., and Heidenreich, M.(eds). 1998. Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governances in a globalized world, London/Bristol.
Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001). Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human geography, 25(4), 569-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688940
Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. Belhaven-Pinter.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy, 31(2), 233-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
Chen, K. and Guan, J. (2011) ‘Mapping the functionality of China’s regional innovation systems: a structural approach’, China Econ. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.11–27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.08.002
Clò, S., Florio, M., Pellegrin, J. and Sirtori, E. (2018) ‘How do research intensive systems emerge in less developed areas? The case of mechatronics in the Italian southern region Apulia’, Int. J. Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2018.091799
Coenen, L., & Moodysson, J. (2009). Putting constructed regional advantage into Swedish practice. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 587-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802682180
Coletti, M., & Maria, E. D. (2015). The rush for cluster initiatives: cluster organisation and management in Central Europe. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 19(5-6), 327-342.
Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
Cooke, P. (2004). Evolution of regional innovation systems–emergence, theory, challenge for action. Regional innovation systems, 2, 1-18.
Cooke, P. N., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: regional perspectives on global competitiveness. Cengage Learning EMEA.
Cooke, P. N., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. Psychology Press.
Dantas, E. and Bell, M. (2009) ‘Latecomer firms and the emergence and development of knowledge networks: the case of Petrobras in Brazil’, Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp.829–844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.007
Dhewanto, W., Lantu, D. C., Herliana, S., & Permatasari, A. (2016). The obstacles for science technology parks in a developing country. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 8(1), 4-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2016.075180
Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in society, 24(3), 243-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and challenges for future research. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002
Doloreux, D., & Porto Gomez, I. (2017). A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1244516
Edquist, C. (2001, June). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art. In DRUID conference, Aalborg (pp. 12-15).
Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Psychology Press.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge‐based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of Universityindustry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V., & Silvani, A. (2002). Looking for regional systems of innovation: evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Regional studies, 36(2), 173-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220121963
Fornahl, D., & Brenner, T. (2003). Cooperation, networks and institutions in regional innovation systems. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Fu, L., & Jiang, X. (2019). Does the multiple-participant innovation improve regional innovation efficiency? A study of China’s regional innovation systems. Sustainability, 11(17), 4658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174658
Guimon, J. (2017). Policies to promote science-industry links and technology commercialisation in emerging countries: the case of Kazakhstan's Technology Commercialization Project. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 9(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2017.10003729
Howells, J. R. (2002). Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban studies, 39(5-6), 871-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220128354
Iammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European planning studies, 13(4), 497-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107084
Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In New Avenues for regional innovation systems-Theoretical Advances, empirical cases and policy Lessons (pp. 221-238). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_11
Kaufmann, A., & Aluja, J. G. (1988). Modelos para la investigación de efectos olvidados. Milladoiro.
Kwon, S., & Motohashi, K. (2017). How institutional arrangements in the national innovation system affect industrial competitiveness: A study of Japan and the U.S. with multiagent simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 221-235. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.005
Landabaso, M., & Mouton, B. (2002). Towards a new regional innovation policy: 8 years of European experience through innovative actions. European Commission–DG regional Policy.–2002.–June.–36 p.
León-Castro, E. (2019). El desarrollo de las pequeñas y medianas empresas: Una formación de las aulas hacia la internacionalización. Inquietud Empresarial, 19(1), I-IV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.10923
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research policy, 29(2), 243-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
Li, M., He, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The triple helix system and regional entrepreneurship in China. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1-23.
Makkonen, T., Williams, A. M., Weidenfeld, A., & Kaisto, V. (2018). Cross-border knowledge transfer and innovation in the European neighbourhood: Tourism cooperation at the Finnish-Russian border. Tourism management, 68, 140-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.008
Mason, C., Castleman, T., & Parker, C. (2005, January). Can knowledge management save regional development?. In Proceedings of the CRIC Cluster Conference: Beyond clusters: Current Practices & Future Strategies Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-15). University of Ballarat, Centre for Regional Innovation and Competitiveness.
Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023
Mytelka, L. K. (2000). Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and innovation, 7(1), 15-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713670244
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J. (1999). Spatial innovation systems. Making connections: Technological learning and regional economic change, 7-33.
Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J. (2002). The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems. International regional science review, 25(1), 102-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016001702762039402
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1999). Managing national innovation systems. OECD Publishing.
Riahi, P., & Fard, H. D. (2019). Science, Technology and Innovation Policies to Strengthen Regional Innovation Systems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 11(2), 193–208.
Sleuwaegen, L., & Boiardi, P. (2014). Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy, 43(9), 1508-1522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.014
Avil´es-Sacoto, S. V., Cook , W. D., Güemes-Castorena,D., & Zhu, J. (2020). Modelling Efficiency in Regional Innovation Systems: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Problem with Shared Outputs within Groups of Decision-Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.052
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 419-428. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.009
Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. S. (2006). Local antecedents and trigger events: Policy implications of path dependence for cluster formation. Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development, 243-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207183.003.0012
Descargas
Publicado
-
Resumen349
-
PDF 311
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Denisse Ballardo-Cárdenas, Pedro L. López-de Alba, Ernesto León-Castro, Ramón Martínez-Huerta
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Al enviar los artículos para su evaluación, el(los) autor(es) acepta(n) que transfiere(n) los derechos de publicación a la Revista Inquietud Empresarial, el Comité Editorial entrega un formato “Autorización para publicación del artículo - copyright” al autor para que lo diligencie y se comprometa mediante su firma, a ceder sus derechos a la revista.
Para aumentar su visibilidad, los documentos se envían a bases de datos y sistemas de indización, así mismo pueden ser consultados en la página web de la revista http://www.uptc.edu.co/enlaces/reinqempre
La revista está autorizada por una licencia de atribución Creative Commons (CC) de reconocimiento no comercial 4.0. Para las licencias CC, el principio es el de la libertad creativa. Conscientes de su importancia en nuestra cultura, este sistema complementa el derecho de autor sin oponerse a éste. El contenido de los artículos es responsabilidad de cada autor y no compromete, de ninguna manera, a la revista o a la institución. Se permite la divulgación y reproducción de títulos, resúmenes y contenido total, con fines académicos, científicos, culturales y sin ánimo de lucro, siempre y cuando se cite la respectiva fuente. Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con fines comerciales. PREGUNTAR LA LICENCIA PARA LA REVISTA.
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
