Multiple criteria hierarchy approach for analyzing competitiveness of States in Mexico

Pavel Alvarez; Manuel Muñoz-Palma; Luz Eva Miranda-Espinoza; Pavel Lopez-Parra; Ernesto León-Castro

doi:10.19053/01211048.11408

Autores/as

Pavel Alvarez Department of economic and management sciences, Universidad Autómoma de Occidente, Lola Beltrán, 80020, Culiacán, Mexico, pavel.alvarez@uadeo.mx http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-076X
Manuel Muñoz-Palma Management department, Universidad de Sonora, Luis Encinas, 83000 Hermosillo, Mexico
Luz Eva Miranda-Espinoza Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Lola Beltrán, Culiacán, Mexico
Pavel Lopez-Parra Department of economic and management sciences, Universidad Autómoma de Occidente, Lola Beltrán, 80020, Culiacán, Mexico
Ernesto León-Castro Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Av. Alonso de Ribera 2850, Concepción Chile.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19053/01211048.11408

Palabras clave:

Análisis multicriterio, enfoque jerárquico, competitividad

Resumen

El objetivo principal de este trabajo es el de evaluar el nivel de competitividad de las regiones de México basado en el desempeño de 10 principales factores provenientes de 100 indicadores. La metodología está basada en el Proceso Jerárquico Multicriterio con la capacidad de analizar el desempeño de un subconjunto de indicadores y el conjunto completo de indicadores, y como impactan en la competitividad de la región. Un aspecto importante de Proceso Jerárquico Multicriterio implementado es que considera la interacción entre criterios (indicadores) y mide el desempeño de un gran número de criterios. La principal contribución de la investigación es la identificación del nivel peor de competitividad de la región, y los factores que requieren más atención por el tomador de decisiones.

Palabras clave: Análisis multicriterio, enfoque jerárquico, competitividad.

Códigos JEL: C69, C81, D81

Recibido: 10/07/2020. Aceptado: 05/11/2020. Publicado: 01/12/2020

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., & Rizzo, M. (2018). Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 158, 136-153. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.041

Botti, L., & Peypoch, N. (2013). Multi-criteria ELECTRE method and destination competitiveness. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 108-113. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2013.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2013.01.001

Blanco-Mesa F., Gil-Lafuente, A.M. (2014). Characterization and Grouping of the Colombia Regions to Develop of Clusters: An Application of Pichat Algorithm. Journal of Computational Optimization in Economics and Finances 5 (3), 187-196.

Blanco-Mesa F., Gil-Lafuente A.M. (2017). Towards competitiveness in the economic activity in Colombia: Using Moore's families and Galois Lattices in clustering. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 51 (3), 231-250.

Blanco-Mesa F., Merigó, J.M, Gil-Lafuente, A.M. (2017). Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 32 (3), 2033-2050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640

Carayannis, E. G., Ferreira, F. A. F., Bento, P., Ferreira, J. J. M., Jalali, M. S., & Fernandes, B. M. Q. (2018). Developing a socio-technical evaluation index for tourist destination competitiveness using cognitive mapping and MCDA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 147-158. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.015

Charles, V., & Zegarra, L. F. (2014). Measuring regional competitiveness through Data Envelopment Analysis: A Peruvian case. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(11), 5371-5381. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.003

Corrente, S., Doumpos, M., Greco, S., Slowinski, R., & Zopounidis, C. (2017). Multiple criteria hierarchy process for sorting problems based on ordinal regression with additive value functions. Annals of Operations Research, 251(1-2), 117-139. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1898-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1898-1

Corrente, S., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2017). A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis. Omega, 73, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.008

Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process in Robust Ordinal Regression. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 660-674. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.03.004

Delgado, M., Porter, M., and Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 495-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq010

Delgado, M., Porter, M., and Stern, S. (2014). Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance, Research Policy, 43(10), 1785-1799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007

Del Vasto-Terrientes, L., Valls, A., Slowinski, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (2015). ELECTRE-III-H: An outranking-based decision aiding method for hierarchically structured criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(11), 4910-4926. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.016

Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2009). Evaluating the Changes in Economic and Social Development of Lithuanian Counties by Multiple Criteria Methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(3), 418-436. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436

Goncalves, J. M., Ferreira, F. A. F., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Farinha, L. M. C. (2019). A multiple criteria group decision-making approach for the assessment of small and medium-sized enterprise competitiveness. Management Decision, 57(2), 480-500. doi:10.1108/md-02-2018-0203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2018-0203

Hernández Rodriguez, C., & Montalvo Corzo, R. F. (2012). Entrepreneurial clusters in China and Mexico –implications for Competitiveness. Revista de globalización, competitividad y gobernabilidad, 6(1), 55-90. doi:10.3232/GCG.2012.V6.N1.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3232/GCG.2012.V6.N1.04

Huang, J. H., & Peng, K. H. (2012). Fuzzy Rasch model in TOPSIS: A new approach for generating fuzzy numbers to assess the competitiveness of the tourism industries in Asian countries. Tourism Management, 33(2), 456-465. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2011.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.05.006

Huang, K. W., Huang, J. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2016). New Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Model for Improving Competence Sets: Enhancing a Company's Core Competitiveness. Sustainability, 8(2). doi:10.3390/su8020175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020175

IMCO. (2016a). Índice de Competitividad Estatal 2014. México: Impresos Villaflorito S.A. de C.V.

IMCO. (2016b). Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad. Retrieved from https://imco.org.mx/

Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2013). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(9), 1176-1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978

Kao, C., Wu, W.-Y., Hsieh, W.-J., Wang, T.-Y., Lin, C., & Chen, L.-H. (2008). Measuring the national competitiveness of Southeast Asian countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(2), 613-628. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.029

Ketels, C. (2003). The Development of the cluster concept - present experiences and further developments. In NRW Conference on Clusters (pp. 1-25). Duisburg

Ketels, C. (2013). Recent research on competitiveness and clusters: what are the implications for regional policy? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 269-284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst008

Khayyat, N., & Lee, J. (2014). A measure of technological capabilities for developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 9, 210-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.003

Ko, Y. C., Fujita, H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2013). A fuzzy integral fusion approach in analyzing competitiveness patterns from WCY2010. Knowledge-Based Systems, 49, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.001

Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28. doi:10.2307/20045917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917

Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2012). International Economics, Theory and Policy. Boston: Pearson.

Lee, S. K., Mogi, G., Kim, J. W., & Gim, B. J. (2008). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(23), 6840-6848. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.028

Marzouk, M. M. (2011). ELECTRE III model for value engineering applications. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 596-600. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.026

Oyarce, J. (2013). Excelencia empresarial y competitividad: ¿una relación fructífera? Panorama Socioeconómico, 31(46), 58-63.

Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 70-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1

Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.

Porter, M. (2000). Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105

Porter, M. (2003). The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 545-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108688

Roy, B. (1985). Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision. Paris, France: Economica.

Roy, B. (1990). The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE Methods. In C. A. Bana e Costa (Ed.), Reading in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid (pp. 155-183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_8

Santiesteban, M. L., & Lopez, J. C. L. (2017). A multicriteria decision aid for evaluating the competitiveness of tourist destinations in the northwest of Mexico. Anuario Turismo Y Sociedad, 21, 51-67. doi:10.18601/01207555.n21.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/01207555.n21.03

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218

Suñol, S. (2006). Aspectos teóricos de la competitividad. Ciencia y Sociedad, 31(2), 178-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22206/cys.2006.v31i2.pp179-198

WEF. (2016). World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://es.weforum.org/agenda/2016/10/

Yeo, G. T., Song, D. W., Dinwoodie, J., & Roe, M. (2010). Weighting the competitiveness factors for container ports under conflicting interests. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(8), 1249-1257. doi:10.1057/jors.2009.88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.88

Yeo, G. T., Wang, Y., & Chou, C. C. (2013). Evaluating the competitiveness of the aerotropolises in East Asia. Journal of Air Transport Management, 32, 24-31. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.06.004

Zangoueinezhad, A., Azar, A., & Kazazi, A. (2011). Using SCOR model with fuzzy MCDM approach to assess competitiveness positioning of supply chains: focus on shipbuilding supply chains. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(1), 93-109. doi:10.1080/03088839.2010.533715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.533715

Zhang, H., Gu, C. L., Gu, L. W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy - A case in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Tourism Management, 32(2), 443-451. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.007