Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effects of technological cooperation on the innovative activity of the colombian manufacturing sector

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to analyze the effect that technological cooperation with business partners and knowledge organizations, both national and foreign, has on the development of technological and non-technological innovation in companies in the Colombian manufacturing sector. A research with a quantitative approach was carried out, in which secondary information from 1.845 manufacturing companies was used, collected in the IX survey of Technological Development and Innovation of Colombia. The results indicate that cooperation with national companies has a greater effect on product and process innovation, while cooperation with national knowledge organizations contributes more to organizational innovation. It is also found that market innovation is not influenced by any type of cooperation, and that international cooperation has no effect on any type of innovation. It is concluded that the types of innovation have different determinants that favor their achievement, therefore, the decision to carry out technological cooperation must start from the definition of the business strategy and the knowledge of the contribution that each type of partner can make to it.

Keywords

innovation, technology cooperation, manufacturing sector, international technological cooperation

PDF (Español) XML (Español)

Author Biography

Yury Yohana Castillo-Molina

Administradora de Empresas, Estudiante de Doctorado en Economía y Gestión de la Innovación

Cesar Augusto Gómez-Villamarín

Administrador de Empresas, Magíster en Economía y Gestión de la Innovación


References

  1. Álvarez, I., Natera, J. M., & Castillo, Y. (2019). Generación y transferencia de ciencia, tecnología e innovación como claves de desarrollo sostenible y cooperación internacional en América Latina. Documentos de Trabajo, 2019. https://doi.org/10.33960/issn-e.1885-9119.dt19
  2. Barroso-Simao, L., Gouveia-Rodrigues, R., & Madeira, M. J. (2016). External relationships in the organizational innovation. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13 (3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.002
  3. Castillo-Vergara, M., & Torres-Aranibar, E. (2019). El papel de la Cooperación para Desarrollar Innovación Tecnológica en la PYME. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14 (4), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242019000400041
  4. Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (6), 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148
  5. Cheng, C., & Shiu, E. (2015). The inconvenient truth of the relationship between open innovation activities and innovation performance. Management Decision, 53 (3), 625–647.
  6. DANE. (2019). Boletín Técnico EDIT 2017 - 2018. 1–60. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/edit/boletin_EDIT_manufacturera_2017_2018.pdf
  7. Díaz, L., Aguilar, I., & De Saá-Pérez, P. (2006). El conocimiento organizativo tecnológico y la capacidad de innovación. Evidencia para la empresa industrial española. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de La Empresa, 33–59. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/807/80702702.pdf
  8. Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2017). Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industries The case of an emerging economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.010
  9. Geldes, C., & Heredia, J. (2016). Cooperación: un tema pendiente para la innovación empresarial. Gestión y Tendencias, 1 (6), 6–9.
  10. Global Innovation Index. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019. Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report#
  11. Gomez, F. A., Daim, T. U., & Robledo, J. (2014). Characterization of the relationship between firms and universities and innovation performance: The case of Colombian firms. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 9 (1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000100006
  12. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (5), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
  13. Heredia-Pérez, J. A., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012
  14. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2020). SME open innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicated external knowledge sourcing. Journal of Small Business Management, 58 (2), 409–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072
  15. Huang, S., Chen, J., & Liang, L. (2018). How open innovation performance responds to partner heterogeneity in China. Management Decision, 56 (1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0452
  16. Kim, Y., & Lui, S. S. (2015). The impacts of external network and business group on innovation: Do the types of innovation matter? Journal of Business Research, 68 (9), 1964–1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.006
  17. Lin, J. Y. (2017). Balancing industry collaboration and academic innovation: The contingent role of collaboration-specific attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.016
  18. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32 (8), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
  19. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62 (12), 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
  20. Moura, D. C., Madeira, M. J., & Duarte, F. A. P. (2020). Cooperation in the field of innovation, absorptive capacity, public financial support and determinants of the innovative performance of enterprisE. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (4), 2050038. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500383
  21. Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27 (6–7), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
  22. Sánchez-González, G. (2014). Efectos de la cooperación sobre el desarrollo de innovaciones organizativas. Economía Industrial, 391, 77–86.
  23. Serrano-Bedia, A. M., López-Fernández, M. C., & García-Piqueres, G. (2018). Complementarity between innovation knowledge sources: Does the innovation performance measure matter?. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21 (1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.09.001
  24. Tello-Gamarra, J., Leo, R. M., Avila, A. M. S., & Wendland, J. (2018). Innovation studies in latin america: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 13 (4), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000400024
  25. Whitley, R. (2002). Developing innovative competences: The role of institutional frameworks. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 497–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.497
  26. Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2016). the Creation and Diffusion of Innovation in Developing Countries: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30 (5), 884–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12126

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.